Evaluation of Productivity and Seed Amino Acid Composition of Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) Cultivated in the Almaty Region of Kazakhstan

S
S.B. Dauletbayeva1
Z
Z.G. Aytasheva1
B
B.A. Zhumabayeva1
Z
Zh. Zh. Chunetova1,*
N
N.A. Altybaeva1
S
S. Abayev2
L
L.P. Lebedeva3
1Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71 al-Farabi Ave., 050040, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
2Kazakh Scientific Research Institute of Agriculture and Crop production, 1 Erlepesova st., 040909, Almalybak village, Karasay dist., Almaty region, Kazakhstan.
3Institute of General Genetics and Physiology, 93 al-Farabi St., 050060, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
  • Submitted22-01-2026|

  • Accepted07-04-2026|

  • First Online 18-04-2026|

  • doi 10.18805/LRF-931

Background: In Kazakhstan, the rapid expansion of animal husbandry has made the development of a stable, high-quality forage base a key priority and since its introduction into field production, sainfoin has gained widespread recognition as a promising crop due to its favorable biological traits. The aim of this study was to examine the sainfoin (Onobrychis vicifolia Scop.), variety Almaty 2, developed due to domestic selection efforts, along with 24 additional variety samples from the collection material. These patterns were evaluated for key economically valuable traits, including productivity, seed protein content and amino acid composition.

Methods: A field assessment of the local breeding material was conducted using phenological observations and measurements. The samples were ranked according to their total productivity of green and dry mass and subject to cluster and correlation analyses.

Result: Five specimens out of the 24 sainfoin variety samples demonstrated a high level of productivity based on dry mass yield. The highest crude protein content was recorded in sample No. 4 (10.7%), while the Almaty 2 variety showed a slightly lower value of 9.9%. Comparative amino acid analysis of sainfoin seeds revealed elevated levels of essential amino acids in sample No. 4, particularly methionine (512.8 mg/100 g), phenylalanine (890.1 mg/100 g), threonine (418.7 mg/100 g) and histidine (4453.3 mg/100 g), compared to Almaty 2 and previously reported data for wheat seeds. Some amino acids in wheat protein are considered limiting, supporting the classification of the studied Kazakhstan sainfoin varieties as sources of high-quality protein suitable for food supplements and combined food and forage use.

In the context of agricultural intensification, the search for and introduction of highly productive forage crops with high nutritional value and resistance to adverse environmental factors is of particular significance. One of such promising crop is sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.), a perennial leguminous plant that is highly resistant to drought and disease. Sainfoin is known for its ability to improve soil structure by enriching it with nitrogenous compounds owing to its extensive root system, which penetrates deeply into the soil. This powerful root system contributes to the plant’s overall viability and enhances the soil’s protection against erosion of various origins (Sakhraoui et al., 2024; Ertuş, 2021; Sariyildiz and Savaci, 2020).
       
Sainfoin plants are cultivated as a valuable and nutritious feed, highly regarded as one of the best honey plants and a source of medical preparations. In animal husbandry, sainfoin is used to produce feed and grass meal, possessing superior nutritional properties, compared to other forage crops. Perennial sainfoin has an advantage over annual forage crops during spring-summer droughts due to its drought resistance. This resistance stems from its ability to absorb moisture from deeper soil layers, facilitated by a well-developed root system (Batkhishig, 2023; Sakhraoui et al., 2024).
       
In Kazakhstan, with the intensive development of animal husbandry, creating a robust and high-quality forage base is a critical challenge. Sainfoin was introduced into field forage production in the 1950s and, due to its biological characteristics, has become widely adopted as a promising crop. A previously compiled register identifies of popular varieties and species used in forage production, selected for their suitable technological qualities summarized those efforts (Bulatova et al., 2015). However, modern data on this crop and its varietal characteristics for zoning in Kazakhstan’s diverse climatic zones are lacking. One approach to developing popular and adapted varieties is the introduction and expansion of variety samples and lines with enhanced nitrogen-fixing capacity and productivity based on selective breeding.
       
Increased sown areas of sainfoin and other legumes can be achieved through the breeding of nitrogen-fixing, high-yielding, rareripe varieties that are suitable for mechanized cultivation and harvesting and resistant to temperature fluctuations.
       
The use of forage grain legumes in crop rotations can play a key role in improving the physico-mechanical properties of soil and enhancing its fertility, simultaneously reducing the need for nitrogen fertilizers. Introducing sainfoin into cultivation helps set up a positive humus balance in crop rotations, positioning this crop as one of the best precursors for cereals. This is because sainfoin can accumulate up to 200 kg/ha of nitrogen in the arable layer, thereby increasing not only the yield of cereals but also the quality of their grain (Xiang et al., 2024; Tufenkci et al., 2006).
       
Sainfoin seeds are a valuable source of plant-based protein, which plays a critical role in providing animals with a complete diet. Several studies have emphasized that the protein fraction of sainfoin seeds is highly digestible and biologically valuable, making it an important component of animal rations, particularly in organic and pasture-based livestock systems (Craine et al., 2024; Andaç et al., 2025; Craine et al., 2023).
       
The amino acid profile of sainfoin seeds can vary significantly depending on the genotype, climatic and soil conditions, cultivation techniques and harvest stage. In this regard, studying the amino acid composition of seeds from different sainfoin varieties and lines is particularly relevant to identify forms with the highest protein value.
       
Currently, another strategic issue is functional nutrition, suggesting that specific products not only meet the body’s basic needs for proteins, fats and carbohydrates but also provide additional health benefits (Wiyono et al., 2024). For instance, sports nutrition includes products and supplements with high protein and amino acid content, as well as various beverages and shakes containing dietary fiber, probiotics, antioxidants and vitamins (Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt, 2024). In this context, the use of well-known agricultural crops, particularly legumes, which are rich in essential biologically active compounds, is highly relevant for the production and enrichment of functional foods. Therefore, studying crops such as sainfoin deserves special attention (Andaç et al., 2025). Moreover, sainfoin is not only used as livestock feed but also serves as a functional additive in the confectionery industry, derived from its seeds and leaves. Thanks to its advanced root system, sainfoin absorbs elevated levels of nutrients from the soil. Sainfoin contain several macro- and microelements, such as P, Ca, Mg, K, Ð, Fe, Mn, Fe, Cu, Ni and Zn in concentrations compared to other legumes (Kaplan et al., 2019, Kidambi et al., 1989; Baker et al., 1952; Kidambi et al., 1990). Other authors also declare that the carotene content, which is presented by neoxanthin, violaxanthin, lutein, zeaxanthin, 9z-β-carotene and 13z-β-carotene, is equal to 246 mg/ kg-1 DM in fresh mass (Rufino-Moya, 2022). Recent studies have shown that this crop possesses additional beneficial properties, due to its unique tannin composition, which provides antihelmintic effects, enhances protein absorption and prevents tympany in cattle (Carbonero et al., 2011).
       
However, it is known that by-products of nutritional components and plant raw materials may contain hazardous or potentially hazardous compounds. Therefore, upon developing recommendations for new unconventional raw materials in food production, detailed studies of their chemical and biochemical composition are necessary, which will be in the focus of our future research.
       
The relevance of this article results from the need for a comprehensive evaluation of the productivity, amino acid content and protein value of seeds from certain sainfoin varieties to identify the most promising specimens for their use in breeding programs and as a source of high-quality forage, the stock of food ingredients and biologically valuable raw materials.
       
The aim of this study is to conduct a comparative assessment of the productivity, amino acid content and protein value of seeds from the Almatinsky 2 variety of Kazakhstani selection and several sainfoin varieties (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.), with an emphasis on identifying genotypes with an optimal balance of agronomic and biochemical characteristics.

Plant material collection and experimental site
 
The experimental work was carried out at the Laboratory of Plant Genetics and Breeding, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, al-Farabi Kazakh National University (Almaty, Kazakhstan). Seed material of the Almatinsky 2 variety and 24 accessions of common sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.), along with experimental plots, were provided by the Forage Crops Laboratory of the Research Institute of Agriculture and Plant Growing, Almalybak, Almaty Region, Kazakhstan. The Almatinsky 2 variety was developed through repeated mass selection of populations under open pollination, using superior sainfoin specimens and was included in the State Register in 1980. This variety is characterized by lodging resistance and a vegetative period of 86-103 days (from sowing to full seed maturity), 52-70 days (from sowing to the first cut) and 30-42 days (from the first cut to the second cut).
 
Structural analysis
 
Structural analysis of sainfoin was conducted during the period from 2023 to 2025 based on several characteristic parameters, following the methodological guidelines for breeding perennial grasses developed by the V.R. Williams All-Union Research Institute of Forage (Dospekhov, 2014). For each biometric parameter, the mean value, standard error of the mean and correlation coefficient were calculated.
 
Statistical analysis
 
Data were analyzed using correlation, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and cluster analyses, performed with the software packages GraphPad Prism 9, Past 4, SPSS and Microsoft Excel 2021 (Sokal and Rohlf, 2013).
 
