Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Efficacy of  Pre and Post Emergence Herbicides against Complex Weed Flora, Yield and Economics of Blackgram under High Hills Wet Temperate Zone of Himachal Pradesh

Puneet Kaur1,*, Niraj Guleria3, Gaytri Hetta2, Meenakshi2
1Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141 004, Punjab, India.
2Department of Agronomy, CSK HP Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, Himachal Pardesh, India.
3CSK HP Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Mountain Agricultural Research and Extension Station, Salooni (Chamba)-176 320, Himachal Pardesh, India.

Background: Implementing integrated strategies for weed management is essential in maximizing blackgram yield. Unchecked weed proliferation leads to substantial decrease in crop productivity. 

Methods: The current field experiment was conducted at Salooni, Himachal Pradesh, to evaluate the efficacy of different integrated weed management practices during Kharif 2022 and 2023. Eleven treatments targeting weed control were evaluated both at pre and post - emergence stages. 

Result: The predominant weeds were Echinochloa colona, Galinsoga parviflora, Cyperus species and other broad leaf weeds were Plantago lanceolata, Trifolium repens, Trianthema species, Ageratum conyzoides. Data on weed dynamics revealed that; after weed-free treatment, the application of Imazethapyr 75 g/ha as PE fb HW at 30 DAS; Pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha as PE fb HW at 30 DAS and Pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha + imazethapyr 75 g/ha (PE) recorded a significantly lower total weed count as compared to other treatments. Parameters related to blackgram growth and yield, including plant height, number of branches per plant, pods per plant, grain yield and haulm yield were significantly higher with weed-free treatment followed by application of imazethapyr 75 g/ha as PE fb HW at 30 DAS, remaining at par with application of pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha + imazethapyr 75 g/ha (PE) and pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha as PE fb HW at 30 DAS. The most economically efficient weed control method was the combination of pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha + imazethapyr 75 g/ha (PE), as it resulted in the highest net returns and marginal benefit-cost ratio.

In India, blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] holds the position of the fourth most valuable pulse crop, following chickpea, pigeonpea and greengram (Kaur et al., 2018; Kumar et al., 2023). Blackgram is also an important Kharif season pulse in Himachal Pradesh, cultivated across 9.4 thousand hectares, resulting in a production of 12 thousand tonnes and a productivity of 1286 kg/ha. While the yield of blackgram in the state surpasses the national average of 555 kg/ha, it falls below the potential of top varieties in the region, which is estimated at 1600 kg/ha (Kumar et al., 2013; Rana et al., 2019a and b).
       
Weeds are the primary production constraints, posing a substantial obstacle in realizing full production potential of a crop. Massive infestation of weeds remains a primary factor contributing to insufficient production, particularly during the Kharif season (July-September) (Mansoori et al., 2015). Weed competition further is the rigorous biological constraint to production in short-statured crops, particularly in the case of Kharif blackgram in Himachal Pradesh due to luxurious growth of weeds because of abundant rainfall in the growing season. Reports indicate that up to 45 per cent of the yield losses in blackgram; can be attributed to weed infestation (Kumar et al., 2013; Yadav et al., 2015). Blackgram receives less priority in Himachal Pradesh and is mainly cultivated in poor and marginal soils. Effective management of weeds in pulses has a potential to enhance both yield and nitrogen fixation. Blackgram exhibits limited competitiveness against weeds, particularly during the early stages of growth (3 to 6 weeks after sowing). Consequently, weed infestation during this critical phase intensifies crop-weed competition, leading to substantial yield losses (Choudhary et al., 2012; Shaktawat et al., 2020). Hence, there is a urgent need for suitable weed control method; as weeds cause more harm to agricultural crops than the accumulated damage caused by all other pests and diseases. Therefore, weed management using adequate means becomes very important to attain a high crop yield. Pendimethalin is the recommended pre-emergence herbicide for weed control in blackgram in Himachal Pradesh. However, its effectiveness in controlling all types of weeds is limited and it has restricted application period with relatively less persistent effects. Additionally, if pendimethalin is not applied as a pre-emergence measure, it cannot be utilized as post-emergence. In contrast, imazethapyr is a broad-spectrum herbicide (Rao et al., 2010; Rana et al., 2019a and b) with the potential to manage both broad-leaved and grassy weeds in pulses. It can be employed in pre-sowing incorporation and during both Pre and Post periods. Furthermore, imazethapyr exhibits a long-term persistence effect, making it more favourable choice for weed control in pulses compared to pendimethalin. However, the Integrated Weed Management (IWM) approach holds significance in weed management as it prevents the shift of weeds towards perennial nature and guards against weed resistance to herbicides. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate various weed control options available and to identify the best treatment in terms of efficacy and economics.
Experimental site
 
