Inclusion of Sorghum in Ruminant Diets Towards Methane Emission Mitigation and Improved Meat Quality: A Review

Nyasha Rugwete1,2,*, Tonderai Mutibvu2, Tinyiko E. Halimani2
1Department of Livestock Research, P.O. Box CY 594 Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe.
2Department of Livestock Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, P.O. Box MP167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Sorghum is among the less widely used crops yet it is ranked the fifth most important cereal crop after wheat, maize, rice and barley. The grain’s nutritional value is similar to that of maize and wheat and the phenolic profile is more abundant and varied than other common cereal grains. Sorghum has been largely included in ruminant diets as an energy source and research findings show insignificant differences in the performance parameters in livestock fed sorghum-based diets, with some studies suggesting sorghum as a more efficient alternative to maize. The narrative review focuses on opportunities for reducing rumen methanogenesis through dietary inclusion of sorghum as well as discussing the impact on relative abundance of microbiota and meat quality. The grain possesses qualities that can potentially influence the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in ruminant livestock production, relative abundance of rumen microbes and meat quality. However, there is very little information on the influence of sorghum grain-based diets on the rumen bacterial community composition and their relationship with ruminal metabolites. Further investigations are required to add more knowledge on the effect of sorghum grain-based diets on meat quality.

Sorghum is among the most important yet least utilised staple crops (Macauley and Ramadjita, 2015). The crop is drought tolerant, has wide adaptation compared to other staple cereals like wheat, maize and rice (Meherunnahar et al., 2018). Sorghum has a unique phenolic profile that is more abundant and diverse than other common cereal grains (Shen et al., 2018). These phenolic compounds are not found in other major cereals and can modify the nutritional value of the individual grains, with some of them resulting in reduced protein digestibility in livestock feed (Wu et al., 2012). Phytochemical  compounds found in sorghum include condensed and hydrolysable tannins, phenolic acids, anthocyanins, phytosterols, flavonoids and policosanols (Dykes, 2019). These phytochemicals have high antioxidant activity and may provide health benefits commonly associated with fruits (Xiong et al., 2019).
       
Tannins are known to have both non-nutritive, negative effects as well as beneficial effects (Jeronimo et al., 2016). The chemical structure and rate of inclusion in diets as well as other factors such as animal species and physiological status will determine the extent to which livestock is either negatively or positively affected by the use of tannins (Jeronimo et al., 2016). Positive effects of tannins on animal growth and performance were reported by Salem (2010) in a study that fed sheep diets containing tannins. Decreased ammonia concentration and decreased protein degradation in the rumen which increased protein available in post-ruminal sites were attributed to tannins. Inclusion of tannins in livestock diets also has the potential to enhance meat lipid and protein oxidative stability, improve shelf life by increasing the resistance of the refrigerated or frozen meat to oxidation (García et al., 2019). The main challenge with inclusion of  tannins in animal diets, however, is the lack of complete information on dosage and side effects on digestion due to the vast sources of tannins (Singh and Kumar, 2020).
       
Very little information is available on the impact of sorghum grain-based diets on rumen microbiota dynamics and meat quality as sorghum has been largely included in ruminant diets as an energy source. Several research findings revealed that there is no significant difference in the performance parameters in livestock fed sorghum as an energy source (Ncube et al., 2014). Baran et al., (2008) also suggested that sorghum grain could be used as a cost-effective alternative to wheat as a source of energy for beef cattle. A study by Yahaghi et al., (2012) found positive results on growth and performance in finishing Iranian Baluchi lambs when maize was replaced with sorghum in barley-based diets and suggested sorghum as a better energy source.
       
The nutritional composition of sorghum grain is comparable to that of maize and  ranks second to maize in total available energy among the cereal grains  (Jimoh and Abdullahi, 2017). The grain’s protein content is similar to that of wheat and maize, with a higher fat content than that of wheat or rice as shown in Table 1. Sorghum is also a rich source of B-complex (β-carotene) vitamins, although the available quantity of vitamins and minerals varies with the agro-ecological zones in which the sorghum is grown (Jimoh and Abdullahi, 2017).
 

Table 1: Nutritional composition of red sorghum, white maize, wheat and rice.


