Impact of in situ Moisture Conservation Practices and Nitrogen Levels on Growth Analysis and Productivity of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) under Rainfed Alfisols

V
V. Soujanya1
G
G. Pratibha2,*
G
G. Karuna Sagar3
B
B. Sandhya Rani4
K
K.V. Rao5
B
B.M.K. Raju6
V
V. Chandrika7
1Department of Agronomy, S.V. Agricultural College, Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University, Tirupati-517 502, Andhra Pradesh, India.
2Division of Resource management, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar-500 059, Hyderabad, India.
3Department of Agronomy, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agriucltural University, Lam, Guntur-522 034, Andhra Pradesh, India.
4Department of Agronomy, DAATT Centre, Chittoor-517 001, Andhra Pradesh, India.
5Division of Resource Management, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar-500 059, Hyderabad, India.
6Section of Design and Analysis, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar-500 059, Hyderabad, India.
7Department of Agronomy, S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupati-517 502, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  • Submitted30-05-2025|

  • Accepted30-12-2025|

  • First Online 23-04-2026|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-5527

Background: To investigate the impact of in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen fertilization practices on growth analysis and productivity of pigeonpea, a field investigation was carried out at Gunegal Research Farm, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, during kharif  2022-23 and 2023-24. 

Methods: During kharif seasons of 2022-23 and 2023-24, field experiments were carried out for two consecutive years at ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture to evaluate the impact of in-situ moisture conservation practices and different levels of nitrogen on growth and productivity of pigeonpea under rainfed Alfisols of semi-arid tropics. The study was conducted in split-plot  design with four different in situ moisture conservation practices as in  main plots and four nitrogen levels as in  subplots.

Result: The pooled data of the study showed that in-situ moisture conservation practices recorded higher yield due to improve growth and physiological indices of the crop because of better moisture availability to the plant. The increase in nitrogen application increased in yield. This increase in yield with nitrogen levels is attributed to higher nitrogen availability which helped in improvement in growth, physiological growth and crop productivity.

Pulses are important food crops in different countries as they are cheaper source of proteins, vitamins, dietary fibre and minerals etc. (Tewari et al., 2019) and contribute to approximately 9 to 10% of total food grain production hence they play crucial role in food security, provide nutritional support and also helps in reducing environmental risks. Traditionally, more than 80% area under pulse production is under rainfed regions with poor soil fertility resulting in low productivity and high instability in production of pulses (Ahlawat et al., 2016). Moreover, pulses increase the soil fertility status with their ability of atmospheric nitrogen fixation and improve  physical structure and contributing to sustainable production systems and ultimately increasing the economy of the rainfed areas. Additionally, pulses fit well into mixed and intercropping systems and crop rotation (Sharma et al., 2019).
       
Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] is the second important pulse crop after chickpea in India. Globally, India ranks first in the pigeonpea area (4.80 m ha) with a production of 4.28 m t and productivity of 892 kg ha-1 (Directorate of Economics and Statistics, 2021). Though pigeonpea is a drought-tolerance crop with a deep-rooted system, prolonged dry spells occurred during early vegetative growth, flowering and pod formation stages severely affect crop growth and productivity (Sangma, 2020). In recent years, erratic distribution of rainfall, early onset and withdrawal of monsoon have made crop production more unstable in rainfed regions due to uncertainties in rainwater availability. The rainfed soils are not only thirsty, but they are also hungry. In general, rainfed soils are deficient in nutrients, particularly in nitrogen. Moisture stress further aggravates the nitrogen deficiency. Nitrogen is essential for the plant growth as it is an integral part of the amino acids, protein, enzymes and chlorophyll molecule. The availability of nitrogen promotes development of the above-ground dark green tissues with soft consistency and contributes in increasing the grain yield. Hence, to achieve higher yields, it is crucial to regulate nitrogen fertilization. The nutrient and moisture stress reduces the input use efficiency of water and fertilizers, ultimately increases the cost of cultivation (Kumar et al., 2023). Under these circumstances, to improve the productivity and sustainability of pigeonpea, it is essential to exercise control over these aspects. In this context, a study on moisture conservation and nitrogen management plays a vital role in enhancing the efficacy of its utilization. Efficient rainwater management practices through land configuration for in-situ rainwater conservation helps to conserve and enhance the moisture availability to the crop plants throughout the growth period of the crops (Garud et al., 2019). Among various land configuration methods ridge and furrows, broad bed and furrows, tied ridges and furrows are effective in controlling surface runoff, soil erosion and increasing infiltration. Besides, moisture availability, these practices improve physico-chemical and biological properties of the soil (Ngangom et al., 2020). Hence, the in situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen level are the most critical for sustainable crop production and resource use efficiency under rainfed condition and provide insurance during abnormal rainfall situation.
       
