Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Asian Journal of
Dairy and Food Research
Print ISSN: 0971-4456
Online ISSN: 0976-0563
NASS Rating
5.44
SJR
0.176
CiteScore
0.357

Chief Editor:
Harjinder Singh
Massey Institute of Food Science and Technology, NEW ZEALAND
Frequency:Bi-Monthly
Indexing:
Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical...

Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research, volume 33 issue 2 (june 2014) : 131-135

IN-VITRO DIGESTIBILITY AND ANTINUTRIENTS AS AFFECTED BY SOAKING, DEHULLING AND PRESSURE COOKING OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM) VARIETIES

Priyanka Thapliyal*, Salil Sehgal, Asha Kawatra
1Department of Foods and Nutrition, C.C.S Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004, India
Cite article:- Thapliyal* Priyanka, Sehgal Salil, Kawatra Asha (2025). IN-VITRO DIGESTIBILITY AND ANTINUTRIENTS AS AFFECTED BY SOAKING, DEHULLING AND PRESSURE COOKING OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM) VARIETIES. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 33(2): 131-135. doi: 10.5958/0976-0563.2014.00589.2.

ABSTRACT

Effect of soaking, dehulling and pressure cooking on in-vitro digestibility and antinutritional factors of chickpea was studied. In-vitro starch and in-vitro protein digestibility ranged from 29.72 to 35.24 mg maltose released/100g and 63.14 to 77.09 per cent, respectively. Soaked, dehulled and pressure cooked chickpea varieties showed significant increment in in-vitro digestibility. Phytic acid ranged from 705.03 to 802.16 mg/100g and decreased from 11.52 to 20.87 per cent in processed chickpea seeds. Trypsin inhibitor activity ranged from 533.33 to 587.92 per cent. Processing decreased trypsin inhibitor activity from 7.72 to 22.87 per cent. Maximum increase in  in-vitro digestibility and reduction in antinutritional factors was recorded during pressure cooking followed by dehulling and soaking.