       
Sorghum grain possesses other qualities that can potentially influence the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (de Oliveira et al., 2007), relative abundance of rumen microbes and meat quality (Sun et al., 2018). The rumen microbiome is a complex ecosystem that consists of bacteria, archaea, protozoa and fungi involved in the fermentation of undigestible feed substrates (Malmuthuge et al., 2015). Rumen microbiota composition is influenced by a number of factors including the composition of different diets (Tajima et al., 2001). An understanding of how the rumen functions, the microbial diversity and dynamics is crucial for the optimization of efficiency in productivity and is also key  to reduction of greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions from ruminants (Hassan et al., 2020). Altering fermentation patterns is considered as one of the most effective ways to reduce enteric methane (Haque, 2018; Tadesse, 2014) and improve meat quality by increasing its oxidative stability. The aim of this review, therefore, is to discuss opportunities to mitigate enteric methane emission through dietary manipulation as well as the impact of sorghum-based diets on gut microbiota dynamics and meat quality.
 
Dietary inclusion of sorghum and enteric methane production
 
Livestock production is estimated to contribute between 9 and 11% of total anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Pickering et al., 2015) implicated in influencing global warming (Min et al., 2020). Approximately 44% of these GHG emissions are in the form of methane (Rojas-Downing et al., 2017). Enteric methane produced from the rumen is the largest single source of livestock emissions among the greenhouse gases and a major contributor to global warming (Haque, 2018). Methane is formed by anaerobic archaea coupled with bacteria, protozoa and fungi in the rumen ecosystem and represents a loss of 2 to 12% (Patra, 2012) of gross energy of feeds. The production of methane is an indicator of loss of energy from feedstuffs that could have been channelled towards production and this is of concern to livestock producers and nutritionists (Moumen et al., 2016).
 
Dietary manipulation is regarded as the most effective and straightforward method for enteric methane abatement compared to other methods such as selective breeding which is slow and may result in loss of  favourable traits (Matthews et al., 2019). Ruminal populations of methanogenic microorganisms are affected by chemical and physical quality of the feed (Pedreira et al., 2013), hence fermentation processes can be manipulated to alter the rumen microbiome. Defaunating agents and antibiotics have commonly been used to alter rumen fermentation patterns in order to improve the productivity of ruminants and reduce methane production. However, most of the chemical additives have adverse effects to host animals and have a temporary impact on methane production (Kataria, 2016). Nutritionists and microbiologists are continuously exploring less adverse, alternative natural substances to reduce methane emission and its global warming effects. Feeding condensed tannins in ruminant production for the reduction of enteric methane is one such form of dietary manipulation (Naumann et al., 2017). Tannins and other phytochemical compounds have been found to be toxic to some of the gut microbes, especially ciliate protozoa, fibre degrading bacteria and methanogenic archaea. Tannins can therefore be included in diets as a method to inhibit proliferation of such microbes in order to reduce enteric methane production (Cieslak et al., 2013).
       
The use of tannins in ruminant diets has received moderate attention despite showing huge potential to decrease enteric methane production (Aboagye and Beauchemin, 2019). Tropical  and temperate plants have abundant tannins and their use may be a cost- effective approach for livestock producers to reduce enteric methane emissions (Piñeiro-Vázquez et al., 2015). Condensed  tannins in forage species such as high tannin sorghum may also be used as a practical means of reducing ruminal degradation of forage protein, thereby  increasing protein absorption  in  the  small  intestine (Addisu, 2016).  Minor cereal crops such as sorghum and millets are considered to have relatively lower carbon footprints compared to those of major cereal crops and as such can be included in diet formulations to reduce carbon footprints in the world (Wang et al., 2018).
       
Research by Méndez-Sánchez et al., (2019) studied the effects of high tannin sorghum (HTS) diets on rumen fermentation and methane production in vitro using a batch culture system and observed that HTS diets decreased methane concentration by 2.96% compared to maize-based diets. It was also concluded that there were no major differences between HTS and low tannin sorghum (LTS) in terms of methane production. The same study also showed that sorghum-based diets produced 14.56% (mL/g DM) less methane compared to the maize-based diets. Although dry matter digestibility in HTS diets was compromised, the results showed a reduction in methane and gas production. High concentrations of sorghum grain in diets may compromise digestibility, nonetheless, the grain was found to be a suitable, economic substitution for maize and a viable option to decrease enteric methane production in ruminants (Méndez-Sánchez et al., 2019). These findings are also supported by Soltan et al., (2021) who found that dietary inclusion of LTS at 75% in place of maize increased ruminal microbial biomass production for optimal lamb growth, performance and reduced methane emission.
       
