Genetic analysis in Yardlong Bean [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. subsp. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdc.]: A Comprehensive Review 

J
Jyoti Kumari1,*
S
S.S. Solankey2
A
Anupam Adarsh2
M
Mala Kumari1
A
Arti Kumari3,*
R
Randhir Kumar2
D
D.A. Chauhan4
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Nalanda College of Horticulture, Noorsarai, Nalanda, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour-803 113, Bihar, India.
2Department of Horticulture (Vegetable Science), Nalanda College of Horticulture, Noorsarai, Nalanda, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour-803 113, Bihar, India.
3Department of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Nalanda College of Horticulture, Noorsarai, Nalanda, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour-803 113, Bihar, India.
4Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari-396 450, Gujarat, India.
  • Submitted11-02-2026|

  • Accepted30-09-2026|

  • First Online 27-10-2026|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-5646

Yardlong bean is a warm-season legume vegetables grown for its long green pods. It is a member of the Fabaceae family, and a subspecies of cowpea bearing exceptionally long, slender, and fleshy pods, occurs in a range of colors, including white, light green, dark green, reddish-brown, and purple. Despite its nutritional and agricultural value, the yardlong bean remains an underexploited legume crop. However, its dual role as a vegetable and leguminous plant highlights need of emphasis on genetic improvement and expansion of area under cultivation. A systematic literature search was conducted at Nalanda College of Horticulture, Noorsarai, Nalanda, to gather relevant information on work done so far on different aspect of crop improvement. Literature published between 1987 to 2026 was searched using academic Search Engine Databases. This manuscript was prepared by reviewing more than 50 papers. Yardlong bean cultivation faces several challenges, including the lack of improved varieties, limited extension services, low market prices, and the occurrence of pests and diseases. Breeding programs primarily aim to enhance pod yield per hectare by increasing the number of pods per plant. Other breeding goals include improving traits such as earliness, reduced vine length, photo-insensitivity, tolerance to biotic stresses and abiotic stresses and wide adaptability to different agroclimatic conditions. Predominance of additive gene effects for major yield attributing traits was recorded by many scientists, making phenotypic selection a promising and efficient strategy for crop improvement.

Yardlong bean being a leguminous vegetable crop is likely to arose from the domestication of cultivated Cowpea in Asia. It is a diploid species with a chromosome number of 2n = 2x = 22. According to Xia et al., (2019), a K-mer distribution analysis estimated the genome size of the Yardlong bean to be approximately 590 Mb. Gene prediction was carried out using a combination of RNA-Seq-based, homologous and de novo approaches, resulting in the identification 42,609 protein-coding genes. Furthermore, their findings indicated that the quality of the Yardlong bean genome assembly is superior compared to that of the common cowpea. In India, the crop occupies an area of about 23,012 hectares, producing around 1,33,587 tonnes of green pods with an average productivity of 5,800 kg per hectare (Leelavathi et al., 2021).
       
It is widely grown as vegetable across China and South east Asian region. This crop can survive in warm, humid conditions but is sensitive to low temperatures. Yardlong bean and cowpea exhibit distinct phenotypic differences that have arisen due to divergent selection during their evolutionary process. Cleistogamous flower structure makes this crop highly self-pollinated. The flowers of the Yardlong bean appear in a range of colors, including white, cream, yellow and purple. Its seeds vary in texture from smooth to wrinkled and range in color from red to black, with a distinct hilum encircled by a dark band (Fig 1). It is vigorous, annual climber that can reach a height of three to four meters. It bears exceptionally long, slender and tender pods that vary in color (Fig 2), ranging from white and light green to dark green, brownish red, or purple (Kamala  et al., 2014). Its productivity and pod quality often decline during the monsoon season, primarily because of heavy rainfall and the prevalence of pests and diseases (Varghese and Celine, 2015). The plant typically exhibits a creeping habit with an indeterminate growth pattern; however, some varieties tend to be more compact and bushier. Its leaves are trifoliate, consisting of three leaflets arranged alternately along the stem and they show considerable variation in size and shape. The crop develops a strong taproot system and bears flowers in racemes along the stems. These racemes are borne on peduncles measuring about 10 to 30 cm in length, each typically carrying two to three pods. The distinctively long peduncles are a characteristic feature of the Yardlong bean, facilitating easy hand harvesting compared to other leguminous crops. From a nutritional standpoint, the immature pods are an excellent source of nourishment, containing 3.5-5% crude protein and appreciable amounts of vitamins A and C, iron, calcium, phosphorus and dietary fiber, making them a valuable vegetable for human consumption (Singh et al., 2001). These attributes make yardlong beans a highly nutritious (Hazra et al., 2007) and valuable vegetable crop. However, in India, only a limited number of commercial Yardlong bean cultivars with high yield potential are available. Moreover, suitable breeding approaches for the genetic improvement of this nutrient-rich vegetable remain insufficient. Therefore, the objective of this article is to compile existing information on Yardlong bean improvement, identify diverse parental lines for use in hybridization programs and understand the inheritance patterns and genetic factors influencing yield and its contributing traits. Assessment of genetic diversity, variability parameters and inheritance pattern is important part of crop improvement as these biometrical tools provide insight into available genetic variation and gene action governing the inheritance pattern of characters from one generation to another generation and also in the selection of genotypes for further breeding programme, it also provides idea to plant breeder about need of creation of variation through hybridization, mutation, genetic engineering and introgression of exotic genotypes.

Fig 1: Variations in seed colour and sees size in Yardlong bean genotype.



Fig 2: Variations in pod colour and pod length in Yardlong bean genotype.


 
Review methodology
 
Relevant literature published between 1987-2026 was searched using different academic search tools like Google scholar, Scopus, PubMed, web of science and research gate. Representative Boolean strings combined these axes. One string took the form of the resource and technology axes combined as follows: “yardlong bean” AND “genetic diversity”, “yardlong bean” AND “genetic, improvement”, “yardlong bean” AND “breeding”, “yardlong bean” AND “germplasm”, “yardlong bean” AND “yield”, “yardlong bean” AND “quality”. Research paper was selected based on their relevance to the objectives of review and reporting information on genetic diversity, variability, heritability, heterosis breeding, combining ability and gene action in yardlong bean. Studie were selected when they addressed aspects relevant to the objectives of the review, including origin, domestication, genetic diversity, germplasm characterization, breeding, yield, quality, stress tolerance, molecular genetics, genomics, or crop improvemen, peer-reviewed scientific journal, conference proceeding, thesis or authoritative institutional publication, where appropriate. The publication contained sufficient methodological or scientific information to evaluate its findings. Both recent studies and important earlier publications were considered so that current developments could be discussed while retaining historically important information Research papers excluded when they were unrelated to yardlong bean or the specific objectives of the review; contained insufficient scientific or methodological information.
 
Approaches of genetic improvement in Yardlong bean
 
In India, Yardlong bean remains an underutilized vegetable, primarily grown in the peninsular regions such as Kerala, Tamil Nadu, coastal Andhra Pradesh and Odisha (Sherly et al., 2025). India is believed to be the centre of cowpea diversity because of two important “cultigroups” viz., Biflora and Sesquipedalis which have evolved from Unguiculata (Ng and Marechal, 1985). The evolution of vegetable cowpea (yardlong bean) from cowpea in the Asian region was also reported by Kongjaimun et al., (2012b). The domestication genetics of the Yardlong bean hold considerable scientific importance, as this crop followed an evolutionary pathway distinct from that of cowpea, which is primarily grown for seed production.  It has been further reported that the yard-long bean has evolved in Asian region from cowpea following intense selection by farmers for long pods that are consumed as a vegetable (Tripathi et al., 2019). Yardlong beans are mainly cultivated in kharif season when availability of other vegetable crops is less (Sultana et al., 2020). In India, few commercial Yardlong bean cultivars with high yield potential are available and approaches for genetic improvement of Yardlong beans are stilled less explored by the breeder. Therefore, the objective of this article is to compile existing information on genetic variability and divergence which will be useful for selection of parental material for hybridization programme. Understanding the inheritance pattern of yield and yield attributing characters is essential for developing superior variety. Appropriate breeding procedure can be predicted for improvement of the traits based on gene action involved in its expression. Yield being a complex and highly variable traits influenced by numerous yield attributing factors (Ullah et al., 2011). Therefore, the relationships among yield and its component traits are fundamental to achieving yield improvement. In conventional breeding programs, understanding the extent of genetic variability and selecting appropriate cultivars or breeding lines becomes an essential step toward successful commercial production of this vegetable.
 
Genetic diversity and genetic variability
 
Genetic diversity and degree of genetic variation within population is fundamental concept behind crop improvement efforts. D-square statistic, proposed by Indian statistician Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis (1928), it is effective in measuring genetic divergence and develop strategies for embedding germplasm diversity in crop improvement programme. Knowledge of variability and genetic diversity is pre-requisite for designing any crop improvement programme. The clustering pattern reflects the amount of genetic divergence in the germplasm, while magnitude of intra-cluster distance, gives an idea about magnitude of genetic diversity among genotypes of same group. Intercluster distance must be taken into account to explore genetic diversity through hybridization (Valarmathi et al., 2007). The relative contribution of individual characters towards expression of genetic diversity is also important as cluster mean performance also help in the selection of parents for hybridization programme (Haripriya et al., 2024). Yardlong bean genotypes are highly variable, which offer significant potential for increasing pod yield through designing appropriate improvement approaches. Among yield attributing characters pod length showed maximum contribution towards genetic diversity followed by test weight, days to maturity and pod yield per plant and due to maximum intercluster distance, it was depicted that hybridization between IC-630381, IC-630379, IC-630383 and IC-626143, will provide superior recombination with desirable traits in segregating generations (Haripriya et al., 2024). Sathish et al., (2023) divided 40 genotypes in nine cluster by Tocher’s method and found maximum divergence between cluster for yield, pod length, number of pods per plant, number of primary branches per plant and pod width, importance of number of pods per plant, number of pods per cluster and vegetable pod yield per plant in diversity analysis also reported by Huque et al., 2012. Eighty-nine genotypes were classified into twelve clusters by Lal et al., (2017b) they depicted maximum contribution of Plant height towards divergence (29.37%) followed by number of peduncles per plant (26.30%), number of pods per plant (18.39%) and pod weight (16.42%) among vegetable cowpea genotypes. The integration of molecular markers along with morphological markers, enables a more encyclopedic assessment of genetic diversity within breeding materials. RAPD analysis depicted substantial polymorphism (79.42%) and also predicted that some hybrids with similar pod performance were genetically distinct while other show both molecular and phenotypic similarity, demonstrating that phenotypic uniformity should not be interpreted as evidence of genetic uniformity (Truong et al., 2026). However, RAPD is a dominant marker system with limited reproducibility; therefore, validation using co-dominant markers, such as SSR or SNP, is recommended. Pidigam  et al. (2019) emphasized the importance of Random amplified polymorphic DNA marker, it is informative, scorable and reproducible and classified 20 genotypes into five major clusters. Importance of Inter-retrotransposon amplified polymorphism (IRAP) and retrotransposon microsatellite amplified polymorphism markers (REMAP) with scoring percentage of 52% was reported by Widyawan et al., (2021). Ogunkanmi  et al. (2007) investigated genetic diversity among fifty accessions of yardlongbean using SSR markers and he concluded that accessions from India showed more genetic diversity than those from other countries, thereby providing further evidence in support of the suggestions that India may be the centre of diversity for the crop and SSR marker are useful in accessing genetic diversity in Yardlong bean. Anwer  et al. (2019) revealed that RAPD markers can be an efficient, fast and, inexpensive way for differentiation of yardlong bean, F1 progenies and their parents, as well as to evaluate their genetic relationships. Genetic diversity in yardlong bean was evaluated by using different DNA markers AFLP (Coulibaly et al., 2002), RAPD (Alam et al., 2013), SSR (Kongjaimun et al., 2012a), SNP (Xu et al., 2011), ISSR and SCoT (Igwe et al., 2017). A study by Rambabu  et al. (2016) observed substantial variability in Yardlong bean collection and revealed that growth habit varies from pole type to bush type, while flower colour varied from light purple, dark purple, pink and white, pod colour also varied from light green, dark green, purple colour with green tip to green colour with purple tip and genotype IC-582859, NSJ-362, IC-582850 and IC-582872 were found to be superior with pod yield and yield attributing characters. Higher Pod length observed in Githika (51 cm) followed by Vellayani Jyothika (45 cm) and Manjari (44 cm) (Sangeetha et al., 2022) as pod length is one of the important yield attributing traits, Githika recorded significantly maximum yield (259 q/ha) followed by Vellayani Jyothika (215 q/ha) and Manjari (199 q/ha).
       