Protein content analysis
 
Protein and amino acid content were analyzed in 2024. Protein content in the samples was determined using the Kjeldahl method, following standard analytical procedures outlined by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC, 2000). Dry, homogenized seed material (1.0 g) was treated with concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO2) in the presence of a catalyst (potassium sulfate and copper sulfate) to mineralize organic nitrogen into ammonium sulfate. The samples were then neutralized with sodium hydroxide (NaOH), subjected to the sublimation (steam distillation) to release ammonia, which was trapped in a boric acid solution and titrated with a standard solution of hydrochloric acid (HCl) to quantify nitrogen content. Crude protein content was calculated by multiplying the total nitrogen content by a conversion factor of 5.95:
 
Protein (%) = Nitrogen (%) ×  5.95

To ensure accuracy and reproducibility, all measurements were performed in triplicate (Horwitz, 2000).
 
Amino acid content analysis
 
Total amino acid (AA) content in seed samples was quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) following acid hydrolysis. Amino acid derivatization was performed using pre-column phenylisothiocyanate (PITC) chromatography. Separation of amino acid derivatives by HPLC required two mobile phases. Mobile phase A consisted of 99% HPLC-grade acetonitrile and 1% acetic acid, whereas the mobile phase B comprised 99.9% HPLC-grade water, 0.1% acetic acid and 0.1 M sodium acetate. All the buffers were filtered through 0.2 µm membrane filters and degased. Chromatographic separation of amino acid fractions was conducted using a Shimadzu Prominence LC-20 system (Shimadzu, Japan), equipped with a UV detector (SPD-20A) and a fluorescence detector (RF-10AXL). The HPLC system included a binary pump (LC-20AD), an autosampler (SIL-20AC), a degasser (DGU-20A5) and a column oven (CTO-20A), controlled by LCSolution software.
 
HPLC separation
 
Samples and standards were separated using a Thermo Hypersil GOLD C18 HPLC column (150 mm × 4 mm, 5 µm). UV detection of the fraction peaks was performed at the wavelength of 254 nm. The mobile phase flow rate was 0.8 mL/min. The total HPLC run time for separating amino acid derivatives in each sample or the blank was 43 minutes.
 
Pre-column derivatization
 
Pre-column derivatization of amino acids was carried out by using phenylisothiocyanate (PITC). Sample hydrolysis (1,000 µL) was performed in 1 M HCl at 110oC for 13 hours. The hydrolyzed sample was dried under vacuum, then redissolved in 150 µL of 0.1 M NaOH, 50 µL of deionized water and 350 µL of PITC reagent (propanol/PITC/triethylamine [8:1:1, v/v/v]). The reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes. Subsequently, PITC was removed under a nitrogen atmosphere and the resulting amino acid derivative mixture was dissolved in 1.5 mL of water, filtered through a 0.45 µm syringe filter and injected into the HPLC system (injector diameter: 10 µm).
 
Amino acid standards
 
Amino acid standards (L-aspartic acid [Asp], L-glutamic acid [Glu], L-serine [Ser], L-asparagine [Asn], L-histidine [His], L-arginine [Arg], L-threonine [Thr], L-alanine [Ala], L-proline [Pro], L-cysteine [Cys], L-tyrosine [Tyr], L-valine [Val], L-methionine [Met], L-cystine [Cys-Cys], L-isoleucine [Ile], L-leucine [Leu], L-phenylalanine [Phe] and L-lysine [Lys]) were obtained from Titan Biotech Ltd. All standards were commercially available, of pharmaceutical grade and had a purity of ≥ 99%.
 
Preparation of standard solutions
 
The above-mentioned standards were accurately weighed and dissolved in 0.1 M HCl to prepare stock standard solutions for each amino acid (1 mg/mL). Each 1 mL standard solution was evaporated under vacuum and derivatized as described above. Calibration solutions were prepared by serial dilution to achieve five concentrations for each amino acid: 1, 10, 25, 50 and 100 µg/mL (Avino et al., 2006; Prasad, 2017).
To investigate the symbiotic capacity of sainfoin varieties and hybrids in planned studies, it was essential to identify accessions that surpass the reference variety Almatinsky 2 in terms of green (fresh) mass, dry mass, forage quality and protein content. According to Mohajer et al. (2012), high-yielding genotypes typically combined favorable morphological traits, supporting the integration of multivariate analysis for more efficient genotype evaluation in forage improvement programs.
       
Growth characteristics and productivity of selected sainfoin accessions from the Kazakhstani collection were evaluated under the conditions of Almaty Region. Field observations were conducted from 2023 to 2025 on experimental plots and production fields at the Kazakh Research Institute of Agriculture and Plant Growing, Almalybak, Almaty Region, Kazakhstan. Twenty-four numbered sainfoin accessions were selected for the study: 41872, 87, 40816, 1663, 40937, 1544, 40998, 40822, 41241, 40935, 40994, 42300, 38623, 40790, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, along with the reference variety Almatinsky 2. The evaluation focused on key agronomic parameters, including plant height, foliage (number of leaves per plant), productive tillering (number of productive shoots per plant), green mass yield and dry mass yield. Quantitative analysis of 50 plants per accession yielded the following results for each parameter (Fig 1).

Fig 1: Distribution of chosen sainfoin samples (cv. Almatinskiy 2, 41872, 87, 40816, 1663, 40937, 1544, 40998, 40822, 41241, 40935, 40994, 42300, 38623, 40790, 1-10).


       
Comparative analysis of plant height and foliage among the studied sainfoin accessions revealed minor variations in these parameters (Fig 1a, b). The average plant height was approximately 67 cm. Sainfoin, a herbaceous perennial, can reach stem heights of up to 1 meter.
       
Foliage significantly influences the forage quality of grasses and is indicative of overall productivity. Compared to alfalfa, sainfoin exhibits greater foliage and fleshy stems (Sokal et al., 2013). Relative to the reference variety Almatinsky 2, all numbered accessions showed increased foliage, which consistently corresponded to their plant height values (Fig 1a, b). Fig 1 illustrates the dynamics of foliage (%), which aligns with plant height (cm). A significant positive correlation was observed between these two traits, with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.60±0.02 (Fig 2).

Fig 2: Correlation matrix by different studied characters.


 
Plant height and productivity
 
The reference variety Almatinsky 2 exhibited a reduced foliage index (39.0±0.5%) with minimal relation to plant height (69.0±0.8 cm). In contrast, the accession No. 3 displayed high, consistent values for both plant height (79.0 ±0.7 cm) and foliage (51.6±0.9%) (Fig 1a, b). However, this correlation between foliage and plant height did not corres-pond to increased yields of green or dry mass (Fig 1d).
       
Productive tillering, defined as the ability of plants to form additional shoots, is a critical breeding trait influencing crop productivity. Analysis of the tillering determined three accessions - 40937, 41241 and 40935, that exhibited significantly greater green and dry mass yields compared to the reference variety Almatinsky 2 (Fig 1c). A substantial positive correlation was observed between tillering and green mass yield in sainfoin, with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.70±0.02 (P<0.01) (Fig 2). However, no significant correlations were detected between other trait pairs, such as foliage and dry mass yield or foliage and tillering (Fig 2).
       
Dry mass yield is a key indicator of the breeding value of forage crops. To evaluate this parameter, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to identify the most promising genotypes for the yield potential. Sainfoin dry mass is a valuable animal feed-stuff, enriched with vitamins and minerals, including vitamin C and calcium, which are particularly beneficial for young cattle (Craine et al. 2023).
       
Dry mass yield data (Fig 1d) indicated that most tested accessions exhibited stable mean values comparable to the trend line of the reference variety Almatinsky 2. However, accessions 40937, 40822, 4, 41241 and 40935 showed considerable deviations in dry mass yield relative to the reference variety, as determined by ANOVA (Fig 3).

Fig 3: Comparative analysis of dry matter yield of sainfoin, cv. Almatinskiy 2 (reference variety) and 24 specimens of the Kazakh collection. 


       
To classify the studied plant collection’s variety samples into groups similar in a set of characteristics, the cluster analysis method was applied. For this, the Ward method with the Euclidean distance as a tool for measuring the extent of similarity was used. The clustering data are presented as a dendrogram (Fig 4).

Fig 4: Dendrogram of clustered sainfoin collection samples by economically valuable characters using Ward’s method. 


       
The following characteristics were considered as important economically valuable characteristics of sainfoin: plant height, tillering, foliage, green and dry productive mass. Based on the cluster analysis, 6 clusters were obtained. In this case, the variety samples forming a single cluster had a similar set of characteristics. The first and second clusters included 4 sainfoin variety samples (40937, 41241, 40935, 40822), which were characterized by a tall stem, high tillering, green and dry mass (Table 1).

Table 1: Comparative study of five selected sainfoin varieties from Kazakhstani collection based on the main economically valuable characteristics (2023-2025).


 
Cluster grouping of accessions
 
The third cluster comprised seven sainfoin accessions (38623, 40790, 9, 2, 41872, 1544, 42300), characterized by low productivity in terms of green and dry mass yields.
       
Accession No. 4 was ascribed to a distinct fourth cluster, exhibiting average values for all traits except dry mass yield, which was notably high (Table 1). This accession matched the reference variety Almatinsky 2 across all evaluated parameters, except its superior dry mass yield, indicating its high forage quality.
       
The fifth cluster included the reference variety Almatinsky 2 and six sainfoin accessions, all displaying similar average values for all traits, comparable to the control.
       