There is still need to quantitatively summarise the effects of tannins on methane emissions from ruminants despite increasing information from previous research (Jayanegara et al., 2012). Mitigation effect on methane production is not the same for all condensed tannins, but is determined by the concentration and structure of the condensed tannins in diets (Min et al., 2003).
 
Effects of sorghum-based diets on rumen microbiome dynamics
 
The ruminant digestive tract is estimated to be populated by over 5000 species of microorganisms, with the rumen being the most diversely populated (Cholewinska et al., 2021). The Diversity of the rumen population in both species richness and evenness is considered beneficial, as this ensures the stability of the microbiome (Cholewinska et al., 2021; Henderson et al., 2015). High species richness results in diverse gut microorganisms functionality and ability to use fractions of the substrate resources in the digestive tract, in turn ensuring efficient use of limiting resources (Celi et al., 2017). The diversity of the rumen microbiome also makes it possible for producers to feed by-products such as distillers’ grain that would otherwise have limited value (Latham et al., 2017). Gut microbiota engineering has potential to improve the health, production efficiency as well as quality of products from food-producing animals (Khafipour et al., 2016).
       
Diet manipulation can completely modify the substrates available to the rumen microbiota, leading to variations in gut microbiota species richness, diversity, function and changes in fermentation end-products (Petri et al., 2013). Switching from a low energy to a high energy diet can significantly disrupt the microbiome, ultimately reducing the value of the feed as the microbiome does not fully break down the biomass, leaving less nutrients available for absorption by the host’s digestive system (Khafipour et al., 2016). Research findings by Mao et al., (2016) showed that goats fed diets with a high concentration of maize had a significant influence on the structure of rumen bacteria, especially their diversity and composition. The same study showed that increasing the concentration of maize grain in diets had a significant negative effect on microbial diversity, with diets containing less or no maize associated with more microbiome species richness. The influence of sorghum grain-based diets on the rumen bacterial community composition and their relationship with ruminal metabolites remains largely unknown. There is need for further investigations as not much is known about the nature of the rumen microbiome in ruminants fed different diets (Petri et al., 2013).
       
Findings of a study by Piñeiro-Vázquez et al., (2015) associated the presence of condensed tannins in diets with a reduction in protozoa population by up to 79% and a decrease in rumen methanogens by up to 33%. Other investigations carried out using sorghum-based diets showed high concentrations of protozoa in the rumen. The variations in the bacterial and protozoal population due to increase in dietary starch were attributed to a decline in ruminal pH (Castillo-Lopez and Domínguez-Ordóñez, 2019). The inclusion of high tannin sorghum grain in ruminant livestock diets could therefore have significant effects on the relative abundances of ruminal microbiota at the phylum level but this requires validation. The rumen is an intricate ecosystem and it is recommended that any analysis of the impact of plant components on the populations of methanogens should take into account the entire population of methane producing microbiota as well as their individual orders or species (Cieslak et al., 2013). The numerous sources of tannins results in a great diversity in their antimicrobial activity and this requires continuous research, identification and selection of tannins that are effective and specific to target microbes (Huang et al., 2018).
       
A decrease in protozoal population is not always associated with a decrease in microbiota responsible for methane production. A study by Bhatta et al., (2015) showed the varied effects tannins had on the protozoal population. This is probably due to the fact that some tannins have a direct effect on methane producing bacteria that is not associated with protozoa. Other researchers have demonstrated that suppressing the growth of protozoa or defaunation resulted in a decline in the methanogen population associated with protozoa, for example, species belonging to Methanobacteriaceae (Belanche et al., 2014). A corresponding increase in the number of free-living Methanobacteriales was also observed as a result of suppressing the proliferation of protozoa (Goel and Makkar, 2012). However, a reduction in the number of protozoa is not always associated with a decrease in the number of methanogens as some studies have only observed limited correlations between methanogens and methanogenesis. A decrease in the population of one methanogen may result in the proliferation of another (Cieslak et al., 2013).
 
