Sensory evaluation of pearl millet cultivars grown in I-C Zone of Rajasthan
 

DOI: 10.18805/ajdfr.v36i03.8974    | Article Id: DR-1123 | Page : 256-259
Citation :- Sensory evaluation of pearl millet cultivars grown in I-C Zone of Rajasthan.Asian Journal Of Dairy and Food Research.2017.(36):256-259
Dashrath Bhati and Madhu Goyal bhati.dashrath.1@gmail.com
Address : Department of Foods and Nutrition, College of Home Science, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Beechwal, Bikaner-334 006, Rajasthan, India.
Submitted Date : 6-05-2016
Accepted Date : 27-06-2017

Abstract

Sensory parameters are the basic and main attribute in acceptability of any food. Keeping this thing in view nine cultivars of pearl millet, grown in Rajasthan were evaluated for organoleptic quality. Organoleptic evaluation was done by preparing basic recipes (chappati and khichada). The result showed significant variation (P³0.05) in terms of mean scours for colour, appearance, flavour, taste and overall acceptability. All the cultivars were found to be acceptable in the form of chappati and khichada.  However hybrid cultivars had better preference followed by land races and composite cultivars. Among hybrids, RHB 121 was found to be more acceptable. 

Keywords

Millets Organoleptic evaluation Sensory attributes Varieties.

References

  1. Abbott, J. A. (1999). Quality measurement of fruits and vegetables. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 15: 207-225.
  2. Aguyoh, J.N., Audi, W., Saidi, M. and Gao, K. (2004). Growth, yield and quality response of water melon subjected to different levels of manure, Int.J.Agric.Res 9(2): 12-15
  3. Anna, W., El¿bieta, K., Justyna, S.G. and Katarzyna, W. (2013). Sensory quality of carrots from organic and conventional cultivation. Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin 77: 75-87.
  4. Anonymous (2000), Agronomy Terminology, Oxford Publication. 
  5. Bourn, D. and Prescott, J. (2002). A comparison of the nutritional value, sensory qualities and food safety of organically and conventionally produced foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 42:1–34. 
  6. Heaton, S. (2001). Organic farming, food quality and human health: a review of the evidence. Bristol: U.K.: Soil Assn.
  7. Khairwal, I.S. Rai, K.N. Yadav, O.P., and Bhtnagar, S.K. (2004), Pearl Millet Cultivars, All India Coordinated Pearl Millet Improvement Project (ICAR), Mandor, Jodhpur.
  8. Khairwal, I.S. Sehgal, S. Rai, K.N. and Kawatra, A. (2004) Diversified uses of Pearl millet, All India Coordinated Pearl Millet Improvement Project (ICAR), Mandor, Jodhpur
  9. Sams, E. (1999). Preharvest factors affecting post harvest texture. Post Harvest Soil.Technol.15: 249-254.
  10. Sharma, S. (1995). Nutrient composition and cooking quality of pearl millet strain grown in Rajasthan. M.Sc. Thesis, Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner Rajasthan.
  11. Sreedevi, L. and Divakar, Suma. (2015). A Comparative Quality analysis of Banana (var palayamkodan). Research Journal of Biological Sciences. 4(4), 6-11.
  12. Swaminathan, M. (1987). Food Science Chemistry and Experimental Foods. The Bangalore Printing and Publishing Co. Ltd. Mysore road, Banglore. Winter, C.K. (2006). Organic foods. J. Food Sci. 10:44–8. 
  13. Woese, K., Lange, D., Boess, C. and Bogel, K.W. (1997). A comparison of organically and conventionally grown foods—results of a review of the relevant literature. J Sci Food Agric. 74: 281–93. 
  14. Worthington, V. (1998). Effect of agricultural methods on nutritional quality: a comparison of organic with conventional crops. Altern Ther HealthMed. 4(1):58–69.

Global Footprints