Green and dry fodder yield
The integrated application of bioinoculants, biostimulants and FYM significantly enhanced green and dry fodder yields of berseem during both years of experimentation (Table 1). Among the nutrient management strategies, T
3 comprising PGPR + 75% RDN through FYM along with three foliar sprays of
Panchagavya recorded the highest productivity, producing green fodder yields of 57.0 and 58.5 t ha
-1 and dry fodder yields of 7.6 and 8.1 t ha
-1 during 2023-24 and 2024-25, respectively. However, the treatment remained statistically comparable with T
4 (PGPR + 75% RDN through FYM + three sprays of seaweed extract), which also produced substantially higher fodder yields than the remaining treatments. Treatments involving
Beejamrit in combination with FYM and biostimulant sprays (T
5 and T
6) resulted in intermediate productivity but significantly outperformed the sole FYM treatment (T
2). In contrast, the absolute control (T
1) recorded the lowest green and dry fodder yields during both years. Overall, integrated nutrient management treatments improved green fodder yield by 38.4% during 2023-24 and 45.8% during 2024-25 over the T
1. The enhanced productivity under integrated treatments may be attributed to improved soil fertility, enhanced microbial activity and better nutrient availability resulting from FYM application, along with increased root growth and nutrient uptake mediated by PGPR
(Dhaliwal et al., 2023). Furthermore,
Panchagavya and seaweed extract possibly stimulated physiological and metabolic activities through naturally occurring growth-promoting substances and beneficial microorganisms (
Kaith and Dadhich, 2024;
Onte et al., 2025). The numerically higher productivity recorded under T
3 suggests a synergistic interaction among FYM, PGPR and Panchagavya, leading to improved nutrient use efficiency and greater biomass accumulation. This response agrees with
Kumar et al. (2021a), who also observed that integrating organic nutrient sources with bio-inputs improved forage productivity over the use of organic manure alone. Likewise,
Garg et al. (2024) observed significant improvements in crop productivity under enhanced organic nutrient management strategies, which is consistent with the positive response obtained under the integrated bioinoculant- and biostimulant-based nutrient management adopted in the present study. However, although T
3 consistently recorded numerically higher green and dry fodder yields than T
4, the differences were statistically non-significant. This statistical parity indicates that both
Panchagavya and seaweed extract effectively complemented PGPR and FYM-based nutrient management under the present conditions. Nevertheless, the slight numerical advantage of T
3 may be attributed to the presence of diverse beneficial microorganisms, enzymes, amino acids, vitamins and naturally occurring plant growth regulators in Panchagavya, which may have enhanced nutrient availability, microbial activity and physiological processes more effectively than the seaweed extract used in this study (
Behera et al., 2024;
Nekar, 2024).
Proximate composition
Fodder quality, as reflected by proximate composition parameters, was significantly influenced by different nutrient management treatments (Fig 1). Among all treatments, T
3 (PGPR + 75% RDN through FYM + three foliar sprays of
Panchagavya) recorded the highest dry matter (13.2% and 13.7%), CP (19.7% and 19.8%), EE (3.62% and 3.7%) and TA contents (17.8% and 18.0%) during 2023-24 and 2024-25, respectively. Treatments T
4, T
5 and T
6 remained statistically at par with T
3 for certain quality attributes, particularly dry matter and crude protein content, whereas T
2 exhibited comparatively lower values among nutrient management treatments, although it remained significantly superior to the absolute control. The statistical similarity between T
3 and T
4 for dry matter and crude protein indicates that both Panchagavya and seaweed extract were equally effective in improving these major quality attributes when integrated with PGPR and FYM, although T
3 consistently recorded slightly higher numerical values. Compared with T
1, treatment T
3 enhanced dry matter, crude protein, ether extract and total ash contents by 12.3–19.8%, 13.3-14.4%, 52.1-65.3% and 21.8-25.5%, respectively, across both years. The improved fodder quality under T
3 may be attributed to the synergistic influence of FYM, PGPR and Panchagavya in enhancing nutrient mineralization, nutrient uptake and physiological activity, thereby promoting protein synthesis and lipid metabolism
(Choudhary et al., 2024). These findings are consistent with
Ngone et al., (2023), who also reported that integrating biofertilizers with organic nutrient sources improved forage quality by enhancing nutrient uptake and protein accumulation in maize. In contrast, the relatively lower values under T
2 may be associated with slower nutrient release from FYM applied alone, as also observed by
Nirere et al., (2021).
Fibre fractions
The fibre fractions of berseem were significantly affected by different nutrient management strategies, with integrated nutrient treatments markedly reducing fibre concentration compared with the absolute control (Table 2). Among the treatments, T
3 (PGPR + 75% RDN through FYM + three foliar sprays of
Panchagavya) recorded the lowest NDF, ADF and ADL contents, registering 43.1 and 40.8% NDF, 25.5 and 24.8% ADF and 4.0 and 3.9% ADL during 2023 and 2024, respectively. Treatment T
4 (PGPR + 75% RDN through FYM + three foliar sprays of seaweed extract) remained statistically comparable with T
3 for ADF and ADL contents during both years. This statistical parity suggests that both biostimulants were similarly effective in reducing structural carbohydrate accumulation, although Panchagavya consistently produced marginally lower fibre values. In contrast, T
2 (100% RDN through FYM) exhibited relatively higher fibre fractions among nutrient-managed treatments, although values remained significantly lower than the control. The reduction in fibre components under integrated treatments may be attributed to enhanced nutrient availability and improved nitrogen uptake resulting from the synergistic action of bioinoculants, biostimulants and FYM. Improved nitrogen nutrition regulates carbohydrate metabolism and limits the accumulation of lignified structural carbohydrates, thereby reducing fibre concentration in forage crops (
Kumar et al. 2021b). Similar findings were also reported by
Moore et al., (2020).
Quality attributes
The quality attributes of berseem fodder were significantly influenced by different nutrient management practices, particularly with respect to cell wall constituents, organic matter and total carbohydrate content (Fig 2). Among the treatments, T
3 (PGPR + 75% RDN through FYM + three foliar sprays of
Panchagavya) recorded the highest cell content during both years (56.9% and 59.2%, respectively), remaining statistically comparable with T
4 (PGPR + 75% RDN through FYM + three foliar sprays of seaweed extract). In contrast, T
3 exhibited the lowest cellulose, hemicellulose, organic matter and total carbohydrate contents during both experimental years. Compared with the T
1, T
3 increased cell content by 11.4% and 15.6%, while reducing cellulose, hemicellulose, organic matter and total carbohydrate concentrations during 2023 and 2024, respectively. Treatments T
5 and T
6 showed intermediate responses but performed significantly better than the control. The reduction in organic matter and carbohydrate content under T
3 may be attributed to enhanced nitrogen availability and greater nitrogen accumulation in plant tissues, which likely promoted carbohydrate utilization and metabolic activity within the forage. Similar observations were also reported by
Iqbal et al., (2017) and
Sumon et al., (2018).