Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research

  • Chief EditorHarjinder Singh

  • Print ISSN 0971-4456

  • Online ISSN 0976-0563

  • NAAS Rating 5.44

  • SJR 0.151

Frequency :
Bi-Monthly (February, April, June, August, October & December)
Indexing Services :
Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research, volume 22 issue 2 (june 2003) :

EFFECT OF POTATO STARCH AND BARLEY FLOUR ON THE COMPOSITION, PROCESSING AND SENSORY PROPERTIES OF LOW-FAT GROUND PORK PATIIES

Kumar Manish*, Sharma B.D.
1Division of Livestock Products Technology, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar -BareilIy (243122), India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Manish* Kumar, B.D. Sharma (2025). EFFECT OF POTATO STARCH AND BARLEY FLOUR ON THE COMPOSITION, PROCESSING AND SENSORY PROPERTIES OF LOW-FAT GROUND PORK PATIIES. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 22(2): . doi: .
Low-fat ground pork patties (4% added fat) were prepared with three combination of potato starch and barley flour viz., Group I-2.5% potato starch + 10% barley flour, Group II-5% potato starch +7% barley flour and Group III-7.5% potato starch + 4% barley flour. These treated groups were compared with high-fat control (15% added fat) for compositional, physico-chemi,cal and sensory attributes. The moisture content of raw and cooked low-fat patties was Significantly (P0.05) higher whereas protein content was significantly (P0.05} lower than high-fat control patties. Cooking yieki fat and moisture retention improved significantly (P0.01) in low-fat patties and maximum in group I. The dimensions of low-fat patties were maintained, better tan high-fat patties. The shear force value decreased significantly (P0.05) in all treated groups. The flavour and texture scores followed a declining trend with increase in barley flour in th formulation i.e. recorded minimum for Group I and maxmum for Group III. The overall acceptability was highest for Group III and rated almost highly acceptable by the sensory panelists.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)