The proximate and anti-nutritional composition of the processed broad bean flour samples
Table 1 represents the results of the proximate and anti-nutrient contents of the flour samples.
Ash content
The proximate content revealed that the ash content in the flour samples ranged from 1.71-2.48% and were significantly different (P<0.05) from one another with the exception of Sample SKBBF and SPBBF. Sample CBBF had the highest ash content and this is in accordance with the view of
Nwokenkwo et al., (2020) who stated that cooking and soaking operation reduced the antinutrients in soybean, thereby releasing their mineral contents which further increased the ash content in the flour sample.
Fiber content
The fiber content of the flour samples were significantly (P<0.05) different with the exception of Samples RBBF and SKBBF. The fiber content of the samples ranged from 2.34 to 6.37%, with sample RBBF having the highest fiber content of (6.37%) and Sample SCBBF had the least fiber content (2.34%). The least fiber content in sample SCBBF could be attributed to the processing techniques applied to the raw broad bean, which may have resulted to the hydrolysis of high molecular weight fiber compounds into soluble polymer. This view is in agreement with the findings of
Nithya et al., (2007) on green peas. However, Samples CKBBF and SCBBF having involved in the application of heat by the cooking operation resulted in the breakdown of more fibrous compounds into soluble forms than Sample SKBBF and SPBBF.
Moisture, carbohydrate and protein content
The moisture content of the broad bean flour ranged from10.35% to 12.30% while the carbohydrates ranged from 51.51% to 55.91%. However, the protein values of the samples were generally high as proteins are high in leguminous plants, because proteins are major storage compounds for legumes. The protein content analyzed were significantly different, as the samples show varying protein content due to the application of different processing technique with values ranging from 24.58 to 26.71%. This is higher than the approved standard protein content of 16% of foods for infant formula, thereby enabling the use of broad bean in the fortification of foods low in protein (
Codex, 2007). The results obtained here are lower than that reported by
Odimegwu et al., (2020). The flour sample produced from combined effects of soaking and cooking technique had the highest protein content, as protease inhibitors and anti-nutrients that bind proteins present in broad bean were readily released by the technique. However, Samples RBBF, SKBBF and SPBBF exhibited no significant (p> 0.05) difference as the soaking and sprouting techniques caused low changes in the protein content when compared to Sample CKBBF and SCBBF which involved the use of heat for the processing.
Fat content
The fat content of the flour samples ranged from 1.97 to 4.97% with same CKBBF having the highest fat content (4.97%). The fat contents of the flour samples were significantly different from each other with the exception of Samples RBBF, SKBBF, SPBBF and SCBBF which are not significantly different from each other. The reduced fat content of the flour sample processed from cooked Broad bean may be attributed to the breakdown of fat molecules by the application of heat in the cooking process. This could be as a result of differences in temperature and cooking time. The fat content of the analyzed samples were however lower than most legumes and cereal crops obtained in a study by
Nithya et al., (2007) which would however cause an increase in the shelf stability of the samples, as there would be low effect of spoilage by rancidity.
Phytate content
The application of the processing techniques resulted in a decrease in the phytate content, which is why the phytate content analyses were considerably different. This is in line with findings published by
Luo et al., (2010a), which show that phytates, which bind up zinc, iron, magnesium and calcium to prevent the body from utilizing them, are primarily concentrated in the cotyledon of legumes. When the hulls of broad beans are removed during processing, the hull to cotyledon mass ratio decreases, which lowers the phytate percentage in the processed broad bean (
Thamaraiselvi et al., 2024). At 0.78%, Sample RBBF had the greatest phytate concentration, while Sample SCBBF had the lowest, at 0.30%. Comparable to earlier research on legumes by
Chinma et al., (2022) observed a comparable decline in phytate concentrations on pigeon pea as processing treatment (germination) advanced. According to
Wang et al., (2008), the processing methods may have activated endogenous phytase, which decreased the amount of phosphorus stored as phytic acid and, as a result, decreased the samples’ phytate concentration. However, the type of legume seed under study affects the amount of reduction in phytates. Due to the heat-stable nature of phytates in broad beans, a published article by
Duhan et al., (2002) suggested that cooking may raise the phytate value. According to
Vijayakumari et al., (2007), the phytate level of soybeans was decreased considerably by the combined processing procedure of soaking and cooking; this was nevertheless noticeable in Sample SCBBF.