Growth analysis is a conceptual framework for exploring the impact of management practices like moisture and nutrients on crop development. The study on crop growth and physiology such as leaf area, AGR, CGR and dry matter, prioritizes growth strategies in response to varying environmental challenges. It helps to enhance crop productivity and resilience in changing climate conditions. Growth indices are useful for interpreting plant responses to environmental stimuli. 
       
On this backdrop there is need to study the impact of in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels on growth and physiology of pigeonpea and to evolve an appropriate management practices of successful cultivation of pigeonpea that results in efficient rainwater conservation through land configuration and nitrogen levels for higher productivity of pigeonpea. Keeping the above fact in view the present investigation was conducted to study the impact of in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels on growth analysis and productivity of pigeonpea.
Experimental site
 
Field experiment was conducted during 2022-23 and 2023-24 for two consecutive years at Gunegal Research Farm (GRF), ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santhoshnagar, Hyderabad, India. The rainfall received during crop growth period from July to December during 2022 and 2023 at experimental site was 799.5 mm in 46 rainy days and 440.7 mm in 25 rainy days respectively. The soil of the experimental field was sandy loam in texture and slightly acidic in reaction with pH of 6.4 and EC of 0.13 d Sm-1. The N, P2O5 and K2O and organic carbon content of soil was low (144.65 kg ha-1), medium (28.54 kg ha-1) and medium (236.53 kg ha-1) and medium (0.64 %), respectively.
       
The experiment was laid out in split-plot design with in-situ moisture conservation practices viz., flatbed sowing (I1), flatbed with conservation furrow (CF) (I2), raised bed with conservation furrow (CF) (I3) and paired rows with conservation furrow (CF) (I4) in main plot and nitrogen management practices viz., Control (without fertilizer) (N1), 75% RDN (N2), 100 % RDN (N3) and 125 % RDN (N4) in sub-plots . The pigeonpea variety used for the investigation was ‘WRGE-97’. The nitrogen was applied as per the treatments. The entire recommended dose of P2O5 and K2O (60:60 kg ha-1) for pigeonpea and nitrogen as per the treatments was applied as a basal dose. All the recommended agronomic practices were followed and appropriate weed, pest and disease management operations  were followed.
       
The plant growth parameters  (plant height, number of branches and dry matter accumulation) and physiological observations viz., leaf area index (LAI) (Watson, 1958), Absolute growth rate (AGR) (West et al., 1920), Crop growth rate (CGR), Relative growth rate (RGR) (Radford, 1967), Net assimilation rate (NAR) (Gregory et al., 1926) and chlorophyll content with SPAD chlorophyll meter (Debtanu and Das, 2007) were recorded at vegetative, flowering, pod formation and harvest stages of pigeonpea as per the standard procedures. At maturity, the yield was recorded from the net plot area and computed to per hectare. Statistical analysis for all parameters was carried out in split-plot design with SAS software version 9.2 (English). ANOVA was computed and mean difference was made using least significant difference (LSD) at P≤0.05 level of significance.
Growth parameters
 
The pooled analysis of the growth parameters revealed that in situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels had significantly influenced the plant height, number of branches plant-1 and dry matter production at all the growth stages of pigeonpea viz., vegetative, flowering, pod formation and at harvest, while the interaction effect among themself  was found to be non-significant. The variation exerted by the in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels on growth parameters viz., plant height, number of branches plant-1 and dry matter production at vegetative, flowering, pod formation and at harvest stage are given in Table 1a and 1b.

Table 1a: Influence of in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels on plant height and number of branches plant-1 at different growth stages of pigeonpea (Pooled data over two years).



Table 1b: Influence of in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels on dry matter production and SPAD chlorophyll values at different growth stages of pigeonpea (Pooled data over two years).


