Brooding performance
The results of the feed consumption, growth performance, feed conversion ratio and mortality of the experimental chicks during brooding are presented in Table 1. The mean daily feed consumption of SassoT44 breed of chicks (45.7 g) was higher (p<0.05) than the others. There was no difference (P>0.05) between Koekoek (42.1 g) and Dominant Red Barred (42.1 g) breeds of chicks in mean daily feed consumption (Table 1). Similar result mean daily feed consumption of 39.5 and 42.3 g/chick/day for Koekoek and Bovan Brown breeds of chicks kept during brooding in South Wello Zone, respectively
Gezahegn (2017). The mean daily body weight gain of 15.1 g/ chick was recorded from SassoT44, the value of which was higher (p<0.05) than the others, which might be attributed to the higher genetic potential in growth rate and feed consumption of SassoT44 compared to the others. Similar result was reported live body weight of 829 and 686 g/ head for SassoT44 and Koekoek breeds of chicks at the end of the brooding period from the experiment conducted at the Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center (
Assefa, 2016).
There was no difference (p>0.05) between SassoT44 and Koekoek breeds in feed conversion ratio during the brooding period. On the other side, the mean feed conversion ratio of dominant red barred chicks (3.8) was lower (p<0.05) than the others, indicating that Dominant Red Barred chicks were expensive in growth performance compared to the other two breeds. The mean feed conversion ratio calculated for all the three breeds of chicks in this study were higher than that mean feed conversion ratio of 5.25 and 6.17 for Koekoek and Bovan Brawn from the study conducted in South Wello Zone (
Gezahegn, 2017).
There was no difference (p>0.05) between all the three breeds in mortality during the brooding period. However, the numerical mortality rate calculated for SassoT44 (9.6%) was lower. The mean mortality rate recorded from the current study were higher than mortality rate reported 9.78, 2.89 and 7.4% for Koekoek, Bovan Brawn and Rhode Island Red breeds of chicks respectively, from the study conducted at Andasa Livestock Research Center (
Gezahegn, 2017) and
(Hassen et al., 2006).
Performance of pullets and cockerels
Growth performance
The results of the on-farm performance of the experimental growers of the three breeds (pullets and cockerels) distributed to the participating farmers are shown in Table 2. Mean live body weight of 1.32 and 2.31 kg/head was attained by the pullets of SassoT44 at 16 and 24 weeks of age, respectively.
The mean live body weight attained by SassoT44 was higher (p<0.05) than the others, followed by Koekoek pullets (1.18 and 1.76 kg). The mean live body weight of Dominant Red Barred pullets at the age of 16 and 24 weeks (0.95 and 1.20 kg/head) was lower (p<0.05) than the others respectively. Mean live body weight of 1.5 kg/head for Dominant Red Barred pullets at 16 weeks were reported (
Milan, 2017).
There was no significant difference between SasooT44 (1.42, 2.48 kg/head) and Koekoek cockerels (1.35, 2.03 kg/head) (p>0.05) in mean live body weight achieved at 16 and 24 weeks respectively. The results of the current study was higher than mean live body weight of 1.03 kg/head for pullets and 1.34 kg/head for cockerels of Koekoek breed kept under farmer management condition at the age of 20 weeks (
Kassa and Saba, 2016). The mature live body weight at an age of 24 weeks, recorded for SasooT44 in the present study was higher than mature mean body weight of 1.54, 1.55 and 1.64 kg/head for Isa brown, Bovan Brown and Koekoek exotic breeds respectively (
Tadesse, 2012). Thus the results of the current study indicates that the performance of SasooT44 under farmers management conditions seems to be promising in terms of growth genetic potential and adaptability to local condition, followed by Koekoek pullets.
Reproductive and productive performance
The reproductive and productive performances of the experimental breeds of chicken are presented in Table 2. The mean sexual maturity of the SasooT44 pullets (157 days) was shorter (P<0.05) than the others indicating that SasooT44 reached sexual maturity earlier than the others. Koekoek and Dominant Red Barred pullets required additional days of 6.1 and 13.7 to start laying compared to SasooT44. The mean sexual maturity of Koekoek pullets (164 days) was shorter (p<0.05) than that of Dominant Red Barred pullets (181 days). Similar finding was reported by
Taddese (2012). The difference between the three breeds studied in the current experiment in mean age at first egg might be attributed to the difference in genetic potential and ability to adapt to the local scavenging environment. As shown in Table 2, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between SasooT44 (0.60) and Koekoek (0.59) kept under farmers management conditions in mean daily egg production/hen.
On the other side, mean daily egg production of 0.42 eggs/hen was recorded for Dominant Red Barred, the value of which was lower (p<0.05) than that of the other two breeds. The results of this study was in agreement with that of
Aman et al., (2017) who reported 0.63 eggs/day for SassoT44 layers kept under local scavenging condition in Wolaita Zone of SNNP Regional State. The result of the mean daily egg production recorded for Koekoek layers in the current study was in agreement with that of
Grobbelaar (2010), who suggested that Koekoek breed of layers are promising breed of chicken in terms of hen house egg production under the local scavenging condition of the tropics. The result of the mean daily egg production recorded for Dominant Red Barred breed in the current study was contrary to that of
Milan (2017) who suggested that Dominant Red Barred layers are very productive both in egg laying and meat production and found to be an excellent choices for dual-purpose chicken under sub optimal and harsh production condition of the local scavenging environment.
