Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research

  • Chief EditorHarjinder Singh

  • Print ISSN 0971-4456

  • Online ISSN 0976-0563

  • NAAS Rating 5.44

  • SJR 0.176, CiteScore: 0.357

Frequency :
Bi-Monthly (February, April, June, August, October & December)
Indexing Services :
Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Effects of Storage Tanks and Ambient Temperature on the Liquid Nitrogen Evaporation and Semen Quality of Murrah Buffalo Bulls (Bubalus bubalis)

Averry Clarisse A. Pangga1, Kimberly I B. Turaja1,*, John Kenneth T. Malilay1, Thelma A. Saludes2, Jesus Rommel V. Herrera2
1Institute of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Laguna, 4031, Philippines.
2Department of Agriculture-Philippine Carabao Center at the University of the Philippines Los Baños, Philippines.

Background: The integrity of storage tanks is essential in maintaining the liquid nitrogen used to preserve buffalo semen straws later utilized for artificial insemination. Faulty semen handling procedures, and equipment maintenance damage the spermatozoa leading to low-quality semen and low conception rates.

Methods: The study used two brands of liquid nitrogen tanks and four purebred mature Bulgarian Murrah buffaloes. The semen samples were collected twice a week and immediately processed by the center’s laboratory technician following a slow freezing technique. After processing, the semen straws were stored in LN2 tanks at -196oC.

Result: Results revealed that tank 2 was more efficient in maintaining the weekly amount of LN2 and the frequent opening of tank covers significantly (P<0.05) decreased the quantity of LN2 after four days. Moreover, the different brands of LN2 tanks did not affect sperm motility and livability, however, the frequency of exposing the semen straws to ambient temperature for 5 and 10 seconds lowered the sperm quality. In conclusion, semen straws should not be exposed to ambient temperature beyond the recommended time due to its deleterious effect on the semen quality compromising the success of insemination.

Artificial insemination (AI) has become one of the most important techniques for genetic improvement for farm animals including buffaloes. Successful conservation  of semen for a longer period is obtained by maintaining the viability of spermatozoa from its collection until its use for insemination (Meena et al., 2017). Likewise, dewars, LN2 field tanks, and LN2 are essential tools for preserving and storing semen for an extended time. The temperature in semen storage tanks is crucial in maintaining the cells, tissues, and viability of semen stored within the tanks (Ahmadzadeh, 2022; Bustani et al., 2021; Thomas et al., 2021). During the storage, the sperm are cooled to a very low temperature below zero at -196oC where all biological activity ceases (Getreu and Fuller, 2019). Hence, frozen semen straws that are properly stored and frozen last for a long time given that the temperature is maintained correctly (Bahmid et al., 2022). However, since the straws’ surface area to volume ratio is high, they are susceptible to thermal insults and become vulnerable to ambient temperature once lifted out of the LN2 tanks. Moreover, the exposure of semen straws above -130oC and subsequent re-cooling cause irreversible damage.
       
Faulty semen handling procedures, improper semen handling techniques, and equipment maintenance damage the spermatozoa leading to lower conception rates (Sudheer et al., 2017; Du Ponte, 2007). Therefore, special consideration should be given to semen storage and care and maintenance of the LN2 tanks to ensure the fertility of frozen semen straws since the success of AI depends on the availability of good-quality semen (Ahmadzadeh, 2022; Nirmal et al., 2020). Poor handling habits by veterinarians and technicians result in cumulative damage that lowers the sperm’s fertilizing capabilities, and in some instances causes total infertility (Stroud, 2013). Since AI technicians normally open, and lift the canisters several times a week to draw semen straws and conduct AI services in various places, it is important to ascertain the effects of using different brands of LN2 tanks and exposing the semen to ambient temperature at various times as this could influence sperm motility and livability which are vital parameters in the success of artificial insemination. Hence this study is conducted.
The study was carried out at the institutional farm of the DA-PCC at UPLB from February 05, 2024 - March 07, 2024. The experimental frozen semen straws were provided by the semen laboratory of the center which came from four purebred, mature Bulgarian Murrah buffalo bulls having good genetic traits ranging from 3-5 years, apparently healthy, and regularly used as semen donors. The semen samples came from the first or second ejaculate which was collected twice a week from 5:00 to 6:00 in the morning and was immediately processed by the laboratory technician of the center following a slow freezing technique. After processing, the semen straws were stored in the LN2 tanks at -196oC.
       