Genetic variability within Yardlong bean cultivars will indicate the need for the introgression of exotic germplasm into breeding programs (Fang et al., 2007). In Yardlong bean high GCV, PCV along with high heritability observed for green pod yield per plant, green pod width, green pod length (Devan et al., 2021; Merin and Sarda, 2022). Phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV) is indicator of total variations which includes genetic as well as environmental effect while genetic coefficient of variation (GCV) gives a basis to access and compare the range of genetic variability for quantitative traits. High PCV and GCV reported for pod yield per plant (45.07, 44.15) followed by number of pods per plant (34.85, 34.77), pod girth (21.11, 20.96), number of seeds per pod (20.33, 20.20) and plant height (20.84, 20.26) respectively by Haripriya  et al. (2024), higher GCV and PCV for these traits also reported by Shivakumar  et al. (2014). Estimates of heritability gives idea about characters which are least sensitive to environmental factors and strength of these characters for inheritance to next generation and phenotypic selection through these characters are effective. Highest estimates of heritability observed for number of pods per plant (99.49%), number of seeds per pod (98.76%), plant height (91.55%). The sole estimation of heritability doesn’t give idea about progeny progress in the subsequent generation, but still it should be interpreted in connection with the genetic advance. High value of genetic advance as percent of mean was obtained for pod yield per plant (89.11%) followed by number of pods per plant (71.44%), pod girth (42.89%), number of seeds per pod (41.36%), plant height (40.58%) and pod length (37.60%). The high heritability and genetic advance observed for these traits suggest that their phenotypic variation is relatively less influenced by environmental effects and that additive gene action may have a substantial role in their inheritance. Therefore, these traits can be effectively improved through selection in breeding programmes. So simple selection may be suggested for improvement through these characters (Haripriya et al., 2024; Vidya et al., 2002; Resmi et al., 2019). High heritability along with moderate genetic advance as per cent of mean suggest the predominance of both additive and non-additive gene action. Lal et al., (2017b) infers higher magnitude of PCV than GCV for all the characters emphasizing the environmental effect on expression of characters, high GCV, PCV along with high heritability with genetic advance reported for plant height, pod yield per plant, pod weight, number of pods per plant and pod length. Similar result obtained by several workers (Nath et al., 2009; Huque et al., 2012; Chattopadhyay et al., 2014; Nwofia  et al., 2013). High estimates of genotypic coefficient of variation, heritability and genetic advance for the characters, viz. pod yield per plant, number of peduncles per plants, number of pods per plants, pod weight and pod length indicate that improvement of these characters can be achieved through selection. In Yardlong bean traits such as flower color, pod color, pod size, pod weight, pod texture and fruit characteristics showed maximum variability (Alam et al., 2013). This variability is an essential resource for breeding, as limited genetic diversity remains a major constraint to their improvement (Kusmiyati et al., 2021). Several studies have investigated the genetic variability of Yardlong beans and the application of this knowledge in breeding strategies (Phansak et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2010; Hossain et al., 2013; Huang et al., 2018). Toppo et al., (2018) evaluated twelve Yardlong bean genotypes for growth and yield under Allahabad Agro-Climatic Conditions. Earliness in first pod picking was recorded in three genotypes: Improved AK-57, TS-18 long yard and Richa (65.33 days after sowing). Maximum Pod length was recorded in COPBVAR-6 (51.67 cm), the number of seeds per pod was recorded in Richa (18.67) and pod yield per plant (481.33 g). Six genotypes (VL Lobia-1, VS-3, PVCP-20 Vyjayanthi, Arka Mangala, Lola) were evaluated (Sarada et al., 2020) in RBD with four replications during 2016-18. They reported that Pod girth was maximum in Arka Mangala, whereas the number of pods per plant was maximum in VS-3. Among the entries evaluated, VS-3 recorded the highest yield (66.2 q/ha), followed by Arka Mangala (54.7 q/ha).
 
Character association and Cause-effect analysis
 
Yield is a complex quantitative trait controlled by several genes, so selection through yield is not possible. Correlation and path analysis can increase selection potency for yield improvement and its attributing components. In yardlong bean pod yield per plant, showed strong positive correlation with pod weight, number of peduncle and number of pods per plant (Lal et al., 2017a; Huque et al., 2012; Chattopadhyay et al., 2014; Madhavi et al., 2014) depicting selection through these traits might be fruitful in further generation. Sultana et al., (2020) inferred significant positive correlation of number of seed per pod, number of pods per plant with pod yield per plant while significantly negative correlation with days to harvest. Correlation shed light on principal association between dependent and independent variables where fresh pod yield per plant being a dependent variable and other yield attributing traits are considered as independent variables. Path analysis separates correlation matrix into direct and indirect effect. Devan et al., (2021) depicted that Pod length (0.769) had the highest significant direct influence on green pod yield per plant followed by days to first harvest (0.728), seeds per pod (0.663), green pod width (0.218), days to first flowering (0.189) and vine length (0.106), similar report was given by (Lal et al., 2017b; Nath et al., 2009; Chattopadhyay et al., 2014). Direct effect on pod yield depicted by first flowering, days to maturity, number of pods per plant, pod weight and number of seeds per pod. Correlation and path analysis gives idea about the characters on which maximum emphasis should be given for selection in Vegetable cowpea. Studie on correlation by (Rambabu et al., 2016), revealed traits like plant height, number of primary branches per plant, terminal leaf length, length of harvesting time, length of cluster stalk, number of clusters per plant, numbers of pods per cluster, number of pods per plant, pod length, pod girth, seed number per pod and 100 seed weight showed positive association with pod yield per plant (g). Cause and effect analysis showed that length of cluster stalk (0.8242) and pod girth (0.5550) at genotypic level exhibited high positive direct effect on pod yield per plant. Selection for these associated traits may improve pod output per plant since they are in the right direction. Pod length, pod width and the number of pods per plant positively correlated with pod yield (Manju 2006; Jithesh 2009; Vavilapalli and Celine, 2014; Rambabu et al., 2016; Bhagavati et al., 2019). Pods per cluster and Plant height had a significant positive connection with each other and pods per cluster had a highly significant positive association with pods per plant and pod production. Pod length had a highly significant positive relationship with pods per plant, seed weight and seed yield (Pidigam et al., 2019). Pod yield per plant was highly positive significant with pods per plant and pods per cluster (Ullah et al., 2011; Lovely and Radhadevi, 2006). Positive correlation of pollen viability and fruit set percentage on pod yield per plant reported by Feba et al., (2022). Correlation merely demonstrates the association between characters while it doesn’t give any idea about cause and effect of that association. So, further Path analysis is done to determined true relationship using correlation matrix for separating variables into direct and indirect effect. Green pods per plant, followed by green pod length, number of seeds per pod and green pod width, had a strong positive direct influence on plant pod yield (Nanda et al., 2022; Abhimanyu et al., 2025). This inferred that when other variables remain constant, genetic improvement of such traits will result in higher yields (Manju, 2006; Lovely, 2005). Increased pod yield can be achieved by increasing the number of pods per cluster and number of pods per plant. As a result, these traits can play a significant role in crop improvement and the better-performing accessions aided the advance into the breeding program. High direct effect of number of pods per  plant was earlier reported by (Jana et al., 1983; Chattopadhyay et al., 1997; Resmi 1998; Vardhan and Savithramma, 1998). Pod weight is also found one of major contributor to pod yield (Sobha, 1994; Chattopadhyay et al., 1997; Resmi, 1998). Number of pods per plant and pod weight should be given due importance   in  selection programs for yield improvement  in  yard-long    bean since these characters recorded significant  genotypic correlation with high direct effect on pod yield.
 