The sixth cluster consisted of six accessions (40998, 40994, 10, 40816, 87, 3). These accessions differed from the reference variety in dry mass yield, although the differences were generally insignificant or did not exceed the control (Fig 3). For other evaluated parameters, the values were either comparable to or slightly higher than the control, with no substantial impact on green or dry mass yields.
 
Selection of promising genotypes
 
Cluster analysis enabled the grouping of 25 sainfoin accessions based on multiple traits, identifying clusters of closely related genotypes. Based on the results of analysis of variance (ANOVA) and cluster analysis, five accessions, such as 40937, 40822, 41241, 40935 and 4 were selected from the 25 evaluated for their superior performance compared to the reference variety Almatinsky 2 (Table 1). These accessions were identified as the most promising for further breeding and genetic studies.
 
Protein content and amino acid profile
 
Given the growing importance of functional nutrition, this study also assessed the crude protein content in seeds of the reference variety Almatinsky 2 and accession No. 4, selected as the top-performing accession. Additionally, the amino acid composition of seed proteins from both the reference variety and accession No. 4 was determined (Table 2, Fig 5). The accession No. 4 surpassed the reference variety in crude protein content, with the values of 10.7% and 9.9%, respectively.

Table 2: Amino acid composition of sainfoin seeds of the cv. Almatinsky 2 (No. 2) and sample No. 4. AA - amino acid, *Essential amino acids Samples Amino acid content, mg/100 g.



Fig 5: Comparative analysis of amino acid profiles from seeds of sample No. 4 of sainfoin and wheat seeds (based on average values from literature data).


       
Comparative analysis of the amino acid profiles of the two evaluated accessions (Almatinsky 2 and No. 4) revealed significant quantitative differences in the content of both essential and non-essential amino acids (Table 2).
       
Accession No. 4 exhibited higher concentrations of most amino acids compared to the reference variety Almatinsky 2, suggesting greater biological, forage and nutritional value. Particular attention was focused on essential amino acids, which are critical for complete protein nutrition. Noteworthy, accession No. 4 contained significantly higher levels of histidine (4453.33 µg/100 g vs. 3472.40 µg/100 g in Almatinsky 2). Histidine is the essential substance for tissue growth and development, hemoglobin synthesis and immune system function (Wu, 2010).
       
Accession No. 4 also exposed substantially higher levels of other essential amino acids, including methionine (512.82 µg/100 g vs. 283.64 µg/100 g in the reference variety), which is involved in methylation, detoxification and cysteine biosynthesis (Brosnan and Brosnan, 2006) and lysine (260.67 µg/100 g vs. 144.23 µg/100 g), which is crucial for growth, antibody formation and calcium absorption (Martínez, 2017; Matthews, 2020). Some studies point out the synergistic role of lysine and vitamin C in synthesizing L-carnitine, which enhances muscle oxygen utilization, improves endurance and supports bone growth and collagen production in connective and bone tissues (Furusawa et al., 2008).
       
Furthermore, accession No. 4 has indicated the elevated levels of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), specifically leucine and isoleucine. These amino acids, constituting up to 35% of muscle tissue, play a central role in skeletal muscle metabolism, recovery from physical exertion and activation of protein biosynthesis (Newsholme and Blomstrand, 2006). The increased content of these amino acids enhances the potential value of accession No. 4 for sports nutrition and therapeutic diets.
       
Arginine content in accession No. 4 (5324.16 µg/100 g) also significantly exceeded that of the reference variety (3943.21 µg/100 g). Arginine is vital for regulating vascular tone, wound healing and nitric oxide synthesis, particularly under physiological stress (Wu et al., 2009).
       
Additionally, accession No. 4 exhibited higher levels of cystine, alanine, aspartic acid and other amino acids compared to Almatinsky 2, indicating an enriched protein composition or greater bioavailability.
       
Accession No. 4 had lower tyrosine content (230.71 µg/100 g) compared to Almatinsky 2 (409.36 µg/100 g), but significantly higher phenylalanine content (890.08 µg/100 g vs. 511.73 µg/100 g). The phenylalanine-to-tyrosine ratio (tyrosinylation coefficient) in accession No. 4 was 3.86, more than three times higher than that of the reference variety (1.25). This elevated ratio may reflect greater comprehensive stability (mechanical, thermal and chemical) of membrane proteins in accession No. 4 compared to the control (Scriver et al., 2001). It may also indicate increased activity of enzymes involved in the tyrosine biosynthesis (Zhumabaeva et al., 2017).
 
Comparison with wheat
 
Given the potential use of sainfoin seed powder in flour-based confectionery products (Tarasenko, 2015), a comparative analysis was conducted between the experimentally determined key amino acid contents in seeds of accession No. 4 and wheat seeds, based on literature data (Zenkova, 2019). Fig 5 presents the amino acid profiles of accession No. 4 (blue) and wheat (orange), expressed in mg/100 g of product (Fig 5).
       
Accession No. 4 showed higher methionine content comparing to the wheat, suggesting greater biological value of the former in this respect. Methionine is a limiting amino acid in cereals and its elevated presence can improve the overall amino acid profile of a product. Methionine plays a critical role in metabolism, protein biosynthesis and the reaction of transmethylation as the methyl group donor (via S-adenosylmethionine). It is also involved in the synthesis of biomolecules, such as cysteine, creatine and glutathione, thereby supporting the cellular antioxidant defense. Methionine deficiency can impair growth and protein metabolism, particularly in humans and  animals consuming grains with low amounts of this amino acid (Brosnan and Brosnan, 2006).
       
By contrast, glutamic acid and proline contents were significantly higher in wheat, attributed to the elevated levels of glutelins and prolamins, which determine the technological properties of wheat flour. Oppositely, sainfoin accession No. 4 disposed lower levels of these amino acids, suggesting differences in protein composition and functional properties, when compared to the wheat grain.

Cystine was present in substantial amounts in accession No. 4 (~1800 mg/100 g), whereas wheat contained significantly smaller amounts of that amino acid. Cystine and proline are amino acids playing substantial biological roles in plant stress adaptation.
       
Analysis revealed that sainfoin accession No. 4 excelled wheat in the content of several biologically valuable amino acids, namely arginine, histidine and aspartic acid. Arginine and histidine play critical parts in protein metabolism and immunomodulation, specifying the high nutritional and functional value of this sainfoin accession. Higher arginine content, which supports nitric oxide synthesis and nitrogen metabolism regulation and the increased histidine levels, essential for hemoglobin synthesis and tissue growth, are particularly remarkable.
       
Accession No. 4 also has demonstrated a significant accumulation of aspartic acid (2985.1 mg/100 g) compared to wheat grain (598.3 mg/100 g). Aspartic acid is imperative for energy metabolism, brain function and the synthesis of other amino acids. Aspartate contributes to ATP generation, acts as a neurotransmitter, supports the functioning of the central nervous system and participates in DNA replication and transcription. Moreover, D-aspartate can temporarily stimulate  testosterone synthesis (Roshanzamir and Safavi, 2017).
       
Accession No. 4 has surpassed wheat by the content of phenylalanine and threonine, amino acids that are limited in wheat protein but decisive for its enhanced biological value. Phenylalanine (890.08 mg/100 g, as previously discussed) and threonine (418.73 mg/100 g) levels in sainfoin were obviously higher than those in wheat flour (491.8 mg/100 g and 116.7 mg/100 g, respectively). Threonine is an essential amino acid that neutralizes toxins, supports fat metabolism in the liver and serves as the key component of collagen (Lee and Kim, 2019; Wen et al., 2023).
       
Comparative analysis depicts the balanced amino acid profile of sainfoin accession No. 4 relative to wheat grain, positioning this sanfoin specimen as a promising candidate for developing functional food products or combined protein mixtures in dry or liquid forms. Increased antioxidant activity under stress conditions may reflect an adaptive metabolic response, highlighting the species as a promising source of biologically active compounds (Beyaz and Yıldız, 2020). This, in turn, supports its potential application in the development of functional feed additives.
This study demonstrated that sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) grown under the agroecological conditions of the Almaty Region shows stable productivity and high protein quality. Significant differences between the Almatinsky 2 variety and accession No. 4 indicate substantial genetic variability and strong breeding potential.
       
Accession No. 4 exhibited an improved amino acid profile, with higher levels of essential amino acids (methionine, phenylalanine, threonine, and histidine) compared to the control and wheat, highlighting its value as a high-quality protein source. The observed amino acid balance further supports its potential use in functional foods and specialized nutrition.
       
Overall, the studied sainfoin accessions represent promising genetic resources for forage production and breeding programs aimed at enhancing protein composition. They may also serve as alternative protein sources to complement cereal-based diets, particularly in regions with similar environmental conditions.
This article was supported by Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Grant Program AP23488711 “Integration of Selective Molecular Marking and Plant Inoculation with Nitrogen Fixers for the Formation of Optimal Sainfoin Germplasm in Southeast Kazakhstan”.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
The authors declare no conflict of interests.

  1. Andaç, A.E., Yılmaz Tuncel, N., Tülbek, M.Ç. and Tuncel, N.B. (2025). Characterization and effects of heat treatments on antinutritional components and enzyme activities in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia L.) seeds: A high-protein alternative plant-based food source. Food Research International. 199: 115372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres. 2024.115372. 