Impact of sorghum grain-based diets on meat quality
 
Meat is one of the main sources of fats, especially saturated fatty acids (SFA) in human diets. Saturated fatty acids have been implicated in causing unfavourable effects on human health such as increasing the risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer, especially in developed countries (Nieto and Ros, 2012). Diets high in SFA contribute to the increase in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level, which is positively related to the occurrence of heart disease (Briggs et al., 2017). However, some monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), particularly long-chain n-3 PUFA have been shown to be beneficial to human health (DiNicolantonio and O’Keefe, 2017). The consumption of fatty acids such as (C14:0 and C16:0) and monounsaturated trans fatty acids is not recommended and their concentration in meat can be reduced by increasing the proportions of PUFA absorbed by food producing animals through dietary manipulation (Nieto and Ros, 2012).
       
Proanthocyanidins in sorghums are usually regarded as anti-nutrients, but Larrain et al., (2007) observed similar or improved growth rates in animals fed high-tannin sorghum diets as compared to animals fed maize based diets. It was also observed by Larraínet_al(2008) that steers fed a mixture of high tannin sorghum (HTS) and maize grain diet (1:1) and those fed a maize based ration had a dressing percentage of 60.5 and 63.1%, respectively. Diets containing HTS at 50% inclusion produced steers with similar weight and carcass characteristics as those steers fed maize-based diets. The study also found that complete replacement of maize with HTS produced leaner meat and animals with similar estimated amounts of boneless, closely trimmed retail cuts.
       
Studies in recent years have seen increasing interest in improving the quality of meat and meat products through inclusion of plants rich in tannins in ruminant diets (Jeronimo et al., 2016). Flavour and colour are among the meat palatability and sensory properties by which meat quality is readily assessed by consumers. Oxidative processes result in deterioration of meat quality thereby negatively affecting decisions on consumer purchase (Larrain et al., 2007). Oxidative processes also negatively affect colour and flavour in red meat, which may result in sensory degradation or off-flavours especially during storage (Domínguez et al., 2019). Manipulating or altering feed ingredients in animal diets is considered to be the best technology available to alter and improve the oxidative stability of meat in ruminants. Tannins are known to have antioxidant activity and some studies show that inclusion of tannins in ruminant diets may improve the animal antioxidant status (Huang et al., 2018; Jeronimo et al., 2016; López-André  et al., 2013). High tannin sorghums contain condensed tannins, which have both in vitro and in vivo antioxidant activity and their inclusion in livestock diets has potential to increase antioxidants in high-grain diets for meat producing livestock. The use of high tannin sorghums (HTS) diets to improve oxidative stability and general quality of meat by reducing oxidative damage in muscle requires further research. 
       
Zhong et al., (2016) found that substitution of finely ground corn with equal amounts of finely ground sorghum in lamb diets improved meat colour through increased antioxidant tannin deposition in the meat and also protected the lambs against Haemonchus contortus infection. Sun et al., (2018) also found that sorghum-based diets improved lamb growth and meat quality by decreasing yellowness of meat during storage compared to maize-based diets. Similar results were found by Luciano et al., (2009) where inclusion of tannins in sheep diets improved the stability of fresh lamb in terms of its colour by maintaining redness and decreasing rate of degradation during extended refrigeration.
       
The aforementioned results by Larrain et al., (2007) showed that oxidative stability of muscle tissue was affected in different ways depending on the species studied and the difference is likely related to contrasting digestive physiology and microbial metabolism and modifications of proanthocyanidins in the rumen. It was also found that it is possible to accelerate or delay discoloration and lipid oxidation in muscle tissue by changing the ingredients in the diets fed to the animals. Results also showed that finishing steers with HTS did not affect Warner-Bratzler shear, sensory attributes and fatty acid composition of muscle tissue (Larraín et al., 2008).
Sorghum grain is mainly incorporated in diets as an energy source and may be successfully used as a complete or partial replacement of maize in livestock diets. The review has shown that sorghum grain may be a viable option to mitigate methane production in ruminants. There is, however, need for further research to come up with comprehensive information on dosage, side effects on digestion and the issue of resistance due to prolonged exposure to tannins. Finally, the influence of sorghum grain-based diets on the rumen bacterial community composition and their relationship with ruminal metabolites remains largely unknown. Further investigations are required to get more knowledge on the effects of sorghum grain-based diets on the rumen microbiome as well as meat quality.
The study was funded by the Government of Zimbabwe through the Ministry of Higher and Tertiary Education, Innovation, Science and Technology Development.
Authors certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial, personal, other people or organizations related to the material discussed in the manuscript.