       
In situ
moisture conservation practices recorded the highest growth like plant height, number of branches plant-1 and dry matter production at all the growth stages. Among the in situ moisture conservation practices, flatbed with CF (conservation furrow), raised bed with CF and paired row with CF recorded highest growth parameters. This higher growth might be due to better moisture availability for a longer period because of rainwater stored in conservation furrows. The  better moisture availability helped the crop to escape from  the stress during dry spells which in turn resulted in higher growth parameters (Kirar et al., 2020; Vijayaprabhakar and Jayanthi, 2018). However,  lowest growth was observed in flatbed sowing might be due to low stored soil moisture and poor moisture availability to the crops. Besides, low moisture restricted root growth because of low soil moisture and compacted soil under flatbed has resulted in poor growth (Sharma et al., 2019).
       
Application of nitrogen increased growth parameters viz., plant height, number of branches plant-1 and dry matter production throughout the crop growth stages. Application of 125% RDN recorded maximum growth parameters viz., plant height, number of branches plant-1 and dry matter accumulation. This might be due to the higher nitrogen availability in soil which led to increase absorption of nutrients by pigeonpea which resulted in cell multiplication and elongation that might have helped in improved growth of pigeonpea (Dayanandanaik et al., 2024; Kulkarni et al., 2020 and Panchavati et al., 2020). Control, i.e. no nitrogen application recorded the lower growth parameters of pigeonpea throughout the crop growth peroid. This might be attributed to poor growth of crops due to insufficient supply of nitrogen in the control treatment.
 
Spad chlorophyll values
 
The pooled analysis of SPAD chlorophyll content gradually increased up to flowering stage of pigeonpea and later decreased with time due to senescence. In situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen management did not significantly influenced the SPAD values in pigeonpea are presented in Table 1b. Highest values were recorded in flatbed with CF and raised bed with CF compared to flatbed sowing method owing to increase availability of soil moisture and balanced supply of nutrients to the crop at all stages (Honnali and Biradar (2020). Application of 125% RDN recorded numerically higher SPAD values followed by 100% RDN. These results are in close association with findings Honnali et al. (2020) and Nagaraj et al. (2019).
 
Physiological growth
 
The physiological indices viz., leaf area index (LAI),  Absolute growth rate (AGR), crop growth rate (CGR), relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR) increased up to flowering stage and decreased thereafter. AGR is typically measured as an increment in total dry weight per plant over a specific unit of time, whereas, RGR expresses growth in terms of a rate of increase in weight per unit weight. NAR values were higher during early vegetative growth stages but declines as crop advance in age might be due to leaf mutual shading and decreased photosynthetic efficiency in older foliage (Amanullah et al., 2010).
       
The physiological growth like LAI, AGR and CGR of pigeonpea were significantly influenced by in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels during vegetative, flowering and pod formation stage of Pigeonpea. Whereas, RGR and NAR were significantly influenced by in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels during vegetative stage only, Whereas,  at later stages these parameters were non-significant during later stages of pigeonpea. The interaction effect among moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels on all the physiological growth indices was not significant. The graphical representation of all the physiological indices viz., LAI, AGR, CGR, RGR and NAR as influenced by in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels are presented in the Fig 1, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 4a, 4b, 5a and 5b respectively.

Fig 1: Influence of in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels on leaf area index at different growth stages of pigeonpea (Pooled data of 2022-23 and 2023-24).



Fig 2a: Absolute growth rate of pigeonpea as influenced by in situ moisture conservation practices.



Fig 2b: Absolute growth rate of pigeonpea as influenced by nitrogen levels.



Fig 3a: Crop growth rate of pigeonpea as influenced by in situ moisture conservation practices.



Fig 3b: Crop growth rate of pigeonpea as influenced by nitrogen levels.



Fig 4a: Relative growth rate of pigeonpea as influenced by in-situ moisture conservation practices.



Fig 4b: Relative growth rate of pigeonpea as influenced by nitrogen levels.



Fig 5a: Net assimilation rate of pigeonpea as influenced by in-situ moisture conservation practices.



Fig 5b: Net assimilation rate of pigeonpea as influenced by nitrogen levels.


       
Among the in situ moisture conservation practices, flatbed with CF recorded significantly higher LAI, AGR, CGR, RGR and NAR and this was on par with raised bed with CF at all growth stages of pigeonpea except at harvest. Higher physiological indices in moisture conservation practices might be due to the availability of conserved rainwater in the furrows for a longer period. The higher moisture content improved the crop growth of pigeonpea as compared to no moisture conservation practices. While, the lowest physiological indices were recorded in flatbed sowing i.e., without moisture conservation practice at all growth stages of  pigeonpea. This might be due to lower dry matter production resulted in lower physiological indices.
       
