Among the 200 milk samples, CMT was found positive in 45% (n=90) samples. Our results were comparable with other workers
Busanello et al., (2017); Olivares-Perez et al., (2017); Ahmed et al., (2018); Algammal et al., (2020); Abed et al., (2021). A similar, result was also obtained by
Birhanu et al., (2017).
Further, the collected milk samples were subjected to measurement of SCC. The result of the SCC of 200 milk samples indicated the prevalence of SCM as 37% (n=74). These findings are in complete agreement with
Hegde et al., (2013), Nithinprabhu, (2010) and Javia et al., (2018).
These 74 milk samples were cultured for primary isolation of predominant pathogens like
S.
aureus,
Streptococci and
E.
coli found positive for the presence of these bacteria. Out of these 74 positive samples for SCC, 72 samples had bacterial growth and while in the 02 samples bacterial growth was absent. A total of 97 isolates were recovered from these milk samples either as single or mixed infections. The etiological prevalence of SCM caused by
S.
aureus, (54/200, 27%),
Streptococcus spp. (30/200, 15%) and
E.
coli (13/200, 6.5%) respectively either as single and or as mixed infections. Similar findings were also reported by
Lakshmi and Jayavardhanan (2016) and Sztachanska et al., (2016).
Antibiogram study of individual isolates of S. aureus, Streptococcus and E. coli
All the 54 isolates of
S.
aureus showed varying degrees of resistance to different antibiotics. The highest resistance was observed for Penicillin-G (88.9%), Tetracycline (83.3%), Erythromycin (81.5%) and Ampicillin (75.9%) respectively. Total (51.9%) isolates of Staphylococci were resistant to Methicillin. The lowest levels of resistance were observed in Ceftriaxone and Co-trimoxazole (20.4%) and (25.9%) respectively. The least resistance (16.7%) was observed against Gentamicin. The antimicrobial resistance of
S.
aureus isolates in our current study are comparable with the finding’s other researchers
Hoque et al., (2018), Pal et al., (2017), Preethirani et al., (2015).
For the Streptococci isolate, a high level of antibiotic resistance was observed for Methicillin (93.3%) and Tetracycline (53.3%). These isolates were less resistant to Erythromycin (30%), Penicillin-G (16.7%), Ampicillin (16.7%), Gentamicin (13.3%) and Ceftriaxone (10%). Co-trimoxazole is the most sensitive antibiotic. Similar results were also observed by
Javia et al., (2018) and
Preethirani et al., (2015).
All the 13
E.
coli. isolate, showing a high resistance towards the Penicillin-G (100%) Methicillin (92.3%), Tetracycline (92.3%), Erythromycin (76.9%) and Ampicillin (76.9%) while Ceftriaxone (38.5%) was the least resistant. Similar higher resistance to oxytetracycline was reported by
Alekish et al., (2013) and
Das et al., (2017). The percentage sensitivity and resistance of three isolates-
S.
aureus,
Streptococcus and
E.
coli. to the individual antibiotics is given in Table 2.
Genotypic detection of antibiotic resistance gene
Antimicrobial resistance is conferred by the presence of resistance genes that can be linked to genetic elements. Table 3 signifies the genotypic pattern of antibiotic resistance in three isolates-
S.
aureus,
Streptococcus and
E.
coli. Among all the
S.
aureus isolates examined in this study, the overall detection rate of the
mecA gene was (51.9%), 28 out of 54 indicating the high prevalence of methicillin-resistant (MRSA) strains as they yielded an amplification product of 583 bp and
blaZ gene (81.4%) 44 isolates could be identified as methicillin-resistant as they yielded an amplification product of 816 bp. Of all the 30 isolates of Streptococci, none of the isolates were found to be positive for the
erm gene as they did not yield the amplified product of 639 bp and hence were recorded as
ermB negative. Among 30 isolates 17 (56.6%) isolates were found to carry
tetM genes as they showed an amplification product of 397 bp size. Out of 13 isolates of
E.
coli. 12 isolates were found to carry the
tetA gene and
tetB gene, as they showed amplification products of 887 bp size and 773 bp size, respectively. Fig 1 to 5 showed amplification products of the respective gene and the size of the antibiotic resistance gene.
These findings were supported by the results of previous studies describing the associations between resistance phenotypes and resistance genes of different bacteria.
Haran et al., (2012), Awad et al., (2017), Shrivastava et al., (2018) and
Abed et al., (2021). The inconsistency of the genotype-phenotype association of AMR could be explained by resistance phenotypes that can be expressed upon the stimulation of many different genetic factors that have not been investigated in this study and each factor may present a unique epidemiological character as studied by
Boerlin et al., (2005) and
Van et al., (2020).