  2. Avino, P., Campanella, L. and Russo, M.V. (2006). High-performance liquid chromatography intercom parative study for amino acid analysis in two tissues by PITC- and OPA-derivatizations. Analytical Letters. 34(6): 867-882. https://doi.org/10. 1081/AL-100103598. 

  3. Baker, C.J.L., Heimberg, M., Alderman, G. and Eden, A. (1952). Studies of the composition of sainfoin. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 42(4): 382-394. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S0021859600057282. 

  4. Batkhishig, Z. and Batmunkh, L. (2023). Result of the research on sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa L.) varieties in the Great Lake region of Mongolia. Proceedings of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences. 63(4): 37-43. https://doi.org/10. 5564/pmas.v63i04.3433. 

  5. Beyaz, R. and Yıldız, M. (2020). Influence of PEG-induced drought stress on antioxidant components of callus tissue of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) ecotypes. Legume Research. 44(2): 197-201. doi: 10.18805/LR-556.

  6. Brosnan, J.T. and Brosnan, M.E. (2006). The sulfur-containing amino acids: An overview. The Journal of Nutrition. 136(6 Suppl): 1636S-1640S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/ 136.6.1636S.

  7. Bulatova, K.K., Massonichich-Shotunova, R., Meiirman, G. and Mazkirat, S. (2015). Diversity of sainfoin (Onobrychis Mill.) collection samples according to the spectra of storage proteins. Genetika. 47: 375-382. https://doi.org/10.2298/ GENSR1502375B.

  8. Carbonero, C.H., Mueller-Harvey, I., Brown, T.A. and Smith, L. (2011). Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia): A beneficial forage legume. Plant Genetic Resources. 9(1): 70-85. https:// doi.org/10.1017/S1479262110000328.

  9. Craine, E.B., Makav, M., Dağ, S., Uysal, A.Y., Eroğlu, H.A. and Kuru, B.B. (2024). Effect of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) seed-based diet on rats: A comprehensive evaluation of hemogram, biochemistry and histopathology. Food Science and Nutrition. 12(7): 4692-4701. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/fsn3.4117.

  10. Craine, E.B., Şakiroğlu, M., Peters, T.E., Barriball, S. and Schlautman, B. (2023). Nutritional quality of (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) seeds: A potentially novel perennial pulse crop for human use. Legume Science. 5(4): e189. https:// doi.org/10.1002/leg3.189.

  11. Dospekhov, B.A. (2014). Methodology of field experiments (with the basics of statistical processing of research results). Moscow: Alliance. p. 350.

  12. Ertuş, M.M. (2021). Genetic relationship in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) landraces cultivated in East Anatolia using RAPD and ISSR markers. Legume Research. 44(8): 888- 893. doi: 10.18805/LR-614.

  13. Furusawa, H., Sato, Y., Tanaka, Y., Inai, Y., Amano, A. and Iwama, M. (2008). Vitamin C is not essential for carnitine biosynthesis in vivo: Verification in vitamin C-depleted senescence marker protein-30/gluconolactonase knockout mice. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 31(9): 1673- 1679. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.31.1673. 

  14. Horwitz, W. (2000). Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 17th edn. Arlington, VA: AOAC International.

  15. Kaplan, M. (2019). Fatty acid and trace element compositions of the seeds of different Onobrychis viciifolia genotypes. Genetika. 51(2): 585-593. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1902585K.

  16. Kidambi, S.P., Matches, A.G. and Bolger, T.P. (1990). Mineral concentrations in alfalfa and sainfoin as influenced by soil moisture level. Agronomy Journal. 82(2): 229-236. https://doi.org/ 10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200020012x.

  17. Kidambi, S.P., Matches, A.G. and Griggs, T.C. (1989). Variability for Ca, Mg, K, Cu, Zn and K/(Ca + Mg) ratio among three wheatgrasses and sainfoin on the southern high plains. Journal of Range Management. 42(4): 316-322. https:// doi.org/10.2307/3899502.

  18. Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt, K. (2024). Plant-based proteins, peptides and amino acids in food products dedicated for sportspeople: A narrative review of the literature. Nutrients. 16(11): 1706. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111706.

  19. Lee, D.Y. and Kim, E.H. (2019). Therapeutic effects of amino acids in liver diseases: Current studies and future perspectives. Journal of Cancer Prevention. 24(2): 72-78. https:// doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2019.24.2.72.

  20. Martínez, Y., Li, X., Liu, G., Bin, P., Yan, W., Más, D., Valdivié, M. and Hu, C.A.A. (2017). The role of methionine on metabolism, oxidative stress, and diseases. Amino Acids. 49(12): 2091-2098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-017-2494-2.

  21. Matthews, D.E. (2020). Review of lysine metabolism with a focus on humans. The Journal of Nutrition. 150(Suppl 1): pp. 2548S-2555S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxaa224.

  22. Mohajer, S., Jafari, A.A., Taha, R.M. and Bakrudeen, A.A. (2012). Evaluation of yield and morphology traits in 72 genotypes of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) through factor analysis. Legume Research. 35(2): 132-137. 

  23. Newsholme, E.A. and Blomstrand, E. (2006). Branched-chain amino acids and central fatigue. The Journal of Nutrition. 136(1Suppl): 274S-276S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/ 136.1.274S.

  24. Prasad, K. (2017). HPLC analysis of amino acid and antioxidant composition of three medicinal plants of (Pithoragarh) Uttarakhand Himalayas. Journal of Analytical and Pharmaceutical Research. 6(4): 00186. https://doi.org/10.15406/ japlr.2017.06.00186.

  25. Roshanzamir, F. and Safavi, S.M. (2017). The putative effects of D-aspartic acid on blood testosterone levels: A systematic review. International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine. 15(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijrm.15.1.1.

  26. Rufino-Moya, P.J., Bertolín, J.R., Blanco, M., Lobón, S. and Joy, M. (2022). Fatty acid profile, secondary compounds and antioxidant activities in the fresh forage, hay and silage of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) and sulla (Hedysarum coronarium). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 102(11): 4736-4743. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11834.

  27. Sakhraoui, A., Ltaeif, H.B., Sakhraoui, A., Villalba, J.J., Castillo, J.M. and Rouz, S. (2024). Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia): A legume with great ecological and agronomical potential under climate change. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 162(4): 307-331. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859624 000327.

  28. Sariyildiz, T. and Savaci, G. (2020). Ability of green cover from sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) and dog rose (Rosa canina L.) to control erosion and improve soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks in terraces of Northwest Turkey. Euro- Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration. 5(1): 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-020-0148-3.

  29. Scriver, C.R., Beaudet, A.L., Sly, W.S. and Valle, D. (2001). The metabolic and molecular bases of inherited disease. 8th edn.  New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.

  30. Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (2013). Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 4th edn. New York: W.H. Freeman.

  31. Tarasenko, N.A., Butina, E.A. and Gerasimenko, E.O. (2015). Peculiarities of chemical composition of sainfoin seeds powder. Oriental Journal of Chemistry. 31(3): 1673-1682.

  32. Tufenkci, S., Erman, M. and Sönmez, F.  (2006). Effects of phosphorus and nitrogen applications and Rhizobium inoculation on the yield and nutrient uptake of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia L.) under irrigated conditions in Turkey. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 49(1): 101- 105. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00288233.2006.9513699. 

  33. Wen, M.L., Xu, F., Li, X.Q., Zhang, Z.Y., Wang, L.S., Liu, L., Yang, C.W. and Zhang, C.N. (2023). Dietary threonine improves muscle nutritional value and muscle hardness associated with collagen synthesis in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Food Chemistry. 422:  136223. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136223. 

  34. Wiyono, N., Yudhani, R., Wasita, B., Suyatmi, S., Wardhani, L.O., Pesik, R.N., Yarso, K.Y. and Rahayu, R.F. (2024). Exploring the therapeutic potential of functional foods for diabetes: A bibliometric analysis and scientific mapping. Narra Journal. 4(1): e382. https:// doi.org/10.52225/narra.v4i1.382. 

  35. Wu, G. (2010). Functional amino acids in growth, reproduction and health. Advances in Nutrition. 1(1): 31-37. https://doi.org/ 10.3945/an.110.1008.

  36. Wu, G., Bazer, F.W., Davis, T.A., Kim, S.W., Li, P., Rhoads, J.M., Satterfield, M.C., Smith, S.B., Spencer, T.E. and Yin, Y. (2009). Arginine metabolism and nutrition in growth, health and disease. Amino Acids. 37(1): 153-168. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00726-008-0210-y. 

  37. Xiang, H., Xu, J., Wei, S., Yang, H., Song, J. and Yu, X. (2024). Crop rotation of sainfoin on the Longzhong Loess Plateau has a positive effect on enhancing soil carbon sequestration potential. Agriculture. 14(12): 12160. https://doi.org/10. 3390/agriculture14122160. 

  38. Zenkova, M.L. (2019). Mineral and amino acid composition of germinated and canned wheat grains. Food Processing: Techniques and Technology. 49(4): 513-521. https:// doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2019-4-513-521. 

  39. Zhumabaeva, B., Dzhangalina, E., Aytasheva, Z., Lebedeva, L., Inelova, Z. and Chunetova, Z. (2017). Morphogenetic and biochemical study on university common bean collection. OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences. 17(4): 335-342. https://doi.org/ 10.3844/ojbsci.2017.335.342.

