Where,
Y- Whitefly population.
X
1- Maximum temperature.
X
2- Minimum temperature.
X
3- Rainfall.
X
4- Relative humidity.
The results of the study showed that the higher temperatures facilitate the expansion of whitefly numbers, resulting in a greater transmission rate of YMD. On the other hand, a reduction in the whitefly population was noted during rainy period, indicating that such weather conditions may function as a natural control mechanism by dislodging and removing whiteflies, thereby decreasing the numbers. Under the prevailing agro-climatic conditions, relative humidity and minimum temperature may have remained within ranges that neither restricted nor enhanced whitefly survival and virus transmission. Consequently, their effects were likely overshadowed by more influential variables such as maximum temperature, sunshine hours and sowing time, which more directly govern vector population build-up and crop susceptibility. These findings are in agreement with previous reported results wherein maximum temperature and minimum temperature showed positive correlations with whitefly population (r = 0.505 and r = 0.150)
(Patil et al., 2021). According to the earlier findings
(Meti et al., 2018), the populations of whiteflies fluctuated in response to environmental conditions, reaching a maximum of 1456/trap in the 50
th SMW under 29.7°C max temperature, 16.7°C min temperature and 8.2 mm rainfall, while the lowest number (16-20/trap) occurred in the 39-40
th SMWs with cooler temperatures and higher rainfall. Similarly, a significant positive relationship was observed between the whitefly population and higher temperature coupled with bright sunshine hours, whereas evening relative humidity and rainfall were found to have a significant negative correlation
(Verma et al., 2023). Thus, it could be concluded that the incidence of MYMV disease and the associated vector population escalated with higher temperatures and increased relative humidity
(Khan et al., 2018).
Among the various sowing dates assessed, T1 (6
th SMW) exhibited the lowest YMD incidence of 13.85 per cent, followed by T2 (7
th SMW) with an incidence of 20.07 per cent. The data indicated a progressive increase in disease incidence with delayed sowing dates, resulting in high YMD incidence of 78.15 per cent and 60.58 per cent in T4 (9
th SMW) and T3 (8
th SMW) respectively (Table 3).
The distribution and variability of Yellow Mosaic Disease (YMD) incidence across different sowing windows was illustrated by using violin plot. Early sowing treatments (T1 and T2) exhibited narrow, symmetrical violin shapes signifying a concentrated distribution of low disease incidence with limited variability, indicative of stable and favourable conditions for disease escape or suppression. Conversely, later sowing dates (T3 and T4) revealed broader and more irregular violins, reflecting not only elevated YMD incidence but also substantial variability among successive disease assessment intervals. This pattern underscored a strong temporal influence on disease dynamics, where delayed sowing created conditions more conducive for disease development and spread (Fig 2).
Sowing date had a significant impact on seed yield too. There was a reduction in yield with delayed sowings. The optimal yield was recorded at earliest sowing time
i.
e. during 6
th SMW, while delayed sowings showed decline in yield with higher incidence of yellow mosaic disease (YMD). Specifically, the first sowing on January 30
th had lowest YMD incidence and highest yield of 5.75 quintals per ha, while February 23
rd sowing recorded highest YMD incidence and reduced yield of 2.50 quintals per ha.
A strong negative correlation (r = -0.86) between Yellow Mosaic Disease (YMD) incidence and seed yield across different sowing dates was visualized by a scatter plot with regression line. As YMD incidence increased, seed yield showed a corresponding decline. Early sowing treatments (T1 and T2) with lower disease incidence recorded higher seed yields, while delayed sowing dates (T3 and T4) experienced high disease pressure, resulting into significant reduction in yield levels (Fig 3).
Higher YMD incidence leads to extensive chlorosis and mosaic symptoms, which reduce photosynthetic efficiency, disrupt assimilate translocation and limit pod development. Early sowing likely enabled crop escape from peak whitefly activity, resulting in lower virus transmission and healthier canopy development, thereby sustaining higher yields. In contrast, delayed sowing exposed plants to favourable conditions for whitefly proliferation, increasing YMD infection at early growth stages and causing substantial yield losses. This inverse relationship highlights the detrimental impact of YMD on yield and reinforces the importance of ideal sowing window as one of the strategies to overcome disease induced yield losses.
This trend may be attributed to increasing temperatures associated with late sowing dates, which can elevate whitefly population and facilitate the spread of disease. These results align with the findings of previous report (
Meghashree, 2017), which showed that sowing mungbean on June 6
th led (Check) to the lowest YMD incidence of 4.85 per cent. As sowing dates were progress, by each week a clear upward trend in disease incidence was noticed with a peak YMD incidence of 15.15 per cent for plots sown on July 11
th. A study
(Mahalakshmi et al., 2014) corroborated these findings, indicating that the lowest YMD incidence (4.85%) occurred on June 6th. Furthermore, the sowing on February 15
th and March 1
st resulted in lower YMD infections, while April 1
st sowing led to significant yield reductions due to high MYMV infection
(Rashid et al., 2013).
