Liquid nitrogen plays a vital role in effectively storing and keeping the quality of frozen semen for prolonged periods. Hence, it should be stored away from direct sunlight and placed in a cool, clean, dry, and well-ventilated environment (
Dalton, 2022;
Thomas et al., 2021; Duponte et al., 2007). However,
Llanto (2017) observed that all
LN2 tanks in provincial and field stations (
e.
g. center or field tanks) were stored in vacant spaces inside the offices and placed directly on the floor in the Bicol region. The same set-up was done in this experiment where LN2 field tanks were stored outside the semen laboratory room and placed directly on the floor. The tanks were exposed to an environmental temperature that ranges from 26-28oC for one month to simulate the environmental temperature to which the LN2 field tanks of the AI technicians were exposed when rendering AI services in the municipalities.
Evaporation loss (%)
The evaporation loss of LN2 stored in different LN2 field tanks and the frequency of opening the field tank cover is presented in Table 1. A significantly higher (P<0.05) evaporation loss (49.79±4.47%) was obtained in tank 2 compared to tank 1 (45.60±5.37%). This suggests that tank 2 is more efficient in maintaining the weekly amount of LN2. Pomeroy et al. (2019) reported that the designs of LN2 tanks (
e.
g. size, shape, construction materials, welds, and sealants) do not prevent the loss of the tank’s structural integrity. Moreover, the gradual loss of vacuum caused by metal fatigue and structural stress also increases the use of LN2. Although there were no tests done to measure the evaporation loss of different LN2 tanks used by the AI technicians in the service areas, higher evaporation loss is expected due to the frequent opening of tank covers and lifting of canisters for some time, especially those AI technicians who conduct several AI services in a week. Furthermore, mishandling the tanks during transport may cause damage resulting in premature loss of LN2
(Thomas et al., 2021).
Similarly, the evaporation loss significantly differed (P<0.05) across treatments. The highest percent evaporation loss was observed in T3 (51.94±3.31%) followed by T2 (47.57± 4.50%) and T1 (43.57±4.52%) respectively. This suggests that the frequent opening of tank covers (T2 and T3) can significantly (P<0.05) decrease the quantity of LN2 within 4 days respectively. The nitrogen evaporation rate depends on how the tank is opened, the type of tank, and the integrity of the tank (Thomas
et_al2021). Therefore, weekly monitoring of LN2 levels is important to ensure the quality of stored frozen semen.
Evaporation rate (L/day)
The evaporation rate of LN2 tanks and the frequency of opening the tank covers are presented in Table 2. The evaporation rate of LN2 in tank 2 (0.25±0.02 L/day) is significantly (P<0.05) higher than in tank 1 (0.20/day) which is consistent with the results obtained in evaporation loss. However, the evaporation rates of T1 (0.20±0.02 L/day) and T2 (0.25 ±0.02 L/day) were higher than that stated in the company’s manual which is 0.14 L/day for tank 1 and 0.10 L/day for tank 2. The difference in evaporation rates can be explained by how the end-user handled the LN2 field tanks.
The experimental LN2 field tanks were exposed to higher environmental temperatures at 26-28
oC for one month. This shows that LN2 tanks with higher evaporation loss resulted in a higher evaporation rate. Likewise, evaporation rates were affected (P<0.05) by the frequency of opening the tank covers at various times. The highest evaporation rate was found in T3 (0.25±0.02 L/day) while T2 (0.22±0.03 L/day) and T1 (0.21±0.02 L/day) did not differ (P>0.05) from each other. This means that opening the tank covers more than five (5) times a week significantly (P<0.05) increases the evaporation rates which is unavoidable since AI technicians may conduct several AI services in a week. Moreover, the field tanks are exposed to different environmental conditions and are transported
via motor vehicles.