The field experiment was conducted at the research farm of Mountain Agricultural Research and Extension Station, Salooni (Chamba), Himachal Pradesh, India, during kharif 2022 and 2023. The farm is situated at 32°43'17.89"N latitude and 76°3'5.47"E longitude and has an elevation of 1725.22 m above sea level in the western part of the Himalayas. The experimental area is a part of high hills wet temperate zone of Himachal Pradesh.
 
Treatments and design
 
The field experiment was designed with eleven weed control treatments viz., T1: Pendimethalin 1 kg/ha as PE fb quizalofop-p-ethyl 50 g/ha at 30 DAS; T2: Pendimethalin 1 kg/ha as PE fb imazethapyr 75 g/ha at 30 DAS; T3: Pendimethalin 1 kg/ha + imazethapyr 75 g/ha (PE); T4: Pendimethalin 1 kg/ha as PE fb HW at 30 DAS; T5: Oxyfluorfen 150 g/ha as PE fb quizalofop-p-ethyl 50 g/ha at 30 DAS; T6: Oxyfluorfen 150 g/ha as PE fb imazethapyr 75 g/ha at 30 DAS; T7: Oxyfluorfen 150 g/ha as PE fb HW at 30 DAS; T8: Imazethapyr 75 g/ha as PE fb quizalofop-p-ethyl 50 g/ha at 30 DAS; T9: Imazethapyr 75 g/ha as PE fb HW at 30 DAS; T10: Weed free; and T11: weedy check (no weed control). Weed management treatments were arranged in randomized block design (RBD) with three replications. The herbicides were applied as per treatments using a knapsack sprayer fitted with a flat fan nozzle at spray volume of 600 litres of water ha-1.
 
Crop establishment method and management
 
Blackgram cultivar, Palampur 93, was sown at a plant spacing of 30 cm × 10 cm, on 4th July 2022 and 2nd July 2023 and harvested on 14th October 2022 and 20th October 2023. The crop was supplied with a fertilizer dose of 20 kg N, 40 kg P2O5 and 20 kg K2O per hectare. Basal nutrients were applied through IFFCO complex fertilizer (12:32:16) and urea (46% N). Observations on the weed count were recorded after 1 month (30 DAS, days after sowing), 2 months (60 DAS) and at harvest through a quadrant (25cm × 25cm) in two randomly selected spots in each plot, which were then transformed into a one square metre area.
 
Economics
 
Gross returns were calculated by multiplying the value of the per unit yield in rupees and the yield obtained. Gross returns as a result of weed control were computed by deducting the gross returns obtained in the weedy check from the gross returns obtained in the weed management treatment.  
 
Net returns = Gross returns due to weed control - Cost of weed control



  
 
 Statistical analysis
 
Weed count data were subjected to square-root transformation to account for non-normality of distribution. The data were subjected to statistical analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the randomized block design to test the significance of overall differences among the treatments through the “F” test. Conclusions were drawn at the 5% probability level.
Weed flora
 
The experimental field was infested with grassy, broadleaf weeds and sedges (Fig 1). Weed flora in blackgram were composed of Echinochloa colona (21-22%), Galinsoga parviflora (18-19%) and Cyperus species (17-20%).  The other weeds viz., Plantago lanceolata, Trifolium repens,Trianthema species, Ageratum conyzoides as a whole constituted 40-43% of the total weed flora. Rana et al., (2019) also reported that in Himachal Pradesh, major weeds affecting blackgram include Echinochloa sp., Dactyloctenium aegyptium and Cyperus iria, which contributes to significant crop yield reductions.
 