According to Table 2, mortality rate of 5.3, 6.4 and 9.5% was recorded for SasooT44, Koekoekand Dominant Red Barred from breeds of chicken during growing and early laying periods respectively. The percent mortality occurred in the case of Dominant Red Barred breed (9.54) was higher (p<0.05) than the others (Table 2). Similar finding was reported by
Demeke (2004).
Egg quality parameters
Koekoek breed had white-creamy eggshell color, while of Dominant Red Barred and SasooT44 had brown egg shell color. The mean egg and albumen weight recorded for SasooT44 (51.6 g, 29.3 g) and Koekoek (51.4 g, 29.7 g) were higher (p<0.05) than that of Dominant Red Barred (47.4 g, 26.4 g) without showing difference among each other’s (Table 3). On the contrary, there were no difference (p>0.05) between the three breeds in mean yolk and shell weight. Also there were no different in yolk, albumen and shell weight ratio, shell thickness, yolk color (color fun) and yolk height. The results of the current study is contrary to that of
Islam et al., (2001), who reported that genetic variation had little effect on egg weight.
The mean egg weight recorded for eggs collected from Koekoek breed was similar with finding reported mean egg weight of 51.6 g for Koekoek layers kept at Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center
(Getachewu et al., 2016). On the other side the mean egg weight reported for Koekoek layers (48.84 g) from the study conducted in East Showa of the Oromia Regional State
Tadese (2012) was lower than that reported in the this study.
There was no difference (p>0.05) between all the three breeds studied in egg shape index, the values of which were within the standard and ranged between 73 and 76%.
The egg shape index recorded in the this study was lower than that of
Kumar et al., (2014), who reported egg shape index of 77.28 and 78.43 for Rodes Island Red and Bovan White kept under intensive management in North Ethiopia, respectively which might be attributed to difference in genotypes.
The mean egg shell weight recorded for Dominant Red Barred (5.65 g) was lower (p<0.05) than the others while there was no difference (P>0.05) between Koekoek (6.17 g) and SasoT44 (5.85 g) in mean egg shell weight. These results were higher than that of
Kumar et al., (2014), who recorded 5.20 and 5.03 g for Rodes Island Red and Bovan White kept under intensive management in north Ethiopia which might be attributed to difference in management and genotypes. There was no difference (p>0.05) among all the three breeds in shell thickness.
The mean albumen weight of Dominant Red Barred (26.40 g) was lower than that of SasooT44 (29.27 g) and Koekoek (29.72 g). There was no significant difference (P>0.05) between SasooT44 and Koekoek eggs in mean albumen weight. The results of the this study was lower than that of Tadesse (2012), who reported mean albumen weight of 33.37 and 34.54 g for Isa Brown and Bovan Brown from the study conducted in East Showa of the Oromia Reginal State. There was no difference (p>0.05) between SasooT44 (16.8 mm) and Koekoek (16.47 mm) in mean yolk height, while Dominant Red Barred (15.9 mm) had lower (p<0.05) mean yolk height than that of the other two breeds. The results of this study was lower than reported figure 17.4, 17.8 and 17.8 mm of mean yolk height for Isa Brown, Bovan Brown and Koekoek from the research conducted in East Showa of the Oromia Regional State (
Tadese, 2012).
The yolk colors of eggs collected Koekoek (7.20) was higher (p<0.05) than that of SasooT44 (6.25) and Dominant Red Barred (5.54). There was no difference(p>0.05) between SasooT44 and Dominant Red Barred in yolk color which could be attributed to the availability of green plant material in the study area. Diffirent results was reported for yolk color 9.94, 7.77 and 10.8 for Isa Brown, Bovan Brown and Koekoek exotic breeds respectively in East Showa Zone (
Tadesse, 2012).
There was significant difference (p>0.05) between all the three breeds in mean HU scores. The results of HU scores obtained from the current study was in agreement with HU score of 77.7 and 76.6 for Isa Brown and Koekoek kept under village production system in East Showa Zone (
Tadesse, 2012). Age of the hen and season of the year affects HU. According to the United States Department of Agriculture, eggs with Haugh Unit score of above 72.00 is classified as grade AA, while there is consumer resistant to purchase eggs which have HU below 60. The height of the thick albumen surrounding the yolk, combined with the egg weight, determines the Haugh Unit score. Eggs with higher HU, has better egg quality (
Haugh, 1937). Thus, the qualities of all the eggs produced by all the three breeds studied were within acceptable range as measured by HU-score.
Based on the overall internal and external egg quality parameters, all the three breeds were found to be equally productive under the local farmer’s management conditions.