Essential oil yield
The yield of the YBO, QNO and KTO were 1.315 ± 0.136, 2.600 ± 0.037 and 1.505 ± 0.045 %, respectively. The yield of QNO (2.600 ± 0.037 %) was approximately equal to that of
C.
cassia bark essential oil from Guangdong and Guangxi (2.55%) which was conducted by (
Abdurahman Nour et al., 2016).
Chemical compositions of essential oils
Fig 3 and Table 1 show the identified components present in EOs of YB, QN and KT, respectively. The EO from
C.
cassia bark of YB consists of 19 compounds accounting for 99.91% of the total oil. Meanwhile, the EO from
C.
cassia bark of QN contains 19 constituents representing 99.98% of the total oil. EO from
C.
cassia bark of KT, on the other hand, includes 21 compounds accounting for 99.88% of the total oil. As expected,
trans-cinnamaldehyde was the most abundant in three EOs which was accounted to compose more than 94% of the constituents of total oil. Noticeably, the KT
C,
cassia bark EO provided the highest
trans-cinnamaldehyde concentration at 96.07% of 99.91% total, followed by YB (94.72%) and QN (94.69%). The amount of
trans-cinnamaldehyde present in YBO, QNO and KTO was extremely greater than that of the
C.
cassia bark EOs from the Guangdong and Guangxi provinces (66.28 - 71.22% and 73.56 - 77.21%, respectively) which was conducted by
(Li et al., 2013). Notably, GC-MS analysis revealed the presence of nine other compounds in all three EOs (Fig 4 -A, B). However, four components were only detected in YBO (Fig 4 -C1), seven in QNO (Fig 4 -C2) and nine in KTO only (Fig 4 -C3).
Organoleptic and physicochemical properties
Table 2 details the physicochemical and organoleptic characteristics of the
C.
cassia bark essential oils from YB, QN and KT. All three essential oils had the same color (light yellow), odor (cinnamon-like note) and taste (hot and spicy). There were generally no significant differences in physicochemical parameters among three
C.
cassia bark essential oils, namely total acid number, saponification value, ester value and peroxide value, but specific gravity, optical rotation and iodine value.
Minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration
There were significant differences in the susceptibilities of
C.
cassia bark EOs against ten studied microbial strains (Table 3). Indeed, KTO generally exerted powerful effectiveness against ten selected microbial strains as both MIC and MBC were recorded as low as 0.0156-0.125% and 0.0313-0.250%, respectively. Differences in the susceptibility of tested microorganisms to KTO were quantitatively identified. Accordingly, KTO was able to powerfully inhibit the growth of
S.
pyogenes 19615 at the lowest dose of 0.0156% whereas five microbial strains, namely
S.
aureus 25923,
E.
faecalis 29212,
B.
subtilis 15245,
E.
coli 25922 and
A.
baumanni 19606, displayed the least sensitivity to KTO with the same highest MIC value of 0.125%. Notably, the same trend had been identified in MBC, but at different levels.
QNO also exhibited potent antibacterial capacity against ten selected microbial strains as MIC and MBC were documented to be 0.0313-0.250% and 0.0625-0.500%, respectively.
P.
mirabilis 12453, in contrast to KTO, was found the most susceptible to QNO as both MIC and MBC were recorded to the lowest dose of 0.0313% and 0.0625%, respectively. Three microbial strains, namely
P.
aeruginosa 27853,
K.
pneumoniae 700603 and
A.
baumanni 19606, displayed the same MIC and MBC values of 0.0625% and 0.125%, respectively. However, the differences in susceptibility of six other tested microbial strains to QNO could be noted as MIC of three microbial strains, namely
S.
aureus 25923,
S.
pneumoniae 49619 and
S.
pyogenes 19615, was valued at the same dose of 0.125%, whereas
E.
faecalis 29212,
B.
subtilis 15245 and
E.
coli 25922 had the same dose of 0.250%. The same pattern had been observed in MBC but at different levels.
On the other hand, YBO of the lowest concentration (MIC value of 0.0625% and MBC value of 0.125%) was able to inhibit six studied microbial strains (
S.
aureus 25923,
S.
pneumoniae 49619,
E.
coli 25922,
P.
aeruginosa 27853,
A.
baumanni 19606,
P.
mirabilis 12453).
B.
subtilis 15245, on the contrary, exerted the least sensitivity to YBO with MIC and MBC values of 0.250% and 0.500%, respectively.
Although
trans-cinnamaldehyde was predominant in all three EOs, representing more than 94% of the total oil, significant differences in antibacterial activity against ten studied microbial strains were documented, reflecting the effects of other components in
C.
cassia bark essential oils. EO is a complex mixture of naturally occurring volatile compounds, primarily terpenoids, phenylpropanoids and phenolics. Certain components present in EO might interact with others, resulting in variations in binding affinity to different lipophilic molecular structures of lipids, protein, glycolipids, lipoprotein and glycoprotein present in the bacterial cell wall and cytoplasmic membrane. In addition to the diversified and complicated nature of phytocomponents present in EOs, the differences in susceptibility of Gram-negative and Gram-positive to a variety of EOs considerably attribute to the effects of antibacterial activity against microorganisms. Nevertheless, the present results would hopefully encourage more studies to elucidate the mechanisms behind which
C.
cassia bark essential oils exhibited antibacterial effects, for the purpose of exploiting the potential of this valuable EO to the fullest.