  1. Aboagye, I.A., Beauchemin, K.A. (2019). Potential of molecular weight and structure of tannins to reduce methane emissions from ruminants: A review. Animals. 9: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110856.

  2. Addisu, S. (2016). Effect of dietary tannin source feeds on ruminal fermentation and production of cattle; A review. Online J. Anim. Feed Res. Sci. Online J. Anim. Feed Res. 6: 45-56.

  3. Baran, M.S., Yokus, B., Gul, I., Alp, M., Sahm, N. (2008). The effect of sorghum grain on ruminal fermentation and some blood parameters in beef cattle. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 7: 825-829.

  4. Belanche, A., de la Fuente, G., Newbold, C.J. (2014). Study of methanogen communities associated with different rumen protozoal populations. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 90: 663-677. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6941.12423.

  5. Bhatta, R., Saravanan, M., Baruah, L., Prasad, C.S. (2015). Effects of graded levels of tannin-containing tropical tree leaves on in vitro rumen fermentation, total protozoa and methane production. J. Appl. Microbiol. 118: 557-564. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12723.

  6. Briggs, M., Petersen, K., Kris-Etherton, P. (2017). Saturated fatty acids and cardiovascular disease: Replacements for saturated fat to reduce cardiovascular risk. Healthcare. 5: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare5020029.

  7. Castillo-Lopez, E., Domínguez-Ordóñez, M.G. (2019). Factors affecting the ruminal microbial composition and methods to determine microbial protein yield. Rev. Mex. Ciencias Pecu. 10: 120-148. https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v10i1.4547.

  8. Celi, P., Cowieson, A.J., Fru-nji, F., Steinert, R.E., Kluenter, A., Verlhac, V. (2017). Gastrointestinal functionality in animal nutrition and health/: New opportunities for sustainable animal production. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 234: 88- 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.09.012.

  9. Cholewinska, P., Górniak, W., Wojnarowski, K. (2021). Impact of Selected Environmental Factors on Microbiome of the Digestive Tract of Ruminants. 1-10.

  10. Cieslak, A., Szumacher-Strabel, M., Stochmal, A., Oleszek, W. (2013). Plant components with specific activities against rumen methanogens. Animal. 7(2): 253-265. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113000852.

  11. de Oliveira, S.G., Berchielli, T.T., Pedreira, M. dos S., Primavesi, O., Frighetto, R., Lima, M.A. (2007). Effect of tannin levels in sorghum silage and concentrate supplementation on apparent digestibility and methane emission in beef cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 135: 236-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.07.012.

  12. DiNicolantonio, J.J., O’Keefe, J.H. (2017). Good Fats Versus Bad Fats: A Comparison of Fatty Acids in the Promotion of Insulin Resistance, Inflammation and Obesity. Mo. Med. 114: 303-307.

  13. Domínguez, R., Pateiro, M., Gagaoua, M., Barba, F.J., Zhang, W., Lorenzo, J.M. (2019). A comprehensive review on lipid oxidation in meat and meat products. Antioxidants. 8: 1- 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8100429.

  14. Dykes, L. (2019). Tannin analysis in sorghum grains. Methods Mol. Biol. 1931: 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9039-9_8.

  15. García, E.M., López, A., Zimerman, M., Hernández, O., Arroquy, J.I., Nazareno, M.A. (2019). Enhanced oxidative stability of meat by including tannin-rich leaves of woody plants in goat diet. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci. 32: 1439- 1447. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0537.

  16. Goel, G., Makkar, H.P.S. (2012). Methane mitigation from ruminants using tannins and saponins. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 44: 729-739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9966-2.