The experiment used six new LN2 field tanks with different brands provided by DA-PCC, Headquarters and Genepool, Nueva Ecija. Before the experiment, the empty tanks were inspected for any defects to maintain the amount of LN2, and capably store frozen semen straws throughout the experiment. Before the study, the tanks were individually weighed, consistently filled with the required amount of LN2, and observed daily for one week for any reduction until it finally stabilized. During the experiment, the tanks were placed outside the semen laboratory office and exposed to an ambient temperature of about 26-28oC. This was done to mimic the environmental condition to which the LN2 field tanks of the AI technicians were exposed. The amount of LN2 was monitored and filled with LN2 weekly. The same procedure was done for one month.
       
The frozen semen straws were randomly assigned into three treatments replicated four times with 3 replicates per treatment. The treatments used in the experiment were: T1 - Control (undisturbed); T2 - 3 times a week of opening the tank covers and semen exposure to ambient temperature for 5 seconds; and T3 - 5 times a week of opening the tank covers and semen exposure to ambient temperature for 10 seconds.
       
The amount of LN2 in each tank was consistently measured once a week by getting the initial weight (every Monday), and the final weight (every Friday) using a calibrated weighing scale. The individual weights of the LN2 field tanks were recorded and deducted to get the actual weights of the amount of LN2 left in the tanks. The evaporation rate was computed using the derived formula:
       
 
  
while LN2% loss was computed by using this formula:
 
  
       
A total of 72 experimental frozen semen straws packed in 0.5 ml capacity were used in this study. Twelve semen straws for each treatment were drawn and evaluated for their post-thaw sperm motility characteristics. The semen samples in T1 were thawed at 39-42oC for 15 to 20 seconds while treatments 2 and 3 were exposed to ambient temperature for 5 and 10 seconds using the same thawing temperature and were immediately examined with the assistance of an experienced laboratory technician of the semen laboratory using Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA) Androvision. The averages from the 12 values per treatment were computed and subjected to statistical analysis.
       
The samples used in the livability evaluation were obtained from semen straws from each treatment used in the post-thaw motility testing. The stain used in the livability analysis contained eosin (0.2 g) and nigrosine (1.0 g) dissolved in 20 ml of 0.03% sodium citrate solution. The solution was mixed thoroughly using a magnetic stirrer at 300 rpm. Two drops of semen were placed in a clean glass slide then 1-2 drops of stain were added, dried, and evaluated within 24 hrs. A digital microscope (Optika®, B-293) objectives E-plan 40x/0.65 was connected to a laptop to determine the livability of post-thawed semen. Fully stained and half-stained spermatozoa were considered dead while live sperm were those that did not absorb the stain. The percentage of live sperm was computed using the formula lifted from Mamuad et al., (2005).
 
   
 
The averages from the 12 values per treatment were computed and subjected to statistical analysis.
 
Data analysis
 
All data were analyzed using ANOVA in Completely Randomized Design (SAS® OnDemand Academics Software). Comparison of treatment means was analyzed using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) at a 5% level of significance. Results were presented as mean±standard deviation.
Liquid nitrogen plays a vital role in effectively storing and keeping the quality of frozen semen for prolonged periods. Hence, it should be stored away from direct sunlight and placed in a cool, clean, dry, and well-ventilated environment (Dalton, 2022; Thomas et al., 2021; Duponte  et al., 2007). However, Llanto (2017) observed that all LN2 tanks in provincial and field stations (e.g. center or field tanks) were stored in vacant spaces inside the offices and placed directly on the floor in the Bicol region. The same set-up was done in this experiment where LN2 field tanks were stored outside the semen laboratory room and placed directly on the floor. The tanks were exposed to an environmental temperature that ranges from 26-28oC for one month to simulate the environmental temperature to which the LN2 field tanks of the AI technicians were exposed when rendering AI services in the municipalities.
 
Evaporation loss (%)
 
The evaporation loss of LN2 stored in different LN2 field tanks and the frequency of opening the field tank cover is presented in Table 1. A significantly higher (P<0.05) evaporation loss (49.79±4.47%) was obtained in tank 2 compared to tank 1 (45.60±5.37%). This suggests that tank 2 is more efficient in maintaining the weekly amount of LN2. Pomeroy et al. (2019) reported that the designs of LN2 tanks (e.g. size, shape, construction materials, welds, and sealants) do not prevent the loss of the tank’s structural integrity. Moreover, the gradual loss of vacuum caused by metal fatigue and structural stress also increases the use of LN2. Although there were no tests done to measure the evaporation loss of different LN2 tanks used by the AI technicians in the service areas, higher evaporation loss is expected due to the frequent opening of tank covers and lifting of canisters for some time, especially those AI technicians who conduct several AI services in a week. Furthermore, mishandling the tanks during transport may cause damage resulting in premature loss of LN2 (Thomas et al., 2021).

