Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research, volume 42 issue 3 (september 2023) : 314-319

Effect of Graded Levels of Dried Orange (Citrus sinensis) Byproducts on Production Efficiency, Blood Parameters and Antioxidant Status of Broiler Chickens

CHAIB EDDOUR Ahmed Readh1,*, LITIM Miloud1, LARBAOUI Abdelkarim2, BOUDEROUA Kaddour1, BELHOCINE Chaima1
1Laboratory of Biotechnology Applied to Agriculture and Environmental Preservation in Higher School of Agronomy “Mohamed El Amjed Ben Abdel Malek”, Hall Technology Kharouba, Mostaganem- Algeria.
2Laboratory Food Technology and Nutrition, University of Mostaganem “Abdelhamid Ibn Badis”, Mostaganem-2700, Algeria.
Cite article:- Readh Ahmed EDDOUR CHAIB, Miloud LITIM, Abdelkarim LARBAOUI, Kaddour BOUDEROUA, Chaima BELHOCINE (2023). Effect of Graded Levels of Dried Orange (Citrus sinensis) Byproducts on Production Efficiency, Blood Parameters and Antioxidant Status of Broiler Chickens . Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 42(3): 314-319. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.DRF-307.
Background: Orange wastes are bioactive compounds produced during the industrial transformation.The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of feeding dried sweet orange byproducts (DOP) on broiler growth performance, serum metabolites and antioxidant status.

Methods: A total of 200 of 20-day experimental broiler chicks were distributed into a completely randomized design which included 4 dietary treatments with 5 replicates of 10 birds fed each. The dietary treatments included a control diet with no corn substitution and three diets containing 5, 10 and 15% Dried Orange Pulp. Feed intake (FI), body weight gain (BWG), feed conversion ratio (FCR), carcass traits, serum components, and blood antioxidant status were measured.

Result: FCR and BWG of chickens were improved when using graded levels of DOP compared to the control group (P<0.05). Serum total protein and glucose were significantly increased (P<0.0001) in DOP groups compared to the control. Serum Cholesterol and triglyceride decreased significantly (P<0.0001) in the DOP groups. Higher Aspartate amino transferase, Lactate Dehydrogenase and Creatine Phospho Kinase activities were observed in Control group compared to the other treatments.
Broiler chicken meat production is a growing industry due to the rapid growth of chicks, the availability of high-quality meat at low prices and the chicken’s rapid response to changes in ration composition (Alzawqari et al., 2016). Currently, there is a greater focus on consuming a diet that is rich in bioactive and antioxidants compounds (Abbas et al., 2022). In particular, Citrus sinensis known as sweet orange, is the major citrus crop produced worldwide and is a rich source of bioactive compounds and dietary fiber (Nieto et al., 2021). A total of 143 755.6 thousand tonnes of citrus fruits were produced worldwide in 2019; the largest producer was China, which produced 37 739.0 thousand tonnes.

Orange production constitutes approximately 54.84% of the entire world’s production of citrus fruits, followed by mandarin production 24.70% and grapefruit production 6.47% (Nieto et al., 2021).

Algeria had a 1593 thousand tonnes of citrus production (2% of world production) with a 1199.5 thousand tonnes of oranges where 40% are utilized in fruit transformation (FAO, 2021). However, the orange fruit industry produces 390,000 tons of waste per year (Lagha-Benamrouche and Madani, 2013). Moreover, the rise in cereal prices, particularly for corn and soybean meal, coupled with the European Union’s ban on antibiotics (Alzawqari et al., 2016), has prompted a search for new alternatives to animal diets. Citrus co-products obtained from juice production are composed of peel and pulp. Several bioactive substances, such as dietary fiber (pectin, cellulose and hemicellulose), minerals (potassium, calcium and magnesium), organic acids (citric, oxalic and malic), vitamins (vitamin C), phenolic compounds and flavonoids (hesperidin, narirutin) (Azizi et al., 2018) are abundant in these fractions.