  17. Haque, M.N. (2018). Dietary manipulation: A sustainable way to mitigate methane emissions from ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 60: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-018-0175-7.

  18. Hassan, F.U., Arshad, M.A., Ebeid, H.M., Rehman, M.S. ur, Khan, M.S., Shahid, S., Yang, C. (2020). Phytogenic additives can modulate rumen microbiome to mediate fermentation kinetics and methanogenesis through exploiting diet- microbe interaction. Front. Vet. Sci. 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.575801.

  19. Henderson, G., Cox, F., Ganesh, S., Jonker, A., Young, W., Global Rumen Census Collaborators; Janssen, P., Erratum, H. (2015). Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci. Rep. 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14567.

  20. Huang, Q., Liu, X., Zhao, G., Hu, T., Wang, Y. (2018). Potential and challenges of tannins as an alternative to in-feed antibiotics for farm animal production. Anim. Nutr. 4: 137- 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.09.004.

  21. Jayanegara, A., Leiber, F., Kreuzer, M. (2012). Meta-analysis of the relationship between dietary tannin level and methane formation in ruminants from in vivo and in vitro experiments. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl). 96: 365-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01172.x.

  22. Jeronimo, E., Pinheiro, C., Lamy, E., Dentinho, M.T., Sales-Baptista, E., Lopes, O., Capela e Silva, F. (2016). Tannins in ruminant nutrition: Impact on animal performance and quality of edible products. Capítulos de Livros. pp: 1-43.

  23. Jimoh, W.L.O., Abdullahi, M.S. (2017). Proximate analysis of selected sorghum cultivars. Bayero J. Pure Appl. Sci. 10: 285. https://doi.org/10.4314/bajopas.v10i1.43.

  24. Kataria, R.P. (2016). Use of feed additives for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farms. Microbiol. Res. (Pavia). 6. https://doi.org/10.4081/mr.2015.6120.

  25. Khafipour, E., Li, S., Tun, H.M., Derakhshani, H., Moossavi, S., Plaizier, K.J.C. (2016). Effects of grain feeding on microbiota in the digestive tract of cattle. Anim. Front. 6: 13-19. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2016-0018.

  26. Larrain, R.E., Schaefer, D.M., Reed, J.D. (2007). High Tannin Sorghum Diets and Oxidative Stability of Beef - univ of wisconsin [www document]. Sorghum Improv. Conf. North Am. Jt. Conf. Natl. Sorghum Prod. South. Seed Assoc. URL https://reeis.usda.gov/web/crisprojectpages/0204851-high-tannin-sorghum-diets-and-oxidative-stability-of- beef.html.

  27. Larraín, R.E., Schaefer, D.M., Richards, M.P., Reed, J.D. (2008). Finishing steers with diets based on corn, high-tannin sorghum or a mix of both: Color and lipid oxidation in beef. Meat Sci. 79: 656-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.10.032.

  28. Latham, E.A. anderson, R.C., Daigle, C.L. (2017). Metagenomics of the bovine rumen with distiller’s grains.

  29. López-Andrés, P., Luciano, G., Vasta, V., Gibson, T.M., Biondi, L., Priolo, A., Mueller-Harvey, I. (2013). Dietary quebracho tannins are not absorbed, but increase the antioxidant capacity of liver and plasma in sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 110: 632-639. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114512005703.

  30. Luciano, G., Monahan, F.J., Vasta, V., Biondi, L., Lanza, M., Priolo, A. (2009). Dietary tannins improve lamb meat colour stability. Meat Sci. 81: 120-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.meatsci.2008.07.006.

  31. Macauley, H., Ramadjita, T. (2015). Cereal crops: Rice, maize, millet, sorghum, wheat., in: Feeding Africa. Senegal. pp: 1-36. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315560625-26.

  32. Maize grain | Feedipedia [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://www.feedipedia.org/node/556 (accessed 7.30.21).

  33. Malmuthuge, N., Griebel, P.J., Guan, L.L. (2015). The gut microbiome and its potential role in the development and function of newborn calf gastrointestinal tract. Front. Vet. Sci. 2: 1- 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2015.00036.

