ABSTRACT
Rasogollas were prepared from different proportion of cow milk and safflower milk 100:0 (T0),
70:30 (T1), 60:40 (T2 and 50:50 (T3). The hedonic sensory score for rasogolla samples obtained
from treatment T0, T1, T2 and T3 were 8.84, 8.55, 8.16 and 7.46, respectively. It was observed
that rasogolla prepared from 50 parts of cow milk and 50 parts of safflower milk was acceptable
and economical. On an average the rasogolla of treatment T3 contained 6.92 per cent fat, 6.70
per cent protein, 39.89 per cent sucrose, 0.96 per cent ash and 54.22 per cent total solid. Cost
of production of T0 treatment was Rs.65.33/kg which got reduced to Rs.59.91 (T1), 58.85 (T2)
and 56.86 (T3). The advantage of safflower milk is that it is cheaper and rich in polyunsaturated
fatty acid.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
- A.O.A.C. (1965). Official Methods of Analysis, 11th Ed.. Association of Official Analytical Chemist. Wasshington D.C.
- Bhattacharya, D.C. and Des Raj (1980). Indian J. Dairy Sci., 33 (2) : 237-243.
- Gadhave, D.K. (2001). M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Marathwada Agriculture University, Parbhani, India
- Gupta, S.K. (1976). Indian Dairyman, 28 : 293.
- I.S.I. (1981). Hand Book of Food Analysis Part-XI, Dairy products. Indian Standards Institution, Manak Bhavan, New Delhi.
- Katara, R.V. and Bhargava, V.N. (1990). Asain J. Dairy Res., 9(A) : 175-180.
- Maske, R.D. (1997). M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis Marathwada Agriculture University, Parbhani.
- Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1967). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. 2nd ed. Indian Council of Agril. Research, New Delhi.
- Wankhede, D.B. and Tharanathan, R.N. (1976). Agrilc. Food Chem., 24 (6) : 45.
The Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research (AJDFR) follows a disclaimer policy that outlines the responsibilities of the journal, authors, reviewers, and readers. The policy is designed to ensure that all published content is accurate and meets ethical standards, and to protect the journal from any legal liability.
The AJDFR does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the content published in the journal. The opinions expressed in published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal or its editorial board. The journal does not accept any responsibility for any errors or omissions in the content published in the journal.
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their work is original, accurate, and meets ethical standards. They are also responsible for obtaining permission to use copyrighted material and for providing appropriate attribution.
Reviewers are responsible for ensuring that the content of articles is accurate, original, and meets ethical standards. They are also responsible for maintaining confidentiality and disclosing any conflicts of interest.
Readers are responsible for evaluating the content of articles and for making their own judgments about the accuracy and reliability of the information presented. They are also responsible for complying with copyright laws and ethical standards when using the content of articles.
AJDFR is committed to ensuring that all published content meets ethical standards and that all parties involved in the publishing process understand their responsibilities. The disclaimer policy is designed to protect the journal from any legal liability and to ensure that readers can rely on the accuracy and reliability of the content published in the journal.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.