Oxalate content
There was a notable significant difference in the oxalate content generated by oxalic acid in the form of soluble (potassium and sodium) or insoluble (calcium, magnesium and iron) salts, rendering them inaccessible. The oxalate contents were decreased to varying concentrations by the different processing methods. Sample SCBBF had the lowest oxalate concentration (3.38%) while Sample RBBF had the highest (6.70%). By breaking the bonds that oxalic acids have with calcium, magnesium, iron, potassiumand sodium ions, respectively, the processing methods used decreased the amount of oxalate in the samples
(Chinma et al., 2022). This study’s oxalate concentration was less than that of soybean flour as reported by
Shiriki et al., (2015).
Tannin content
Table 2 showed the results of the tannin content. All samples were significantly different in tannin contents, except sample SKBBF and SPBBF, CKBBF and SCBBF, respectively. The tannin concentration was high, ranging from 1.50 to 0.52%. Broad beans have large amounts of tannin in their testa and it is regarded as one of the main anti-nutrients. They are responsible for binding of proteins, carbohydrates and iron, which makes it unavailable for the body to absorb. With a tannin level of 1.50%, Sample RBBF had the greatest tannin content, while Sample SCBBF had the lowest, at 0.52%. According to
Osman (2007) and
Chukwu et al., (2024), the tannin content of the samples was lowered by the processing methods. This could be as a result of the breakdown caused by soaking and sprouting or elimination of anti-nutrients using high temperatures, which releases bound nutrients and increases their availability for the body use.
Saponin
The saponin contents ranges from 3.52% to 2.48% in which samples SKBBF, SPBBF, CKBBF and SCBBF differed significantly among each other. Reduced saponin content might be due to different processing procedures with SCBBF having the lowest saponin level. The loss of nutrients as a result of heating at high temperatures and the hydrolysis of large molecular weight soluble polymers could be the cause of this
(Nithya et al., 2007). Soaking and cooking eliminated heat-sensitive/heat-stable antinutrients from kidney beans, which is consistent with our findings that both methods significantly decreased the saponin content of the beans (
Osman, 2007).
Functional properties of the processed broad bean samples
Bulk density
The bulk densities of all the samples (Table 2) showed significant differences except for sample RBBF and SKBBF; SPBBF and SCBBF, which were not influenced by the different processing techniques. The bulk densities varied from 0.735% to 0.53% while Sample SCBBF had the lowest value (0.53%). Heat treatment converted several high molecular fibre components that give food bulk into soluble forms
(Fasoyiro et al., 2010). Given that high fibre contributes to the bulk of food samples, these results correlated with the findings of the protein, fat and crude fibre analyses shown in Table 1. Sample RBBF, on the other hand, had the highest bulk density (0.735%), which is consistent with the findings of
Ogbo et al., (2017). This is because the sample had no processing, which allowed the high molecular compound to stay intact and contribute bulk to the flour sample. The bulk density as measured in Sample SKBBF was not significantly different (p>0.05) from Sample RBBF, suggesting that the soaking technique had little effect on the bulk density. Particle size and density have an impact on flour’s bulk density, which in turn influences packaging requirements.
Swelling power
The samples’ water absorption index during heating was shown by the swelling power, which varied significantly except for Samples RBBF and SKBBF; SPBBF and CKBBF, which did not. The samples’ swelling power differs when heat and water are applied and this may be due to the variations in the sample composition brought about by the various processing methods (Ndife and Abbo, 2009). Sample CKBBF had the highest swelling power (1.85- 1.4), which is consistent with the findings of
Duhan et al., (2002). This may be because Sample CKBBF contains more soluble components, like proteins and carbohydrates, which absorbed water upon heating and increased in size. On the other hand, Sample RBBF (1.41) showed the opposite pattern, with less soluble components due to no processing.