  34. Mao, S.Y., Huo, W.J., Zhu, W.Y. (2016). Microbiome-metabolome analysis reveals unhealthy alterations in the composition and metabolism of ruminal microbiota with increasing dietary grain in a goat model. Environ. Microbiol. 18: 525- 541. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12724.

  35. Matthews, C., Crispie, F., Lewis, E., Reid, M., O’Toole, P.W., Cotter, P.D. (2019). The rumen microbiome: A crucial consideration when optimising milk and meat production and nitrogen utilisation efficiency. Gut Microbes. 10: 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2018.1505176.

  36. Meherunnahar, M., Chowdhury, R., Hoque, M., Satter, M., Islam, M. (2018). Comparison of nutritional and functional properties of BK2 foxtail millet with rice, wheat and maize flour. Progress. Agric. 29: 186-194. https://doi.org/10.3 329/pa.v29i2.38305.

  37. Méndez-Sánchez, A.R., Beauchemin, K.A., Corona, L., Márquez- Mota, C.C., Romero-Pérez, A., (2019). Effect of high- tannin sorghum grain on rumen fermentation and methane production in vitro. J. Anim. Sci. 97: 7315.

  38. Min, B.R., Barry, T.N., Attwood, G.T., McNabb, W.C. (2003). The effect of condensed tannins on the nutrition and health of ruminants fed fresh temperate forages: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 106: 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00041-5.

  39. Min, B.R., Solaiman, S., Waldrip, H.M., Parker, D., Todd, R.W., Brauer, D. (2020). Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants: A review of plant tannin mitigation options. Anim. Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1016j.aninu.2020.05.002.

  40. Moumen, A., Azizi, G., Chekroun, K. Ben, Baghour, M. (2016). The effects of livestock methane emission on the global warming: A review. Int. J. Glob. Warm. 9: 229-253. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGW.2016.074956.

  41. Naumann, H.D., Tedeschi, L.O., Zeller, W.E., Huntley, N.F. (2017). The role of condensed tannins in ruminant animal production: Advances, limitations and future directions. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 46: 929-949. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902017001200009.

  42. Ncube, S., Ndlovu, L.R., Tavirimirwa, B., Tambo, G., Mwembe, R.B.N.G. (2014). Growth performance of ruminants fed different proportions of maize and sorghum grain. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 26.

  43. Nieto, G., Ros, G. (2012). Modification of Fatty Acid Composition in Meat Through Diet: Effect on Lipid Peroxidation and Relationship to Nutritional Quality - A Review, in: Catala, A. (Ed.), Lipid Peroxidation. pp: 239-258. https://doi.org/ http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/51114.

  44. Patra, A.K. (2012). Enteric methane mitigation technologies for ruminant livestock: A synthesis of current research and future directions. Environ. Monit. Assess. 184: 1929-1952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2090-y.

  45. Pedreira, M. dos S., de Oliveira, S.G., Primavesi, O., de Lima, M.A., Frighetto, R.T.S., Berchielli, T.T. (2013). Methane emissions and estimates of ruminal fermentation parameters in beef cattle fed different dietary concentrate levels. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 42: 592-598. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982013000800009.

  46. Petri, R.M., Schwaiger, T., Penner, G.B., Beauchemin, K.A., Forster, R.J., McKinnon, J.J., McAllister, T.A. (2013). Changes in the rumen epimural bacterial diversity of beef cattle as affected by diet and induced ruminal acidosis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79: 3744-3755. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03983-12.

  47. Pickering, N.K., Oddy, V.H., Basarab, J., Cammack, K., Hayes, B., Hegarty, R.S., Lassen, J., McEwan, J.C., Miller, S., Pinares-Patino, C.S., De Haas, Y. (2015). Animal board invited review: Genetic possibilities to reduce enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Animal. 9: 1431- 1440. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115000968.

  48. Piñeiro-Vázquez, A.T., Canul-Solís, J.R., Alayón-Gamboa, J.A., Chay-Canul, A.J., Ayala-Burgos, A.J., Aguilar-Pérez, C.F., Solorio-Sánchez, F.J., Ku-Vera, J.C. (2015). Potential of condensed tannins for the reduction of emissions of enteric methane and their effect on ruminant productivity Potencial de los taninos condensados para reducir las emisiones de metano entérico y sus efectos en producción de rumiantes. Arch Med Vet. 47: 263-272.