REFERENCES

  1. Bishnoi, S. and Khetarpaul, N. (1993). Effect of domestic processing and cooking methods on in vitro starch digestibility of different pea cultivars (Pisum sativum). Plant Foods Human Nutr. 45: 381-388.
  2. Chaturvedi, A. and Sarojini, G. (1996). Malting of pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoideum). Its effect on starch and protein digestibility. J. Food Sci. Technol. 33(4): 342-344.
  3. Chimmad, B.V., Naik, R.K. and Rao, M. (2005). Nutritional quality of black bean (Phaseolus) seeds. J. Food Sci. Technol. 42(1): 53-55.
  4. Davies, N.T. and Reid, H. (1979). An evaluation of phytate, zinc, copper, iron and manganese content and availability of soya based textured vegetable protein meat substitute or meat extrudes. Br. J. Nutr. 41: 579-589.
  5. Duhan, A., Khetarpaul, N. and Bishnoi, S. (2001). Effect of soaking, germination and cooking on phytic acid and hydrochloric acid extractability of a pigeon pea cultivar. J. Food Sci. Technol. 38(4): 374-378.
  6. El-Faki, H.A. Venkatraman, L.V.and Desikachar, H.S.R. (1984). Effect of processing on the in vitro digestibility of proteins and carbohydrates in some Indian legumes. Qual. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 34: 127-133.
  7. Frias, J., Vidal-Valverdr, C., Sotomayor, C., Diaz-Pollan, C and Urbano, G. (2000). Influence of processing on available carbohydrate content and antinutritional factors of chickpea. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 210(5): 340-345.
  8. Jood, S., Bishnoi, S. and Sharma, S. (1998). Nutritional and phsyio-chemical properties of chickpea and lentil cultivars. Die Nahrung Food 42: 70-73.
  9. Kakati, P., Deka, S.C., Kotoki, D. and Saikia, S. (2010). Effect of traditional methods of processing on the nutrient contents and some antinutritional factors in newly developed cultivars of green gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek] and black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] of Assam, India. Int. Food Res. J. 17: 377-384.
  10. Kataria, A., Chuhan, B.M. and Punia, D. (1990). Effect of domestic processing and cooking methods on the contents of carbohydrates of amphidiploids (black gram X mungbean). Food Chem. 36: 63-67.
  11. Khattab, R.Y. and Arntfield, S.D., (2009). 1. Nutritional quality of legume seeds as affected by some physical treatments. 2. Antinutritional factors . LWT Food Sci. and Tech., 42(6): 1113-1118.
  12. Mertz, E.T., Kirleis, A.W. and Axtell, J.D. (1983). In vitro digestibility of proteins in major food cereals. Food. Proc. 42(5): 6026-6028.
  13. Mulimani, V.H., Nanda, S.K. and Thippeswamy, S. (2003). Effect of procegging on phytic acid content in different red gram (Cajanus cajan L.) varieties. J.Food Sci. Technol. 40(4):371-373.
  14. Muzquiz, M., and Wood, J.A. (2007). Antinutritional factors. In: Chickpea Breeding and Management. Yadav, S.S., Redden, B.,Chen, W., Sharma, B. (Eds.), CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 143–166.
  15. Negi, A., Boora, P. and Gupta, P.P., (2001). Starch and Protein digestibility of newly released moth bean cultivars. Effect of soaking, dehulling, germination, pressure cooking. Nahrung. 45(4): 251-254.
  16. Nergiz, C. and Goggoz, E. (2007). Effect of traditional cooking methods on some antinutrients and in-vitro protein digestibility of dry bean varirties (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown in Turky. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 42: 868-873.
  17. Nti, C.A. and Plahar, W.A. (1996). Cowpea inhibition of human and bovine pretease activities and effect of processing. Food Control. 7: 129-133.
  18. Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.U., (1961). Statistical Methods of Agricultural Workers. 2nd Edn. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi. pp.12-87.
  19. Ramkrishna, V.P., Jhansirani and Ramakrishna R. (2006). Nutritional quality of storage proteins during germination of Indian bean (Dolichos lablab var. lignosus) seeds. Crop Sci. 40: 125-126.
  20. Roy, D.N. and Rao, P.S. (1971). Evidence, isolation purification and some properties of a trypsin inhibitor in lathyrus sativus. J. Agric. Food Chem. 19: 257-259.
  21. Saharan, K. (1994). Studies on the development of products from rice bean and faba bean:Their sensory and nutritional evaluation. Ph. D. Thesis. CCS Haryana Agricultural University.
  22. Saharan, K., Khetarpaul, N. and Bisnoi, S. (2002). Variability in physicochemical properties and nutrient composition of newly released rice bean and faba bean cultivars. J .Food. Compo. Analy. 15: 159-167.
  23. Sharma, A. and Sehgal, S. (1992). Effect of processing and cooking on the anti-nutritional factors of faba bean (Vicia faba). Food Chem. 43: 383-385.
  24. Shimelis, E.A. and Rakshit, S.K., (2007). Effect of processing on antinutrients and in vitro protein digestibility of kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties grown in East Africa. Food Chemistry, 103: 161-172.
  25. Shinde, G.B., Adsule, R.N. and Kale, A.A. (1991). Effect of dehulling and cooking treatment on phytate phosphorous, polyphenols and trypsin inhibitor activity of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. walp) seeds. Indian Food Packer. pp. 63-65.
  26. Singh, U., Khedekar, M.S. and Jambunathan, R. (1982). Studies on desi, kabuli chickpea cultivars. The levels of amylase inhibitors, levels of oligosaccharides and in vitro starch digestibility. J. Food Sci. 47: 510-512.
  27. Sinha, S., Kawatra, A. and Sehgal, S. (2007). Effect of processing on proximate composition of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). J. Dairying Foods and Home Sci. 26(1): 11-14.
  28. Uzogara, M., Mckieky, J.A. and Parlikar, G. S. (1990). Reducing the polyphenols and phytate and improving the protein quality of pearl millet by dehulling and soaking. J. Food. Sci. Technol. 27(3): 140-143.
  29. Vijayakumari, K., Pugalenthi, M. and Vadivel, V. (2007). Effect of soaking and hydrothermal processing methods on the level of antinutrients and in vitro protein digestibility of Bauhinia purpurea L. seeds. Food Chem. 103: 968-975.
  30. Wood, J.A., and Grusak, M.A. (2007). Nutritional Value of Chickpea. In: Chickpea Breeding and Management. Yadav, S.S. Redden, B., Chen, W., Sharma, B. (Eds.), CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 101–142.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)