Foam capacity/foam stability
The samples responded differently to the air-water contact, their foam stability varied greatly, with Sample CKBBF having the highest foam capacity (13.5). The soluble proteins in the sample have the ability to absorb air at the air-water interface and lower the water’s surface tension, which is known as the foam capacity. Since proteins are what absorb the air-water interface and cause overhead foam, this could be the result of having more protein as observed in our study and less denatured protein as reported by
Ndife and Abbo, (2009). However, sample RBBF showed the opposite pattern, with a lower protein concentration than the other samples. Nonetheless, the results of this study’s foam capacity was higher than that found in the flour of
Mucuna pruriens seeds by
Ezegbe et al., (2022). This suggests that broad beans could be utilized in recipes for cakes, “akara” salad dressings,
etc. Thus, the samples exhibiting high foam capacity also exhibited high foam stability. Sample CKBBF and Sample RBBF have strong and low foam stability, respectively, within the range of 12.7 to 4.7.
Gelatinization temperature
The temperature at which the samples gelled upon heating because they contained soluble starch granules is known as the gelatinization temperature. The study’s gelatinization temperature varied significantly due to the various amounts of soluble particles produced by the different processing methods, which led to the formation of gel. The samples’ gelatinization temperatures varied from 83.5 to 66.7°C, with sample SKBBF having the highest gelatinization temperature while sample SCBBF, the lowest. The cooking process may have broken down high molecular carbohydrates into soluble components like starch, which solidified upon cooling, resulting in the lowest gelatinization temperature in sample SCBBF; nevertheless, reheating produced gels at lower temperatures. According to
Fasoyiro et al., (2010), it may have taken a higher temperature and energy for the broad bean flour to initiate rapid water ingression and swelling of starch granules in samples RBBF and SKBBF due to the processing techniques’ inability to produce soluble compounds.
Water absorption capacity
The water absorption capacity is a measure of the degree of granular integrity, which establishes the strength of the associative forces between the starch granules; thus, a reflection of the protein and carbohydrate content of the blends (
Acobs, 1999). With the exception of samples SPBBF and SCBBF, which showed an increase in water absorption capacity, there were significant differences (P<0.05) in the water absorption capacities of the samples. Water absorption capacity varied from 2.55 and 0.97, with Sample RBBF being the lowest while sample CKBBF being the highest; thus, aligns with the findings of
Ijarotimi et al., (2012). This could be because polysaccharides are broken down into compounds that absorb or take up water molecules and more polar amino acids are present.
Oil absorption capacity
According to
Usman et al., (2016), the physical entrapment of oil is responsible for the oil absorption capacity and flavour retention and improved food mouthfeel. Samples RBBF, SPBBF and SCBBF showed significant differences from each other, except for Samples SPBBF and CKBBF, indicating an increase in the samples’ oil absorption capacity. Sample SCBBF had the highest oil absorption capacity, which may account for its high mouthfeel and taste. Sample RBBF, on the other hand, had the reverse effect, since Sample CPF moi moi was made using cowpea flour, which served as the control sample. The oil absorption capacity ranged from 2.05 to 1.13. From a flavour perspective, the food sample enhanced by oil is demonstrated by the maximum oil absorption ability.
Mineral content of broad beans flour processed using different techniques.
The results of the mineral contents (iron, zinc, calcium and potassium) of broad beans processed using various methods were assessed and presented in Table 3. Sample RBBF had a potassium concentration of 16.32 mg/100 g, while sample SPBBF had a potassium content of 46.23 mg/100 g. With the exception of samples RBBF and CKBBF, the potassium level of the samples varied significantly (p<0.05). Osmotic pressure is sustained in part by potassium which additionally, aids in maintaining the body’s proper acid-base balance (
Hadiza, 2023).
The calcium contents of the flour samples varied from 7.86 mg/100 g for the SCBBF sample to 26.10 mg/100 g for the SPBBF sample. All samples had significantly differing calcium contents with the exception of the RBBF and CKBBF samples. The sample with the highest iron content was the flour made from sprouted broad beans. There were significant difference in the iron contents of the samples. High iron concentrations in food samples aid in the production of haemoglobin, which promotes red blood cell renewal while the formation and growth of bones depend on the mineral calcium
(Ofoedu et al., 2021).
All samples has low levels of zinc, with sample SPBBF having the highest level. However, all samples differed considerably in terms of zinc concentration. Significant differences were seen in the values Zinc is crucial to good health to maintain body system due to its ability to form a co-factor in a number of important enzyme systems.
