Weather conditions during the experimental period
The higher average air temperature was recorded in the dry season (from April to August) at 30.1°C, 29.9°C and 30.3°C in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. However, the lower relative humidity was found in the dry season in 2017, 2018 and 2019, which was 74.8%, 75.3% and 74.6% respectively (Table 1). The average highest temperature was found for June indicating higher heat stress on dairy cows between 2017 and 2019 followed by July, August, and the lowest in January (Fig 2). The average highest relative humidity was recorded in November followed by December, October and no significant variation was observed from January to May between 2017 and 2019. Furthermore, the highest relative humidity was found in November indicating higher heat stress on dairy cows during this month followed by July, August and the lowest in January between 2017 and 2019 (Fig 2).
Broucek et al., (2009) and St.
Pierre et al., (2003) stated that a higher temperature may reduce milk production and adversely affect the fertility of cows. Furthermore, high temperatures coupled with high relative humidity make this process difficult and the cow’s body temperature increased
(Allen et al., 2015). This may result in impaired thermoregulation and heat stress
(Rhoads et al., 1992). Therefore, temperature and relative humidity are the very critical factor which determines the milk production.
THI pattern in Batticaloa district in Sri Lanka
THI value for every month in 2017, 2018, and 2019 are presented in (Table 2) while Fig 3 shows the differences between THI in both seasons (Wet and Dry) between 2017 and 2019. THI values in all years were increased gradually from January to June and decreased from July to December between 2017 and 2019. No significant difference in mean THI was estimated (80.2, 80.0 and 80.7 in 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively) during the experimental period. The highest THI value (83.2) was recorded in June 2019 while the lowest (76.1) in January 2017 and 2018. Overall, the highest THI was recorded in May, June and July in all three years and higher THI was estimated in the dry season compared with the wet season in Batticaloa district.
Kadzere et al., (2002) concluded that THI <70 points to the lack of heat stress, THI values of 75-78 point to heat stress and THI >78 means a serious threat to cow welfare. Most commonly, it is assumed that heat stress occurs when THI values exceed 72 since milk production begins to decrease
(Akyuz et al., 2010). According to the findings of similar studies, the THI value was high from 2017 to 2019 in the study period. Therefore, it will lead to an increase in the heat stress of cows in the study area. Ultimately it affects the milk production in Batticaloa district. Hence, livestock farmers have to take mitigation techniques to overcome this issue, especially during the dry season.
Milk production (2017-2019) in Batticaloa district, Sri Lanka
The highest annual milk production was recorded in 2017 while the lowest was in 2019 in the study area (Fig 4). Milk production in all years decreased from January to July and increased gradually from August to December from 2017 to 2019. However, the results indicated that milk production decreased suddenly from April to June in 2017 and 2018 in Batticaloa district. The average highest milk yield (1.2 Million liters) was recorded in January 2017 and the lowest (0.1 million liters) was in July 2019. Even though, similar milk production trend was found in all three years.
Cattle farmers, all over the world are facing the problem of heat stress in dairy cattle. Air velocity and intensity of solar radiation, particularly in unshaded areas of a barn, coupled with the temperature and relative humidity, increase the effect of heat stress (
Angrecka and Herbut, 2016). Suitable temperature, humidity conditions, ventilation and ammonia concentration are particularly important as they affect the cows’ rest conditions, their behavior, hormonal and metabolic changes and milk production
(Herbut et al., 2015). The milk yield of cows may also be further improved by providing shade to the cows in the pre milking area of the milking facility
(Wildridge et al., 2017). Hot weather conditions are associated with reductions in dairy cows feed intake and milk yield
(Garner et al., 2017).
The trend of milk production suddenly declined in 2019 especially in the mid of the year due to climate change of trough compared with the rest of the years of the months in this area. Cattle affected by heat stress showed a reduction in feed intake and milk yield and shift metabolism, resulting in reduced their milk production efficiency
(Dahl et al., 2016). Moreover, another important reason for the lowest production might be the death of animals due to various factors such as climate changes, poor management practices, lack of pasture and fodders and so on. Most probably the temperate climates with milder seasons put less stress on cows than climates with more extreme weather. Geography is closely tied to weather climate and farmer management. For example, the large number of the cattle population is extensively raising with the ineffective environment such a parcel land, water, vaccine and other facilities during this period (
Santhirakumar and Narmilan, 2020). When cows do not have comfortable places to rest, space to graze, and farmers’ malpractices resulted in decreased quality and quantity of milk.
Interaction between THI and milk production
A significantly negative relationship (p<0.05) was observed between milk production and THI in 2017, 2018 and from 2017 to 2019 except 2019 due to the sudden death of cattle in Batticaloa district (Fig 5). The highest correlation (- 0.899**) was estimated between milk production and THI in 2018 (Table 3). No statistically significant relationship was found in 2019 due to several other reasons which are mentioned under milk production.
Also, a cow’s health has the biggest impact on the quality of the milk it produces. Just like humans, cows can catch illnesses such as a cold or flu. They’re also susceptible to irritation or inflammation of their udders if stall conditions are poor. Exposure to mud, manure and runoff can expose the herd to more pathogens, increasing incidents of infection in the Batticaloa district in 2019, therefore, increasing THI value decreased Milk production in the experimental area during this period.
Regression model between THI and milk production
The highest temperature was recorded for June indicating the highest heat stress on dairy cows and the highest relative humidity was recorded in November from 2017 to 2019. There was no significant difference in mean THI (80.2, 80.0, and 80.7 in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively) during the experimental period. Overall, the highest THI values were recorded in May, June and July in all three years (Fig 6 and Table 4). The highest milk yield (1.2 million liters) was recorded in January 2017 and the lowest (0.1 million liters) was in July 2019. Though, similar milk production trend was found throughout all three years. A negative significant relationship (p<0.05) was observed between milk production and THI in 2017, 2018 and from 2017 to 2019 except 2019 due to sudden death of cattle in Batticaloa district. Therefore, increased THI value decreased milk production in the experimental area during this period. The negative slope of the regression line in all three years indicated that milk production decreased as THI increased. The value of this relationship for predictive purposes is relatively high, as depicted by an R2 value of 0.808 in 2018 and the lowest (0.290) in 2019.
Tousova et al., (2017) mentioned that to cool their bodies, cows increased their respiration rates and consumed less feed during hot weather, which in turn caused a decline in milk production. During hot weather, cows were often less active
(West et al., 2003) as their body temperature increased in response to locomotion
(Schutz et al., 2011). Cows suffered from heat stress, if the mean daily THI exceeds 68 when the minimum daily THI is greater than 65 or both
(Carter et al., 2011).
Heat stress caused economic losses because it decreased milk yield and growth performance in both dairy and beef cattle (
St-Pierre, 2003). Therefore, farmers are advised to focus on the heat stressof cows to increase milkproduction in the study area.