Fig 1: Distribution of weeds in experimental blackgram field and their density (%).


 
Effect on weeds
 
Data on weed count were recorded at 30 DAS (Days after sowing), 60 DAS and at harvest. The impact of different weed control treatments on weed counts is illustrated graphically in Fig 2a and 2b for the years 2022 and 2023, respectively. It is evident from the figures that after weed free plots, application of pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha + imazethapyr 75 g/ha (PE) had lower weed density at 30 DAS followed by imazethapyr 75 g/ha as PE fb HW 30 DAS as compared to other treatments for both the years. This reduction can be attributed to the more effective suppression of both grasses and broad-leaved weeds during the early stages of crop growth with the application of imazethapyr. At 60 DAS, total weed count was less with pendimethalin 1 kg/ha as PE fb HW 30 DAS and imazethapyr 75 g/ha as PE fb HW 30 DAS. This was due to the complete removal of all weed types through hand weeding at 30 DAS. A similar trend was observed in total weed count at the harvest of the blackgram crop. These findings are in conformity with Rana et al., (2019), who observed that the application of imazethapyr at 80g/ha as a pre-emergence treatment was at par with imazethapyr at 70g/ha pre-emergence and the pre-emergence application of imazethapyr+ pendimethalin pre-mix resulted in significantly lower weed count and dry weight. Chandrakar et al., (2014) also supported the efficacy of early post-emergence application (15-20 DAS) of imazethapyr at 40g/ha and pendimethalin + imazethapyr as a pre-emergence treatment against weeds in black gram. The treatments constituting of oxyfluorfen 150 g/ha were toxic to blackgram and these plots shows less germination of crop as well as weeds.
 

Fig 2a: Effect of treatments on count of major weeds in blackgram during 2022.


 

Fig 2b: Effect of treatments on count of major weeds in blackgram during 2023.


       
The combination of pendimethalin + imazethapyr was more successful in controlling weeds. The increase in weed density and dry weight in various treatments can be attributed to the continuous growth of weeds with a higher competitive ability than the crop. The pre-emergent application of herbicides, such as pendimethalin + imazethapyr, initially inhibits the germination of weed flora. However, with time, the herbicide dissipates and deactivates in the soil, leading to subsequent increase in the next flush of weeds.
       
All weed control treatments significantly reduced weed density in blackgram compared to the weedy check (Table 1). With the exception of the application of imazethapyr 75 g/ha as PE fb HW 30 DAS, pendimethalin 1 kg/ha as PE fb HW 30 DAS and pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha + imazethapyr 75 g/ha (PE) had recorded significantly lower total weed count as compared to other treatments. The weed index, which signifies the percentage decrease in yield compared to weed-free conditions (achieved through hand weeding in the current scenario), exhibited its highest value in the weedy check treatment followed by oxyfluorfen 150 g/ha as PE fb imazethapyr 75 g/ha at 30 DAS and oxyfluorfen 150 g/ha as PE fb HW at 30 DAS.
 

Table 1: Effect of weed control treatments on count of weeds (No.m-2) in blackgram.


 
Effect on crop growth and yield attributes
 
Weed control treatments resulted in significant variation in plant height, number of branches per plant and pod number per plant of blackgram (Table 2). After weed free, the application of imazethapyr 75 g/ha as PE fb HW 30 DAS remaining at par with pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha + imazethapyr 75 g/ha (PE) and pendimethalin 1 kg/ha as PE fb HW 30 DAS; had significantly higher values  for growth parameters and yield attributes viz., plant height, number of branches per plant and number of pods per plant. The weedy check treatment had recorded lower values for growth attributing characters. The maximum plant height observed under the noted treatments might be attributed to a reduced weed population, leading to decreased competition for soil moisture, solar radiation, plant nutrients and space during the active growth period. This reduction in competition likely resulted in better nutrient availability, fostering rapid cell development and facilitating luxurious crop growth. Similar results were reported by Susmitha et al., (2019). The higher number of branches and pods per plant obtained could be attributed to the effective control of weeds including grasses, broad-leaved plants and sedges, during the early crop growth period. This finding aligns with results reported by Yadav et al., (2015). The treatments containing oxyfluorfen at 150 g/ha were found to be toxic to black gram.
 