Gene action
 
Yield is complex quantitative traits; its expression is governed by several genes. Understanding the genetic makeup of these yield attributing traits is essential for designing any effective breeding programme. Gene action refers to manner in which gene influence the expression of a trait (Maurya et al., 2026). It can be determined by mating a set of genotypes in all possible combinations by using different mating design like Diallel and line ´ tester to estimate general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) reflecting additive and non-additive gene actions, while with the help of generation mean analysis, where different generations like F1, F2 and backcross are used to determine additive, dominance and epistasis interaction via scaling test. Ratio of gca variance and sca variance is good indicator of gene action as if its value is less than one there is predominance of non-additive gene action while when its value is more than one it indicates the involvement of additive gene action in transfer of that trait. Ratnakumari et al., (2020), conducted a study to get information about the nature and magnitude of gene action for yield and attributing characters, they made crosses in half diallel fashion using Seven yardlong bean genotypes viz., Babli, Geethika, Bobbili Local, Vizianagaram Local, Lola, Trivendram Local, Bhuvaneswar Local. Magnitude of SCA variance was greater than that of GCA variance, depicting predominance of non-additive gene action for vine length, average leaf area, days to 50% flowering, number of pods per plant, pod length, pod girth, number of seeds per pod and pod yield per plant, Additive gene action observed for traits like primary branches per plant and days to first picking as magnitude of GCA variance was greater than that of SCA variance. (Kumari et al., 2026; Romanus et al., 2008; Badhe et al., 2016; Owusu et al., 2018; Pallavi et al., 2018) in cowpea, Farag and Afiah (2012) in faba bean, Das et al., (2014) in Dolichos bean, Askander and Osman (2018) in Pea, Latha et al., (2018) in Mung bean. Bharathi et al., (2019) in Blackgram]. Recombination breeding can be suggested for characters days to 50 per cent flowering, pod weight, pods per cluster, pod yield per plant and length of the harvest period (Romanus et al., 2008), prevalence of additive gene action for days to maturity and pod length reported by Owusu et al., (2018), pod weight, number of pods per plant, hundred fresh seed weight, pod width, pod length and seeds per pod had higher SCA variance designing predominance of dominant gene action in the inheritance of yield and most of the characters in Cowpea reported by Kumari et al., 2018 and Pampaniya, 2017. Quantitative characters do not follow the Mendelian ratio (Fehr, 1987). Inheritance pattern in plant growth habit and seed coat colour in crosses between Yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis) and Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), is assessed through chi  square  tests of different generations P1, P2. F1, F2 BCP1 and BCP2 and shows segregation ratio of ratio of  3 indeterminate: 1 determinate, while seed coat color segregated in a 3 black: 1 brown ratio. Plant growth habit and seed coat color are controlled by a single dominant gene, with segregation in the F2 generation in  accordance with Mendel’s First Law (Nantawong  et al., 2026).  Furthermore, the dihybrid  cross analysis of both traits revealed segregation in a 9 indetermine black seed coat: 3 indeterminate brown seed coats: 3 determinate black seed coat: 1 de terminate brown seed coat ratio, which is in accordance with the  the oretical expectation. This finding demonstrates that the two traits are controlled by genes located on different chromosomes and assort independently, consistent with Mendel’s Second Law. However, In Yardlong bean brown seed coat colour is dominant over white seed coat colour (Qu et al., 2011). Kusmiyati  et al. (2021), assessed segregation ration in F2 population of Yardlong bean. Segregation ratio is assessed in Fn generation to estimate whether the progeny has attained homozygosity or still it will split into different traits. They found that Pod length, Plant height, number of leaves per plant and pod sweetness showed normal distribution in F2 population in yardlong bean were classified as quantitative traits that were controlled by many genes. Selection based on these characters should be done at later generations, as these characters are controlled by many genes having small effect on expression of these characters and also influenced by environment. Pod weight is controlled by epistasis gene action so selection through this character can be done at early stage and it is not inherited directly from parents to offspring. Lovely and Radhadevi (2025) observed additive x additive, additive x dominance and dominance x dominance gene effects for traits such as pod length, pod yield per plant, number of pods per plant and root weight, indicating the involvement of epistatic gene action. The presence of duplicate and complementary epistasis suggested that hybridization followed by selection in segregating generations could be effective for improving these traits. Recombination breeding was also recommended for enhancing pod yield and pod weight. Rahman and Saad (2000) studied inheritance of yield and attributing characters utilizing the mean of six population P1, P2, F1, F2, BC1P1 and BC1P2 in four crosses of Vigna sesquipedalis and shed light on the importance of dominance gene action for number of pods per plant and pod yield per plant also depicted involvement of digenic interaction [additive x additive (i) and dominance x dominance (l)] for these characters which varied among the crosses. Pedigree selection and heterosis breeding can be used to exploit the fixable and non-fixable components of variation respectively in in this crop.
Stagnation in yield caused by narrow genic base is major constraints in any crop improvement programme, so exploration of genetic materials and collection of germplasm from diversity rich area is prerequisite for any breeding programme. Multilocation evaluation alongside characterization of germplasm and making germplasm available to breeders for exploration of its breeding potential is need of time. Integrated analysis done so far on molecular and phenotypic variation in yardlong bean by scientists shed light on moderate to high variability in pod related traits like pod length and pod weight, confirming selection through these traits would be yield oriented. Yield and its component traits in yardlong bean are complex characters governed by additive, dominance and epistatic gene actions. Despite the progress made, important knowledge gaps remain. Greater attention is required to understand genotype × environment interactions, stability of important traits, the genetic basis of nutritional and quality characteristics, resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, and the inheritance of traits associated with market-preferred pod characteristics. In addition, the integration of conventional quantitative genetic analysis with molecular and genomic approaches remains an important area for future research.
The authors are sincerely thankful to BAU Sabour, Bhagalpur for providing financial support and necessary facilities in carrying out the present investigation. Authors are also thankful to Publication Unit of BAU Sabour for providing communication number (BAU COMMUNICATION NO. 2787/261008) for submission of article for publication.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
Not applicable.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Abhimanyu, R., Shinde U.S., Dhumal, S.A., Sarvade, S.A., Pawar, R.D. and Mote M.S. (2025). Correlation and path analysis in yard long bean genotypes for yield and its attributing character. Plant Archives. 25(2): 1273-1280.

  2. Alam, S.S., Tasmin R., Jahan I., Habib M.A. and Sultana S.S. (2013). Fluorescent banding and RAPD analysis of five cultivars in Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdc. Cytologia. 78(1): 73-79.

  3. Anwar, S., Karno, K., Kusmiyati, F. and Herwibawa, B. (2019). Genetic relationships between yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis) F1 progenies and their parents based on RAPD markers. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 250: 012-053. doi:10.1088/ 1755-1315/250/1/012053.

  4. Askander, H.S. and Osman, K.F. (2018). Heterosis and combining ability effects for some traits of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture. 64(4): 447-458. 

  5. Badhe, P.L., Raut, D.M., Magar, N.M., Borole, D.N. and Pawar, V.Y. (2016). Diallel analysis in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 7(2): 291-302. 

  6. Bhagavati, P.P., Kiran Patro, T.S.K.K., Prasad N.V., Reddy L.N., Emmanuel, N.M. and Suneetha D.R.S. (2019). Correlation for growth, quality, yield and yield components in yardlong bean [Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdc.]. International Journal of Current Microbiology, Applied Science. 8(1): 410-414.

  7. Bharathi, D., Reddy, K.H, Reddy, D.M., Lata, P. and Reddy, B.R. (2019). Combining ability studies for various quantitative traits in blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) hepper]. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 7(3): 3095-3098. 

  8. Chattopadhyay, A., Dasgupta, T., Hazra, P. and Som, M.G. (1997). Character association and path analysis in vegetable cowpea. Madras Agriculture Journal. 84: 153-156.

  9. Chattopadhyay, A., Rana, N.P., Seth, T., Das, S., Chatterjee, S. and Dutta, S. (2014). Identification of selection indices and choosing of parents for vegetable cowpea (Vigna unguiculata  CV-GR. sesquipedalis) breeding programme. Legume Research. 37(1): 19-25. doi: 10.5958/j.0976-0571.37.1.003.

  10. Chen, C.Y. and Peng H. (2010). Differentiation and phylogenetic relationship among different cultivars of asparagus bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis). Nordic Journal of Botany. 28: 251-256.

  11. Coulibaly, S., Pasquet, R.S., Papa, R. and Gepts, P. (2002). AFLP Analysis of the phenetic organization and genetic diversity of Vigna unguiculata L. walp. reveals extensive gene flow between wild and domesticated types. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 104: 358-366. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s001220100740.

  12. Das, I., Seth, T., Durwas, S.V., Dutta, S., Chattopadhyay, A. and Singh, B. (2014). Gene action and combining ability for yield and yield component traits in dolichos bean (Dolichos lablab var. typicus). Journal of Breeding and Genetics. 46(2): 293-304. 

  13. Devan, S.R., Rathod, V., Chinthan, K.N., Lakshmidevamma, T.N., Deepashree, G., Shilpashree, N., Anjanappa, M. and Manjunathagowda, D.C. (2021). Morphological characterization, trait variability and their association and diversity analysis among yard long bean [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. subsp. Sesquipedalis (L.) Verdc.] genotypes. Research Square. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-572423/v1.

  14. Fang, J.G., Chao, C.C.T., Roberts, P.A. and Ehlers, J.D. (2007). Genetic diversity of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] in four West African and USA breeding programs as determined by AFLP analysis. Genet Resource and Crop Evolution. 54: 1197-1209.

  15. Farag, H.I.A. and Afiah, S.A. (2012). Analysis of gene action in diallel crosses among some faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes under Maryout conditions. Annals of Agricultural Sciences. 57(1): 37-46. 

  16. Feba, V., Sarada, S. and Thomas, B. (2022). Correlation studies in yard long bean [Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdcourt] crosses under open field and rain shelter. Annals of Plant and Soil Research. 24(4): 651-655. doi:10.47815/apsr.2022.10223.

  17. Fehr W.R. (1987). Principles of Cultivar Development: Theory and Technique (New York: Macmillan Publ Company).

  18. Haripriya, K., Sathyaraj, D. and Aashikajothi, P. (2024). Genetic variability and diversity analysis in yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata subsp. Sesquipedalis). Accessions under coastal saline ecosystem. Agricultural Science Digest. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5979.

  19. Hazra, P., Chattopadhyay, A., Dasgupta, T., Kar, N., Das, P.K. and Som, M.G. (2007). Breeding strategy for improving plant type, pod yield and protein content in vegetable cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Acta Horticulture. 752: 275-280.

  20. Hossain, M.K., Nazmul, A., Silva, J.A.T., Biswas, B.K. and Mohsin, G.M. (2013). Genetic relationship and diversity based on agro-morphogenic characters in yard long bean (Vigna sesquipedalis L.) germplasm. International Journal of Plant Breeding. 7(2): 129-135.  

  21. Huang, H., Tan, H., Xu, D., Tang, Y., Niu, Y., Lai, Y., Tie, M. and Li, H. (2018). High-density genetic map construction and comparative genome analysis in asparagus bean. Scientific  Reports. 8: 4836. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23173-0.

  22. Huque, A.K.M.M., Hossain, M.K., Alam, N., Hasanuzzaman, M., Biswas, B.K. and Arifuzzaman, M. (2012). Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis for yield and its component characters in string bean [Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis (L.)Verdc.]. Jahangirnagar University Journal of Biological Science. 1(1): 1-10.

  23. Igwe, D.O., Afiukwa, C.A., Ubi, B.E., Ogbu, K.I., Ojuederie, O.B. and Ude, G.N. (2017). Assessment of genetic diversity in Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp) accessions using inter- simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphic markers. BMC Genetics. 18: 98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-017-0567-6.

  24. Jana, S., Som, M.G. and Das, M.D. (1983). Correlation and path analysis of vegetable pod yield components in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata var. sesquipedalis). Haryana Journal of Horticulture Science. 12: 224-227.

  25. Jithesh, V.G. (2009). Genetic analysis of resistance to pod borers and yield in yard long bean [Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdcourt]. M.Sc. (Ag) Thesis, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur. p.187.

  26. Kamala, V., Aghora, T.S., Sivaraj, N., Rao, T., Pandravada, S.R., Sunil, N., Mohan, N., Varaprasad, K.S., Chakrabarty, S.K. (2014). Germplasm collection and diversity analysis in yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis) from Coastal Andhra Pradesh and Odisha. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources. 27(2): 171-177.

  27. Kongjaimun, A., Kaga, A., Tomooka, N., Somta, P., Shimizu, T., Shu, Y., Isemura, T., Vaughan, D.A., Srinives, P. (2012a). An SSR-based linkage map of yardlong bean [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. subsp. unguiculata Sesquipedalis Group] and QTL analysis of pod length. Genome. 55: 81-92.

  28. Kongjaimun, A., Kaga, A., Tomooka, N., Somta, P., Vaughan, D.A. and Srinives, P. (2012b). The genetics of domestication of yardlong bean, [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. ssp. unguiculata cv.-gr. Sesquipedalis]. Annals of Botany. 6: 1185-200. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs048.

  29. Kumari, J. and Chauhan, D.A. (2026). Estimation of combining ability and phenotypic stability for green pod yield and its contributing characters in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research. SP-10(1): 984-987. 

  30. Kumari, J. and Chauhan, D.A. (2018). Genetic analysis for yield and contributing characters in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 7(4): 2453-2458.