Evaluation of Productivity and Seed Amino Acid Composition of Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) Cultivated in the Almaty Region of Kazakhstan

S
S.B. Dauletbayeva1
Z
Z.G. Aytasheva1
B
B.A. Zhumabayeva1
Z
Zh. Zh. Chunetova1,*
N
N.A. Altybaeva1
S
S. Abayev2
L
L.P. Lebedeva3
1Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71 al-Farabi Ave., 050040, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
2Kazakh Scientific Research Institute of Agriculture and Crop production, 1 Erlepesova st., 040909, Almalybak village, Karasay dist., Almaty region, Kazakhstan.
3Institute of General Genetics and Physiology, 93 al-Farabi St., 050060, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
  • Submitted22-01-2026|

  • Accepted07-04-2026|

  • First Online 18-04-2026|

  • doi 10.18805/LRF-931

Background: In Kazakhstan, the rapid expansion of animal husbandry has made the development of a stable, high-quality forage base a key priority and since its introduction into field production, sainfoin has gained widespread recognition as a promising crop due to its favorable biological traits. The aim of this study was to examine the sainfoin (Onobrychis vicifolia Scop.), variety Almaty 2, developed due to domestic selection efforts, along with 24 additional variety samples from the collection material. These patterns were evaluated for key economically valuable traits, including productivity, seed protein content and amino acid composition.

Methods: A field assessment of the local breeding material was conducted using phenological observations and measurements. The samples were ranked according to their total productivity of green and dry mass and subject to cluster and correlation analyses.

Result: Five specimens out of the 24 sainfoin variety samples demonstrated a high level of productivity based on dry mass yield. The highest crude protein content was recorded in sample No. 4 (10.7%), while the Almaty 2 variety showed a slightly lower value of 9.9%. Comparative amino acid analysis of sainfoin seeds revealed elevated levels of essential amino acids in sample No. 4, particularly methionine (512.8 mg/100 g), phenylalanine (890.1 mg/100 g), threonine (418.7 mg/100 g) and histidine (4453.3 mg/100 g), compared to Almaty 2 and previously reported data for wheat seeds. Some amino acids in wheat protein are considered limiting, supporting the classification of the studied Kazakhstan sainfoin varieties as sources of high-quality protein suitable for food supplements and combined food and forage use.

In the context of agricultural intensification, the search for and introduction of highly productive forage crops with high nutritional value and resistance to adverse environmental factors is of particular significance. One of such promising crop is sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.), a perennial leguminous plant that is highly resistant to drought and disease. Sainfoin is known for its ability to improve soil structure by enriching it with nitrogenous compounds owing to its extensive root system, which penetrates deeply into the soil. This powerful root system contributes to the plant’s overall viability and enhances the soil’s protection against erosion of various origins (Sakhraoui et al., 2024; Ertuş, 2021; Sariyildiz and Savaci, 2020).
       
Sainfoin plants are cultivated as a valuable and nutritious feed, highly regarded as one of the best honey plants and a source of medical preparations. In animal husbandry, sainfoin is used to produce feed and grass meal, possessing superior nutritional properties, compared to other forage crops. Perennial sainfoin has an advantage over annual forage crops during spring-summer droughts due to its drought resistance. This resistance stems from its ability to absorb moisture from deeper soil layers, facilitated by a well-developed root system (Batkhishig, 2023; Sakhraoui et al., 2024).
       
In Kazakhstan, with the intensive development of animal husbandry, creating a robust and high-quality forage base is a critical challenge. Sainfoin was introduced into field forage production in the 1950s and, due to its biological characteristics, has become widely adopted as a promising crop. A previously compiled register identifies of popular varieties and species used in forage production, selected for their suitable technological qualities summarized those efforts (Bulatova et al., 2015). However, modern data on this crop and its varietal characteristics for zoning in Kazakhstan’s diverse climatic zones are lacking. One approach to developing popular and adapted varieties is the introduction and expansion of variety samples and lines with enhanced nitrogen-fixing capacity and productivity based on selective breeding.
       
Increased sown areas of sainfoin and other legumes can be achieved through the breeding of nitrogen-fixing, high-yielding, rareripe varieties that are suitable for mechanized cultivation and harvesting and resistant to temperature fluctuations.
       
The use of forage grain legumes in crop rotations can play a key role in improving the physico-mechanical properties of soil and enhancing its fertility, simultaneously reducing the need for nitrogen fertilizers. Introducing sainfoin into cultivation helps set up a positive humus balance in crop rotations, positioning this crop as one of the best precursors for cereals. This is because sainfoin can accumulate up to 200 kg/ha of nitrogen in the arable layer, thereby increasing not only the yield of cereals but also the quality of their grain (Xiang et al., 2024; Tufenkci et al., 2006).
       
Sainfoin seeds are a valuable source of plant-based protein, which plays a critical role in providing animals with a complete diet. Several studies have emphasized that the protein fraction of sainfoin seeds is highly digestible and biologically valuable, making it an important component of animal rations, particularly in organic and pasture-based livestock systems (Craine et al., 2024; Andaç et al., 2025; Craine et al., 2023).
       
The amino acid profile of sainfoin seeds can vary significantly depending on the genotype, climatic and soil conditions, cultivation techniques and harvest stage. In this regard, studying the amino acid composition of seeds from different sainfoin varieties and lines is particularly relevant to identify forms with the highest protein value.
       
Currently, another strategic issue is functional nutrition, suggesting that specific products not only meet the body’s basic needs for proteins, fats and carbohydrates but also provide additional health benefits (Wiyono et al., 2024). For instance, sports nutrition includes products and supplements with high protein and amino acid content, as well as various beverages and shakes containing dietary fiber, probiotics, antioxidants and vitamins (Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt, 2024). In this context, the use of well-known agricultural crops, particularly legumes, which are rich in essential biologically active compounds, is highly relevant for the production and enrichment of functional foods. Therefore, studying crops such as sainfoin deserves special attention (Andaç et al., 2025). Moreover, sainfoin is not only used as livestock feed but also serves as a functional additive in the confectionery industry, derived from its seeds and leaves. Thanks to its advanced root system, sainfoin absorbs elevated levels of nutrients from the soil. Sainfoin contain several macro- and microelements, such as P, Ca, Mg, K, Ð, Fe, Mn, Fe, Cu, Ni and Zn in concentrations compared to other legumes (Kaplan et al., 2019, Kidambi et al., 1989; Baker et al., 1952; Kidambi et al., 1990). Other authors also declare that the carotene content, which is presented by neoxanthin, violaxanthin, lutein, zeaxanthin, 9z-β-carotene and 13z-β-carotene, is equal to 246 mg/ kg-1 DM in fresh mass (Rufino-Moya, 2022). Recent studies have shown that this crop possesses additional beneficial properties, due to its unique tannin composition, which provides antihelmintic effects, enhances protein absorption and prevents tympany in cattle (Carbonero et al., 2011).
       
However, it is known that by-products of nutritional components and plant raw materials may contain hazardous or potentially hazardous compounds. Therefore, upon developing recommendations for new unconventional raw materials in food production, detailed studies of their chemical and biochemical composition are necessary, which will be in the focus of our future research.
       
The relevance of this article results from the need for a comprehensive evaluation of the productivity, amino acid content and protein value of seeds from certain sainfoin varieties to identify the most promising specimens for their use in breeding programs and as a source of high-quality forage, the stock of food ingredients and biologically valuable raw materials.
       
The aim of this study is to conduct a comparative assessment of the productivity, amino acid content and protein value of seeds from the Almatinsky 2 variety of Kazakhstani selection and several sainfoin varieties (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.), with an emphasis on identifying genotypes with an optimal balance of agronomic and biochemical characteristics.

Plant material collection and experimental site
 
The experimental work was carried out at the Laboratory of Plant Genetics and Breeding, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, al-Farabi Kazakh National University (Almaty, Kazakhstan). Seed material of the Almatinsky 2 variety and 24 accessions of common sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.), along with experimental plots, were provided by the Forage Crops Laboratory of the Research Institute of Agriculture and Plant Growing, Almalybak, Almaty Region, Kazakhstan. The Almatinsky 2 variety was developed through repeated mass selection of populations under open pollination, using superior sainfoin specimens and was included in the State Register in 1980. This variety is characterized by lodging resistance and a vegetative period of 86-103 days (from sowing to full seed maturity), 52-70 days (from sowing to the first cut) and 30-42 days (from the first cut to the second cut).
 
Structural analysis
 
Structural analysis of sainfoin was conducted during the period from 2023 to 2025 based on several characteristic parameters, following the methodological guidelines for breeding perennial grasses developed by the V.R. Williams All-Union Research Institute of Forage (Dospekhov, 2014). For each biometric parameter, the mean value, standard error of the mean and correlation coefficient were calculated.
 
Statistical analysis
 
Data were analyzed using correlation, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and cluster analyses, performed with the software packages GraphPad Prism 9, Past 4, SPSS and Microsoft Excel 2021 (Sokal and Rohlf, 2013).
 