Table 1: Evaporation Loss (%) of LN2 in different LN2 field tank models and frequency of lifting the canisters.


       
Similarly, the evaporation loss significantly differed (P<0.05) across treatments. The highest percent evaporation loss was observed in T3 (51.94±3.31%) followed by T2 (47.57± 4.50%) and T1 (43.57±4.52%) respectively. This suggests that the frequent opening of tank covers (T2 and T3) can significantly (P<0.05) decrease the quantity of LN2 within 4 days respectively. The nitrogen evaporation rate depends on how the tank is opened, the type of tank, and the integrity of the tank (Thomaset_al2021). Therefore, weekly monitoring of LN2 levels is important to ensure the quality of stored frozen semen.

Evaporation rate (L/day)
 
The evaporation rate of LN2 tanks and the frequency of opening the tank covers are presented in Table 2. The evaporation rate of LN2 in tank 2 (0.25±0.02 L/day) is significantly (P<0.05) higher than in tank 1 (0.20/day) which is consistent with the results obtained in evaporation loss. However, the evaporation rates of T1 (0.20±0.02 L/day) and T2 (0.25 ±0.02 L/day) were higher than that stated in the company’s manual which is 0.14 L/day for tank 1 and 0.10 L/day for tank 2. The difference in evaporation rates can be explained by how the end-user handled the LN2 field tanks.

Table 2: Evaporation rate (L/day) of LN2 used in storing Murrah buffalo semen.


       
The experimental LN2 field tanks were exposed to higher environmental temperatures at 26-28oC for one month. This shows that LN2 tanks with higher evaporation loss resulted in a higher evaporation rate. Likewise, evaporation rates were affected (P<0.05) by the frequency of opening the tank covers at various times. The highest evaporation rate was found in T3 (0.25±0.02 L/day) while T2 (0.22±0.03 L/day) and T1 (0.21±0.02 L/day) did not differ (P>0.05) from each other. This means that opening the tank covers more than five (5) times a week significantly (P<0.05) increases the evaporation rates which is unavoidable since AI technicians may conduct several AI services in a week. Moreover, the field tanks are exposed to different environmental conditions and are transported via motor vehicles.
       
Although gradual changes in liquid nitrogen levels are normal and expected, monitoring the amount of LN2 weekly is necessary to maintain its capacity to store frozen semen. Regular maintenance (e.g. monitoring of tank weights and liquid gas levels) varies from laboratory to laboratory and may involve daily or weekly inspections (Pomeroy et al., 2019). With proper handling, most tanks will last for years but all liquid nitrogen tanks will eventually fail due to aging and loss of vacuum (Du Ponte, 2007).

P-values of the main effects
 
Table 3 presents the p-values of the main effects of LN2 field tank brands and semen exposure to ambient temperature and their interaction effect on the buffalo semen parameters. The utilization of different LN2 field tank brands did not significantly (P>0.05) affect sperm motility and livability. Although the evaporation loss and rates differed (P<0.05) from each other (Tables 1 and 2) both tanks are efficient in maintaining LN2 levels. However, both parameters were significantly (P<0.05) affected by the frequent semen exposure to ambient temperature at various times. This indicates that different brands of LN2 tanks can be used in storing semen but weekly monitoring of the quantity of LN2 is needed due to some evaporation loss. Moreover, frequent semen exposure to ambient temperature lowers semen quality.

Table 3: P-values of the main effects of LN2 field tank brands and semen exposure to ambient temperature and its interaction effect on the buffalo semen parameters.


 
Post-thaw sperm motility (%)
 
