Characteristics of camel farms
The herd structure plays an important role in camel management and depends on the rainy season, year and area of grazing
(Farah et al., 2007). As shown in Table 1, the sampling reveals that the herds are predominantly composed of female camels. Additionally, a smaller herd size was observed in the intensive system, whereas larger herd sizes were found in the extensive and semi-intensive systems. The division of the camel herd into small groups, one grazing and the other being sedentary, is a common practice in semi-intensive farming within the study area. Often the animals kept sedentary are in milk and gestating females. This helps to avoid risk associated with grazing in a herd, as well as facilitates their management, especially during heat periods and poor pasture conditions.
Milk production
The mean daily camel milk yield per farm ranges from 3.5 to 64 liters, influenced by management goals and production strategies Table 2. In semi-intensive and intensive farming systems, milking is routinely performed once or twice a day. For extensive system, milking is not organized, as herders collect milk according to their visits to the pasture. Traditionally, in Ouargla, men were fully responsible for camel husbandry practices; today, women hold major responsibilities. They contributetofeeding and milking practices owing to the intensive system.
Approximately, twelve camel farmers will benefit from the sale of camel milk, especially in the semi-intensive system (65 per cent of milk sellers), due to the rapid spread of awareness of camel milk’s nutritional and medicinal values. The semi-intensive production system is easier to manage as regards animal husbandry and production organization (
Jaouad, 2021). It indicates that camels are playing a more increasingly significant economic role in the semi-intensive system
(Shuiep et al., 2014) than in extensive systems.
Contribution of the various charges to camel milk cost price
The mean cost of camel milk (pre-COVID-19) exhibits a range of 0.6± 0.37 USD per liter. In juxtaposition to the extant market valuation of 3.65 USD per liter, pastoralists are presently realizing a profit margin approximating 3.05 ± 0.39 USD.
The structuring of production costs shows the dominance of food charges mainly barley grains (supplement used) with an average of 45 DZD, followed by labor costs withan average of 24 DZD, various charges (Packaging,) of 7.4 DZD, charges related to veterinary care of 4 DZD, transportation costs of 2 DZD and charges related to milk conservation (energy) which are the least important, with 0.002 DZD. Feeding charges constitute 55% of camel milk cost price (Fig 1) it remains one of the limiting factors of milk production. Feed prices have become extremely volatile in recent years.The recent leap in grain prices has had a major effect on the whole dairy chain due to the competitiveness of feed resources and feed costs (
Alqaisi Shawabkeh et al., 2011). In the absence of control over animal feed quality and quantity, which represents a major concern for breeders, in addition to the management of reproduction and health, the technical and economic control of dairy camels’ feeding is an unavoidable necessity according to
Laameche and Chehma (2012); to reduce the cost of breeding and therefore, ensure the sustainability of dairy camel farming.
The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 rapidly evolved from a public health crisis into a significant global economic crisis
(Lazereg et al., 2020). This led to unprecedented volatility in dairy product prices worldwide.
From December 2021 to November 2022, fodder prices increased significantly by 33.83%. The price of barley, a crucial feed, rose from 2500 to 3400 DZD per quintal (equivalent to 18.25 to 24.82 USD). This upward trend in feed costs led to a noticeable increase in camel milk production costs, with the cost per liter rising to 1.05 ± 0.61 USD. Consequently, camel milk prices now range between 3.65 and 4.38 USD per liter. Despite these increased costs, pastoralists are currently realizing a profit margin of approximately 2.6±0.73 USD per liter. The substantial profit margins, even after a significant increase in production costs, demonstrate the economic viability of camel milk production. This profitability can attract more investors and farmers to the sector, potentially leading to more organized and large-scale production.
It’s important to note that the COVID-19 pandemic didn’t have a specific impact on the camel sector when compared to other livestock industries or the broader agricultural sector. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic has heightened the recognition of camel milk’s value, particularly in light of the growing consumer interest in immune-boosting foods during the pandemic
(Nagy et al., 2021). As highlighted by
Tahereh and Tanveer (2021), camel milk, known for its high lactoferrin content, particularly in powdered or tablet forms, may serve as a novel and promising candidate for preventing and treating more severe cases of COVID-19.
Dynamics of camel milk
Fig 2 shows the sales and average milk yield of dairy female camels.
The collected camel milk is primarily intended for sale, accounting for over 70% of the total collected milk. On the other hand, milk self-consumption is relatively low in our study cases, not exceeding one-third of the production. Comparing the proportion of milk sold, representing the “commercial potential,” with the average milk yield of the dairy camels, representing the “milk potential of the camels,” reveals that the maximum production potential of the dairy camels is underutilized. For instance, breeder number 8 has a commercial potential of only 1,800 liters per year but a high milk potential of the camels, reaching 118,000 liters per year. Conversely, breeder number 10 has a commercial potential of 3,840 liters per year and a milk potential of the camels amounting to 100,000 liters per year. This indicates that some breeders could exploit their milk production potential further. Generally, the milk sold represents only 1.5% to 18% of the milk potential of the dairy camels, except for breeders 5 and 6, reaching 53.5% and 34.5%, respectively. These quantities of milk sold are equivalent to the production potential of 2 to 10 dairy camels for herds ranging from 7 to 59 dairy camels.
These variations in milk sales can be attributed to various factors, such as:
· Distances between supply sites and consumers.
· The absence of milk collection and processing units in the study area, leads to informal milk marketing.
· Difficulties in transporting milk due to the remoteness of grazing sites. Some extensive breeders (breeders 8 and 9) sell milk to dairies in neighboring cities like Ghardaïa region for a limited period during grazing along their routes.
It is essential to note that the commercial potential of camel milk is directly related to the breeder’s strategy and market opportunities. Our findings highlight the importance of optimizing the valorization of camel milk for more efficient and sustainable management of dairy camels in the study area.