Although gradual changes in liquid nitrogen levels are normal and expected, monitoring the amount of LN2 weekly is necessary to maintain its capacity to store frozen semen. Regular maintenance (
e.
g. monitoring of tank weights and liquid gas levels) varies from laboratory to laboratory and may involve daily or weekly inspections
(Pomeroy et al., 2019). With proper handling, most tanks will last for years but all liquid nitrogen tanks will eventually fail due to aging and loss of vacuum (
Du Ponte, 2007).
P-values of the main effects
Table 3 presents the p-values of the main effects of LN2 field tank brands and semen exposure to ambient temperature and their interaction effect on the buffalo semen parameters. The utilization of different LN2 field tank brands did not significantly (P>0.05) affect sperm motility and livability. Although the evaporation loss and rates differed (P<0.05) from each other (Tables 1 and 2) both tanks are efficient in maintaining LN2 levels. However, both parameters were significantly (P<0.05) affected by the frequent semen exposure to ambient temperature at various times. This indicates that different brands of LN2 tanks can be used in storing semen but weekly monitoring of the quantity of LN2 is needed due to some evaporation loss. Moreover, frequent semen exposure to ambient temperature lowers semen quality.
Post-thaw sperm motility (%)
The post-thaw sperm motility of Bulgarian Murrah buffalo bulls stored in different LN2 field tank brands and exposed to ambient temperature at various times is presented in Table 4. The highest average sperm motility was noted in tank 1 (86.15±1.12%) followed by tank 2 (84.38±1.35%) but did not (P>0.05) differ from each other which means that using LN2 field tank brands does not affect sperm motility especially when the amount of LN2 is regularly monitored. This conforms with the study of Llanto (2017), who stated that storage did not affect the post-thaw motility of the frozen semen. However, 70% post-thaw motility was noted in their study which was lower than the values obtained in this study with 86.15-84.38% respectively. The higher sperm motility obtained in this study can be due to the fewer times the semen straws were exposed to ambient temperature. In contrast, sperm motility varies (P<0.05) across treatments. The lowest sperm motility was found in T3 (79.92±1.40%) followed by T2 (85.46±1.37%) and T1 (90.43±0.95%), respectively. The frequency of exposing the frozen semen straws to ambient temperature for at least 5 and 10 seconds resulted in lower sperm motility (T3 - 79.92 and T2 - 85.46% vs T1 - 90.43%). This is in agreement with the study of
Mamuad et al., (2005), who observed that too long and frequent exposure of frozen semen in the air damages the quality of frozen semen. Recommendably, the transfer of frozen semen should be done at least 3 seconds while exposing and all other actions for transferring should be conducted within 5 seconds. Moreover, several handling activities if improperly performed expose frozen semen to temperatures that lead to cell damage or even death which occurs when the internal temperature of the semen straws increases above -130
oC (
Stroud, 2013). To stabilize the crystalline formation of frozen semen it should be maintained at -120
oC
(Mamuad et al., 2005). The damage from each exposure is cumulative and straws inside the tank can be damaged especially when semen straw lifted out of the LN2 tank is re-introduced to below those temperatures (
Stroud, 2013). It is interesting to note, that the experimental frozen semen straws were not re-introduced to LN2 and were immediately evaluated, however, a significant decrease in sperm motility was observed in treatments (T2-85.46% and T3-79.92%) after exposure to ambient temperature for a certain time. Although frozen semen properly stored in LN2 at -196oC stays viable for at least a thousand years, damage to sperm occurs in sperm when the transformed large crystals invade the cell membranes and cellular organelles. The severity of damage to cells depends on how high the temperature gets above -130
oC and the duration of exposure above-130oC. Moreover, since the temperature in the necks of standard dewars is about -75oC and the room temperature is expected to have a higher temperature, it is common for frozen semen to be exposed and damaged
(Sudheer et al., 2017; Stroud, 2013).