The post-thaw sperm motility of Bulgarian Murrah buffalo bulls stored in different LN2 field tank brands and exposed to ambient temperature at various times is presented in Table 4. The highest average sperm motility was noted in tank 1 (86.15±1.12%) followed by tank 2 (84.38±1.35%) but did not (P>0.05) differ from each other which means that using LN2 field tank brands does not affect sperm motility especially when the amount of LN2 is regularly monitored. This conforms with the study of Llanto (2017), who stated that storage did not affect the post-thaw motility of the frozen semen. However, 70% post-thaw motility was noted in their study which was lower than the values obtained in this study with 86.15-84.38% respectively. The higher sperm motility obtained in this study can be due to the fewer times the semen straws were exposed to ambient temperature. In contrast, sperm motility varies (P<0.05) across treatments. The lowest sperm motility was found in T3 (79.92±1.40%) followed by T2 (85.46±1.37%) and T1 (90.43±0.95%), respectively. The frequency of exposing the frozen semen straws to ambient temperature for at least 5 and 10 seconds resulted in lower sperm motility (T3 - 79.92 and T2 - 85.46% vs T1 - 90.43%). This is in agreement with the study of Mamuad et al., (2005), who observed that too long and frequent exposure of frozen semen in the air damages the quality of frozen semen. Recommendably, the transfer of frozen semen should be done at least 3 seconds while exposing and all other actions for transferring should be conducted within 5 seconds. Moreover, several handling activities if improperly performed expose frozen semen to temperatures that lead to cell damage or even death which occurs when the internal temperature of the semen straws increases above -130oC (Stroud, 2013). To stabilize the crystalline formation of frozen semen it should be maintained at -120oC (Mamuad et al., 2005). The damage from each exposure is cumulative and straws inside the tank can be damaged especially when semen straw lifted out of the LN2 tank is re-introduced to below those temperatures (Stroud, 2013). It is interesting to note, that the experimental frozen semen straws were not re-introduced to LN2 and were immediately evaluated, however, a significant decrease in sperm motility was observed in treatments (T2-85.46% and T3-79.92%) after exposure to ambient temperature for a certain time. Although frozen semen properly stored in LN2 at -196oC stays viable for at least a thousand years, damage to sperm occurs in sperm when the transformed large crystals invade the cell membranes and cellular organelles. The severity of damage to cells depends on how high the temperature gets above -130oC and the duration of exposure above-130oC. Moreover, since the temperature in the necks of standard dewars is about -75oC and the room temperature is expected to have a higher temperature, it is common for frozen semen to be exposed and damaged (Sudheer et al., 2017; Stroud, 2013).

Table 4: Post-thaw sperm motility (%) of Bulgarian Murrah buffalo bulls stored in different liquid nitrogen tanks (LN2), and exposed to various environmental conditions.


       
The increased duration of semen straw to room temperature at about 28-30oC significantly decreases the sperm motility of Simmental cattle which corroborates with the results of this study. The lowest sperm motility (P4-44.88%; P5-35.88% and P6-20.50%) was found in samples with the highest lifting time of about 25, and 30 seconds, respectively which are unfit for AI use because their motility was < 40% (Hoesni et al., 2022). On the contrary, higher sperm motility was obtained in this study due to the faster time of exposing the semen to ambient temperature. Furthermore, the progressive motility decreased when the semen doses were subjected to higher temperatures. The magnitude of the damaging effects increases with longer exposure time (Sudheer et al., 2017). On the other hand, the temperature and other climatic factors (e.g. humidity, photoperiod) directly affect the animals (Singh  et al., 2023).

One of the most significant characteristics influencing sperm’s ability to fertilize is motility (Broekhuijse, 2015; Feitsma, 2009). It indicates the progressive movement of sperm in the female reproductive tract to reach the egg and initiate fertilization (Bahmid et al., 2022). Sperm motility is crucial in determining semen quality both before and after thawing since it naturally controls the sperm’s capacity to fertilize oocytes (Puglisi  et al., 2012). Moreover, the estimation of post-thaw motility is increasingly being utilized to evaluate the success of freezability of buffalo bull semen (Parmar et al., 2021).
 
Post-thaw live sperm (%)
 