  31. Kusmiyati, F., Anwar S. and Herwibawa, B. (2021). Agronomic character evaluation of F3 Yardlong bean progenies. International Conference on Life Sciences and Technology. 2353: 030019. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0052844.

  32. Lal, H., Nagendra R. and Nath, V. (2017b). Biometrical approaches for selection of parents in vegetable cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) breeding programme. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 87(8).  https://doi.org/10.56093/ ijas.v87i8.73236.

  33. Lal, H., Reddy, R.B. and Vishwanath, (2017a). Biometrical studies of yield and related traits in advance breeding lines of bush type vegetable cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. Legume Research. 41(6): 867-872. doi: 10.18805/LR-3799.

  34. Latha, S., Eswari, K.B. and Kumar, S.S. (2018). Combining ability analysis for seed yield and its component characters in green gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek.]. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 6(2): 237-242. 

  35. Leelavathi, K., Umesha, C., Singh V., Singh S.N., Bharathi A. and Raju, G. (2021). Response of plant growth regulators and micronutrients on growth and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). Biological Forum An International Journal. 13(1): 186-190.

  36. Lovely, B.  (2005).  Genetic analysis of yield and mosaic resistance in yard long bean [Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis (L.)  Verd.] Ph.D.  thesis, Kerala Agriculatural  University, Thrissur.

  37. Lovely, B. and Radhadevi, D.S. (2006). Character association studies in yard long bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis L. Verde.). Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources. 19(1): 80-82.

  38. Lovely, B. and Radhadevi, D.S. (2025). Digenic interactions on yield in yardlong bean: A generation mean analysis. Journal of Sustainable Technology in Agriculture. 1: 1. https:// doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15684703.

  39. Madhavi, K., Sivaji, T. and Amrutha, N. (2014). Correlation studies for pod yield in vegetable cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]. Trends in Biosciences. 7(6): 465-467.

  40. Mahalanobis, P.C. (1928). On the generalized distance in statistics. Journal of Genetics. 41: 159-193.

  41. Manju, P.R.  (2006).  Characterization of Vegetable Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)  Walp]. Ph.D. Thesis, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, p.147

  42. Maurya, B.L., Singh, A.K., Maurya, R.K. and Rao, N.V.D.P. (2026). Assessment of nature and magnitude of gene action and components of genetic variation for quality traits and yield. International Journal of Agriculture Extension and Social Development. 9(6): 1074-1076. 

  43. Merin, E.G. and Sarada, S. (2022). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield traits in yard long bean [Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdcourt]. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences. 14(5): 11333-11335.

  44. Nanda M., Rathod, V., Chavan, M.L., Gasti, V.D., Nandimath, S.T. (2022). Correlation and path analysis study in Yardlong bean genotypes. Pharma Innovation. 11(3): 2344-2347.

  45. Nantawong, A., Inchonbot, S., Thonnalak, T., Senkhamwong, T., Watcharawetsaringkharn, S. (2026). genetic inheritance of plant growth habit and seed coat color in crosses between Yardlong Bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis) and Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). King Mongkut’s Agricultural Journal. 44(3).

  46. Nath, V., Lal, H., Rai, M, Rai, N. and Ram, D. (2009). Hierarchical clustering and character association studies in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. Indian Journal Plant Genetic Resources. 22: 22-25.

  47. Ng, N.Q. and Marechal, R. (1985). Cowpea Taxonomy, Origin and Germplasm. Cowpea Research, Production and Utilization, Wiley, Hoboken. pp. 11-21.

  48. Nwofia, G.E., Ogbonna, N.D. and Agbo, C.U. (2013). Path analysis and heritability estimate of yield and yield components in vegetable cowpea as influenced by planting season. American Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. 13(9): 1283-1289.

  49. Ogunkanmi, L.A., Ogundipe, O.T., Ng, N.Q., Scoles, G.J. and Fatokun, C. (2007). Genetic diversity in yardlongbean (Vigna unguiculata subspecies sesquipedalis) as revealed by simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 61(1): 43-52.

  50. Owusu, E.Y., Amegbor, I.K., Darkwa, K., Frimpong, R.O. and Sie, E.K. (2018). Gene action and combining ability studies for grain yield and its related traits in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Cogent Food and Agriculture. 4: 1-16.

  51. Pallavi, Y.V., Verma, A. and Bansala, M.K., (2018). Analysis of combining ability for yield and its attributing characters in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]. Pharma Innovation. 7(7): 202-204. 

  52. Pampaniya, A.G. (2017). Combining ability analysis for yield and its components in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. M.Sc. thesis. Navsari Agricultural University, Gujarat. 

  53. Phansak, P., Taylor, P.W.J. and Mogollon, O. (2005). Genetic diversity in yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis) and related Vigna species using sequence tagged microsatellite site analysis. Scientia Horticulturae. 106(2): 137-146.   

  54. Pidigam,  S.,  Munnam, S.B.,  Nimmarajula, S., Gonela,  N.,  Adimulam, S.S., Yadla, H., Bandari, L. and Amarapalli G. (2019). Assessment of genetic diversity in Yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis) germplasm from India usind RAPD markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 66: 1231-124.

  55. Qu, P., Hu, T., Yang, Y., Wu, X., Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qin, D., Ehlers, J.D., Close, T.J., Lu, Z. and Li, G. (2011). Mapping genes governing flower and seedcoat color in asparagus bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis) based on single nucleotide polymorphism and simple sequence repeat markers. Horticultural Science. 46(8): 1102-1104. https:/ /doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.46.8.1102. 

  56. Rahman, M. and Saad, M. (2000). Estimation of additive, dominance and digenic epistatic interaction effects for certain yield characters in Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis. Euphytica. 114: 61-66.

  57. Rambabu, E., Ravinder R., K., Kamala, V., Saidaiah, P. and Pandravada, S.R., (2016). Morphological characterization of yardlong bean-an under exploited vegetable. International Journal of Science and Nature. 7(2): 344-348.

  58. Ratnakumari, N., Naidu, N.L., Reddy, R.V.S.K., Patro, K.T.S.K.K., Babu, D.R. and Umakrishna K. (2020). Studies on gene action for yield and quality traits in Yardlong Bean [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. ssp. Sesquipedalis Verdc.]. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science. Special Issue.11: 1521-1526.

  59. Resmi, P.S. (1998). Genetic variability in yard long bean [Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdcourt]. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, India. 94 pp. 

  60. Resmi, P.S., Celine, V.A. and Vahab, A.M. (2019). Genetic variability in yard long bean [Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis (L.) Ver court]. Legume Research. 27(4).

  61. Romanus, K.G., Hussein, S. and Mashela, P.W. (2008). Combining ability analysis and association of yield and yield components among selected cowpea lines. Euphytica. 162: 205-210. 

  62. Sangeetha, K S., Prabha, J.A., Mariya Dainy M.S. and Jayalekshmi G. (2022). Evaluation of high yielding yard long bean varieties. Journal of Krishi Vigyan. 11(1): 154-157.

  63. Sarada C. and Rao N.H.P. (2020). Evaluation of yard long bean [Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdcourt] genotypes in vertisols of Andhra Pradesh. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 9(1): 1167-1171. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020. 901.131.

  64. Sathish, N., Gasti V.D., Rathod, V., Kamble, C., Masuthi, D.A., Mahantesh, V. and Nishani S. (2023). Studies on genetic variability and divergence in yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis) genotypes screened under polyhouse conditions. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 12(3): 4958- 4963. 

  65. Sherly, J., Sumithra, S., Kanthaswamy, V., Manojkumar, K. (2025). Screening of Yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis) genotypes under coastal region of Karaikal, India. Plant Archives. 25(1): 211-217.

  66. Shivakumar, V. and Celine, V.A. (2014). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield attributes in yardlong bean [Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis]. Bioinfolet. 11(2A): 415-417.

  67. Singh, J. Kalloo, G. and Singh, K.P. (2001). Vegetable Crops: Nutritional Security. Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi,  pp: 1-56.

  68. Sobha, P.P.  (1994).  Variability and Heterosis in Bush Type Vegetable Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) walp.].  M.Sc. (Ag.)  thesis, Kerala Agric.  Univ., Thrissur, 123 p

  69. Sultana, Z., Ahmed, N., Islam, M.S. and Rahim, M.A. (2020). Genetic variability and yield components of yard long bean (Vigna unguiculata var. sesquipedalis L.). Agronomoski Glasnik. 3: 107-122.

  70. Toppo, S., Singh, D. and Deepanshu (2018). Evaluation trial in Yardlong bean in Allahabad agroclimatic condition. Global Journal of Bioscience and Biotechnology. 7(3): 447-450.

  71. Tripathi, K., Gore, P.G., Ahlawat, S.P., Tyagi, V., Semwal, D.P., Gautam, N.K., Rana J.C. and. Kumar A. (2019). Cowpea genetic resources and its utilization: Indian perspective-A review.  Legume Research. 42(4): 437-446. doi: 10.18805/LR- 4146.

  72. Truong, H.T.H. and Ho, N.T.H. (2026). Phenotypic and molecular diversity of commercial yardlong bean [Vigna unguiculata Subsp. sesquipedalis] Hybrids for Breeding Utilization. Legume Research. 49(8): 1277-1288. doi: 10.18805/LRF-939.

  73. Ullah, M.Z., Rahman, M.J.H. and Saki, A.A.H.M.A. (2011). Genetic variability, character association and path analysis in yard long bean. SAARC Journal of Agriculture. 9: 9-16.

  74. Valarmathi, V., Surendran, C. and Muthiah, A.R. (2007). Genetic divergence analysis in subspecies of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata ssp. unguiculata and Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis). Legume Research. 30: 192-196. 

  75. Vardhan, P.N.H. and Savithramma, D.L. (1998). Variability, character association, path analysis and assessment of quality parameters in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) germplasm for vegetable traits. ACIAR Food Legume Newsletter. 28: 7-8. 

  76. Varghese, L. and Celine, V.A. (2015). Department of Olericulture, College of Agriculture, Vellayanikerala. Evolution of yard long bean (Vigna unguiculata subsp. Sesquipedalis (L.) Verdcourt) genotypes for yield and quality character under polyhouse. International Journal of Applied and pure science and Agriculture. 1(7): 7-15.

  77. Vavilapalli, S. and Celine, V.A. (2014). Studies on character association and path coefficient analysis in yard long bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis). Bioinfolet. 11(2B): 448- 454.

  78. Vidya, S.K., Kumar, V. and Oommen, K.V. (2002). Genetic variability and Heritability of yield and related characters in yard- long bean. Journal of Tropical Agriculture. 40: 11-13.

  79. Widyawan, M.H. and Wulandary, S. and Nuraini, F. and Taryono. (2021). Population structure and genetic diversity analysis of indonesian yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis). Sabrao Journal of Breeding and Genetics. 53(3): 391-402. 

  80. Xia, Q., Pan, L., Zhang, R., Ni, X., Wang, Y., Xia, D., Yun, G., Zhe, Z. et al. (2019). The genome assembly of asparagus bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedialis). Scientific Data. 6: 124. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0130-6.

  81. Xu P., Wu, X., Wang B., Liu Y., Ehlers J.D., Close T.J., Roberts P.A. et al. (2011). A SNP and SSR based genetic map of asparagus bean (Vigna.unguiculata ssp. sesquipedialis)  and Comparison with the broader species. PLoSONE. 6(1): e15952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.001595.