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of substituting maize by orange byproducts in the daily feed of broiler chickens and investigate the influence of dietary dried orange pulp on growth performance, carcass characteristics and blood metabolites of broiler chickens.
The preparation of dried orange pomace
 
Fresh orange byproducts were purchased from the local factory after juice processing and spread on a clean floor in a greenhouse for sun drying. The pulp was then transferred and processed into powder using a 1-mm screen and stored until it is used.
 
Animals, diets and experimental design
 
The study was conducted at the Agronomy Higher School Workshops in Mostaganem, Algeria, from March to June 2021. Two hundred male chicks (Arbor Acres), aged one day and weighing 45±5 g, were procured from a commercial hatchery. The chicks were fed a consistent starter diet (3035 kcal/kg) for a duration of 16 days and were provided with free access to food and water.

From the 16th day of age, the birds were individually weighed and then randomly assigned to one of four treatment diets and four floor pens. The treatment diets included a control diet formulated according to the nutritional requirements established by the Algerian West Poultry Group (ORAVIO) for broilers. Additionally, there were three experimental diets in which 5%, 10% and 15% dried orange pulp was substituted for corn in the diets, as detailed in Table 1.

Table 1: Feed ingredients and nutrients composition of different diets.



The trial lasted 49 days during the period of March- April 2021 and used scaffoldings and pens with dimensions of 2,3´2, 2 m and a height of 1 m. Each treatment consisted of five replicated pens (1 m2) with 10 birds each. The building complex was then fumigated, washed and disinfected.

The brooding temperature of the experimental broiler house was initially set at approximately 32-34°C. After three days of rearing, the temperature was gradually decreased by 0.5°C per day until a constant temperature of 20-22°C was reached. The temperature was then maintained at this level. The humidity was controlled at around 60-70%, and the chickens were reared under standard hygienic conditions. The poultry building had thermostatically controlled cross-ventilation and a lighting program. The lights were used to provide a 23-hour light and 1-hour dark cycle during the first 21 days of rearing and a 22-hour light and 2-hour dark cycle from day 22 to day 49 of the rearing period.
 
Sampling and data collection
 
Performance measurement
 
Feed intake, Body weight gain (BWG) and Feed conversion ratio (FCR) were calculated for each group on weekly basis.
 
Measurements at slaughter
 
After the 49-day duration of the experiment, ten birds were selected from each group or treatment. They were then weighed, slaughtered and eviscerated in a local commercial slaughterhouse. Carcass yield was determined by subtracting the weight of the eviscerated organs (liver, heart, gizzard, spleen, intestine, breast, thigh and abdominal fat) from the live weight.
 
Blood sampling and determination of serum components
 
At the end of the study, on the postnatal 49th day; one day before slaughter, two birds per replicate, were selected for the blood analysis; 5 ml of blood samples were collected into EDTA tubes from 10 birds in each treatment. The samples were then transferred to the laboratory and centrifuged at 3000×g for 10 minutes to separate the serum.

The serum was stored in an Eppendorf tube at -20°C until assayed for measuring blood parameters. Serum Total protein (TP), Glucose (Glu), Cholesterol (Chol), Triglycerides (TG), Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Lactate Dehydrogenase, (LDH) and Creatine kinase (CK) were analyzed using reagent laboratory kits (BIOLABO SAS, France) using a spectrophotometer (SPECORD 210, Germany).
 
Stastical analysis
 
For determination of the statistical significance of the results, appropriate parametric test ANOVA were used. The results were presented as text and tables as mean values and standard error of mean (SEM). Data were statistically analyzed by SPSS statistical software (IBM SPSS version 26). The statistical comparison was made by Tukey test at the 95% probability level.
The results of the experimental trial on broiler performance, carcass characteristics and blood metabolites are summarized in Tables 2, 3 and 4.