Vitamin content of broad beans flour processed using different techniques
Table 3 shows the vitamin composition (vitamin B1, B2, B6 and vitamin C) of broad beans flour processed using different techniques. The Vitamin B1 contents of the sample ranged from 2.60 mg/100 g for sample CKBBF to 8.16 mg/100 g for the Sample SPBBF. However, vitamin B1 content of the samples were significantly different among the samples with vitamin B2 ranging from 3.84mg/100g for sample CKBBF to 9.26 mg/100 g for the sample SPBBF. Sprouted broad bean flour had the highest vitamin B2 whereas the vitamin B6 for sample SPBBF ranged from 3.26 mg/100 g to 7.26 mg/100 g. Vitamin B6 content of the samples differ significantly among each other and were high; thus, help in prevention of soreness and burning of the lips, mouth, tongue, photophobia, burning sensations and eye itching (
Olusanya, 2018;
Makwana et al., 2021; and
Mohanapriya et al., 2024).
The vitamin C content of the samples were low and differ significantly among the samples (P<0.05). Vitamin C contents of the samples ranged from 0.68 mg/100 g for sample CKBBF to 0.860 mg/100 g for sample RBBF.
Sensory evaluation of Moi Moi samples produced from the processed Broad bean flours
Appearance
From the results obtained in Table 4, it was observed that there were significant differences between the control sample CPF with a mean score of 7.50 and the other samples in terms of appearance of the samples of moi moi produced. This could be due to no effect of processing technique on the color of the flour of the moi moi. However, Sample SPBBF rated the lowest score (7.02) and was moderately liked. Sample CPF was liked very much than other samples due to the difference in raw material as panelists preferred the moi moi developed from cowpea flour than the broad beans moi moi in terms of appearance.
Aroma
The aroma score of Sample CPF (7.3) was moderately liked and shows significant difference from Sample SKBBF (6.3) which was liked slightly. Sample CPF, SPBBF, CKBBF and SCBBF were not significantly different (p> 0.05) from each other but the least aroma score (5.90) which was slightly liked was observed in Sample SPBBF. The least score observed in Sample SPBBF may be attributed to the difference in raw material when compared to Sample CPF. However, on the application of the processing techniques, the aroma score of the broad bean moi moi samples increased with Sample SCBBF having the highest score (7.10) amongst the broad bean moi moi samples. This observed results is in correlation with a report by
Russell et al., (2006) and this could be as a result of high water and oil absorption capacity of the sample, as it retains more flavor than other samples.
Texture
The texture of Sample CPF ranked highest with a mean score of 7.8 and was significantly different from Samples SKBBF, CKBBF and SCBBF respectively. The moi moi samples developed from sample CKBBF had the least mean score (5.40), which indicates that the samples were neither liked nor disliked. This however could be due to the earlier cooking operation performed on the sample at high temperature, as the sample gelatinized easily on cooking, due to starch hydrolysis, making the sample to produce soluble gels which solidifies on cooling and on further cooking produced more concentrated gels
(Luo et al., 2010a).
Taste
From the Table 4, the taste score were significantly different with the exception of Samples SKBBF, SPBBF, CKBBF and SCBBF which were not significantly different from one another. Sample CPF had the highest score (7.50) which indicates that the moi moi samples was liked very much. The moi moi sample produced from flour of soaked broad bean had the least taste score of 5.30 by the panelists and it was significantly different from other Samples. The low taste score may be attributed to its low water and oil absorption capacities as it entrapped lower flavors. In accordance with a report by
Nwosu et al., (2014), there exist a relationship between the water absorption capacity and flavor intake of food samples, as foods having high water absorption capacity tends to entrap more flavor compounds.
Mouthfeel
The mouthfeel score of Sample CPF (6.90) was moderately liked and was significantly different from Sample SPBBF, CKBBF and SCBBF and was not significantly different from Sample SKBBF. The highest mean score (6.90) of mouth feel in Sample CPF may be due to its different raw material from the broad bean. Sample CKBBF (5.12) which is neither liked nor disked had the least score for mouthfeel. The poor preference in mouthfeel could however be due to the overcooking cooking.
Overall acceptability
The control sample (CPF) had the highest overall acceptance (7.62), as it was liked moderately and Sample SPBBF had the lowest acceptability score (5.83) which was liked slightly. However, all the moi moi samples were acceptable, as their overall acceptance score were above 5.0 and they were significantly different from one another, with the exception of Sample CPF and SCBBF and SKBBF and SPBBF, which were not significantly different from each other.