Nitrogen fertilization management exerted significant influence on LAI, AGR, CGR, RGR and NAR of pigeonpea. Application of 125% RDN recorded significantly higher physiological indices of pigeonpea which was followed by 100% RDN and 75% RDN application during both the years as well as in pooled data. Higher dose of nitrogen application resulted in higher nitrogen availability and uptake by crop which reflected in the form of higher dry matter production ultimately leading to higher physiological indices. Significantly lower values of all the physiological indices were registered in control treatment  during all stages of pigeonpea. The lower physiological growth in control could be attributed to the deficiency of nitrogen, leading to low dry matter production, indicating reduced photosynthetic activity. Consequently, this could have resulted in the lowest LAI, AGR, CGR, RGR and NAR. Higher doses of nitrogen improved the growth attributing characters viz., plant height, leaf area and dry matter production which might have increased the physiological growth. These results were in accordance with the findings of Dayanandanaik et al. (2024); Venkatalakshmi (2016).
 
Seed and stalk yield
 
The perusal of the pooled data of two years of seed and stalk yield presented in Table 2. revealed that flatbed with CF (conservation furrow) recorded higher seed and stalk yield and was on par with raised bed with CF and paired row with CF in the individual years as well as in pooled mean. The conserved moisture in furrows supported crop growth at critical growth stages might have favored overall growth of crop and greater translocation of food material to the reproductive part which might have helped in higher seed and stalk yield. These results were in line with Raviraja et al. (2023); Shrivastava et al. (2018) and Sadavadiya et al. (2017). Flatbed sowing recorded significantly lower pooled seed yield as compared to other moisture conservation practices i.e., flatbed with CF, raised bed with CF and paired row with CF during both the years of study and in pooled mean.

Table 2: Influence of in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels on seed and stalk yield of pigeonpea (Pooled data of 2022-23 and 2023-24).


       
Among the nitrogen levels 125% RDN application recorded highest seed and stalk yield in pooled mean and followed by 100% RDN and 75% RDN respectively. The crop yield increased with increase in nitrogen application. The increase in yield might be due to higher nitrogen availability which improved leaf area, this increase in leaf area has increased the SPAD chlorophyll content and ultimately photosynthesis which might led to more dry matter production and consequently higher seed yield. These findings are in agreement with the findings of Honnali et al. (2020); Daka et al. (2020) and Panchavati et al. (2020). Significantly lowest seed and stalk yield of pigeonpea was recorded in control might be due to lowest crop growth and dry matter production led to reduction in seed and stalk yields. The interaction effect between in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels did exerted significant influence on seed and stalk yield of pigeonpea in mean data of two years.
From this study, it was concluded that in-situ moisture conservation practices due to different land configuration practices like  flatbed with conservation furrow, raised bed with CF and paired row with CF in combination with higher dose of nitrogen i.e., 125% RDN application resulted in better growth and development and suitable for achieving higher yield of Pigeonpea in Alfisols of Hyderabad, India.
We authors  thankful to the ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad for providing necessary financial and technical support under the National Innovations on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) project.
The author declares that there are no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the legume research reported in this paper.

  1. Ahlawat, I.P.S., Sharma, P and Singh, U. (2016). Production, demand and import of pulses in India. Indian Journal of AgronomySpecial issue(61): S33-S41.

  2. Amanullah, M., Asif, K., Nawab, Z., Shah, M., Hassan, A.Z and Khan, S.K. (2010). Impact of planting density and p- fertilizer source on the growth analysis of maize. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 42(4): 2349-2357.

  3. Daka, A.K., Kumar, S., Singh, B., Singh, K., Kumar, A and Navish, K. (2020). Nitrogen use efficiency, economic return and yield performance of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) as influenced by nipping and fertility levels. Legume Research. 43(1): 105-110. doi: 10.18805/LR-4062.

  4. Dayanandanaik, S., Rehaman, H.M.A., Somashekar, K.S., Krishnamurthy, R., Vishwanath, K and Navi, L. (2024). Effect of foliar nutrition on growth and yield of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L). Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 10(2): 142-149.

  5. Debtanu, M. and Das, D.K. (2007). Nitrogen management through SPAD and LCC in rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown in an inceptisol. Annals of Agricultural Research. 26(1): 142-143.