Table 2: Effect of dietary dried orange pulp concentration on the performance of broiler chickens.


 

Table 3: Effect of feeding dried orange pulp (DOP) on carcass yield, different organs and relative immune organs (expressed as a percentage of carcass weight) of broiler chickens at 49 days of age.



Table 4: Effect of Dried orange pulp (DOP) on Blood Serum Constituents of Arbor Acres Broiler Chickens at 49 Days of Age.



Growth performance
 
The 5, 10 and 15% DOP based diets enhanced body weight at day 49 of rearing compared to the control group. There were significant differences in broiler weight gain and feed conversion ratio among treatments due to dietary DOP (P<0.05). Significant improvements in FCR of (5 and 10% DOP), except in 15% DOP. In the final week of the trial, the groups fed with 5% and 10% DOP had a decline in FCR of 9% and 13%, respectively, compared to the control group. Additionally, during the period of 35-42 days, the 5% DOP group had better FCR values compared to the control group, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The trial also found a significant enhancement in BWG of chicks after the incorporation of orange byproducts to their diets.

Our results are related to the findings of (Vlaicu et al., 2020), who showed that adding orange pulp or essential oil (Citrus sinensis L) to broiler diets had a significant impact on weight growth and feed conversion ratio. The improvement in FCR values observed in DOP-diets is consistent with the results reported by (Abbasi et al., 2015), where hesperidin was found to enhance the activity of digestive enzymes (Kamboh and Zhu, 2013). The composition of gut microbiota can also influence FCR since colonic bacteria enzymes can affect the structure of polyphenols, increasing their bioavailability (Luca et al., 2019).

Our findings are similar to those reported by (Oluremi et al., 2010), who demonstrated that orange pulp had a positive effect on body weight and feed intake throughout the experiment. However, our results partially agree with the experiments of (Boumezrag et al., 2018 and Alzawqari et al., 2016), where supplementation with orange peel or a combination of orange peel and lemon grass leaf had no effect on BWG, FI and FCR.
 
Carcass parameters
 
The inclusion of dietary dried orange pulp (DOP) in the diets resulted in a significant increase in liver and intestine yields (P<0.01). The liver efficiency in the 15% DOP group showed a 28% increase compared to the control broilers. Additionally, a significant decrease of over 26% in abdominal fat yield was observed in the 15% DOP broilers compared to the control group (P<0.05).

The increase in liver and intestine yields of broilers fed orange waste is attributed to the antioxidant property of flavonoids like naringin (Goliomytis et al., 2015), also feeding soluble fiber-rich meals result in high-viscosity digesta and elevated cell proliferation (Gonzalez-Alvarado et al., 2010). These findings were partially in line with (Akbarian et al., 2013 and Ebrahimi et al., 2014); where none of the dietary interventions had a significant influence on the mean weight of gizzard or liver. Our findings of abdominal fat yield are in agreement with those of (Abbassi et al., 2015).

The improvement in abdominal fat yield for dietary orange pulp treatments may be due to presence of naringin in DOP and its role as a powerful antioxidant that be able to prevent oxidation and accumulation of fat by the inhibition of adipocyte proliferation and modulating fat metabolism (Guo et al., 2016). The trial results were partially related to (Pourhossein et al., 2015), proved that adding essential oil isolated from orange peel to broiler meals results in a higher live weight, showed no significant effect on the spleen weight and the broilers fed with sweet orange peel diet had a considerable rise in liver weight.
 
Blood parameters
 
The substitution of corn with orange byproducts in bird’s diets at 16 days of rearing had a significant (P<0.05) effect on serum glucose, total protein, cholesterol, triglycerides, Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and Creatine kinase (CK).

Serum glucose levels were significantly higher (P<0.05) in all dietary groups, except for the 5% DOP group, compared to the control group. Feeding the control diet resulted in a decrease in blood glucose levels by more than 68% compared to the 15% DOP-based diet. The elevated glucose concentration may be attributed to the main glycosylated flavanones, hesperidin and narirutin, found in citrus peel (Chen et al., 2017).

