Samples
Mature artichoke flowers (
Cynara scolymus L.) from fresh, well-developed flower heads are purchased from a local market (Medenine, Tunisia). The variety used in our study is the cultivar called ‘Violet d’Hyères‘. This variety is exploited in Tunisia during the autumn and winter periods till the second half of February. Camel chymosin FAR-M was obtained from CHYMAX® M. 1000 International Milk Clotting Units (IMCU) ml 1, Chr. Hansen A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark was used as control. Fresh camel milk was collected from she-camels (
Camelus dromadarius) belonging to the Arid Land Institute camel herd (IRA Medenine, Tunisia, in 2021). Samples were brought to the laboratory in an isotherm container and were analyzed and processed upon arrival.
Preparation of the enzymatic extract
The flowers were dried for about three weeks at a room temperature not exceeding 25°C and shielded from light, scattered on filter paper according to the process used by
Tsouli (1974). Extraction is performed on 10 g of dried flowers using a sodium acetate buffer solution at 0.1 M, pH 5 adjusted with boric acid at 0.2% depending on the optimized process in the laboratory. After macerating for 24 h under gentle agitation, then freezing and thawing, the solution obtained is centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 45 min at 4°C (Thermo Electron LED GmbH Am Kalkberg, Germany). The recovered supernatant goes through 2 successive filtrations, on filter paper, then a vacuum filtration on a 0.4 microns membrane. The crude, enzymatic extract is adjusted to enzymatic stability pH at 5 (
Laurent 1974;
Tsouli 1974).
Characterization of the enzyme extract
Extraction yield and characteristics
The extraction yield (EY) constitutes the ratio between the weight of the extract obtained and the total weight of artichoke powder prepared for the extraction. This yield is given as a percentage according to the following formula:
pH and dry matter of enzymatic extract were determined using International standard methods (
AFNOR, 1993). The protein content was determined according to the Bradford method (
Bradford, 1976), using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard.
Optimization of pH, temperature and CaCl2 concentrations
Optimum pH and temperature were determined according to the method of
Kunitz (1947). To determine the optimal pH for the enzyme activity; 1ml of plant extract was added to 10 ml of camel milk at different pH values (5; 5.6; 6.2; 6.6; 7.5 and 8.5) at 30°C and flocculation time (Tc) were measured. In order to determine the optimum temperature, the purified enzyme solution was incubated with casein solution at various temperatures ranging from 30 to 60°C for 10 min in a controlled temperature water bath and the flocculation time was noted. The optimal CaCl
2 concentration was prepared by dissolving 12 g of skimmed milk powder in 100 ml of CaCl
2 solution with a calcium ion concentration range of 0.01 to 0.09 M, added in tubes containing 10 ml of milk at pH= 6.6 and at T= 30°C, the flocculation time was then determined.
Milk-clotting activity
The milk-clotting activity (MCA) of artichoke extract was determined according to the
Berridge method (1945) modified by
Collin et al., (1977) with some modifications. One unit of enzymatic activity or rennet unit (RU) corresponds to the number of units of weight or volume of milk that can be coagulated with 1 ml of coagulant preparation in 100 seconds and at optimal pH and temperature for the plant extract or camel chymosin. The time needed for curd formation was recorded (Tc). MCA was expressed as RU units and calculated as follows:
• RU: Unit of coagulating activity or rennet unit.
• V: Volume of substrate (ml).
• Q: Volume of coagulant extract (ml).
• Tf: Flocculation time (sec).
Proteolytic activity
Proteolytic activity was determined by the method of
Bergere and Lenoir (1997) using BSA as a substrate. Briefly, 1 ml of 1% protein substrate solution (0.1 M Phosphate buffer, pH 7.0) was mixed with 1ml of coagulant and incubated for 60 min at 35°C. After incubation, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 1ml of 12% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid. The mixture was vortexed vigorously. The absorbance of the clear filtrate was measured at 280 nm. One unit of the enzymatic activity (U) was defined as the amount of protein that gave an increase of one unit in the absorbance at 280 nm under the described conditions.
Cheese making process
Fresh camel milk was pasteurized at 65°C for 30 minutes then cooled to 40°C. The starter culture (
Lactococcus lactis) isolated from artisanal fermented milk was then added to decrease pH at 5.5. After about one hour, the enzymatic preparation was then added at the rate of 10% of milk and mixed thoroughly. The mixture was incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. After coagulation the whey was drained to obtain a fresh cheese and kept at 4°C for further analysis.
Cheeses characterization
The physicochemical characteristics were determined using International standard methods (
AFNOR, 1993). The protein content was determined according to the Bradford method (
Bradford, 1976), using (BSA) as standard. The moisture content (Hm) was calculated according to the following formula:
Hm= 100-DMC
Where:
Hm: Humidity (%).
DMC: Dry matter content.
Sensory analysis
Samples of cheese were subjected to sensory evaluation by 42 untrained panelists. Cheese samples were assessed for their taste, color, flavor, acidity and texture. Panellists received a set of two samples, representing cheeses made with artichoke extract and the control made with chymosin. Each sample was evaluated in duplicate. The panellists were asked to drink plain water at the beginning of the sensory evaluation and between samples to try to make the palate conditions similar for each sample. Cheese traits are rated on the basis of 10 cm unstructured lines with 10 points scale (0 = lower intensity, 10 for higher intensity). Scores were the distances (cm) from the left anchor point. At the end of sensory evaluation, panellists were asked to rank overall cheese acceptability.
Statistical analysis
The data obtained were subjected to a statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SAS software (version 9.0) By the GLM procedure. Results are reported as means ± standard deviation, which were separated by the comparison test Duncan’s multiple at p≤0.05 (
Cochran and Cox, 1992). Triplicate measurements were performed for each analysis.