The effect of different crop residues, microbial consortia, nitrogen, carbon sources and residue placement on carbon mineralization in soil was evaluated using a microcosm incubation study of 75 days. The results showed that the carbon mineralization rate varied significantly among the treatments and followed the Michaelis-Menten model (Fig 1, 2 and 3) The model fit metrics and kinetics were statistically studied and presented in tables 4, 5 and 6. The highest cumulative C mineralization and decomposition rate (Vmax) were observed for cotton residue with 1% consortia + 1% urea + 1.5% jaggery applied on the soil surface (CDS treatment), indicating the robust activity of carbon mineralization in this treatment. The effect of residue placement was significant (P<0.0001), with higher values for residues incorporated into soils than those placed on the surface, except for cowpea residue, which performed well irrespective of placement. This finding contradicts the previous study by
Li et al., (2013), who reported higher cumulative C mineralization for maize residues placed on the soil surface.
The results suggest that the combination of crop residues, microbial consortia, nutrient sources and residue placement can influence the carbon mineralization process in soil and have implications for soil fertility and carbon sequestration. The results of carbon mineralization from different crop residues were analyzed using the Michaelis-Menten model, which can help in predicting the effects of different crop residue management practices on soil carbon sequestration (
Al-Kaisi and Mahdi, 2011). The model was statistically significant (P< 0.0001) and well fitted to the data, as indicated by the high R
2 values (0.93 to 0.99) and the low RMSE values (5.67 to 50.65) for all treatments. The model parameters, Vmax and Km, revealed the rate and efficiency of substrate utilization by soil microbes (Table 4). The treatments receiving high carbon and nitrogen sources along with consortia (CFS, MFI, CWFI) recorded the maximum Vmax values (745.31, 812.71 and 951.72 µmol/min, respectively), indicating higher mineralization of carbon from cotton, maize and cowpea residues (Table 6).
Meanwhile, the treatments with incorporation of 1% consortia (CBI, MBI, CWBI) recorded the lowest Km values (15.71, 16.11 and 14.68 mM, respectively), indicating higher efficiency of substrate binding and utilization in soil. The treatments with surface placement of crop residues generally exhibited lower Vmax and higher Km values than the treatments with incorporation of crop residues, suggesting that incorporation enhances microbial activity and substrate availability
Cooper et al., (2011). The results also showed that the addition of substrate may increase the efficiency of carbon mineralization, but over saturation leads to decline the mineralization rate. The lowest rate of mineralization was noted in control treatments with no additives
(Rieke et al., 2022).
Overall, the Michaelis-Menten model provides valuable insights into carbon dynamics across different treatments and can be used to optimize crop residue management for soil health and productivity
(Datta et al., 2019). The effects of different treatments on carbon mineralization from three crop residues (cowpea, cotton and maize) were evaluated using the cumulative mineralization values and the Michaelis-Menten model parameters (Vmax and Km). The results showed that cowpea residue exhibited the highest carbon mineralization rate, followed by cotton and maize, across all treatments. The treatments receiving consortia, urea and jaggery (CFS, MFI, CWFI) recorded the highest cumulative mineralization values and Vmax values, indicating higher microbial activity and carbon turnover from the added substrates. The treatments with incorporation of consortia alone (CBI, MBI, CWBI) recorded the lowest Km values, indicating higher efficiency of substrate binding and utilization in soil. The treatments with surface placement of crop residues generally exhibited lower mineralization rates and Vmax values than the treatments with incorporation of crop residues, suggesting that incorporation enhances substrate availability and microbial contact.
The results also revealed that the C/N ratio of the crop residues influenced the mineralization rate and efficiency. The low C/N ratio of cowpea residue resulted in higher mineralization than the high C/N ratio of maize residue, which resulted in slower decomposition. The cotton residue had a moderate C/N ratio and recorded moderate mineralization rates. The rate of carbon mineralization increased significantly up to the 50
th day of incubation and then gradually slowed down across all treatments. The results demonstrated that different crop residue management practices can affect the carbon dynamics in soil and can be optimized to improve soil health and productivity.
The decomposition of the residues was facilitated by the closer contact between soil and residue, as shown by many studies (
Abiven and Recous, 2007). The residue–soil contact was influenced by the chemical characteristics (soluble compounds) and morphological features of the residues, as well as the particle size and location in the soil. The C mineralization of the residues, whether incorporated or surface-applied, was also affected by moisture content and temperature. The initial C mineralization was higher for crop residues with low C/N ratio and high N concentration than for those with high C/N ratio and low N concentration (Table 2; Fig 1 and 2). This is consistent with the findings of previous studies
(Li et al., 2011). The substrate quality and nitrogen availability in soil affect the microbial activity
(Muhammad et al., 2011). When residue decomposes, it releases nitrogen into the soil, which acts as an N source for the microorganisms and enhances C mineralization.
Thus, the initial N concentration might have influenced the C mineralization of the residues
(Poudel et al., 2023). Cowpea residue, being a legume, had higher N content and lower C/N ratio than cotton and maize residues (Table 2) and therefore decomposed faster regardless of placement. In contrast, maize and cotton residues had high C/N ratio (Table 2). Furthermore, adding external nitrogen and carbon sources improved the carbon mineralization in respective treatments than in residue alone treatments (Fig 3).