Serum lipid fractions showed significant reduction (P<0.05) in total cholesterol and triglycerides, in broilers fed with DOP-based diets in comparison to control. An increase of more than 48% in TG blood concentration was noticed in the serum of control group compared to the 10% DOP group. The 10% DOP meal decreased the cholesterol in animal serum by more than 52% compared to the control diet.

Our findings are in agreement with (Alefzadeh et al., 2016 and Abbasi et al., 2015) concluded that dietary dried orange peel and orange pulp lowered blood cholesterol and triglycerides. This effect may be attributed to the hypocholesterolemic properties of citrus fruits. The flavonoids have been shown to inhibit the synthesis of cholesterol in the liver by inhibiting the activity of the hepatic enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase (Gilani et al., 2018).

Feeding DOP-diets led to an increase in the serum total protein level (P<0.001) compared to the control diet; which can be ascribed to the transamination of phenolic and flavonoid compounds present in the orange wastes (Akbarian et al., 2013).

Feeding DOP-based diets presented a significant decrease in AST levels compared to the control diet (P=0.014). Specifically, the serum activity of AST was reduced in 15% DOP group, which is more than 29% lower than the control group activity.

However, the results of ALT obtained in this trial were similar to (Alagawany et al., 2021 and Suliman et al., 2019), showed that orange byproducts have positively affected the liver enzymes in broiler chickens and quail. The decrease in AST serum levels observed in this study could be linked to naringin, a compound found in orange peel and byproducts which may reduce the liver cell enzyme leakage (Jiang et al., 2020 and Gibson et al., 2017).

The inclusion of DOP reduced the activity of LDH and CK (P<0.05). The lowest activities of (CK) were observed in DOP-based diets compared to the control group. A reduction of more than 46% was observed in the 15% DOP compared to the basal diet. The relative concentrations of LDH were significantly lower in DOP 10 and 15% than in the control group (P<0.01).

In the current investigation, the reduction of CK and LDH levels in the serum indicated that dietary flavonoids have beneficial effects against stress. This is in line with (Akbarian et al., 2013), who found that dietary antioxidants such as hesperidin and dietary genistein are defenders against oxidative damage in poultry rearing and with (Hao et al., 2019), who reported that naringenin has cardioprotective potential and reduces myocardial biomarkers such as AST, ALT, CK and LDH. Furthermore, DOP at different percentage in the diets from (21 to 49 days) age had a significant positive effect on chicken antioxidant status. These results are in agreement with those showed by (Alzawqari et al., 2016), because citrus byproducts are a source of phenolic molecules and α-tocopherol with antioxidant properties (Delgado-Pertinez et al.,  2021).
The inclusion of dried orange pulp in broiler diet is effective in reducing serum triglycerides and cholesterol. The use of DOP in broiler diets increased the serum total protein content. Broilers fed DOP- based diets presented an increase in productive performance, improved feed conversion ratio and liver enzyme activity and reduced stress enzymes activity.
None

  1. Abbas, R.J. and Al-Jrrah, I.A.T. (2022). Influence of feeding natural and synthetic lycopene on performance, egg quality and serum parameters of Japanese quail layers. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 41(4): 474-479. DOI: 10.18805/ ajdfr.DRF-274.

  2. Abbasi, H., Seidavi, A., Liu, W., Asadpour, L. (2015). Investigation on the effect of different levels of dried sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) pulp on performance, carcass characteristic and physiological and biochemical parameters in broiler chicken. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 22: 139-146, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.sjbs.2014.09.006.