  6. Directorate of Economics and Statistics (2021). Agricultural Statistics at a Glance. 2021 Report.

  7. Garud, H.S., Asewar, B.V., Dhawan, A.S., Gokhale, D.N and Mirza, I.A. (2019). Productivity and soil moisture conservation studies of pigeon pea based intercropping systems as influenced by different land configurations. Legume Research. 42(3): 365-369. doi: 10.18805/LR-4093.

  8. Gregory, F.G. (1926). The effect of climatic conditions on growth of barley. Annals of Botany. 40: 1-26.

  9. Honnali, S. and Biradar, D.P. (2020). Conservation agriculture and nutrient application effects on productivity, profitability and energetics of pigeonpea under semi-arid tropics. Journal of Farm Sciences. 33(1): 49-54.

  10. Honnali, S., Kuchanur, P., Biradar, D.P., Aladakatti, Y.R., Hebbar, M and Nirmalnath, P.J. (2020). Effect of zero tillage practices and nutritional levels on microbes, enzymatic activities in soil and productivity of pigeonpea under rainfed situations. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 9(3): 1140-1149.

  11. Kirar, N.S., Sasode, D.S., Rawat, G.S., Joshi, E. and Mahor, S. (2020). Performance of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) sown on different land configuration techniques. Journal of Pharmacognosy and  Phytochemistry. 9(4): 224-227.

  12. Kulkarni, S., Rao, K.N., Ravi, M.V., Veeresh, H., Desai, B.K and Swamy, M. (2020). Growth and yield of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) as influenced by different nutrient management approaches. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 9(1): 1411- 1415.

  13. Kumar, A., Singh, R., Singh, T., Dass, A., Arora, K and Reddy, M.B. (2023). Effect of land configuration and weed management practices on weeds, productivity and profitability of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan). Indian Journal of Ecology. 50(3): 641-645.

  14. Nagaraj, D.M., Babu, B.M., Polisgowdar, B.S., Ayyanagowdar, M.S., Krishnamurthy, D., Kandpaland, K and Ramesh, G. (2019). Influence of chlorophyll content and leaf area index on growth of pigeonpea. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. SP-9: 43-51.

  15. Ngangom, B., Das, A., Lal, R., Idapuganti, R.G., Layek, J., Basavaraj, S., Babu, S., Yadav, G.S and Ghosh, P.K. (2020). Double mulching improves soil properties and productivity of maize-based cropping system in eastern Indian Himalayas. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. 3: 308-320.

  16. Panchavati, G.N., Dhyani, B.P and Shahi, U.P. (2020). Effect of nitrogen levels and scheduling on growth and yield of pigeonpea in integrated approach. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 9(7): 1230-1238.

  17. Radford, P.J. (1967). Growth analysis formulae-their use and abuse. Crop Science. 7(3): 171-173.

  18. Raviraja, B.S.R., Rao, K.N., Bhat, S.N., Amaregouda, A and Sajjanar, S. (2023). Effect of moisture conservation practices on yield and economics of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) in black soil. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 12(9): 1940- 1945.

  19. Sadavadiya, H.B., Naik, V.R and Choudhary, S.D. (2017). Effect of land configuration, irrigation and INM on growth, yield and water use efficiency of Indian bean (var.GNIB-21). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science. 6(7): 2624-2630.

  20. Saileela, K. (2018). Modelling the water balance components of in situ water harvesting for castor and redgram based intercropping systems in Alfisols. Ph.D Thesis. Professor Jayashanker Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad, Telangana.

  21. Sangma, C.B. (2020). Soil and crop health management for the cultivation of pigeon pea: An overview of management practices. Management of Fungal Pathogens in Pulses: Current Status and Future Challenges. pp 143-167.

  22. Sathe, R.K. (2015). Response of transplanted pigeonpea to different panting geometry and land configuration. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis. Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.

  23. Sharma, S.K., Kumar, A., Singh, K and Kumar, N. (2019). Effect of land configuration and weed management on yield and yield attributes of green gram (Vigna radiate). Agricultural Science Digest. 39(4): 320-323. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5025.

  24. Shrivastava, P., Khare, Y.R., Sharma, A and Pahalwan, D.K. (2018). Effect of raised bed sowing of pigeon pea in vertisols in central Narmada valley agro-climatic zone of Madhya Pradesh. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 7(3): 2904-2906.