Genetic analysis in Yardlong Bean [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. subsp. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdc.]: A Comprehensive Review 

J
Jyoti Kumari1,*
S
S.S. Solankey2
A
Anupam Adarsh2
M
Mala Kumari1
A
Arti Kumari3,*
R
Randhir Kumar2
D
D.A. Chauhan4
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Nalanda College of Horticulture, Noorsarai, Nalanda, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour-803 113, Bihar, India.
2Department of Horticulture (Vegetable Science), Nalanda College of Horticulture, Noorsarai, Nalanda, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour-803 113, Bihar, India.
3Department of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Nalanda College of Horticulture, Noorsarai, Nalanda, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour-803 113, Bihar, India.
4Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari-396 450, Gujarat, India.
  • Submitted11-02-2026|

  • Accepted30-09-2026|

  • First Online 27-10-2026|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-5646

Yardlong bean is a warm-season legume vegetables grown for its long green pods. It is a member of the Fabaceae family, and a subspecies of cowpea bearing exceptionally long, slender, and fleshy pods, occurs in a range of colors, including white, light green, dark green, reddish-brown, and purple. Despite its nutritional and agricultural value, the yardlong bean remains an underexploited legume crop. However, its dual role as a vegetable and leguminous plant highlights need of emphasis on genetic improvement and expansion of area under cultivation. A systematic literature search was conducted at Nalanda College of Horticulture, Noorsarai, Nalanda, to gather relevant information on work done so far on different aspect of crop improvement. Literature published between 1987 to 2026 was searched using academic Search Engine Databases. This manuscript was prepared by reviewing more than 50 papers. Yardlong bean cultivation faces several challenges, including the lack of improved varieties, limited extension services, low market prices, and the occurrence of pests and diseases. Breeding programs primarily aim to enhance pod yield per hectare by increasing the number of pods per plant. Other breeding goals include improving traits such as earliness, reduced vine length, photo-insensitivity, tolerance to biotic stresses and abiotic stresses and wide adaptability to different agroclimatic conditions. Predominance of additive gene effects for major yield attributing traits was recorded by many scientists, making phenotypic selection a promising and efficient strategy for crop improvement.

Yardlong bean being a leguminous vegetable crop is likely to arose from the domestication of cultivated Cowpea in Asia. It is a diploid species with a chromosome number of 2n = 2x = 22. According to Xia et al., (2019), a K-mer distribution analysis estimated the genome size of the Yardlong bean to be approximately 590 Mb. Gene prediction was carried out using a combination of RNA-Seq-based, homologous and de novo approaches, resulting in the identification 42,609 protein-coding genes. Furthermore, their findings indicated that the quality of the Yardlong bean genome assembly is superior compared to that of the common cowpea. In India, the crop occupies an area of about 23,012 hectares, producing around 1,33,587 tonnes of green pods with an average productivity of 5,800 kg per hectare (Leelavathi et al., 2021).
       
It is widely grown as vegetable across China and South east Asian region. This crop can survive in warm, humid conditions but is sensitive to low temperatures. Yardlong bean and cowpea exhibit distinct phenotypic differences that have arisen due to divergent selection during their evolutionary process. Cleistogamous flower structure makes this crop highly self-pollinated. The flowers of the Yardlong bean appear in a range of colors, including white, cream, yellow and purple. Its seeds vary in texture from smooth to wrinkled and range in color from red to black, with a distinct hilum encircled by a dark band (Fig 1). It is vigorous, annual climber that can reach a height of three to four meters. It bears exceptionally long, slender and tender pods that vary in color (Fig 2), ranging from white and light green to dark green, brownish red, or purple (Kamala  et al., 2014). Its productivity and pod quality often decline during the monsoon season, primarily because of heavy rainfall and the prevalence of pests and diseases (Varghese and Celine, 2015). The plant typically exhibits a creeping habit with an indeterminate growth pattern; however, some varieties tend to be more compact and bushier. Its leaves are trifoliate, consisting of three leaflets arranged alternately along the stem and they show considerable variation in size and shape. The crop develops a strong taproot system and bears flowers in racemes along the stems. These racemes are borne on peduncles measuring about 10 to 30 cm in length, each typically carrying two to three pods. The distinctively long peduncles are a characteristic feature of the Yardlong bean, facilitating easy hand harvesting compared to other leguminous crops. From a nutritional standpoint, the immature pods are an excellent source of nourishment, containing 3.5-5% crude protein and appreciable amounts of vitamins A and C, iron, calcium, phosphorus and dietary fiber, making them a valuable vegetable for human consumption (Singh et al., 2001). These attributes make yardlong beans a highly nutritious (Hazra et al., 2007) and valuable vegetable crop. However, in India, only a limited number of commercial Yardlong bean cultivars with high yield potential are available. Moreover, suitable breeding approaches for the genetic improvement of this nutrient-rich vegetable remain insufficient. Therefore, the objective of this article is to compile existing information on Yardlong bean improvement, identify diverse parental lines for use in hybridization programs and understand the inheritance patterns and genetic factors influencing yield and its contributing traits. Assessment of genetic diversity, variability parameters and inheritance pattern is important part of crop improvement as these biometrical tools provide insight into available genetic variation and gene action governing the inheritance pattern of characters from one generation to another generation and also in the selection of genotypes for further breeding programme, it also provides idea to plant breeder about need of creation of variation through hybridization, mutation, genetic engineering and introgression of exotic genotypes.

Fig 1: Variations in seed colour and sees size in Yardlong bean genotype.



Fig 2: Variations in pod colour and pod length in Yardlong bean genotype.


 
Review methodology
 
Relevant literature published between 1987-2026 was searched using different academic search tools like Google scholar, Scopus, PubMed, web of science and research gate. Representative Boolean strings combined these axes. One string took the form of the resource and technology axes combined as follows: “yardlong bean” AND “genetic diversity”, “yardlong bean” AND “genetic, improvement”, “yardlong bean” AND “breeding”, “yardlong bean” AND “germplasm”, “yardlong bean” AND “yield”, “yardlong bean” AND “quality”. Research paper was selected based on their relevance to the objectives of review and reporting information on genetic diversity, variability, heritability, heterosis breeding, combining ability and gene action in yardlong bean. Studie were selected when they addressed aspects relevant to the objectives of the review, including origin, domestication, genetic diversity, germplasm characterization, breeding, yield, quality, stress tolerance, molecular genetics, genomics, or crop improvemen, peer-reviewed scientific journal, conference proceeding, thesis or authoritative institutional publication, where appropriate. The publication contained sufficient methodological or scientific information to evaluate its findings. Both recent studies and important earlier publications were considered so that current developments could be discussed while retaining historically important information Research papers excluded when they were unrelated to yardlong bean or the specific objectives of the review; contained insufficient scientific or methodological information.
 
Approaches of genetic improvement in Yardlong bean
 
In India, Yardlong bean remains an underutilized vegetable, primarily grown in the peninsular regions such as Kerala, Tamil Nadu, coastal Andhra Pradesh and Odisha (Sherly et al., 2025). India is believed to be the centre of cowpea diversity because of two important “cultigroups” viz., Biflora and Sesquipedalis which have evolved from Unguiculata (Ng and Marechal, 1985). The evolution of vegetable cowpea (yardlong bean) from cowpea in the Asian region was also reported by Kongjaimun et al., (2012b). The domestication genetics of the Yardlong bean hold considerable scientific importance, as this crop followed an evolutionary pathway distinct from that of cowpea, which is primarily grown for seed production.  It has been further reported that the yard-long bean has evolved in Asian region from cowpea following intense selection by farmers for long pods that are consumed as a vegetable (Tripathi et al., 2019). Yardlong beans are mainly cultivated in kharif season when availability of other vegetable crops is less (Sultana et al., 2020). In India, few commercial Yardlong bean cultivars with high yield potential are available and approaches for genetic improvement of Yardlong beans are stilled less explored by the breeder. Therefore, the objective of this article is to compile existing information on genetic variability and divergence which will be useful for selection of parental material for hybridization programme. Understanding the inheritance pattern of yield and yield attributing characters is essential for developing superior variety. Appropriate breeding procedure can be predicted for improvement of the traits based on gene action involved in its expression. Yield being a complex and highly variable traits influenced by numerous yield attributing factors (Ullah et al., 2011). Therefore, the relationships among yield and its component traits are fundamental to achieving yield improvement. In conventional breeding programs, understanding the extent of genetic variability and selecting appropriate cultivars or breeding lines becomes an essential step toward successful commercial production of this vegetable.
 
Genetic diversity and genetic variability
 
Genetic diversity and degree of genetic variation within population is fundamental concept behind crop improvement efforts. D-square statistic, proposed by Indian statistician Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis (1928), it is effective in measuring genetic divergence and develop strategies for embedding germplasm diversity in crop improvement programme. Knowledge of variability and genetic diversity is pre-requisite for designing any crop improvement programme. The clustering pattern reflects the amount of genetic divergence in the germplasm, while magnitude of intra-cluster distance, gives an idea about magnitude of genetic diversity among genotypes of same group. Intercluster distance must be taken into account to explore genetic diversity through hybridization (Valarmathi et al., 2007). The relative contribution of individual characters towards expression of genetic diversity is also important as cluster mean performance also help in the selection of parents for hybridization programme (Haripriya et al., 2024). Yardlong bean genotypes are highly variable, which offer significant potential for increasing pod yield through designing appropriate improvement approaches. Among yield attributing characters pod length showed maximum contribution towards genetic diversity followed by test weight, days to maturity and pod yield per plant and due to maximum intercluster distance, it was depicted that hybridization between IC-630381, IC-630379, IC-630383 and IC-626143, will provide superior recombination with desirable traits in segregating generations (Haripriya et al., 2024). Sathish et al., (2023) divided 40 genotypes in nine cluster by Tocher’s method and found maximum divergence between cluster for yield, pod length, number of pods per plant, number of primary branches per plant and pod width, importance of number of pods per plant, number of pods per cluster and vegetable pod yield per plant in diversity analysis also reported by Huque et al., 2012. Eighty-nine genotypes were classified into twelve clusters by Lal et al., (2017b) they depicted maximum contribution of Plant height towards divergence (29.37%) followed by number of peduncles per plant (26.30%), number of pods per plant (18.39%) and pod weight (16.42%) among vegetable cowpea genotypes. The integration of molecular markers along with morphological markers, enables a more encyclopedic assessment of genetic diversity within breeding materials. RAPD analysis depicted substantial polymorphism (79.42%) and also predicted that some hybrids with similar pod performance were genetically distinct while other show both molecular and phenotypic similarity, demonstrating that phenotypic uniformity should not be interpreted as evidence of genetic uniformity (Truong et al., 2026). However, RAPD is a dominant marker system with limited reproducibility; therefore, validation using co-dominant markers, such as SSR or SNP, is recommended. Pidigam  et al. (2019) emphasized the importance of Random amplified polymorphic DNA marker, it is informative, scorable and reproducible and classified 20 genotypes into five major clusters. Importance of Inter-retrotransposon amplified polymorphism (IRAP) and retrotransposon microsatellite amplified polymorphism markers (REMAP) with scoring percentage of 52% was reported by Widyawan et al., (2021). Ogunkanmi  et al. (2007) investigated genetic diversity among fifty accessions of yardlongbean using SSR markers and he concluded that accessions from India showed more genetic diversity than those from other countries, thereby providing further evidence in support of the suggestions that India may be the centre of diversity for the crop and SSR marker are useful in accessing genetic diversity in Yardlong bean. Anwer  et al. (2019) revealed that RAPD markers can be an efficient, fast and, inexpensive way for differentiation of yardlong bean, F1 progenies and their parents, as well as to evaluate their genetic relationships. Genetic diversity in yardlong bean was evaluated by using different DNA markers AFLP (Coulibaly et al., 2002), RAPD (Alam et al., 2013), SSR (Kongjaimun et al., 2012a), SNP (Xu et al., 2011), ISSR and SCoT (Igwe et al., 2017). A study by Rambabu  et al. (2016) observed substantial variability in Yardlong bean collection and revealed that growth habit varies from pole type to bush type, while flower colour varied from light purple, dark purple, pink and white, pod colour also varied from light green, dark green, purple colour with green tip to green colour with purple tip and genotype IC-582859, NSJ-362, IC-582850 and IC-582872 were found to be superior with pod yield and yield attributing characters. Higher Pod length observed in Githika (51 cm) followed by Vellayani Jyothika (45 cm) and Manjari (44 cm) (Sangeetha et al., 2022) as pod length is one of the important yield attributing traits, Githika recorded significantly maximum yield (259 q/ha) followed by Vellayani Jyothika (215 q/ha) and Manjari (199 q/ha).
       