Under management trail, there was significant difference between the treatments. Seed treatment with Imidachloprid at 5 ml/kg of seeds followed by foliar spray with Thiamethaxom 25% WG 0.3 g/L at 25 days after sowing (T2) was statistically superior with the lower mean disease incidence and mean disease severity of 16.87% and 11.5% respectively with elevated yield of 6.98 q/ha. It was followed by T3 treatment (Seed treatment with Imidachloprid at 5 ml/kg of seeds followed by foliar spray with Diafenthiuron 50 WP 1.0 g/L at 25 days after sowing) which resulted in lower disease incidence and disease severity of 18.67% and 14.38% respectively. Consequently there was increase in yield (6.56 q/ha) when compared to other treatments, whereas T10 treatment showed highest disease incidence and disease severity (73.10% and 54.78%) with lower yield of 3.46 q/ha (Table 4).
The management trial revealed significant differences among the treatments with respect to disease suppression, yield enhancement and economic returns (Table 4). Seed treatment with imidacloprid (5 mL kg
-1 of seed) followed by a foliar spray of thiamethoxam 25% WG (0.3 g L
-1) at 25 DAS (T2) was significantly superior in reducing disease pressure, recording the lowest mean disease incidence (16.87%) and mean disease severity (11.50%). This effective disease suppression was reflected in an elevated yield of 6.98 q ha
-1, which was the highest among all treatments. The next best treatment was T3, comprising seed treatment with imidacloprid (5 mL kg
-1) followed by a foliar application of diafenthiuron 50 WP (1.0 g L
-1) at 25 DAS, which resulted in comparatively lower disease incidence (18.67%) and disease severity (14.38%), with a corresponding yield increase to 6.56 q ha
-1. In contrast, the untreated control (T10) recorded the highest disease incidence (73.10%) and disease severity (54.78%), resulting in the lowest yield (3.46 q ha
-1), emphasizing the substantial benefits of seed treatment based integrated chemical approaches in managing the disease.
Economic analysis further substantiated the biological effectiveness of the treatments. T2 recorded the highest net returns (₹ 19,582 ha
-1) and the highest benefit-cost ratio (1.76), emphasizing its economic viability. This was followed by T3, which produced net returns of ₹ 15,138 ha
-1 with a B:C ratio of 1.55. In contrast, T10 resulted in a monetary loss (₹ -2,532 ha
-1) and the poorest B:C ratio (0.90), clearly indicating the economic risks associated with unprotected cultivation.
Integrating seed treatment with targeted foliar insecticidal applications plays a vital role in minimizing disease impact and enhancing productivity in susceptible cultivars. The superior performance of T2 can be attributed to the systemic and long-lasting activity of neonicotinoids, which effectively suppress vector populations during the early stages when plants are most vulnerable. By reducing initial inoculum pressure and limiting secondary spread, imidacloprid-thiamethoxam integration ensures lower disease incidence and severity, consistent with previous findings on vector-borne diseases in pulses
(Jayappa et al., 2017; Vishal et al., 2024). Treatments T
2 and T
3 both demonstrated the efficacy of systemic (imidacloprid, thiamethoxam) and contact-vapour action insecticides (diafenthiuron) in interrupting disease transmission cycles. Their ability to provide uniform plant protection likely contributed to the higher yields recorded in these treatments. It was corroborated with the earlier study conducted by
Swapna and Prema (2025) where, it was reported that seed treatment with Imidacloprid 600 FS @ 5 ml/kg of seeds, followed by foliar spray (pyriproxifen 5% + difenthuron 25% SE) @ 2 ml/l resulted in lowest YMD incidence of 13.42, 17.55, 20.80 and 24.78 per cent at 30 DAS, 45 DAS, 60 DAS and 90 DAS (physiological maturity), respectively. This trend aligns with established epidemiological principles that emphasize early intervention as essential for managing rapidly spreading vector-borne diseases.
The study dissected the impact of environmental factors, sowing time and vector targeted insectides in the management of Yellow Mosaic Disease (YMD) in mungbean. A strong positive correlation between whitefly population and maximum temperature, coupled with a negative correlation with rainfall, infers that warm and dry conditions favour the vector proliferation and subsequent disease spread. Early sowing effectively minimized both whitefly abundance and YMD incidence, resulting in higher yield, whereas delayed sowing exposed the crop to intensified disease pressure and hence led to severe yield loss. Such information helps in strategic formulation of crop production practices especially the sowing window as a sustainable measure in minimising the threats of yellow mosaic disease. The findings of chemical management approach reaffirm that prophylactic seed treatment combined with timely systemic foliar sprays forms a reliable, economically viable strategy for managing vector transmitted diseases in mungbean. Future research may focus on integrating these economically favourable chemical based strategies with biological agents, resistant varieties and cultural management practices to develop sustainable, holistic IPM modules suitable for diverse agro-climatic zones to enhance mungbean production and further support India’s vision of
Atmanirbharata in pulses in order to ensure nutritional food security to the country.