The post-thaw live sperm of Bulgarian Murrah buffalo bulls stored in different LN2 tanks and exposed to ambient temperature is presented in Table 5. The per cent livability of frozen semen straws was comparable and not affected (P>0.05) by using different LN2 field tanks which coincides with the observations of Llanto (2017), who obtained a good, fertile, and relatively high percentage (83.69-93.05%) of live sperm in all experimental stations irrespective of storage. The percentage of live spermatozoa is important because it determines the ejaculate quality (Singh et al., 2018). Although a lower percentage of live sperm was recorded in this study, frozen semen with >70% live sperm is considered good (RCA, 2004). Therefore, it can be used for artificial insemination while sperm with questionable fertility has <50% live sperm (Vale, 2004). Conversely, there was a significant (P<0.05) reduction in percent sperm livability across treatments. The number of times the semen straws are exposed to ambient temperature for a longer time led to a decrease in sperm livability which corroborates with the study of Mishra et al. (2013) who observed a lower percent live sperm count when the ambient temperature increases to 25-35oC. Additionally, a drastic reduction in the percentage of live cells was observed with successive exposure of straws to room temperature. Notably, 25% of live cells in the straw were lost after a 10-second exposure while a higher percentage of live cells is expected to be lost given continued exposure at room temperature (Wells et al., 1973). Furthermore, semen straws should not be exposed above the LN2 even for a short time (10 seconds) as they become warm faster, and any exposure leads to irreversible damage to sperm viability (Minimum Standards for Production of Semen 2022). Hence, a decreased number of semen exposure to warmer temperatures eliminates fluctuations in semen quality (Amundson et al., 2023). The length of lifting semen straws at room temperature (28-30oC) affected the sperm livability of Simmental cattle. The treatments with longer lifting times (25 and 30 seconds) led to 35.13% and 21.01% sperm livability which is not recommended for AI use (Hoesni et al., 2022). Lower sperm livability may lead to lower conception rates. Therefore, a sperm with high livability should be considered.

Table 5: Post-thaw live sperm (%) of Bulgarian Murrah buffalo bulls stored in different LN2 tank models and exposed to various environmental conditions.


       
On the other hand, trained users might assume that exposing frozen semen to ambient conditions does not cause any damage as long as the contents are in a frozen state. However, thermal damage occurs after very short ambient exposures (Liberman et al., 2016). The frost line serves as a landmark and commonly recommended area for semen straw removal (Ahmadzadeh et al., 2022) while the neck of dewars is the working area where samples are handled and consequently exposed to potentially damaging temperatures. When semen is held above the frost line, a decrease in fertility occurs, as slight warming can cause sperm cells to die. If the desired straw cannot be located within 7-10 seconds of lifting the canister, it should be placed back into liquid nitrogen for 10-15 seconds. Furthermore, avoid using fingers to grab a straw of semen, as the heat of the hands can cause the straw to begin to thaw and again decrease the fertility of that semen (Amundson et al., 2023).
The amount of LN2 was significantly affected by using different brands of LN2 field tanks. LN2 field tank 2 was more efficient in terms of maintaining the weekly amount of LN2. Likewise, the frequent opening of tank covers and leaving them open for 5 to 10 seconds lowered the amount of LN2 within 4 days. There were no interaction effects (P>0.05) between the LN2 field tank brands and the semen exposure to ambient temperature at various times.
       
The use of different LN2 brands did not affect sperm motility and livability while the frequency of exposing the frozen semen straws to ambient temperature lowered the sperm motility and livability especially those samples exposed for a longer time.
 
The present study was supported by the Department of Agriculture - Philippine Carabao Center at the University of the Philippines Los Baños (DA-PCC at UPLB).
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
All the semen samples were donated by the semen laboratory of the DA-PCC at UPLB. The researchers did not directly handle the animals. The semen collection was a regular activity of the center.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Ahmadzadeh, A., Hale, A., Shagii B., Dalton, J. (2022). The effect of the liquid nitrogen level on the temperature in a semen storage tank. Journal of Dairy and Veterinary Sciences. 15: 2.

  2. Amundson, O. and Brandt, K. (2023).  Proper semen handling techniques. https://extension.sdstate.edu/proper-semen-handling- techniques. 

  3. Anonymous, (2022). Minimum Standards for Production of Bovine Frozen Semen. https://dahd.nic.in/ sites/default/filess/MSP-2022- for-production-of-bovine-frozen-semen.pdf. 

  4. Bahmid, N.A., Karja, N.W.K., Arifiantini, R.I. (2022). The quality of frozen Friesian Holstein semen after long storage. Tropical Animal Science Journal. 46(1): 13-19. 

  5. Broekhuijse, M., Sostarice, E., Fietsma, H., Gadella, B. (2015). Application of computer-assisted semen analysis to explain variations in pig fertility. Animal Reproductive Science. 90: 779-789.

  6. Bustani, G.S., Baiee, F.H. (2021). Semen Extenders: An evaluative overview of preservative mechanisms of semen and semen extender. Veterinary World. 14(5): 1233.

  7. Dalton, J. (2022). Tips for Better Semen Storage and Handling. https:// hoards.com/article-32542-tips-for-better-semen-storage- and-handling.html.

  8. DuPonte, M.W. (2007). Proper semen handling during an artificial insemination program. Cooperative Extension Service. https:// www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/oc/freepubs/pdf/LM-16.pdf. 