  49. Rice grain, polished | Feedipedia [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://www.feedipedia.org/node/12526 (accessed 7. 30.21).

  50. Rojas-Downing, M.M., Nejadhashemi, A.P., Harrigan, T., Woznicki, S.A. (2017). Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation and mitigation. Clim. Risk Manag. 16: 145- 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.02.001.

  51. Salem, H. Ben (2010). Nutritional management to improve sheep and goat performances in semiarid regions. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 39: 337-347. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-35982010001300037.

  52. Shen, S., Huang, R., Li, C., Wu, W., Chen, H., Shi, J., Chen, S., Ye, X. (2018). Phenolic compositions and antioxidant activities differ significantly among sorghum grains with different applications. Molecules. 23: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23051203.

  53. Singh, A.P., Kumar, S. (2020). Applications of Tannins in Industry, in: Tannins - Structural Properties, Biological Properties and Current Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85984.

  54. Soltan, Y., Filho, A.A., Abdalla, A., Berenchtein, B., Schiavinatto, P., Costa, C., Soltan, Y., Filho, A.A., Abdalla, A., Berenchtein,  B., Schiavinatto, P., Costa, C. (2021). Replacing maize with low tannin sorghum grains: lamb growth performance, microbial protein synthesis and enteric methane production. Anim. Prod. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20605.

  55. Sorghum grain | Feedipedia [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://www.feedipedia.org/node/224 (accessed 7.30.21).

  56. Sun, H.X., Gao, T.S., Zhong, R.Z., Fang, Y., Di, G.L., Zhou, D.W. (2018). Effects of corn replacement by sorghum in diets on performance, nutrient utilization, blood parameters, antioxidant status and meat colour stability in lambs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 98: 723-731. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas- 2017-0136.

  57. Tadesse, G. (2014). Rumen manipulation for enhanced feed utilization and improved productivity performance of ruminants: A review. Momona Ethiop. J. Sci. 6: 3. https://doi.org/10.4314/mejs.v6i2.109618.

  58. Tajima, K., Aminov, R.I., Nagamine, T., Matsui, H., Nakamura, M., Benno, Y. (2001). Diet-dependent shifts in the bacterial population of the rumen revealed with real-time pcr. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 2766-2774. https://doi.org/10.112 8/AEM.67.6.2766-2774.2001.

  59. Wang, C., Liu, Q., Guo, G., Huo, W.J., Zhang, Y.L., Pei, C.X., Zhang, S.L., Yang, W.Z., Wang, H. (2018). Effects of substituting corn with steam-flaked sorghum on growth, digestion and blood metabolites in young cattle fed feedlot diets. Anim. Prod. Sci. 58: 299-306. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16265.

  60. Wheat grain | Feedipedia [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://www.feedipedia.org/node/223 (accessed 7.30.21).

  61. Wu, Yuye, Li, X., Xiang, W., Zhu, C., Lin, Z., Wu, Yun, Li, J., Pandravada, S., Ridder, D.D., Bai, G., Wang, M.L., Trick, H.N., Beane, S.R., Tuinstra, M.R., Tesso, T.T., Yu, J. (2012). Presence of tannins in sorghum grains is conditioned by different natural alleles of Tannin1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109: 10281-10286. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201700109.

  62. Xiong, Y., Zhang, P., Warner, R.D., Fang, Z. (2019). Sorghum grain: From genotype, nutrition and phenolic profile to its health benefits and food applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 18: 2025-2046. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541- 4337.12506.

  63. Yahaghi, M., Liang, J.B., Balcells, J., Valizadeh, R., Alimon, A.R., Ho, Y.W. (2012). Effect of replacing barley with corn or sorghum grain on rumen fermentation characteristics and performance of Iranian Baluchi lamb fed high concentrate rations. Anim. Prod. Sci. 52: 263-268. https://doi.org/10.1 071/AN11181.

  64. Zhong, R.Z., Fang, Y., Wang, Y.Q., Sun, H.X., Zhou, D.W. (2016). Effects of substituting finely ground sorghum for finely ground corn on feed digestion and meat quality in lambs infected with Haemonchus contortus. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 211: 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci. 2015.08.007.

Editorial Board

View all (0)