Submitted13-07-2020|
Accepted11-08-2020|
First Online 28-09-2020|
ABSTRACT
Method: The prevalence of three groups of antibiotics; namely Gentamycin, Streptomycin and sulfonamides was studied in fresh milk available in five different study areas; namely Budhanilkantha, Dharmasthali, Tokha, Nepaltar and Gaushala from Kathmandu Valley of Nepal. The milk samples (n=100) were collected from local dairy collection centers of Kathmandu valley. Qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis with rapid screening kits revealed that 6% (n=6) samples were positive for antibiotic residues in the fresh milk for gentamycin, streptomycin and sulfonamide groups. Total 5% milk samples contained unidentified antibiotics residues. Sulfonamides residues were found to be highest 3% (n=3) followed by gentamycin 2% (n=2) and streptomycin 1% (n=1) with no any milk sample with multiple residues. Total 2 samples were positive in Dharmasthali, 2 in Gaushala, 1 in Nepaltar, 1 in Tokha and no positive samples from Budhanilkantha area. There was no statistical significant difference between study areas and commonly used antibiotics residues in milk samples (P>0.05).
Conclusion: The antibiotic residues were found above the maximum residue limits that presented serious threat to consumer health and raised a serious concern regarding the implementation and monitoring of international regulations.
REFERENCES
- Aning, K.G., Donkor, E.S., Omore, A., Nurah, G.K., Osafo, E.L.K. and Staal, S. (2007). Risk of exposure to marketed milk with antimicrobial drug residues in Ghana. Open Food Science Journal. 1: 1-5.
- Baynes, R.E., Lyman, R. anderson, K.L. and Browne, C.F. (1999). A preliminary survey of antibiotic residues and viable bacteria in milk from three Carribean basin countries. Journal of Food Protection. 62(2): 177-180.
- CDC. (2011). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimates of foodborne illness in the United States. https://www.cdc.gov/foodborneburden/2011-foodborne-estimates.html.
- Ceyhan, I. and Bozkurt, M. (2009). Ankara piyasasinda satilan sütlerde, penisilin arastirmasi. Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi. 44: 1-5.
- De Vries, A. and Kaylegian, K. (2018). Rapid assessment of the gaps in dairy cattle feeding, management and milk processing that constrain milk quality and quantity in Nepal. Gainesville, FL, USA: Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Livestock Systems.
- Droumev, D.R. (1983). Review of antimicrobial growth promoting agents available. Veterinary Research Communications. 7: 85-99.
- Haapapuro, E.R., Barnard, N.D. and Simon, M. (1997). Review- animal waste used as livestock feed: dangers to human health. Preventive Medicine. 26: 599-602.
- Jackson, B.A. (1980). Toxicology of drug and chemical residues. Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 6th Ed. Iowa State University Press. Ames. pp 1149-1151.
- Kaya, S.E., Filazi, A. (2010). Determination of Antibiotic Residues in Milk Samples. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi. 16: 31-35.
- Koyu, M.Y. (2010). Determination of Antibiotic Residues in Milk Samples: thesis report, Makale Kodu (Article Code): KVFD-2009-1174.
- Mitchell, J.M, Griffiths, M.W., McEwen, S.A., McNab, W.B. and Yee, A.E. (1998). Antimicrobial residues in milk and meat: Causes, concerns, prevalence, regulations, tests and test performance. Journal of Food Protection. 61: 742-756.
- Mosalagae, D., Pfukenyi, D.M. and Matope, G. (2011). Milk producer’s awareness of milk-borne zoonoses in selected smallholder and commercial dairy farms of Zimbabwe. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 43: 733-739.
- Nguz, K. (2007). Assessing food safety system in sub-Saharan countries: An overview of key issues. Food Control. 18: 131-134.
- Pashu-Panshi Diary 2073. (2017). Ministry of Livestock Development, Department of Livestock Services, HIMALI Project, Hariharbhawan, Lalitpur.
- Pehrsson, P.R., Haytowitz, D.B., Holden, J.M., Perry, C.R. and Beckler, D.G. (2003). “USDA’s National Food and Nutrient Analysis Program: Food Sampling” (PDF). Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 13(4): 379-389.
- R Core Team. R. (2020). A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org.
- Raymond M.J., Wohrle, R.D. and Call, D.R. (2006). Assessment and promotion of judicious antibiotic use on dairy farms in Washington State. Journal of Dairy Science. 89: 3228-3240.
- Romano, A., Viola, M., Gueant-Rodriguez, R.M., Gaeta, F., Valluzzi, R. and Gueant, J.L. (2007). Brief Communication: tolerability of meropenem in patients with IgEmediated hypersensitivity to penicillins. Annals of Internal Medicine. 146: 266-269.
- Sedhain, P. (2008). Screening of Sulfonamides and Tetracycline antibiotics residue in market milk at Kathmandu valley. An internship report submitted to IAAS, Rampur, Chitwan.
- Sharma B, Bhandari R., Prasai T. and Anal, A. (2008). A study on the prevalence of antibiotics residue in milk sample collected from Kathmandu: Research article. Nepalese Veterinary Journal. 30: 137-142.
- Snavely, S.R. and Hodges, G.R. (1984). The neurotoxicity of antibacterial agents. Archives of Internal Medicine. 101: 92-104.
- Unnikrishnan, V., Bhavadasan, M.K., Surendra Nath, B. and Ram, C. (2005). Chemical residues and contaminants in milk: A review. Indian Journal of Animal Science. 75: 592-598.
- VSDAO. (2013). Standards Approved by Department of Livestock Services, Veterinary Drugs Standards and Drugs Administration (VSDAO), Budhanilkantha, Kathmandu.
- Xie, M. and Yongda, Y. (2002). An analysis of China food safety problems. Shanghai Economic Research. 1: 39-45.
- Yamaki, M., Berruga, M.I., Althus, R.L., Molina M.P. and Molina, A. (2004). Occurrence of antibiotic residue in milk from Manchega ewe dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science. 87: 3132-3137.
- Zahid Hosen, S.M., Mostafa Kamal, A.T.M., Barua, S., MdAnwar, S., Mazumder, K. and Md Hassan, K. (2010). Detection of residual antibiotics in fresh cow milk. Bangladesh Pharmaceutical Journal. 13: 64-66.
The Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research (AJDFR) follows a disclaimer policy that outlines the responsibilities of the journal, authors, reviewers, and readers. The policy is designed to ensure that all published content is accurate and meets ethical standards, and to protect the journal from any legal liability.
The AJDFR does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the content published in the journal. The opinions expressed in published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal or its editorial board. The journal does not accept any responsibility for any errors or omissions in the content published in the journal.
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their work is original, accurate, and meets ethical standards. They are also responsible for obtaining permission to use copyrighted material and for providing appropriate attribution.
Reviewers are responsible for ensuring that the content of articles is accurate, original, and meets ethical standards. They are also responsible for maintaining confidentiality and disclosing any conflicts of interest.
Readers are responsible for evaluating the content of articles and for making their own judgments about the accuracy and reliability of the information presented. They are also responsible for complying with copyright laws and ethical standards when using the content of articles.
AJDFR is committed to ensuring that all published content meets ethical standards and that all parties involved in the publishing process understand their responsibilities. The disclaimer policy is designed to protect the journal from any legal liability and to ensure that readers can rely on the accuracy and reliability of the content published in the journal.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.