Genetic variability within Yardlong bean cultivars will indicate the need for the introgression of exotic germplasm into breeding programs (Fang et al., 2007). In Yardlong bean high GCV, PCV along with high heritability observed for green pod yield per plant, green pod width, green pod length (Devan et al., 2021; Merin and Sarda, 2022). Phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV) is indicator of total variations which includes genetic as well as environmental effect while genetic coefficient of variation (GCV) gives a basis to access and compare the range of genetic variability for quantitative traits. High PCV and GCV reported for pod yield per plant (45.07, 44.15) followed by number of pods per plant (34.85, 34.77), pod girth (21.11, 20.96), number of seeds per pod (20.33, 20.20) and plant height (20.84, 20.26) respectively by Haripriya  et al. (2024), higher GCV and PCV for these traits also reported by Shivakumar  et al. (2014). Estimates of heritability gives idea about characters which are least sensitive to environmental factors and strength of these characters for inheritance to next generation and phenotypic selection through these characters are effective. Highest estimates of heritability observed for number of pods per plant (99.49%), number of seeds per pod (98.76%), plant height (91.55%). The sole estimation of heritability doesn’t give idea about progeny progress in the subsequent generation, but still it should be interpreted in connection with the genetic advance. High value of genetic advance as percent of mean was obtained for pod yield per plant (89.11%) followed by number of pods per plant (71.44%), pod girth (42.89%), number of seeds per pod (41.36%), plant height (40.58%) and pod length (37.60%). The high heritability and genetic advance observed for these traits suggest that their phenotypic variation is relatively less influenced by environmental effects and that additive gene action may have a substantial role in their inheritance. Therefore, these traits can be effectively improved through selection in breeding programmes. So simple selection may be suggested for improvement through these characters (Haripriya et al., 2024; Vidya et al., 2002; Resmi et al., 2019). High heritability along with moderate genetic advance as per cent of mean suggest the predominance of both additive and non-additive gene action. Lal et al., (2017b) infers higher magnitude of PCV than GCV for all the characters emphasizing the environmental effect on expression of characters, high GCV, PCV along with high heritability with genetic advance reported for plant height, pod yield per plant, pod weight, number of pods per plant and pod length. Similar result obtained by several workers (Nath et al., 2009; Huque et al., 2012; Chattopadhyay et al., 2014; Nwofia  et al., 2013). High estimates of genotypic coefficient of variation, heritability and genetic advance for the characters, viz. pod yield per plant, number of peduncles per plants, number of pods per plants, pod weight and pod length indicate that improvement of these characters can be achieved through selection. In Yardlong bean traits such as flower color, pod color, pod size, pod weight, pod texture and fruit characteristics showed maximum variability (Alam et al., 2013). This variability is an essential resource for breeding, as limited genetic diversity remains a major constraint to their improvement (Kusmiyati et al., 2021). Several studies have investigated the genetic variability of Yardlong beans and the application of this knowledge in breeding strategies (Phansak et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2010; Hossain et al., 2013; Huang et al., 2018). Toppo et al., (2018) evaluated twelve Yardlong bean genotypes for growth and yield under Allahabad Agro-Climatic Conditions. Earliness in first pod picking was recorded in three genotypes: Improved AK-57, TS-18 long yard and Richa (65.33 days after sowing). Maximum Pod length was recorded in COPBVAR-6 (51.67 cm), the number of seeds per pod was recorded in Richa (18.67) and pod yield per plant (481.33 g). Six genotypes (VL Lobia-1, VS-3, PVCP-20 Vyjayanthi, Arka Mangala, Lola) were evaluated (Sarada et al., 2020) in RBD with four replications during 2016-18. They reported that Pod girth was maximum in Arka Mangala, whereas the number of pods per plant was maximum in VS-3. Among the entries evaluated, VS-3 recorded the highest yield (66.2 q/ha), followed by Arka Mangala (54.7 q/ha).
 
Character association and Cause-effect analysis
 
Yield is a complex quantitative trait controlled by several genes, so selection through yield is not possible. Correlation and path analysis can increase selection potency for yield improvement and its attributing components. In yardlong bean pod yield per plant, showed strong positive correlation with pod weight, number of peduncle and number of pods per plant (Lal et al., 2017a; Huque et al., 2012; Chattopadhyay et al., 2014; Madhavi et al., 2014) depicting selection through these traits might be fruitful in further generation. Sultana et al., (2020) inferred significant positive correlation of number of seed per pod, number of pods per plant with pod yield per plant while significantly negative correlation with days to harvest. Correlation shed light on principal association between dependent and independent variables where fresh pod yield per plant being a dependent variable and other yield attributing traits are considered as independent variables. Path analysis separates correlation matrix into direct and indirect effect. Devan et al., (2021) depicted that Pod length (0.769) had the highest significant direct influence on green pod yield per plant followed by days to first harvest (0.728), seeds per pod (0.663), green pod width (0.218), days to first flowering (0.189) and vine length (0.106), similar report was given by (Lal et al., 2017b; Nath et al., 2009; Chattopadhyay et al., 2014). Direct effect on pod yield depicted by first flowering, days to maturity, number of pods per plant, pod weight and number of seeds per pod. Correlation and path analysis gives idea about the characters on which maximum emphasis should be given for selection in Vegetable cowpea. Studie on correlation by (Rambabu et al., 2016), revealed traits like plant height, number of primary branches per plant, terminal leaf length, length of harvesting time, length of cluster stalk, number of clusters per plant, numbers of pods per cluster, number of pods per plant, pod length, pod girth, seed number per pod and 100 seed weight showed positive association with pod yield per plant (g). Cause and effect analysis showed that length of cluster stalk (0.8242) and pod girth (0.5550) at genotypic level exhibited high positive direct effect on pod yield per plant. Selection for these associated traits may improve pod output per plant since they are in the right direction. Pod length, pod width and the number of pods per plant positively correlated with pod yield (Manju 2006; Jithesh 2009; Vavilapalli and Celine, 2014; Rambabu et al., 2016; Bhagavati et al., 2019). Pods per cluster and Plant height had a significant positive connection with each other and pods per cluster had a highly significant positive association with pods per plant and pod production. Pod length had a highly significant positive relationship with pods per plant, seed weight and seed yield (Pidigam et al., 2019). Pod yield per plant was highly positive significant with pods per plant and pods per cluster (Ullah et al., 2011; Lovely and Radhadevi, 2006). Positive correlation of pollen viability and fruit set percentage on pod yield per plant reported by Feba et al., (2022). Correlation merely demonstrates the association between characters while it doesn’t give any idea about cause and effect of that association. So, further Path analysis is done to determined true relationship using correlation matrix for separating variables into direct and indirect effect. Green pods per plant, followed by green pod length, number of seeds per pod and green pod width, had a strong positive direct influence on plant pod yield (Nanda et al., 2022; Abhimanyu et al., 2025). This inferred that when other variables remain constant, genetic improvement of such traits will result in higher yields (Manju, 2006; Lovely, 2005). Increased pod yield can be achieved by increasing the number of pods per cluster and number of pods per plant. As a result, these traits can play a significant role in crop improvement and the better-performing accessions aided the advance into the breeding program. High direct effect of number of pods per  plant was earlier reported by (Jana et al., 1983; Chattopadhyay et al., 1997; Resmi 1998; Vardhan and Savithramma, 1998). Pod weight is also found one of major contributor to pod yield (Sobha, 1994; Chattopadhyay et al., 1997; Resmi, 1998). Number of pods per plant and pod weight should be given due importance   in  selection programs for yield improvement  in  yard-long    bean since these characters recorded significant  genotypic correlation with high direct effect on pod yield.
 