  3. Akbarian, A., Golian, A., Gilani, A., Kermanshahi, H., Zhaleh, S., Akhavan, A., De Smet, S., Michiels, J. (2013). Effect of feeding citrus peel extracts on growth performance, serum components and intestinal morphology of broilers exposed to high ambient temperature during the finisher phase. Livestock Sci. 157(2-3): 490-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.livsci.2013.08.010.

  4. Alagawany, M., El-Saadony, M.T., Elnesr, S.S., Farahat, M., Attia, G., Madkour, M. and Reda, F.M. (2021). Use of lemongrass essential oil as a feed additive in quail’s nutrition: Its effect on growth, carcass, blood biochemistry, antioxidant and immunological indices, digestive enzymes and intestinal microbiota. Poultry Science. 100(6): 101172. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101172.

  5. Alefzadeh, T., Bouyeh, M., den Hoven, R.V., Seidavi, A., Laudadio, V. and Tufarelli, V. (2016). Effect of dietary dried orange (Citrus sinensis) peel powder and exogenous multi-enzymes on growth and carcass traits and ileal microflora of broiler chickens. Pakistan Journal of Zoology. 48(6): 1891-1897.

  6. Alzawqari, M.H., Al-Baddany, A.A., Al-Baadani, H.H., Alhidary, I.A., Khan, R.U., Aqil, G.M. and Abdurab, A. (2016). Effect of feeding dried sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) peel and lemon grass (Cymbopogon citratus) leaves on growth performance, carcass traits, serum metabolites and antioxidant status in broiler during the finisher phase. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 23(17): 17077-17082.

  7. Azizi, M., Seidavi, A.R., Ragni, M., Laudadio, V. and Tufarelli, V. (2018). Practical applications of agricultural wastes in poultry feeding in Mediterranean and Middle East regions. Part 1: Citrus, grape, pomegranate and apple wastes. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 74(3): 489-498, https:/ /doi.org/10.1017/S0043933918000478.               

  8. Boumezrag, A., Khiati, B., Benaraba, R., Boukraa, L., Hammoudi, S.M., Chicoteau, P. and Benarbia, M.E.A. (2018). Modulation of broilers’ productivity and blood biochemical parameters by Citruselements dietary supplementation. Veterinaria. 67(3): 129-137.

  9. Chen, X.M., Tait, A.R., Kitts, D.D. (2017). Flavonoid composition of orange peel and its association with antioxidant and anti- inflammatory activities. Food Chem. 218: 15-21. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.016.

  10. Delgado-Pertinez, M., Martín-García, I., Mena, Y., Zarazaga, L.Á. and Guzmán, J.L. (2021). Supplementing the diet of dairy goats with dried orange pulp throughout lactation: Ii effect on milk fatty acids profile, phenolic compounds, fat-soluble vitamins and antioxidant capacity. Animals. 11(8): 2421. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082421.

  11. Ebrahimi, A., Qotbi, A.A.A., Seidavi, A. and Bahar, B. (2014). The effects of dietary supplementation of Citrus sinensis peel extract on production and quality parameters of broiler chicken. Journal of Applied Animal Research. 42(4): 445- 450. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2013.875916.

  12. FAO. (2021). Citrus Fruit Statistical Compendium 2020. Rome. Available Online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/data/QC (accessed on 5 October 2022).

  13. Goliomytis, M., Kartsonas, N., Charismiadou, M.A., Symeon, G.K., Simitzis, P.E. and Deligeorgis, S.G. (2015). The influence of naringin or hesperidin dietary supplementation on broiler meat quality and oxidative stability. PloS One. 10(10): e0141652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.08.010.

  14. Gonzalez-Alvarado, J.M., Jiménez-Moreno, E., González-Sánchez, D., Lázaro, R. and Mateos, G.G. (2010). Effect of inclusion of oat hulls and sugar beet pulp in the diet on productive performance and digestive traits of broilers from 1 to 42 days of age. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 162(1-2): 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.08.010.