Table 2: Effect of weed control treatments on growth and yield attributes of blackgram.


 
Effect on seed and haulm yield
 
The data pertaining to grain yield and haulm yield varied significantly due to different weed management practices and is presented in the Table 3. In 2022, significantly the highest seed yield was recorded with weed free which remained at par with imazethapyr 75 g/ha as PE fb HW 30 DAS. Application of imazethapyr 75 g/ha as PE fb HW 30 DAS also remained at par with the application of pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha + imazethapyr 75 g/ha (PE) and pendimethalin 1 kg/ha as PE fb HW 30 DAS. However, in 2023 weed free treatment being at par with imazethapyr 75 g/ha as PE fb HW 30 DAS and pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha + imazethapyr 75 g/ha (PE) had the highest seed yield. This might be attributed to the lower weed population, creating a favorable environment for the crop with minimal competition from weeds. This condition led to a higher photosynthetic accumulation rate and improved translocation to the sink. The trend in haulm yield of  blackgram was similar during  both the years of study. Sasikala et al., (2014) observed that application of imazethapyr 100 g/ha at 15 days after sowing (DAS) provided excellent control of both grasses and broad-leaf weeds in blackgram, resulting in a higher yield. Ramesh et al., (2016) reported higher seed yield of blackgram with application of different levels of imazethapyr as compared to quizalofop ethyl. Aggarwal et al., (2014) also reported the effectiveness of imazethapyr with 75 and 100 g/ha applied at 15 DAS in blackgram, leading to increased crop yield. The weedy check, on the other hand, had registered the lowest seed yield. 
 

Table 3: Effect of weed control treatments on seed and haulm yield of blackgram.


 
Economics
 
The cost of weed control treatments was computed based on the current market prices of various common and variable agro-inputs. The economics presented in Table 4 revealed that maintaining weed-free conditions incurred the highest cost on weed control. Gross returns were highest due to weed free, but its highest cost of cultivation resulted in lower net return due to weed control in this treatment than pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha + imazethapyr 75 g/ha (PE), imazethapyr 75 g/ha as PE fb HW 30 DAS and pendimethalin 1 kg/ha as PE fb HW 30 DAS. Maximum MBCR of 47.6 was recorded in pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha + imazethapyr 75 g/ha (PE), followed by imazethpyr 75 g/ha as PE fb quizalofop-p-ethyl 50 g/ha at 30 DAS, pendimethalin 1 kg/ha as PE fb imazethapyr 75 g/ha at 30 DAS and pendimethalin 1 kg/ha as PE fb quizalofop-p-ethyl 50 g/ha at 30 DAS. Mansoori et al., (2015) observed that applying imazethapyr + imazamox (pre-mix) at 50 g/ha as post-emergence (20 DAS) resulted in the highest net returns and B: C in blackgram. This was followed by imazethapyr + pendimethalin (pre-mix) at 1000 g/ha as pre-emergence. In a similar vein, Ram et al., (2013) reported higher gross and net returns with imazethapyr at 75 and 100 g/ha compared to 50 g/ha in soybean. Aggarwal et al., (2014) also reported that in blackgram, application of imazethapyr at 100 g/ha at 15 DAS produced the highest gross and net returns, closely followed by imazethapyr at 100 g/ha applied at 25 DAS and hand weeding twice.

Table 4: Economics of treatments as influenced by different weed control treatments in blackgram.