Protein content analysis
 
Protein and amino acid content were analyzed in 2024. Protein content in the samples was determined using the Kjeldahl method, following standard analytical procedures outlined by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC, 2000). Dry, homogenized seed material (1.0 g) was treated with concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO2) in the presence of a catalyst (potassium sulfate and copper sulfate) to mineralize organic nitrogen into ammonium sulfate. The samples were then neutralized with sodium hydroxide (NaOH), subjected to the sublimation (steam distillation) to release ammonia, which was trapped in a boric acid solution and titrated with a standard solution of hydrochloric acid (HCl) to quantify nitrogen content. Crude protein content was calculated by multiplying the total nitrogen content by a conversion factor of 5.95:
 
Protein (%) = Nitrogen (%) ×  5.95

To ensure accuracy and reproducibility, all measurements were performed in triplicate (Horwitz, 2000).
 
Amino acid content analysis
 
Total amino acid (AA) content in seed samples was quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) following acid hydrolysis. Amino acid derivatization was performed using pre-column phenylisothiocyanate (PITC) chromatography. Separation of amino acid derivatives by HPLC required two mobile phases. Mobile phase A consisted of 99% HPLC-grade acetonitrile and 1% acetic acid, whereas the mobile phase B comprised 99.9% HPLC-grade water, 0.1% acetic acid and 0.1 M sodium acetate. All the buffers were filtered through 0.2 µm membrane filters and degased. Chromatographic separation of amino acid fractions was conducted using a Shimadzu Prominence LC-20 system (Shimadzu, Japan), equipped with a UV detector (SPD-20A) and a fluorescence detector (RF-10AXL). The HPLC system included a binary pump (LC-20AD), an autosampler (SIL-20AC), a degasser (DGU-20A5) and a column oven (CTO-20A), controlled by LCSolution software.
 
HPLC separation
 
Samples and standards were separated using a Thermo Hypersil GOLD C18 HPLC column (150 mm × 4 mm, 5 µm). UV detection of the fraction peaks was performed at the wavelength of 254 nm. The mobile phase flow rate was 0.8 mL/min. The total HPLC run time for separating amino acid derivatives in each sample or the blank was 43 minutes.
 
Pre-column derivatization
 
Pre-column derivatization of amino acids was carried out by using phenylisothiocyanate (PITC). Sample hydrolysis (1,000 µL) was performed in 1 M HCl at 110oC for 13 hours. The hydrolyzed sample was dried under vacuum, then redissolved in 150 µL of 0.1 M NaOH, 50 µL of deionized water and 350 µL of PITC reagent (propanol/PITC/triethylamine [8:1:1, v/v/v]). The reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes. Subsequently, PITC was removed under a nitrogen atmosphere and the resulting amino acid derivative mixture was dissolved in 1.5 mL of water, filtered through a 0.45 µm syringe filter and injected into the HPLC system (injector diameter: 10 µm).
 
Amino acid standards
 
Amino acid standards (L-aspartic acid [Asp], L-glutamic acid [Glu], L-serine [Ser], L-asparagine [Asn], L-histidine [His], L-arginine [Arg], L-threonine [Thr], L-alanine [Ala], L-proline [Pro], L-cysteine [Cys], L-tyrosine [Tyr], L-valine [Val], L-methionine [Met], L-cystine [Cys-Cys], L-isoleucine [Ile], L-leucine [Leu], L-phenylalanine [Phe] and L-lysine [Lys]) were obtained from Titan Biotech Ltd. All standards were commercially available, of pharmaceutical grade and had a purity of ≥ 99%.
 
Preparation of standard solutions
 
The above-mentioned standards were accurately weighed and dissolved in 0.1 M HCl to prepare stock standard solutions for each amino acid (1 mg/mL). Each 1 mL standard solution was evaporated under vacuum and derivatized as described above. Calibration solutions were prepared by serial dilution to achieve five concentrations for each amino acid: 1, 10, 25, 50 and 100 µg/mL (Avino et al., 2006; Prasad, 2017).
To investigate the symbiotic capacity of sainfoin varieties and hybrids in planned studies, it was essential to identify accessions that surpass the reference variety Almatinsky 2 in terms of green (fresh) mass, dry mass, forage quality and protein content. According to Mohajer et al. (2012), high-yielding genotypes typically combined favorable morphological traits, supporting the integration of multivariate analysis for more efficient genotype evaluation in forage improvement programs.
       
Growth characteristics and productivity of selected sainfoin accessions from the Kazakhstani collection were evaluated under the conditions of Almaty Region. Field observations were conducted from 2023 to 2025 on experimental plots and production fields at the Kazakh Research Institute of Agriculture and Plant Growing, Almalybak, Almaty Region, Kazakhstan. Twenty-four numbered sainfoin accessions were selected for the study: 41872, 87, 40816, 1663, 40937, 1544, 40998, 40822, 41241, 40935, 40994, 42300, 38623, 40790, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, along with the reference variety Almatinsky 2. The evaluation focused on key agronomic parameters, including plant height, foliage (number of leaves per plant), productive tillering (number of productive shoots per plant), green mass yield and dry mass yield. Quantitative analysis of 50 plants per accession yielded the following results for each parameter (Fig 1).

Fig 1: Distribution of chosen sainfoin samples (cv. Almatinskiy 2, 41872, 87, 40816, 1663, 40937, 1544, 40998, 40822, 41241, 40935, 40994, 42300, 38623, 40790, 1-10).


       
Comparative analysis of plant height and foliage among the studied sainfoin accessions revealed minor variations in these parameters (Fig 1a, b). The average plant height was approximately 67 cm. Sainfoin, a herbaceous perennial, can reach stem heights of up to 1 meter.
       
Foliage significantly influences the forage quality of grasses and is indicative of overall productivity. Compared to alfalfa, sainfoin exhibits greater foliage and fleshy stems (Sokal et al., 2013). Relative to the reference variety Almatinsky 2, all numbered accessions showed increased foliage, which consistently corresponded to their plant height values (Fig 1a, b). Fig 1 illustrates the dynamics of foliage (%), which aligns with plant height (cm). A significant positive correlation was observed between these two traits, with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.60±0.02 (Fig 2).

Fig 2: Correlation matrix by different studied characters.


 
Plant height and productivity
 
The reference variety Almatinsky 2 exhibited a reduced foliage index (39.0±0.5%) with minimal relation to plant height (69.0±0.8 cm). In contrast, the accession No. 3 displayed high, consistent values for both plant height (79.0 ±0.7 cm) and foliage (51.6±0.9%) (Fig 1a, b). However, this correlation between foliage and plant height did not corres-pond to increased yields of green or dry mass (Fig 1d).
       
Productive tillering, defined as the ability of plants to form additional shoots, is a critical breeding trait influencing crop productivity. Analysis of the tillering determined three accessions - 40937, 41241 and 40935, that exhibited significantly greater green and dry mass yields compared to the reference variety Almatinsky 2 (Fig 1c). A substantial positive correlation was observed between tillering and green mass yield in sainfoin, with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.70±0.02 (P<0.01) (Fig 2). However, no significant correlations were detected between other trait pairs, such as foliage and dry mass yield or foliage and tillering (Fig 2).
       
Dry mass yield is a key indicator of the breeding value of forage crops. To evaluate this parameter, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to identify the most promising genotypes for the yield potential. Sainfoin dry mass is a valuable animal feed-stuff, enriched with vitamins and minerals, including vitamin C and calcium, which are particularly beneficial for young cattle (Craine et al. 2023).
       
Dry mass yield data (Fig 1d) indicated that most tested accessions exhibited stable mean values comparable to the trend line of the reference variety Almatinsky 2. However, accessions 40937, 40822, 4, 41241 and 40935 showed considerable deviations in dry mass yield relative to the reference variety, as determined by ANOVA (Fig 3).

Fig 3: Comparative analysis of dry matter yield of sainfoin, cv. Almatinskiy 2 (reference variety) and 24 specimens of the Kazakh collection. 


       
To classify the studied plant collection’s variety samples into groups similar in a set of characteristics, the cluster analysis method was applied. For this, the Ward method with the Euclidean distance as a tool for measuring the extent of similarity was used. The clustering data are presented as a dendrogram (Fig 4).

Fig 4: Dendrogram of clustered sainfoin collection samples by economically valuable characters using Ward’s method. 


       
The following characteristics were considered as important economically valuable characteristics of sainfoin: plant height, tillering, foliage, green and dry productive mass. Based on the cluster analysis, 6 clusters were obtained. In this case, the variety samples forming a single cluster had a similar set of characteristics. The first and second clusters included 4 sainfoin variety samples (40937, 41241, 40935, 40822), which were characterized by a tall stem, high tillering, green and dry mass (Table 1).

Table 1: Comparative study of five selected sainfoin varieties from Kazakhstani collection based on the main economically valuable characteristics (2023-2025).


 
Cluster grouping of accessions
 
The third cluster comprised seven sainfoin accessions (38623, 40790, 9, 2, 41872, 1544, 42300), characterized by low productivity in terms of green and dry mass yields.
       
Accession No. 4 was ascribed to a distinct fourth cluster, exhibiting average values for all traits except dry mass yield, which was notably high (Table 1). This accession matched the reference variety Almatinsky 2 across all evaluated parameters, except its superior dry mass yield, indicating its high forage quality.
       
The fifth cluster included the reference variety Almatinsky 2 and six sainfoin accessions, all displaying similar average values for all traits, comparable to the control.
       