  15. Gibson, C., Akinsoyinu Akintunde, O., Tayo Grace, O., Akinboye Olufunso, E., Afodu Osagie, J., Ndubuisi-Ogbonna Lois, C. and Ogbonnaya Faith, C. (2017). Serum biochemistry and sensory evaluation of broiler chicken fed Cymbopogon citratus leaf meal. World. 5(6): 305-309.

  16. Gilani, Zehra, S., Faiz-ul-Hassan, Galani, S., Ashraf, A. (2018). Effect of natural growth promoters on immunity and biochemical and haematological parameters of broiler chickens. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 17(4): 627-633. 

  17. Guo, X., Liu, J., Cai, S., Wang, O. and Ji, B. (2016). Synergistic interactions of apigenin, naringin, quercetin and emodin on inhibition of 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation and pancreas lipase activity. Obes. Res. Clin. Pract. 10: 327- 339. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.orcp.2015.08.004.

  18. Hao, Y., Wu, B., Li, C. (2019). Cardioprotective efficacy of naringenin against isoproterenol induced chronic heart failure in a rat’s model. International Journal of Pharmacology. 15(6): 759-765. 

  19. Jiang, X., Li, A., Wang, Y., Iqbal, M., Waqas, M., Yang, H. and Li, J. (2020). Ameliorative effect of naringin against thiram-induced tibial dyschondroplasia in broiler chicken. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 27(10): 11337-11348.

  20. Kamboh, A.A. and Zhu, W.Y. (2013). Effect of increasing levels of bioflavonoids in broiler feed on plasma anti-oxidative potential, lipid metabolites and fatty acid composition of meat. Poult. Sci. 92: 454-461. https://doi.org/10.3382/ ps.2012-02584.

  21. Lagha-Benamrouche, S., Madani, K. (2013). Phenolic contents and antioxidant activity of orange varieties (Citrus sinensis L. and Citrus aurantium L.) cultivated in Algeria: Peels and leaves. Ind. Crop. Prod. 50: 723-730. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.048.

  22. Luca, S.V., Macovei, I., Bujor, A., Miron, A., Skalicka-Wozniak, K., Aprotosoaie, A.C., Trifan, A. (2019). Bioactivity of dietary polyphenols: The role of metabolites. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1546669.

  23. Nieto, G., Fernández-López, J., Pérez-Álvarez, J.A., Peñalver, R., Ros, G. and Viuda-Martos, M. (2021). Valorization of citrus co-products: Recovery of bioactive compounds and application in meat and meat products. Plants. 10(6): 1069. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061069.

  24. Oluremi, O.I.A., Okarfor, F.N., Adenkola, A.Y., Orayagn, K.T. (2010). Effect fermentation of sweet orange (Citurs sinensis) fruit peel on its phytonutrients and the performance of broiler starter. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 9(6): 546-549.

  25. Pourhossein, Z., Qotbi, A.A.A., Seidavi, A., Laudadio, V., Mazzei, D. and Tufarelli, V. (2019). Feeding of dried sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) peel on humoral immune response of broiler chickens. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture. 8(4): 361-367.

  26. Pourhossein, Z., Qotbi, A.A.A., Seidavi, A., Laudadio, V., Centoducati, G., Tufarelli, V. (2015). Efect of diferent levels of dietary sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) peel extract on humoral immune system responses in broiler chickens. Anim. Sci. J. 86: 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12250.

  27. Suliman, M.A.E., Eltanani, R.R. and Abdel-Mawla, L.F. (2019). Influence of treated orange pulp on growth performance, nutrients digestibility and plasma constituents of rabbits. World. 9(2): 102-108.

  28. Vlaicu, P.A., Untea, A.E., Panaite, T.D. and Turcu, R.P. (2020). Effect of dietary orange and grapefruit peel on growth performance, health status, meat quality and intestinal microflora of broiler chickens. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 19(1): 1394-1405. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 1828051X.2020.1845576.

Editorial Board

View all (0)