Weeds in blackgram  are a major factor responsible for yield reduction as they reduce the crop yield by 62.7 and 64% during 2022 and 2023 respectively. Here, the application of herbicides reduced the weed infestation and increased the crop yield by more than double when compared with the weedy check. The application of imazethapyr 75 g/ha as PE fb HW at 30 DAS, pendimethalin 1 kg/ha as PE fb HW 30 DAS and pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha + imazethapyr 75 g/ha (PE) were found to be the most efficient methods in controlling weeds as well as in raising crop yields. However, the application of pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha + imazethapyr 75 g/ha (PE) produced the highest net returns (due to weed control) of Rs. 96257 and marginal benefit-cost ratio of 47.6.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  1. Aggarwal, N., Singh, G., Ram, H. and Khanna, V. (2014). Effect of post-emergence application of imazethapyr on symbiotic activities, growth and yield of blackgram (Vigna mungo) cultivars and its efficacy against weeds. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 59: 421-426. 

  2. Chandrakar, D.K., Nagre, S.K., Chandrakar, K., Singh, A.P. and Nair, S.K. (2014). Chemical weed management in black gram. In: Extended Summary of Biennial Conference of Indian Society of Weed Science, DSWR. Jabalpur (M.P.). p 242.

  3. Choudhary, V. K., Suresh, K. P. and Bhagawati, R. (2012). Integrated weed management in black gram (Vigna mungo) under mid hills of Arunachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 57: 382-385.

  4. Kaur, R., Shivay, Y., Singh, G., Virk, H. K., Sen, S. and Rajni (2018). Increasing area under pulses and soil quality enhancement in pulse-based cropping systems-Retrospect and prospects. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 88: 10-21.

  5. Kumar, D., Massey, J.X., Sharma, S.K., Mundra, S.L. and Yadav, S.K. (2023). Vermiwash prepared from different combination of organic sources to improve growth and yield of blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] for organic agriculture. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 57(5): 630-634. 

  6. doi:10.18805/IJARe.A-5630.

  7. Kumar, S., Rana, S.S. and Angiras, N. N. (2013). Weed management in blackgram with specific reference to Ageratum conyzoides. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research. 39(2): 111-119.

  8. Mansoori, N., Bhadauria, N. and Rajput, R. L. (2015). Effect of weed control practices on weeds and yield of black gram (Vigna mungo). Legume Research. 38: 855-857. 

  9. Ram, H., Singh, G., Aggarwal, N., Buttar, G. S. and Singh, O. (2013). Standardization of rate and time of application of imazethapyr weedicide in soybean. Indian Journal of Plant Protection. 41: 33-37.

  10. Ramesh, T. and Rathika, S. (2016). Management of emerged weeds in irrigated blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) through post- emergence herbicides. Legume Research-An International Journal 39(2): 289-292. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.6771.

  11. Rana, S.S., Singh, G., Rana, M., Sharma, N., Kumar, S., Singh,G. and Badiyala, D. (2019a). Impact of imazethapyr and its ready-mix combination with imazamox to control weeds in blackgram. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 51: 151-157.

  12. Rana, S. S., Sharma, N. and Badiyala, D. (2019b). A preliminary study on the time of application of imazethapyr and its ready mix combination with pendimethalin and imazamox against weeds in blackgram. Journal of Research in Weed Science. 2(4): 282-291. 

  13. Rao, A., Rao, G. S. and Ratnama, M. (2010). Bio-efficacy of sand mix application of pre-emergence herbicides alone and in sequence with imazethapyr on weed control in relay crop of black gram. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research. 16: 279–285.

  14. Sasikala, K., Kumar, C. K. and Ashok P. (2014). Efficacy of post emergence herbicides on weed flora and yield of zero till sown rice fallow black gram. In: Extended Summary of Biennial Conference of Indian Society of Weed Science, DWR, Jabalpur (M.P.). p. 234.

  15. Shaktawat, R. (2020). Integrated weed management in blackgram. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 52: 290-291.

  16. Susmitha, M., Vijaya, B.R.U., Ramesh, B.P.V. and Srinivasa, R.M. (2019). Efficacy of different herbicides on weed dynamics and yield attributes in Kharif blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.)]. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 8(6): 2026-31.

  17. Yadav, K.S., Dixit, J.P. and Prajapati, B.L. (2015). Weed management effects on yield and economics of black gram. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 47: 136-138.

Editorial Board

View all (0)