Gene action
 
Yield is complex quantitative traits; its expression is governed by several genes. Understanding the genetic makeup of these yield attributing traits is essential for designing any effective breeding programme. Gene action refers to manner in which gene influence the expression of a trait (Maurya et al., 2026). It can be determined by mating a set of genotypes in all possible combinations by using different mating design like Diallel and line ´ tester to estimate general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) reflecting additive and non-additive gene actions, while with the help of generation mean analysis, where different generations like F1, F2 and backcross are used to determine additive, dominance and epistasis interaction via scaling test. Ratio of gca variance and sca variance is good indicator of gene action as if its value is less than one there is predominance of non-additive gene action while when its value is more than one it indicates the involvement of additive gene action in transfer of that trait. Ratnakumari et al., (2020), conducted a study to get information about the nature and magnitude of gene action for yield and attributing characters, they made crosses in half diallel fashion using Seven yardlong bean genotypes viz., Babli, Geethika, Bobbili Local, Vizianagaram Local, Lola, Trivendram Local, Bhuvaneswar Local. Magnitude of SCA variance was greater than that of GCA variance, depicting predominance of non-additive gene action for vine length, average leaf area, days to 50% flowering, number of pods per plant, pod length, pod girth, number of seeds per pod and pod yield per plant, Additive gene action observed for traits like primary branches per plant and days to first picking as magnitude of GCA variance was greater than that of SCA variance. (Kumari et al., 2026; Romanus et al., 2008; Badhe et al., 2016; Owusu et al., 2018; Pallavi et al., 2018) in cowpea, Farag and Afiah (2012) in faba bean, Das et al., (2014) in Dolichos bean, Askander and Osman (2018) in Pea, Latha et al., (2018) in Mung bean. Bharathi et al., (2019) in Blackgram]. Recombination breeding can be suggested for characters days to 50 per cent flowering, pod weight, pods per cluster, pod yield per plant and length of the harvest period (Romanus et al., 2008), prevalence of additive gene action for days to maturity and pod length reported by Owusu et al., (2018), pod weight, number of pods per plant, hundred fresh seed weight, pod width, pod length and seeds per pod had higher SCA variance designing predominance of dominant gene action in the inheritance of yield and most of the characters in Cowpea reported by Kumari et al., 2018 and Pampaniya, 2017. Quantitative characters do not follow the Mendelian ratio (Fehr, 1987). Inheritance pattern in plant growth habit and seed coat colour in crosses between Yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis) and Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), is assessed through chi  square  tests of different generations P1, P2. F1, F2 BCP1 and BCP2 and shows segregation ratio of ratio of  3 indeterminate: 1 determinate, while seed coat color segregated in a 3 black: 1 brown ratio. Plant growth habit and seed coat color are controlled by a single dominant gene, with segregation in the F2 generation in  accordance with Mendel’s First Law (Nantawong  et al., 2026).  Furthermore, the dihybrid  cross analysis of both traits revealed segregation in a 9 indetermine black seed coat: 3 indeterminate brown seed coats: 3 determinate black seed coat: 1 de terminate brown seed coat ratio, which is in accordance with the  the oretical expectation. This finding demonstrates that the two traits are controlled by genes located on different chromosomes and assort independently, consistent with Mendel’s Second Law. However, In Yardlong bean brown seed coat colour is dominant over white seed coat colour (Qu et al., 2011). Kusmiyati  et al. (2021), assessed segregation ration in F2 population of Yardlong bean. Segregation ratio is assessed in Fn generation to estimate whether the progeny has attained homozygosity or still it will split into different traits. They found that Pod length, Plant height, number of leaves per plant and pod sweetness showed normal distribution in F2 population in yardlong bean were classified as quantitative traits that were controlled by many genes. Selection based on these characters should be done at later generations, as these characters are controlled by many genes having small effect on expression of these characters and also influenced by environment. Pod weight is controlled by epistasis gene action so selection through this character can be done at early stage and it is not inherited directly from parents to offspring. Lovely and Radhadevi (2025) observed additive x additive, additive x dominance and dominance x dominance gene effects for traits such as pod length, pod yield per plant, number of pods per plant and root weight, indicating the involvement of epistatic gene action. The presence of duplicate and complementary epistasis suggested that hybridization followed by selection in segregating generations could be effective for improving these traits. Recombination breeding was also recommended for enhancing pod yield and pod weight. Rahman and Saad (2000) studied inheritance of yield and attributing characters utilizing the mean of six population P1, P2, F1, F2, BC1P1 and BC1P2 in four crosses of Vigna sesquipedalis and shed light on the importance of dominance gene action for number of pods per plant and pod yield per plant also depicted involvement of digenic interaction [additive x additive (i) and dominance x dominance (l)] for these characters which varied among the crosses. Pedigree selection and heterosis breeding can be used to exploit the fixable and non-fixable components of variation respectively in in this crop.
Stagnation in yield caused by narrow genic base is major constraints in any crop improvement programme, so exploration of genetic materials and collection of germplasm from diversity rich area is prerequisite for any breeding programme. Multilocation evaluation alongside characterization of germplasm and making germplasm available to breeders for exploration of its breeding potential is need of time. Integrated analysis done so far on molecular and phenotypic variation in yardlong bean by scientists shed light on moderate to high variability in pod related traits like pod length and pod weight, confirming selection through these traits would be yield oriented. Yield and its component traits in yardlong bean are complex characters governed by additive, dominance and epistatic gene actions. Despite the progress made, important knowledge gaps remain. Greater attention is required to understand genotype × environment interactions, stability of important traits, the genetic basis of nutritional and quality characteristics, resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, and the inheritance of traits associated with market-preferred pod characteristics. In addition, the integration of conventional quantitative genetic analysis with molecular and genomic approaches remains an important area for future research.
The authors are sincerely thankful to BAU Sabour, Bhagalpur for providing financial support and necessary facilities in carrying out the present investigation. Authors are also thankful to Publication Unit of BAU Sabour for providing communication number (BAU COMMUNICATION NO. 2787/261008) for submission of article for publication.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
Not applicable.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Abhimanyu, R., Shinde U.S., Dhumal, S.A., Sarvade, S.A., Pawar, R.D. and Mote M.S. (2025). Correlation and path analysis in yard long bean genotypes for yield and its attributing character. Plant Archives. 25(2): 1273-1280.

  2. Alam, S.S., Tasmin R., Jahan I., Habib M.A. and Sultana S.S. (2013). Fluorescent banding and RAPD analysis of five cultivars in Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdc. Cytologia. 78(1): 73-79.

  3. Anwar, S., Karno, K., Kusmiyati, F. and Herwibawa, B. (2019). Genetic relationships between yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis) F1 progenies and their parents based on RAPD markers. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 250: 012-053. doi:10.1088/ 1755-1315/250/1/012053.

  4. Askander, H.S. and Osman, K.F. (2018). Heterosis and combining ability effects for some traits of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture. 64(4): 447-458. 

  5. Badhe, P.L., Raut, D.M., Magar, N.M., Borole, D.N. and Pawar, V.Y. (2016). Diallel analysis in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 7(2): 291-302. 

  6. Bhagavati, P.P., Kiran Patro, T.S.K.K., Prasad N.V., Reddy L.N., Emmanuel, N.M. and Suneetha D.R.S. (2019). Correlation for growth, quality, yield and yield components in yardlong bean [Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdc.]. International Journal of Current Microbiology, Applied Science. 8(1): 410-414.

  7. Bharathi, D., Reddy, K.H, Reddy, D.M., Lata, P. and Reddy, B.R. (2019). Combining ability studies for various quantitative traits in blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) hepper]. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 7(3): 3095-3098. 

  8. Chattopadhyay, A., Dasgupta, T., Hazra, P. and Som, M.G. (1997). Character association and path analysis in vegetable cowpea. Madras Agriculture Journal. 84: 153-156.

  9. Chattopadhyay, A., Rana, N.P., Seth, T., Das, S., Chatterjee, S. and Dutta, S. (2014). Identification of selection indices and choosing of parents for vegetable cowpea (Vigna unguiculata  CV-GR. sesquipedalis) breeding programme. Legume Research. 37(1): 19-25. doi: 10.5958/j.0976-0571.37.1.003.

  10. Chen, C.Y. and Peng H. (2010). Differentiation and phylogenetic relationship among different cultivars of asparagus bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis). Nordic Journal of Botany. 28: 251-256.

  11. Coulibaly, S., Pasquet, R.S., Papa, R. and Gepts, P. (2002). AFLP Analysis of the phenetic organization and genetic diversity of Vigna unguiculata L. walp. reveals extensive gene flow between wild and domesticated types. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 104: 358-366. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s001220100740.

  12. Das, I., Seth, T., Durwas, S.V., Dutta, S., Chattopadhyay, A. and Singh, B. (2014). Gene action and combining ability for yield and yield component traits in dolichos bean (Dolichos lablab var. typicus). Journal of Breeding and Genetics. 46(2): 293-304. 

  13. Devan, S.R., Rathod, V., Chinthan, K.N., Lakshmidevamma, T.N., Deepashree, G., Shilpashree, N., Anjanappa, M. and Manjunathagowda, D.C. (2021). Morphological characterization, trait variability and their association and diversity analysis among yard long bean [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. subsp. Sesquipedalis (L.) Verdc.] genotypes. Research Square. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-572423/v1.

  14. Fang, J.G., Chao, C.C.T., Roberts, P.A. and Ehlers, J.D. (2007). Genetic diversity of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] in four West African and USA breeding programs as determined by AFLP analysis. Genet Resource and Crop Evolution. 54: 1197-1209.

  15. Farag, H.I.A. and Afiah, S.A. (2012). Analysis of gene action in diallel crosses among some faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes under Maryout conditions. Annals of Agricultural Sciences. 57(1): 37-46. 

  16. Feba, V., Sarada, S. and Thomas, B. (2022). Correlation studies in yard long bean [Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdcourt] crosses under open field and rain shelter. Annals of Plant and Soil Research. 24(4): 651-655. doi:10.47815/apsr.2022.10223.

  17. Fehr W.R. (1987). Principles of Cultivar Development: Theory and Technique (New York: Macmillan Publ Company).

  18. Haripriya, K., Sathyaraj, D. and Aashikajothi, P. (2024). Genetic variability and diversity analysis in yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata subsp. Sesquipedalis). Accessions under coastal saline ecosystem. Agricultural Science Digest. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5979.

  19. Hazra, P., Chattopadhyay, A., Dasgupta, T., Kar, N., Das, P.K. and Som, M.G. (2007). Breeding strategy for improving plant type, pod yield and protein content in vegetable cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Acta Horticulture. 752: 275-280.

  20. Hossain, M.K., Nazmul, A., Silva, J.A.T., Biswas, B.K. and Mohsin, G.M. (2013). Genetic relationship and diversity based on agro-morphogenic characters in yard long bean (Vigna sesquipedalis L.) germplasm. International Journal of Plant Breeding. 7(2): 129-135.  

  21. Huang, H., Tan, H., Xu, D., Tang, Y., Niu, Y., Lai, Y., Tie, M. and Li, H. (2018). High-density genetic map construction and comparative genome analysis in asparagus bean. Scientific  Reports. 8: 4836. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23173-0.

  22. Huque, A.K.M.M., Hossain, M.K., Alam, N., Hasanuzzaman, M., Biswas, B.K. and Arifuzzaman, M. (2012). Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis for yield and its component characters in string bean [Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis (L.)Verdc.]. Jahangirnagar University Journal of Biological Science. 1(1): 1-10.

  23. Igwe, D.O., Afiukwa, C.A., Ubi, B.E., Ogbu, K.I., Ojuederie, O.B. and Ude, G.N. (2017). Assessment of genetic diversity in Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp) accessions using inter- simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphic markers. BMC Genetics. 18: 98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-017-0567-6.

  24. Jana, S., Som, M.G. and Das, M.D. (1983). Correlation and path analysis of vegetable pod yield components in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata var. sesquipedalis). Haryana Journal of Horticulture Science. 12: 224-227.

  25. Jithesh, V.G. (2009). Genetic analysis of resistance to pod borers and yield in yard long bean [Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdcourt]. M.Sc. (Ag) Thesis, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur. p.187.

  26. Kamala, V., Aghora, T.S., Sivaraj, N., Rao, T., Pandravada, S.R., Sunil, N., Mohan, N., Varaprasad, K.S., Chakrabarty, S.K. (2014). Germplasm collection and diversity analysis in yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis) from Coastal Andhra Pradesh and Odisha. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources. 27(2): 171-177.

  27. Kongjaimun, A., Kaga, A., Tomooka, N., Somta, P., Shimizu, T., Shu, Y., Isemura, T., Vaughan, D.A., Srinives, P. (2012a). An SSR-based linkage map of yardlong bean [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. subsp. unguiculata Sesquipedalis Group] and QTL analysis of pod length. Genome. 55: 81-92.

  28. Kongjaimun, A., Kaga, A., Tomooka, N., Somta, P., Vaughan, D.A. and Srinives, P. (2012b). The genetics of domestication of yardlong bean, [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. ssp. unguiculata cv.-gr. Sesquipedalis]. Annals of Botany. 6: 1185-200. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs048.

  29. Kumari, J. and Chauhan, D.A. (2026). Estimation of combining ability and phenotypic stability for green pod yield and its contributing characters in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research. SP-10(1): 984-987. 

  30. Kumari, J. and Chauhan, D.A. (2018). Genetic analysis for yield and contributing characters in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 7(4): 2453-2458.

  31. Kusmiyati, F., Anwar S. and Herwibawa, B. (2021). Agronomic character evaluation of F3 Yardlong bean progenies. International Conference on Life Sciences and Technology. 2353: 030019. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0052844.

