The initial experiments for optimization of formulation on the basis of sensory evaluation indicted that 19.5% level of pearl millet as binder (T2) would result into better quality of the product with respect to appearance, flavour, juiciness, texture and overall palatability. The mean appearance, flavour, juiciness, texture, overall palatability scores of various treatments prepared by different level of pearl millet flour as depicted in Table 2. Inclusion of pearl millet has been successfully attempted in low fat chicken meat balls to enhance the fiber content and improve sensory attributes by
Shanthi and Kalaikannan (2015).
The mean appearance, flavour, juiciness, texture, overall palatability scores of various treatments prepared by different level of pearl millet flour as depicted in Table 2.
The appearance scores for T1, T2 and T3 were 6.33±0.33, 6.66±0.33 and 6.16±0.16 respectively which implies that the appearance scores of T2 was numerically higher than T1 and T2. The overall treatment mean for appearance was 6.38±0.16.
There was non-significant (p>0.05) difference in appearance scores in egg nuggets at all the levels of incorporation of pearl millet flour. This is in agreement with the findings of
Para and Ganguly (2015) who studied the effect of bajra flour (pearl millet) on chicken nuggets and
Nandhini et al., (2018) also reported that the appearance scores did not alter significantly in chicken cutlets. It may be attributed to the similarity of colour of pearl millet flour to the colour of the finished product.
The mean flavour scores for T1, T2 and T3 were 6.00±0.36, 6.83±0.16 and 5.50±0.22 respectively. The overall treatment mean for flavour was 6.11±0.19. The analysis of variance indicated significant (p<0.05) difference in mean flavour scores between treatments. T2 is found to have marked variation from T1 and T3. Similar trends were recorded in juiciness, texture and overall palatability scores of the products.
The juiciness scores for T1, T2 and T3 were 5.83±0.30, 6.66±0.21 and 5.50±0.22 respectively. The overall treatment mean for juiciness was 6.00±0.18.
Physico-chemical properties and proximate composition
The pH of egg nugget prepared with 19.5% levels of pearl millet flour incorporation was found significantly lower than that of control.
Gamit et al., (2020) and
Naveena et al., (2006) also reported significant decrease (p<0.05) in pH of chicken nuggets incorporated with finger millet flour, quality characteristics of chicken meat cutlets incorporated with finger millet (
Eleusine coracana) flour respectively, in contrary to this study.
The cooking yield per cent of egg nuggets recorded control and treatment (19.5% pearl millet added egg nuggets) 94.05±0.05 and 93.65±0.19 per cent (Table 3). The treatment recorded the highest yield while that of control recorded the lowest. This might be due to high fiber content in pearl millet flour 2.6-4.0%
(Abdalla et al., 1998). However, the per cent yield recorded in the study was somewhat higher than those reported by
Deepthi et al., (2011) who had prepared EAP by incorporating WF and rice flour (RF). The observations are in agreement with those of
Das et al., (2015) who reported significantly higher cooking yield in chicken patties formulated with finger millet flour. Increase in cooking yield in chicken nuggets and meat balls respectively. Pawar
et al., (2012) however reported 97% cooking yield after steam cooking in egg crunchy bites.
Moisture percentage of egg nuggets with 19.5% pearl millet flour was non-significantly lower than control. The decrease in moisture percentage may be attributed to less moisture content in finger millet flour as compared to that in chicken meat. The observations are in accordance with those of earlier workers, who prepared different types of meat products with addition of different flours
(Gupta et al., 2015, Gamit et al., 2020).
Protein and fat percentage at 19.5% levels of pearl millet flour incorporation was vary non-significant. The reduction in protein and fat percentage of egg nuggets may be attributed to lower protein and fat content of pearl millet flour as compared to control. The findings are in accordance with
Chatli et al., (2015) who also reported significant decrease (p<0.05) in the protein and fat content of emu meat nuggets formulated with finger millet flour incorporation.
Gamit et al., (2020) who also observed decrease in the protein and fat content in Quality Characteristics of chicken meat cutlets incorporated with finger millet (
Eleusine coracana) flour.
Ash and crude fiber of egg nuggets prepared with pearl millet flour was significantly (p<0.05) higher than control. It might be due to higher mineral and crude fiber content in pearl millet flour than chicken meat. This result is in accordance with those of
Das et al., (2013) who also reported significance difference in ash content of chicken patties.
Gamit et al., (2020) who also observed increase in the ash and crude fiber content in quality characteristics of chicken meat cutlets incorporated with finger millet (
Eleusine coracana) flour.