Effect of cultivation practices on nutritional composition of vegetables

DOI: 10.5958/0976-0563.2015.00033.0    | Article Id: DR-670 | Page : 164-167
Citation :- Effect of cultivation practices on nutritional composition of vegetables .Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research.2015.(34):164-167
Preeti Bajpai, and Darshan Punia preeti.preetibajpai@gmail.com
Address : Department of Foods & Nutrition, CCS Haryana Agriculture University, Hisar-125 001, India.


The present investigation was carried out with the objectives to study the nutrient composition of vegetables grown under organic and inorganic conditions. The results of the present study revealed that inorganically grown vegetables had significantly higher moisture and crude protein per cent as compared to organically grown vegetables. Significant difference was observed in crude fiber content among all the organically grown and inorganically grown vegetables. All the vegetables grown organically had significantly higher ash content as compared to their inorganically grown and conventionally grown counterparts. Calcium, phosphorus, iron, zinc, magnesium, manganese and copper content of organically grown vegetables was significantly higher as compared to inorganically grown vegetables; a non significant difference was observed between mineral content of inorganically grown and conventionally grown vegetables in most of the cases.


Conventional Evaluation Inorganic Nutritional Organic Vegetables.


  1. Akuber, P. (2005). Functional properties of soyabean, corn, carrot flour blend for cookie production. J. Food Sci. Technolo., 42(4):303-307.
  2. AOAC, (2000). Official Method of Analysis of Association of Official Analytical Chemist. Washington, D.C.
  3. Bolan, N. S., Khan, M. A., Donaldson, J., Adriano, D. C. and Matthew, C. (2003). Distribution and bioavailability of copper in farm effluent. Science of the Total Environment, 309(1-3): 225–236.
  4. Chhonkar, P. K. (2003). Organic farming: Science and belief. Dr R. V. Tamhane Memorial lecture delivered at the 68th Annual Convention the Indian Society of Soil Science, CSAU and T, Kanpur.
  5. Reganold, J. P., Glover, J. D., Andrews, P. K. and Hinman, H. R. (2006). Sustainability of three apple production systems. Nature, 410-413.
  6. Rembialkowska, E. (2007). Quality of plant products from organic agriculture. J. Sci .Food Agri., 87: 2757-2762.
  7. Roitner-Schobesberger, B., Darnhofer, I., Somsook, S. and Vogl, C. (2008). Consumer perceptions of organic foods in Bangkok, Thailand. Food Policy, 33:112–121.
  8. Shankaro, K. and Sumathi, S. (2008). Effect of organic farming on nutritional profile of selected vegetable crops. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 20 (3):586-588.
  9. Weibel, F. P., Bickel, R., Leuthold, S. and Alföldi, T. (2000). Are organically grown apples tastier and healthier? A comparative field study using conventional and alternative methods to measure fruit quality, Acta Hort. 517: 417-427.
  10. Worthington, V. (2001). Nutritional quality of organic versus conventional fruits, vegetables and grains. J. Alt. Compl. Med., 7(2):161–173.
  11. Zhao, X., Matta, Z., Loughin, T. M. and Carey, E. E. (2005). Consumer sensory analysis of organically and conventionally grown vegetables. J. Food Sci., 72(2): 87-91.
  12. Zhu, Y., Chen, H., Fan, J., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Chen, J., Fan, J., Yang, S., Hu, L., Leung, H., Mew, T., Teng, P., Wang, Z. and Mundt, C. (2000). Genetic Diversity and Disease Control in Rice. Nature, 406:718–722.

Global Footprints