Microbial analysis of prepared paneer spread
Most of the physico-chemical changes like acidity development, change in pH
etc. are affected by the presence and growth of various microorganisms. Therefore the stored samples of paneer spread were subjected to microbiological analysis for standard plate count (SPC), yeast and mould count (YMC) and coliform count. The changes observed in microbial quality of the paneer spread, prepared with or without incorporation of spices during assessment at a regular interval of 3 days under refrigerated storage condition for 0, 3
rd, 6
th, 9
th and 12
th days. No coliform counts were observed during this storage duration.
Standard plate count (SPC) of paneer spread
Moisture content in paneer spread favours the growth of micro-organism. The major spoilage of paneer spread is due to the growth of microbes. Hence, the SPC of paneer spread samples were studied. The graphical representation of standard plate count (SPC) of spices incorporated paneer spread depicted in Fig 1.
The minimum SPC was observed at day 0 for sample T
0, T
1, T
2 and T
3 i.e. 5.98±0.026 log (cfu/ml), 5.78±0.025 log (cfu/ml), 5.71±0.024 log (cfu/ml) and 5.73±0.015 log (cfu/ml), respectively but it was found maximum at day 12
i.e. 6.42±0.027 log (cfu/ml), 6.39±0.017 log (cfu/ml), 6.31±0.042 log (cfu/ml) and 6.39±0.025 log (cfu/ml), respectively for sample T
0, T
1, T
2 and T
3. During storage of paneer spread at refrigerated temperature, a highly significant (
<0.01) increase in SPC up to 12
th day was observed and there after the product was found unacceptable due to visible mould growth.
The recorded results are in concord with the findings of
Dwivedi et al. (2010) in paneer spread,
Raj (2013) in chhana spread,
Sharma and Jaseja (2016) in paneer spread,
Yadav and Wadehra (2016) in paneer,
Kumar (2017) in cow milk paneer,
Kaur (2019) for paneer spread,
Prajapat (2019) in paneer,
Wanjari et al. (2019) in garlic treated paneer,
Singh et al. (2020) in khoa burfi and
Devi et al., (2021) in milk nuggets who reported that the similar trend of significant increase (P
<0.01) in the standard plate count with increase of storage period. The findings of study are in contradiction with
Tak et al. (2018) in yoghurt who observed the significant decrease (P
<0.01) in the standard plate count with increase of storage period.
The data related to analysis of variance revealed that a highly significant (P
<0.01) increase was observed between period, between treatment and interaction between treatment and period in the standard plate count of paneer spread of the all four sample on the 3
rd, 6
th, 9
th and 12
th day of refrigerated storage.
Coliform count of paneer spread
The growth of coliform count shows unhygienic production of the paneer spread. Hence, the coliform counts of paneer spread samples were studied. The product was found to be free from coliform count and during storage period 0
th, 3
rd, 6
th, 9
th and 12
th day of refrigerated storage there was no coliform count observed. Similar studies were conducted to evaluate the coliform count and no coliform was reported by other workers
viz.
Sharma (2004) in low fat paneer spread,
Dwivedi et al. (2010) in paneer spread,
Mishra (2013) in paneer,
Raj (2013) in chhana spread,
Kaur (2019) in paneer spread,
Singh et al. (2020) in khoa burfi.
Yeast and mould count of paneer spread
The paneer spread possessing high moisture content and having acidic in nature, which favours condition for the growth of yeast and mould on the surface of paneer spread. It is the main cause of spoilage of paneer spread and limiting shelf life of paneer spread. Hence, yeast and mould counts were studied.
The graphical representation of yeast and mould count of all the paneer spread samples depicted in Fig 2. The yeast and mould count of paneer spread samples were found nil up to 6
th day of storage. Thereafter, very few colonies were observed on 9
th day. The prescribed limit for yeast and mould count is 250 cfu/g (IS:5403-1969). The results showed that samples contained much lower counts than the prescribed standard up to 9
th day. So, it can be concluded that the samples were microbiologically safe up to 9
th day during storage, after that it was microbiologically unsafe. During further storage of paneer spread an increase in yeast and mould count was observed up to 12
th day and thereafter the product was found unacceptable due to visible mould growth. The mean yeast and mould count at day 9 of T
0 was 5.35 ± 0.027 log (cfu/ml) whereas in sample T
1 it was 5.33± 0.017 log (cfu/ml), in sample T
2 it was 5.28±0.035 log (cfu/g) and in sample T
3 it was 5.29±0.016 log (cfu/ml). The mean yeast and mould count of paneer spread of T
0 (control), T
1, T
2 and T
3 for day 12 were 5.48±0.015 log (cfu/g), 5.46±0.024 log (cfu/g), 5.41±0.014 log (cfu/g) and 5.44±0.012 log (cfu/g), respectively.
The statistical analysis revealed that a highly significant difference (P<0.01) between treatment, between period and interaction between treatment and period. The results are in agreement with
Raj (2013) in chhana spread,
Yadav and Wadehra (2016) in paneer,
Kumar (2017) in cow milk paneer,
Kaur (2019) in paneer spread,
Wanjari et al. (2019) in garlic treated paneer,
Prajapat (2019) in paneer,
Singh et al. (2020) in khoa burfi and
Devi et al., (2021) in milk nuggets who reported increase in yeast and mould count during storage.