The sixth cluster consisted of six accessions (40998, 40994, 10, 40816, 87, 3). These accessions differed from the reference variety in dry mass yield, although the differences were generally insignificant or did not exceed the control (Fig 3). For other evaluated parameters, the values were either comparable to or slightly higher than the control, with no substantial impact on green or dry mass yields.
 
Selection of promising genotypes
 
Cluster analysis enabled the grouping of 25 sainfoin accessions based on multiple traits, identifying clusters of closely related genotypes. Based on the results of analysis of variance (ANOVA) and cluster analysis, five accessions, such as 40937, 40822, 41241, 40935 and 4 were selected from the 25 evaluated for their superior performance compared to the reference variety Almatinsky 2 (Table 1). These accessions were identified as the most promising for further breeding and genetic studies.
 
Protein content and amino acid profile
 
Given the growing importance of functional nutrition, this study also assessed the crude protein content in seeds of the reference variety Almatinsky 2 and accession No. 4, selected as the top-performing accession. Additionally, the amino acid composition of seed proteins from both the reference variety and accession No. 4 was determined (Table 2, Fig 5). The accession No. 4 surpassed the reference variety in crude protein content, with the values of 10.7% and 9.9%, respectively.

Table 2: Amino acid composition of sainfoin seeds of the cv. Almatinsky 2 (No. 2) and sample No. 4. AA - amino acid, *Essential amino acids Samples Amino acid content, mg/100 g.



Fig 5: Comparative analysis of amino acid profiles from seeds of sample No. 4 of sainfoin and wheat seeds (based on average values from literature data).


       
Comparative analysis of the amino acid profiles of the two evaluated accessions (Almatinsky 2 and No. 4) revealed significant quantitative differences in the content of both essential and non-essential amino acids (Table 2).
       
Accession No. 4 exhibited higher concentrations of most amino acids compared to the reference variety Almatinsky 2, suggesting greater biological, forage and nutritional value. Particular attention was focused on essential amino acids, which are critical for complete protein nutrition. Noteworthy, accession No. 4 contained significantly higher levels of histidine (4453.33 µg/100 g vs. 3472.40 µg/100 g in Almatinsky 2). Histidine is the essential substance for tissue growth and development, hemoglobin synthesis and immune system function (Wu, 2010).
       
Accession No. 4 also exposed substantially higher levels of other essential amino acids, including methionine (512.82 µg/100 g vs. 283.64 µg/100 g in the reference variety), which is involved in methylation, detoxification and cysteine biosynthesis (Brosnan and Brosnan, 2006) and lysine (260.67 µg/100 g vs. 144.23 µg/100 g), which is crucial for growth, antibody formation and calcium absorption (Martínez, 2017; Matthews, 2020). Some studies point out the synergistic role of lysine and vitamin C in synthesizing L-carnitine, which enhances muscle oxygen utilization, improves endurance and supports bone growth and collagen production in connective and bone tissues (Furusawa et al., 2008).
       
Furthermore, accession No. 4 has indicated the elevated levels of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), specifically leucine and isoleucine. These amino acids, constituting up to 35% of muscle tissue, play a central role in skeletal muscle metabolism, recovery from physical exertion and activation of protein biosynthesis (Newsholme and Blomstrand, 2006). The increased content of these amino acids enhances the potential value of accession No. 4 for sports nutrition and therapeutic diets.
       
Arginine content in accession No. 4 (5324.16 µg/100 g) also significantly exceeded that of the reference variety (3943.21 µg/100 g). Arginine is vital for regulating vascular tone, wound healing and nitric oxide synthesis, particularly under physiological stress (Wu et al., 2009).
       
Additionally, accession No. 4 exhibited higher levels of cystine, alanine, aspartic acid and other amino acids compared to Almatinsky 2, indicating an enriched protein composition or greater bioavailability.
       
Accession No. 4 had lower tyrosine content (230.71 µg/100 g) compared to Almatinsky 2 (409.36 µg/100 g), but significantly higher phenylalanine content (890.08 µg/100 g vs. 511.73 µg/100 g). The phenylalanine-to-tyrosine ratio (tyrosinylation coefficient) in accession No. 4 was 3.86, more than three times higher than that of the reference variety (1.25). This elevated ratio may reflect greater comprehensive stability (mechanical, thermal and chemical) of membrane proteins in accession No. 4 compared to the control (Scriver et al., 2001). It may also indicate increased activity of enzymes involved in the tyrosine biosynthesis (Zhumabaeva et al., 2017).
 
Comparison with wheat
 
Given the potential use of sainfoin seed powder in flour-based confectionery products (Tarasenko, 2015), a comparative analysis was conducted between the experimentally determined key amino acid contents in seeds of accession No. 4 and wheat seeds, based on literature data (Zenkova, 2019). Fig 5 presents the amino acid profiles of accession No. 4 (blue) and wheat (orange), expressed in mg/100 g of product (Fig 5).
       
Accession No. 4 showed higher methionine content comparing to the wheat, suggesting greater biological value of the former in this respect. Methionine is a limiting amino acid in cereals and its elevated presence can improve the overall amino acid profile of a product. Methionine plays a critical role in metabolism, protein biosynthesis and the reaction of transmethylation as the methyl group donor (via S-adenosylmethionine). It is also involved in the synthesis of biomolecules, such as cysteine, creatine and glutathione, thereby supporting the cellular antioxidant defense. Methionine deficiency can impair growth and protein metabolism, particularly in humans and  animals consuming grains with low amounts of this amino acid (Brosnan and Brosnan, 2006).
       
By contrast, glutamic acid and proline contents were significantly higher in wheat, attributed to the elevated levels of glutelins and prolamins, which determine the technological properties of wheat flour. Oppositely, sainfoin accession No. 4 disposed lower levels of these amino acids, suggesting differences in protein composition and functional properties, when compared to the wheat grain.

Cystine was present in substantial amounts in accession No. 4 (~1800 mg/100 g), whereas wheat contained significantly smaller amounts of that amino acid. Cystine and proline are amino acids playing substantial biological roles in plant stress adaptation.
       
Analysis revealed that sainfoin accession No. 4 excelled wheat in the content of several biologically valuable amino acids, namely arginine, histidine and aspartic acid. Arginine and histidine play critical parts in protein metabolism and immunomodulation, specifying the high nutritional and functional value of this sainfoin accession. Higher arginine content, which supports nitric oxide synthesis and nitrogen metabolism regulation and the increased histidine levels, essential for hemoglobin synthesis and tissue growth, are particularly remarkable.
       
Accession No. 4 also has demonstrated a significant accumulation of aspartic acid (2985.1 mg/100 g) compared to wheat grain (598.3 mg/100 g). Aspartic acid is imperative for energy metabolism, brain function and the synthesis of other amino acids. Aspartate contributes to ATP generation, acts as a neurotransmitter, supports the functioning of the central nervous system and participates in DNA replication and transcription. Moreover, D-aspartate can temporarily stimulate  testosterone synthesis (Roshanzamir and Safavi, 2017).
       
Accession No. 4 has surpassed wheat by the content of phenylalanine and threonine, amino acids that are limited in wheat protein but decisive for its enhanced biological value. Phenylalanine (890.08 mg/100 g, as previously discussed) and threonine (418.73 mg/100 g) levels in sainfoin were obviously higher than those in wheat flour (491.8 mg/100 g and 116.7 mg/100 g, respectively). Threonine is an essential amino acid that neutralizes toxins, supports fat metabolism in the liver and serves as the key component of collagen (Lee and Kim, 2019; Wen et al., 2023).
       
Comparative analysis depicts the balanced amino acid profile of sainfoin accession No. 4 relative to wheat grain, positioning this sanfoin specimen as a promising candidate for developing functional food products or combined protein mixtures in dry or liquid forms. Increased antioxidant activity under stress conditions may reflect an adaptive metabolic response, highlighting the species as a promising source of biologically active compounds (Beyaz and Yıldız, 2020). This, in turn, supports its potential application in the development of functional feed additives.
This study demonstrated that sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) grown under the agroecological conditions of the Almaty Region shows stable productivity and high protein quality. Significant differences between the Almatinsky 2 variety and accession No. 4 indicate substantial genetic variability and strong breeding potential.
       
Accession No. 4 exhibited an improved amino acid profile, with higher levels of essential amino acids (methionine, phenylalanine, threonine, and histidine) compared to the control and wheat, highlighting its value as a high-quality protein source. The observed amino acid balance further supports its potential use in functional foods and specialized nutrition.
       
Overall, the studied sainfoin accessions represent promising genetic resources for forage production and breeding programs aimed at enhancing protein composition. They may also serve as alternative protein sources to complement cereal-based diets, particularly in regions with similar environmental conditions.
This article was supported by Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Grant Program AP23488711 “Integration of Selective Molecular Marking and Plant Inoculation with Nitrogen Fixers for the Formation of Optimal Sainfoin Germplasm in Southeast Kazakhstan”.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
The authors declare no conflict of interests.

  1. Andaç, A.E., Yılmaz Tuncel, N., Tülbek, M.Ç. and Tuncel, N.B. (2025). Characterization and effects of heat treatments on antinutritional components and enzyme activities in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia L.) seeds: A high-protein alternative plant-based food source. Food Research International. 199: 115372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres. 2024.115372. 

  2. Avino, P., Campanella, L. and Russo, M.V. (2006). High-performance liquid chromatography intercom parative study for amino acid analysis in two tissues by PITC- and OPA-derivatizations. Analytical Letters. 34(6): 867-882. https://doi.org/10. 1081/AL-100103598. 