The increased duration of semen straw to room temperature at about 28-30oC significantly decreases the sperm motility of Simmental cattle which corroborates with the results of this study. The lowest sperm motility (P4-44.88%; P5-35.88% and P6-20.50%) was found in samples with the highest lifting time of about 25, and 30 seconds, respectively which are unfit for AI use because their motility was < 40%
(Hoesni et al., 2022). On the contrary, higher sperm motility was obtained in this study due to the faster time of exposing the semen to ambient temperature. Furthermore, the progressive motility decreased when the semen doses were subjected to higher temperatures. The magnitude of the damaging effects increases with longer exposure time
(Sudheer et al., 2017). On the other hand, the temperature and other climatic factors (
e.
g. humidity, photoperiod) directly affect the animals (
Singh et al., 2023).
One of the most significant characteristics influencing sperm’s ability to fertilize is motility (
Broekhuijse, 2015;
Feitsma, 2009). It indicates the progressive movement of sperm in the female reproductive tract to reach the egg and initiate fertilization
(Bahmid et al., 2022). Sperm motility is crucial in determining semen quality both before and after thawing since it naturally controls the sperm’s capacity to fertilize oocytes (
Puglisi et al., 2012). Moreover, the estimation of post-thaw motility is increasingly being utilized to evaluate the success of freezability of buffalo bull semen
(Parmar et al., 2021).
Post-thaw live sperm (%)
The post-thaw live sperm of Bulgarian Murrah buffalo bulls stored in different LN2 tanks and exposed to ambient temperature is presented in Table 5. The per cent livability of frozen semen straws was comparable and not affected (P>0.05) by using different LN2 field tanks which coincides with the observations of
Llanto (2017), who obtained a good, fertile, and relatively high percentage (83.69-93.05%) of live sperm in all experimental stations irrespective of storage. The percentage of live spermatozoa is important because it determines the ejaculate quality
(Singh et al., 2018). Although a lower percentage of live sperm was recorded in this study, frozen semen with >70% live sperm is considered good (
RCA, 2004). Therefore, it can be used for artificial insemination while sperm with questionable fertility has <50% live sperm (
Vale, 2004). Conversely, there was a significant (P<0.05) reduction in percent sperm livability across treatments. The number of times the semen straws are exposed to ambient temperature for a longer time led to a decrease in sperm livability which corroborates with the study of Mishra et al. (2013) who observed a lower percent live sperm count when the ambient temperature increases to 25-35
oC. Additionally, a drastic reduction in the percentage of live cells was observed with successive exposure of straws to room temperature. Notably, 25% of live cells in the straw were lost after a 10-second exposure while a higher percentage of live cells is expected to be lost given continued exposure at room temperature
(Wells et al., 1973). Furthermore, semen straws should not be exposed above the LN2 even for a short time (10 seconds) as they become warm faster, and any exposure leads to irreversible damage to sperm viability (
Minimum Standards for Production of Semen 2022). Hence, a decreased number of semen exposure to warmer temperatures eliminates fluctuations in semen quality
(Amundson et al., 2023). The length of lifting semen straws at room temperature (28-30
oC) affected the sperm livability of Simmental cattle. The treatments with longer lifting times (25 and 30 seconds) led to 35.13% and 21.01% sperm livability which is not recommended for AI use
(Hoesni et al., 2022). Lower sperm livability may lead to lower conception rates. Therefore, a sperm with high livability should be considered.
On the other hand, trained users might assume that exposing frozen semen to ambient conditions does not cause any damage as long as the contents are in a frozen state. However, thermal damage occurs after very short ambient exposures (Liberman
et al., 2016). The frost line serves as a landmark and commonly recommended area for semen straw removal
(Ahmadzadeh et al., 2022) while the neck of dewars is the working area where samples are handled and consequently exposed to potentially damaging temperatures. When semen is held above the frost line, a decrease in fertility occurs, as slight warming can cause sperm cells to die. If the desired straw cannot be located within 7-10 seconds of lifting the canister, it should be placed back into liquid nitrogen for 10-15 seconds. Furthermore, avoid using fingers to grab a straw of semen, as the heat of the hands can cause the straw to begin to thaw and again decrease the fertility of that semen
(Amundson et al., 2023).