  32. Lal, H., Nagendra R. and Nath, V. (2017b). Biometrical approaches for selection of parents in vegetable cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) breeding programme. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 87(8).  https://doi.org/10.56093/ ijas.v87i8.73236.

  33. Lal, H., Reddy, R.B. and Vishwanath, (2017a). Biometrical studies of yield and related traits in advance breeding lines of bush type vegetable cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. Legume Research. 41(6): 867-872. doi: 10.18805/LR-3799.

  34. Latha, S., Eswari, K.B. and Kumar, S.S. (2018). Combining ability analysis for seed yield and its component characters in green gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek.]. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 6(2): 237-242. 

  35. Leelavathi, K., Umesha, C., Singh V., Singh S.N., Bharathi A. and Raju, G. (2021). Response of plant growth regulators and micronutrients on growth and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). Biological Forum An International Journal. 13(1): 186-190.

  36. Lovely, B.  (2005).  Genetic analysis of yield and mosaic resistance in yard long bean [Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis (L.)  Verd.] Ph.D.  thesis, Kerala Agriculatural  University, Thrissur.

  37. Lovely, B. and Radhadevi, D.S. (2006). Character association studies in yard long bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis L. Verde.). Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources. 19(1): 80-82.

  38. Lovely, B. and Radhadevi, D.S. (2025). Digenic interactions on yield in yardlong bean: A generation mean analysis. Journal of Sustainable Technology in Agriculture. 1: 1. https:// doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15684703.

  39. Madhavi, K., Sivaji, T. and Amrutha, N. (2014). Correlation studies for pod yield in vegetable cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]. Trends in Biosciences. 7(6): 465-467.

  40. Mahalanobis, P.C. (1928). On the generalized distance in statistics. Journal of Genetics. 41: 159-193.

  41. Manju, P.R.  (2006).  Characterization of Vegetable Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)  Walp]. Ph.D. Thesis, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, p.147

  42. Maurya, B.L., Singh, A.K., Maurya, R.K. and Rao, N.V.D.P. (2026). Assessment of nature and magnitude of gene action and components of genetic variation for quality traits and yield. International Journal of Agriculture Extension and Social Development. 9(6): 1074-1076. 

  43. Merin, E.G. and Sarada, S. (2022). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield traits in yard long bean [Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdcourt]. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences. 14(5): 11333-11335.

  44. Nanda M., Rathod, V., Chavan, M.L., Gasti, V.D., Nandimath, S.T. (2022). Correlation and path analysis study in Yardlong bean genotypes. Pharma Innovation. 11(3): 2344-2347.

  45. Nantawong, A., Inchonbot, S., Thonnalak, T., Senkhamwong, T., Watcharawetsaringkharn, S. (2026). genetic inheritance of plant growth habit and seed coat color in crosses between Yardlong Bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis) and Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). King Mongkut’s Agricultural Journal. 44(3).

  46. Nath, V., Lal, H., Rai, M, Rai, N. and Ram, D. (2009). Hierarchical clustering and character association studies in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. Indian Journal Plant Genetic Resources. 22: 22-25.

  47. Ng, N.Q. and Marechal, R. (1985). Cowpea Taxonomy, Origin and Germplasm. Cowpea Research, Production and Utilization, Wiley, Hoboken. pp. 11-21.

  48. Nwofia, G.E., Ogbonna, N.D. and Agbo, C.U. (2013). Path analysis and heritability estimate of yield and yield components in vegetable cowpea as influenced by planting season. American Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. 13(9): 1283-1289.

  49. Ogunkanmi, L.A., Ogundipe, O.T., Ng, N.Q., Scoles, G.J. and Fatokun, C. (2007). Genetic diversity in yardlongbean (Vigna unguiculata subspecies sesquipedalis) as revealed by simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 61(1): 43-52.

  50. Owusu, E.Y., Amegbor, I.K., Darkwa, K., Frimpong, R.O. and Sie, E.K. (2018). Gene action and combining ability studies for grain yield and its related traits in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Cogent Food and Agriculture. 4: 1-16.

  51. Pallavi, Y.V., Verma, A. and Bansala, M.K., (2018). Analysis of combining ability for yield and its attributing characters in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]. Pharma Innovation. 7(7): 202-204. 

  52. Pampaniya, A.G. (2017). Combining ability analysis for yield and its components in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. M.Sc. thesis. Navsari Agricultural University, Gujarat. 

  53. Phansak, P., Taylor, P.W.J. and Mogollon, O. (2005). Genetic diversity in yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis) and related Vigna species using sequence tagged microsatellite site analysis. Scientia Horticulturae. 106(2): 137-146.   

  54. Pidigam,  S.,  Munnam, S.B.,  Nimmarajula, S., Gonela,  N.,  Adimulam, S.S., Yadla, H., Bandari, L. and Amarapalli G. (2019). Assessment of genetic diversity in Yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis) germplasm from India usind RAPD markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 66: 1231-124.

  55. Qu, P., Hu, T., Yang, Y., Wu, X., Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qin, D., Ehlers, J.D., Close, T.J., Lu, Z. and Li, G. (2011). Mapping genes governing flower and seedcoat color in asparagus bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis) based on single nucleotide polymorphism and simple sequence repeat markers. Horticultural Science. 46(8): 1102-1104. https:/ /doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.46.8.1102. 

  56. Rahman, M. and Saad, M. (2000). Estimation of additive, dominance and digenic epistatic interaction effects for certain yield characters in Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis. Euphytica. 114: 61-66.

  57. Rambabu, E., Ravinder R., K., Kamala, V., Saidaiah, P. and Pandravada, S.R., (2016). Morphological characterization of yardlong bean-an under exploited vegetable. International Journal of Science and Nature. 7(2): 344-348.

  58. Ratnakumari, N., Naidu, N.L., Reddy, R.V.S.K., Patro, K.T.S.K.K., Babu, D.R. and Umakrishna K. (2020). Studies on gene action for yield and quality traits in Yardlong Bean [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. ssp. Sesquipedalis Verdc.]. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science. Special Issue.11: 1521-1526.

  59. Resmi, P.S. (1998). Genetic variability in yard long bean [Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdcourt]. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, India. 94 pp. 

  60. Resmi, P.S., Celine, V.A. and Vahab, A.M. (2019). Genetic variability in yard long bean [Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis (L.) Ver court]. Legume Research. 27(4).

  61. Romanus, K.G., Hussein, S. and Mashela, P.W. (2008). Combining ability analysis and association of yield and yield components among selected cowpea lines. Euphytica. 162: 205-210. 

  62. Sangeetha, K S., Prabha, J.A., Mariya Dainy M.S. and Jayalekshmi G. (2022). Evaluation of high yielding yard long bean varieties. Journal of Krishi Vigyan. 11(1): 154-157.

  63. Sarada C. and Rao N.H.P. (2020). Evaluation of yard long bean [Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdcourt] genotypes in vertisols of Andhra Pradesh. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 9(1): 1167-1171. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020. 901.131.

  64. Sathish, N., Gasti V.D., Rathod, V., Kamble, C., Masuthi, D.A., Mahantesh, V. and Nishani S. (2023). Studies on genetic variability and divergence in yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis) genotypes screened under polyhouse conditions. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 12(3): 4958- 4963. 

  65. Sherly, J., Sumithra, S., Kanthaswamy, V., Manojkumar, K. (2025). Screening of Yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis) genotypes under coastal region of Karaikal, India. Plant Archives. 25(1): 211-217.

  66. Shivakumar, V. and Celine, V.A. (2014). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield attributes in yardlong bean [Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis]. Bioinfolet. 11(2A): 415-417.

  67. Singh, J. Kalloo, G. and Singh, K.P. (2001). Vegetable Crops: Nutritional Security. Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi,  pp: 1-56.

  68. Sobha, P.P.  (1994).  Variability and Heterosis in Bush Type Vegetable Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) walp.].  M.Sc. (Ag.)  thesis, Kerala Agric.  Univ., Thrissur, 123 p

  69. Sultana, Z., Ahmed, N., Islam, M.S. and Rahim, M.A. (2020). Genetic variability and yield components of yard long bean (Vigna unguiculata var. sesquipedalis L.). Agronomoski Glasnik. 3: 107-122.

  70. Toppo, S., Singh, D. and Deepanshu (2018). Evaluation trial in Yardlong bean in Allahabad agroclimatic condition. Global Journal of Bioscience and Biotechnology. 7(3): 447-450.

  71. Tripathi, K., Gore, P.G., Ahlawat, S.P., Tyagi, V., Semwal, D.P., Gautam, N.K., Rana J.C. and. Kumar A. (2019). Cowpea genetic resources and its utilization: Indian perspective-A review.  Legume Research. 42(4): 437-446. doi: 10.18805/LR- 4146.

  72. Truong, H.T.H. and Ho, N.T.H. (2026). Phenotypic and molecular diversity of commercial yardlong bean [Vigna unguiculata Subsp. sesquipedalis] Hybrids for Breeding Utilization. Legume Research. 49(8): 1277-1288. doi: 10.18805/LRF-939.

  73. Ullah, M.Z., Rahman, M.J.H. and Saki, A.A.H.M.A. (2011). Genetic variability, character association and path analysis in yard long bean. SAARC Journal of Agriculture. 9: 9-16.

  74. Valarmathi, V., Surendran, C. and Muthiah, A.R. (2007). Genetic divergence analysis in subspecies of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata ssp. unguiculata and Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis). Legume Research. 30: 192-196. 

  75. Vardhan, P.N.H. and Savithramma, D.L. (1998). Variability, character association, path analysis and assessment of quality parameters in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) germplasm for vegetable traits. ACIAR Food Legume Newsletter. 28: 7-8. 

  76. Varghese, L. and Celine, V.A. (2015). Department of Olericulture, College of Agriculture, Vellayanikerala. Evolution of yard long bean (Vigna unguiculata subsp. Sesquipedalis (L.) Verdcourt) genotypes for yield and quality character under polyhouse. International Journal of Applied and pure science and Agriculture. 1(7): 7-15.

  77. Vavilapalli, S. and Celine, V.A. (2014). Studies on character association and path coefficient analysis in yard long bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedalis). Bioinfolet. 11(2B): 448- 454.

  78. Vidya, S.K., Kumar, V. and Oommen, K.V. (2002). Genetic variability and Heritability of yield and related characters in yard- long bean. Journal of Tropical Agriculture. 40: 11-13.

  79. Widyawan, M.H. and Wulandary, S. and Nuraini, F. and Taryono. (2021). Population structure and genetic diversity analysis of indonesian yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis). Sabrao Journal of Breeding and Genetics. 53(3): 391-402. 

  80. Xia, Q., Pan, L., Zhang, R., Ni, X., Wang, Y., Xia, D., Yun, G., Zhe, Z. et al. (2019). The genome assembly of asparagus bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. sesquipedialis). Scientific Data. 6: 124. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0130-6.

  81. Xu P., Wu, X., Wang B., Liu Y., Ehlers J.D., Close T.J., Roberts P.A. et al. (2011). A SNP and SSR based genetic map of asparagus bean (Vigna.unguiculata ssp. sesquipedialis)  and Comparison with the broader species. PLoSONE. 6(1): e15952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.001595.
In this Article
Published In
Legume Research

Editorial Board

View all (0)