  9. Feitsma, H. (2009). Artificial insemination in pigs, research and developments in Netherlands. A review. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae. 37(1): 61-71.

  10. Getreu, N. and Fuller, B. (2019). Stopping the biological clock merging biology and cryogenics in applied cryobiology. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 502: 012003. doi. org/10.1088/1757- 899X/502/1/012003.

  11. Hoesni, F., Erina, S., Tani, S.A.A., Firmansyah. (2022). Resistance of Simmental cattle semen to time exposure at room temperature. Journal of Hunan University Natural Science. 49: 10.

  12. Lieberman, D., McClure, E., Harston, S., and Madan, D. (2016). Maintaining semen quality by improving cold chain equipment used in cattle artificial insemination. Scientific Reports. 6: 28108.

  13. Llanto L. (2017). Evaluation of frozen semen stored in provincial and field stations in Bicol region. Philippine Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science. 43(2): 123-132. 

  14. Mamuad, F.V., Venturina, H.V., Venturina, E.V., Morcoso, R.T., Atabay, E.C., Kazuhiro, K. (2005). Artificial insemination manual for water buffaloes. Water buffaloes and beef cattle improve- ment project (WBBCIP). 971-748-023-0.

  15. Meena, G.S., Raina, VS., Bhakat, M., Mohanty, T.K., Gupta, A.K., Abdullah, M. (2017). Effect of long-term storage in LN2 on bacterial load and preservability of semen in Murrah bulls. Indian Journal of Animal Research.  51(2): 247-251. doi: 10. 18805/ijar.7078.

  16. Mishra, S.R, Kundu, A.K, Mahapatra, A.P.K. (2013). Effect of ambient temperature on membrane integrity of spermatozoa in different breeds of bulls. The Bioscan. 8(1): 181-183.

  17. Nirmal, S., Malil, R.K., Virmani, M., Vijayalakshmy, K., Sing, P. (2020). Morphology and fertility status of sperms in frozen Murrah buffalo bull semen upon storage. Haryana Veterinarian. 59(2): 164-167.

  18. Parmar, K.H., Tank, P.H, Kavani, F.S. (2021). Seasonal influence on post-thaw seminal attributes and conception rate from semen of Jaffaradi buffalo bulls. Indian Journal of Animal Research 55(9): 1014-1017. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4135.

  19. Pomeroy, K.O., Reed, ML., Lomanto, B., Harris, S.G., Hazelrigg, W.B., Kelk, D.A. (2019). Cryostorage tank failures: Temperature and volume loss over time after induced failure by removal of insulative vacuum. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 36: 2271-2278. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10815-019-01597-5.

  20. Puglisi, R., Pozzi, A., Foglio, L., Spano, M., Eleuteri, P., Grollino, M., Biongioni, G., Galli A. (2012). The usefulness of combining traditional sperm assessments with in vitro heterospermic insemination to identify bulls of low fertility as estimated in vivo. Animal Reproduction Science. 132(1-2): 17-28.

  21. Singh, M., Rajoriya, J.S., Kumar, A., Ghosh, S.K., Prasad, J.K. (2018). Review Article: Cryopreservation of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) semen: Current status and future prospective. Buffalo Bulletin. 37: 2.

  22. Singh, P., Kaur, S., and Kumar, A., Kashyap N., Mukhopadhyay and Malhotra, P. (2023). A comparative study for semen quality traits between Murrah and Nili Ravi buffalo breeding bulls maintained at an organized farm. Indian Journal of Animal Research. doi:10.18805/IJAR.B-5118. 

  23. Stroud, B. (2013). Consequences of mishandling frozen semen and embryos. Proceedings, Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle. 

  24. Sudheer. S., Deepthi, S.S.R. (2017). Thermal insults inflicted to bovine frozen semen straws owing to mishandling in liquid nitrogen refrigerator and its impact on seminal characteristics. Indian Journal of Animal Science. 87(12): 1492-1494.

  25. Thomas, J., Andersen, C., and Vanwye, G. (2021). Care and maintenance of a liquid nitrogen tank. https://extension.missouri.edu/ publications/g2002.

  26. Vale, W.G. (2004). Principles of estrus detection and AI. proceedings pre-congress training on the use of reproductive biotechniques in water buffaloes.

  27. Wells, M.E., Hefly, P.J., Bright, T.L. (1973). The effects of exposure to ambient temperature on sperm cells stored in straws. Animal Science Research. https://extension.okstate.edu/ programs/beef-extension/research-reports/site-files/ documents/1973/rr73_39.pdf. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)