Full Research Article
Evaluation of Haemato-biochemical and Oxidative Stress Response of Tiletamine-zolazepam Alone and in Combination with Dexmedetomidine or Butorphanol in Buffalo Calves (Bubalus bubalis)

Evaluation of Haemato-biochemical and Oxidative Stress Response of Tiletamine-zolazepam Alone and in Combination with Dexmedetomidine or Butorphanol in Buffalo Calves (Bubalus bubalis)
Submitted27-09-2025|
Accepted11-04-2026|
First Online 07-09-2026|
Background: General anaesthesia is indispensable for performing surgical interventions in veterinary practice. Tiletamine–zolazepam (Zoletil®/Telazol®), a 1:1 combination of a dissociative anaesthetic and a benzodiazepine tranquilizer, produces dose-dependent central nervous system depression ranging from sedation to surgical anaesthesia, with minimal cardiopulmonary compromise. However, there is limited literature available on its use in combination with dexmedetomidine or butorphanol in buffalo calves under Indian conditions. Therefore, the present study was designed to compare the haemato-biochemical and oxidative stress responses following administration of tiletamine-zolazepam alone and in combination with these preanaesthetic agents in buffalo calves.
Methods: Eighteen healthy non-descript male buffalo calves (n=18), aged between 6 months and 1 year and weighing 80-100 kg, were rand omly divided into three groups (A, B and C; n=6 each). All animals were dewormed with fenbendazole (Panacur®) @ 5 mg/kg body weight orally prior to the experiment. Glycopyrrolate @ 0.01 mg/kg body weight was administered intramuscularly 10 minutes before induction of anaesthesia in all groups. Group A received tiletamine-zolazepam @ 2.5 mg/kg body weight intravenously by slow injection. In Groups B and C, dexmedetomidine @ 2 µg/kg body weight and butorphanol @ 0.075 mg/kg body weight, respectively, were administered 10 minutes prior to intravenous administration of tiletamine-zolazepam @ 2.5 mg/kg body weight as a single bolus dose. Blood samples were collected at 0 minute (baseline, prior to premedication) and at 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes post-induction for evaluation of haematological, biochemical and oxidative stress parameters. A pilot study was conducted to stand ardize the minimum effective dose of anaesthetic agents used in the trial.
Result: Haemoglobin concentration and packed cell volume showed a significant decrease in Groups B and C, while the reduction was non-significant in Group A. Total erythrocyte count and total leukocyte count exhibited non-significant declines across all groups. Differential leukocyte count revealed mild lymphocytopenia accompanied by neutrophilia, with minor variations in monocytes, basophils and eosinophils. Serum glucose, cortisol and malondialdehyde levels increased significantly following induction of anaesthesia and returned towards baseline during recovery, whereas reduced glutathione levels decreased significantly. Serum urea nitrogen and creatinine levels increased in all groups, with a significant rise observed in Group B. Serum gamma-glutamyl transferase showed a non-significant increase, while total protein decreased non-significantly. No significant alterations were observed in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels following anaesthesia. Overall, tiletamine–zolazepam administered alone or in combination with dexmedetomidine or butorphanol produced effective anaesthesia with minimal and transient alterations in haematological, biochemical and oxidative stress parameters in buffalo calves.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.