  3. Baker, C.J.L., Heimberg, M., Alderman, G. and Eden, A. (1952). Studies of the composition of sainfoin. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 42(4): 382-394. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S0021859600057282. 

  4. Batkhishig, Z. and Batmunkh, L. (2023). Result of the research on sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa L.) varieties in the Great Lake region of Mongolia. Proceedings of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences. 63(4): 37-43. https://doi.org/10. 5564/pmas.v63i04.3433. 

  5. Beyaz, R. and Yıldız, M. (2020). Influence of PEG-induced drought stress on antioxidant components of callus tissue of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) ecotypes. Legume Research. 44(2): 197-201. doi: 10.18805/LR-556.

  6. Brosnan, J.T. and Brosnan, M.E. (2006). The sulfur-containing amino acids: An overview. The Journal of Nutrition. 136(6 Suppl): 1636S-1640S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/ 136.6.1636S.

  7. Bulatova, K.K., Massonichich-Shotunova, R., Meiirman, G. and Mazkirat, S. (2015). Diversity of sainfoin (Onobrychis Mill.) collection samples according to the spectra of storage proteins. Genetika. 47: 375-382. https://doi.org/10.2298/ GENSR1502375B.

  8. Carbonero, C.H., Mueller-Harvey, I., Brown, T.A. and Smith, L. (2011). Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia): A beneficial forage legume. Plant Genetic Resources. 9(1): 70-85. https:// doi.org/10.1017/S1479262110000328.

  9. Craine, E.B., Makav, M., Dağ, S., Uysal, A.Y., Eroğlu, H.A. and Kuru, B.B. (2024). Effect of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) seed-based diet on rats: A comprehensive evaluation of hemogram, biochemistry and histopathology. Food Science and Nutrition. 12(7): 4692-4701. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/fsn3.4117.

  10. Craine, E.B., Şakiroğlu, M., Peters, T.E., Barriball, S. and Schlautman, B. (2023). Nutritional quality of (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) seeds: A potentially novel perennial pulse crop for human use. Legume Science. 5(4): e189. https:// doi.org/10.1002/leg3.189.

  11. Dospekhov, B.A. (2014). Methodology of field experiments (with the basics of statistical processing of research results). Moscow: Alliance. p. 350.

  12. Ertuş, M.M. (2021). Genetic relationship in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) landraces cultivated in East Anatolia using RAPD and ISSR markers. Legume Research. 44(8): 888- 893. doi: 10.18805/LR-614.

  13. Furusawa, H., Sato, Y., Tanaka, Y., Inai, Y., Amano, A. and Iwama, M. (2008). Vitamin C is not essential for carnitine biosynthesis in vivo: Verification in vitamin C-depleted senescence marker protein-30/gluconolactonase knockout mice. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 31(9): 1673- 1679. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.31.1673. 

  14. Horwitz, W. (2000). Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 17th edn. Arlington, VA: AOAC International.

  15. Kaplan, M. (2019). Fatty acid and trace element compositions of the seeds of different Onobrychis viciifolia genotypes. Genetika. 51(2): 585-593. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1902585K.

  16. Kidambi, S.P., Matches, A.G. and Bolger, T.P. (1990). Mineral concentrations in alfalfa and sainfoin as influenced by soil moisture level. Agronomy Journal. 82(2): 229-236. https://doi.org/ 10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200020012x.

  17. Kidambi, S.P., Matches, A.G. and Griggs, T.C. (1989). Variability for Ca, Mg, K, Cu, Zn and K/(Ca + Mg) ratio among three wheatgrasses and sainfoin on the southern high plains. Journal of Range Management. 42(4): 316-322. https:// doi.org/10.2307/3899502.

  18. Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt, K. (2024). Plant-based proteins, peptides and amino acids in food products dedicated for sportspeople: A narrative review of the literature. Nutrients. 16(11): 1706. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111706.

  19. Lee, D.Y. and Kim, E.H. (2019). Therapeutic effects of amino acids in liver diseases: Current studies and future perspectives. Journal of Cancer Prevention. 24(2): 72-78. https:// doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2019.24.2.72.

  20. Martínez, Y., Li, X., Liu, G., Bin, P., Yan, W., Más, D., Valdivié, M. and Hu, C.A.A. (2017). The role of methionine on metabolism, oxidative stress, and diseases. Amino Acids. 49(12): 2091-2098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-017-2494-2.

  21. Matthews, D.E. (2020). Review of lysine metabolism with a focus on humans. The Journal of Nutrition. 150(Suppl 1): pp. 2548S-2555S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxaa224.

  22. Mohajer, S., Jafari, A.A., Taha, R.M. and Bakrudeen, A.A. (2012). Evaluation of yield and morphology traits in 72 genotypes of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) through factor analysis. Legume Research. 35(2): 132-137. 

  23. Newsholme, E.A. and Blomstrand, E. (2006). Branched-chain amino acids and central fatigue. The Journal of Nutrition. 136(1Suppl): 274S-276S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/ 136.1.274S.

  24. Prasad, K. (2017). HPLC analysis of amino acid and antioxidant composition of three medicinal plants of (Pithoragarh) Uttarakhand Himalayas. Journal of Analytical and Pharmaceutical Research. 6(4): 00186. https://doi.org/10.15406/ japlr.2017.06.00186.

  25. Roshanzamir, F. and Safavi, S.M. (2017). The putative effects of D-aspartic acid on blood testosterone levels: A systematic review. International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine. 15(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijrm.15.1.1.

  26. Rufino-Moya, P.J., Bertolín, J.R., Blanco, M., Lobón, S. and Joy, M. (2022). Fatty acid profile, secondary compounds and antioxidant activities in the fresh forage, hay and silage of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) and sulla (Hedysarum coronarium). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 102(11): 4736-4743. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11834.

  27. Sakhraoui, A., Ltaeif, H.B., Sakhraoui, A., Villalba, J.J., Castillo, J.M. and Rouz, S. (2024). Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia): A legume with great ecological and agronomical potential under climate change. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 162(4): 307-331. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859624 000327.

  28. Sariyildiz, T. and Savaci, G. (2020). Ability of green cover from sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) and dog rose (Rosa canina L.) to control erosion and improve soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks in terraces of Northwest Turkey. Euro- Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration. 5(1): 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-020-0148-3.

  29. Scriver, C.R., Beaudet, A.L., Sly, W.S. and Valle, D. (2001). The metabolic and molecular bases of inherited disease. 8th edn.  New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.

  30. Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (2013). Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 4th edn. New York: W.H. Freeman.

  31. Tarasenko, N.A., Butina, E.A. and Gerasimenko, E.O. (2015). Peculiarities of chemical composition of sainfoin seeds powder. Oriental Journal of Chemistry. 31(3): 1673-1682.

  32. Tufenkci, S., Erman, M. and Sönmez, F.  (2006). Effects of phosphorus and nitrogen applications and Rhizobium inoculation on the yield and nutrient uptake of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia L.) under irrigated conditions in Turkey. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 49(1): 101- 105. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00288233.2006.9513699. 

  33. Wen, M.L., Xu, F., Li, X.Q., Zhang, Z.Y., Wang, L.S., Liu, L., Yang, C.W. and Zhang, C.N. (2023). Dietary threonine improves muscle nutritional value and muscle hardness associated with collagen synthesis in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Food Chemistry. 422:  136223. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136223. 

  34. Wiyono, N., Yudhani, R., Wasita, B., Suyatmi, S., Wardhani, L.O., Pesik, R.N., Yarso, K.Y. and Rahayu, R.F. (2024). Exploring the therapeutic potential of functional foods for diabetes: A bibliometric analysis and scientific mapping. Narra Journal. 4(1): e382. https:// doi.org/10.52225/narra.v4i1.382. 

  35. Wu, G. (2010). Functional amino acids in growth, reproduction and health. Advances in Nutrition. 1(1): 31-37. https://doi.org/ 10.3945/an.110.1008.

  36. Wu, G., Bazer, F.W., Davis, T.A., Kim, S.W., Li, P., Rhoads, J.M., Satterfield, M.C., Smith, S.B., Spencer, T.E. and Yin, Y. (2009). Arginine metabolism and nutrition in growth, health and disease. Amino Acids. 37(1): 153-168. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00726-008-0210-y. 

  37. Xiang, H., Xu, J., Wei, S., Yang, H., Song, J. and Yu, X. (2024). Crop rotation of sainfoin on the Longzhong Loess Plateau has a positive effect on enhancing soil carbon sequestration potential. Agriculture. 14(12): 12160. https://doi.org/10. 3390/agriculture14122160. 

  38. Zenkova, M.L. (2019). Mineral and amino acid composition of germinated and canned wheat grains. Food Processing: Techniques and Technology. 49(4): 513-521. https:// doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2019-4-513-521. 

  39. Zhumabaeva, B., Dzhangalina, E., Aytasheva, Z., Lebedeva, L., Inelova, Z. and Chunetova, Z. (2017). Morphogenetic and biochemical study on university common bean collection. OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences. 17(4): 335-342. https://doi.org/ 10.3844/ojbsci.2017.335.342.
In this Article
Published In
Legume Research

Editorial Board

View all (0)