Input energy consumption by crops
The energy consumed by the crops throughout their growth stages is illustrated in Fig 1 and 1a. The overall energy consumed by crops is calculated based on the energy expended on land preparation, seeds, plant protection, manures/fertilizers, labor and diesel. During both the years, the plot fertilized with the application of full dose of RDN through inorganic fertilizer recorded higher input energy (37% in 2022 and 41% in 2023, respectively) of aerobic rice - blackgram cropping sequence. Whereas, the lowest input energy (31% in 2022 an 35% in 2023, respectively) was recorded under combined application of inorganic, organic, AM fungi and foliar nutrients. The computation revealed variations in input energy levels, which could attributed to differences in energy utilization under various nutrient management practices. The energy input for black gram production remained consistent across all treatments since the crop was cultivated under residual N fertility with uniform application of P and K, along with consistent management practices. Furthermore, several researchers have previously reported lower total energy requirements for cropping systems that include legume crops
(Malhi et al., 2002). The reduced energy input associated with sustainable nutrient management strategies could be attributed to the lower energy of organic manures compared to chemical fertilizers. Higher energy input with the use of chemical fertilizers was earlier reported by
Paramesh et al. (2019).
Response on output energy and net energy
The total energy output was calculated from both the main and the by-product of the cropping system. The results revealed that
dhaincha intercropping (M
2) increased the total output energy (11.1%) and net energy (74583 MJ ha
-1) over sole rice (M
1). With regard to nutrient management strategies, plot treated half dose of RDN by inorganic fertilizer + quarter dose of RDN by EFYM + quarter dose of RDN by VC + AM fungi + foliar nutrients of 0.5% Urea +1% FeSO
4 + 0.5% ZnSO
4 (S
6) recorded higher output energy (57.4%) and net energy (108405 MJ ha
-1) compared to full dose of RDN by inorganic fertilizer (Table 2). Higher grain and straw yield favours higher output energy
(Kumar et al., 2015). This increase in energy output correlates directly with the biological yield of the crops (
Mallikarjun and Maity, 2017,
Singh et al., 2022). The application of organic manures in nutrient management facilitates a gradual and sustained release of nutrients thereby minimizing losses through leaching and volatilization. This controlled nutrient availability enhances nutrient use efficiency, optimizing energy conversion within the cropping system and contributing to higher net energy gain. In contrast, the exclusive application of inorganic fertilizers often results in suboptimal nutrient utilization due to rapid nutrient release, which increases the risk of losses through leaching, denitrification and volatilization. Consequently, the lower efficiency of nutrient uptake in sole inorganic fertilizer treatments leads to reduced energy productivity and a lower net energy balance in the system (
Garnaik et al., 2025).
Response on specific energy and energy intensiveness
Rice with
dhaincha intercropping (M
2) significantly reduced the specific energy (11.1%) as compared to rice alone (M
1). However, there was no significant effect of
dhaincha intercropping (M
2) on energy intensiveness (Table 2). Among the nutrient management strategies, combined application of inorganic fertilizer, enriched FYM, vermicompost, AM fungi and foliar application of nutrients (S
6) significantly reduced the specific energy (46.1%) and energy intensiveness (35.4%) compared to recommended dose of fertilizer (S
2). Higher specific energy value was recorded in control plot. It denotes a less efficient cropping system. The lowest specific energy value was observed with
dhaincha (M
2) intercropping and sustainable nutrient management practices (S
6). Lowest value of specific energy indicate the more efficient cropping system. Energy intensiveness recorded lower values with sustainable nutrient management strategies (S
6). The per unit energy of organic manures was lower compared to chemical fertilizers which lead to lower energy intensiveness as earlier reported by
Pooniya et al. (2017)
.
Response on energy productivity and energy use efficiency
Rice with
dhaincha intercropping significantly increased the energy productivity (0.150 kg MJ
-1) and energy use efficiency (9.9%) over sole rice (Table 2). Among the various nutrient management practices, plots treated with half dose of RDN by inorganic fertilizer, quarter dose of RDN by EFYM, quarter dose of RDN by VC, AM fungi and foliar nutrients of 0.5% Urea, 1% FeSO
4, 0.5% ZnSO
4 (S
6) recorded significantly higher energy productivity (0.200 kg MJ
-1) and energy use efficiency (42.9%) than sole application of chemical fertilizer (S
2). The increased energy use efficiency and energy productivity were observed in sustainable nutrient management strategies were indeed a result of higher crop productivity. A judicious combination of organic and inorganic nutrient sources led to a reduction in the use of non-renewable energy inputs. Higher output energy and low input energy recorded in the sustainable nutrient management practices lead to higher energy use efficiency and energy productivity as reported by
Meena et al. (2021).
Response on human energy profitability, energy profitability and energy output efficiency
Rice with
dhaincha intercropping significantly increased the human energy profitability (5.89 kg MJ
1), energy profitability (3.01) and energy output efficiency (0.272 × 103 MJ ha
-1 day
-1 compared to sole rice (M
1) (Table 2a). With regard to nutrient management strategies, the plot supplied with half dose of RDN from inorganic fertilizer, quarter dose of RDN from EFYM, quarter dose of RDN from vermicompost, AM fungi and foliar application of 0.5% Urea, 1% FeSO
4, 0.5% ZnSO
4 (S
6) recorded significantly increased human energy profitability (8.20 kg MJ
1), energy profitability (4.18) and energy output efficiency (0.383 × 103 MJ ha
-1 day
-1) compared to sole application of chemical fertilizer (S
2). The higher human energy profitability in the treatments M
2 and S
6 indicated that integrating
dhaincha intercropping and sustainable nutrient management strategies with rice could able to increase the efficiency of human labor, lead to better energy utilization and higher productivity
(Prajapat et al., 2018).
With regard to interaction the effect between
dhaincha intercropping and nutrient management strategies on energy indicators was non-significant.
Correlation analysis
The correlation coefficients indicated significant relationships between the variables (Fig 2). Notably, all inputs demonstrates a strong positive correlation with both output and energy use suggesting that changes in the input variable are closely associated with corresponding changes in output measures. Conversely, variables such as specific energy and energy intensiveness exhibit a moderate negative correlation with input (-0.95 and -0.36, respectively), indicating an inverse relationship. Other variables like energy use efficiency, net energy and human energy profitability showed moderate to strong positive correlations with input reflecting varying degrees of positive associations. Meanwhile, energy productivity and energy profitability demonstrate weaker positive correlations. These results emphasize the importance of optimizing energy inputs to enhance productivity and energy efficiency in the aerobic rice-blackgram system. Variables
viz., energy use efficiency and net energy highlight efficient system performance, while human energy profitability demonstrate the contributions of economic energy from labour and total output respectively.