  25. Tewari, A.K., Shivhare, A.K., Pallewar, S., Tikle, A and Chaturvedi, S.K. (2019). Pulses: Success Story and Way Forward. Promotion of Pulses for Sustainable Production System, Doubling Farmers’ Income and Nutritional Security, Jhansi on 25 October.

  26. Venkatalakshmi, K. (2016). Influence of integrated agronomic management practices on physiological and nutrient uptake of redgram under Alkali soils. Research Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences. 4(3): 1-6.

  27. Vijayaprabhakar, A and Jayanthi, C. (2018). Study on growth and yield response of redgram in various intercropping system and its economics under different land configurations in North Western agro climatic zone of Tamil Nadu. Madras Agricultural Journal. 105(1-3): 7-12.

  28. Watson. D.J. (1958). The dependence of net assimilation rate on leaf area index. Annals of Botany. 22: 37-54.

  29. West, C., Briggs, G.E. and Kidd, F. (1920). Methods and significant relations in the quantitative analysis of plant growth. New Phytologist. 19: 200-207.

Impact of in situ Moisture Conservation Practices and Nitrogen Levels on Growth Analysis and Productivity of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) under Rainfed Alfisols

V
V. Soujanya1
G
G. Pratibha2,*
G
G. Karuna Sagar3
B
B. Sandhya Rani4
K
K.V. Rao5
B
B.M.K. Raju6
V
V. Chandrika7
1Department of Agronomy, S.V. Agricultural College, Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University, Tirupati-517 502, Andhra Pradesh, India.
2Division of Resource management, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar-500 059, Hyderabad, India.
3Department of Agronomy, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agriucltural University, Lam, Guntur-522 034, Andhra Pradesh, India.
4Department of Agronomy, DAATT Centre, Chittoor-517 001, Andhra Pradesh, India.
5Division of Resource Management, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar-500 059, Hyderabad, India.
6Section of Design and Analysis, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar-500 059, Hyderabad, India.
7Department of Agronomy, S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupati-517 502, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  • Submitted30-05-2025|

  • Accepted30-12-2025|

  • First Online 23-04-2026|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-5527

Background: To investigate the impact of in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen fertilization practices on growth analysis and productivity of pigeonpea, a field investigation was carried out at Gunegal Research Farm, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, during kharif  2022-23 and 2023-24. 

Methods: During kharif seasons of 2022-23 and 2023-24, field experiments were carried out for two consecutive years at ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture to evaluate the impact of in-situ moisture conservation practices and different levels of nitrogen on growth and productivity of pigeonpea under rainfed Alfisols of semi-arid tropics. The study was conducted in split-plot  design with four different in situ moisture conservation practices as in  main plots and four nitrogen levels as in  subplots.

Result: The pooled data of the study showed that in-situ moisture conservation practices recorded higher yield due to improve growth and physiological indices of the crop because of better moisture availability to the plant. The increase in nitrogen application increased in yield. This increase in yield with nitrogen levels is attributed to higher nitrogen availability which helped in improvement in growth, physiological growth and crop productivity.

Pulses are important food crops in different countries as they are cheaper source of proteins, vitamins, dietary fibre and minerals etc. (Tewari et al., 2019) and contribute to approximately 9 to 10% of total food grain production hence they play crucial role in food security, provide nutritional support and also helps in reducing environmental risks. Traditionally, more than 80% area under pulse production is under rainfed regions with poor soil fertility resulting in low productivity and high instability in production of pulses (Ahlawat et al., 2016). Moreover, pulses increase the soil fertility status with their ability of atmospheric nitrogen fixation and improve  physical structure and contributing to sustainable production systems and ultimately increasing the economy of the rainfed areas. Additionally, pulses fit well into mixed and intercropping systems and crop rotation (Sharma et al., 2019).
       
Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] is the second important pulse crop after chickpea in India. Globally, India ranks first in the pigeonpea area (4.80 m ha) with a production of 4.28 m t and productivity of 892 kg ha-1 (Directorate of Economics and Statistics, 2021). Though pigeonpea is a drought-tolerance crop with a deep-rooted system, prolonged dry spells occurred during early vegetative growth, flowering and pod formation stages severely affect crop growth and productivity (Sangma, 2020). In recent years, erratic distribution of rainfall, early onset and withdrawal of monsoon have made crop production more unstable in rainfed regions due to uncertainties in rainwater availability. The rainfed soils are not only thirsty, but they are also hungry. In general, rainfed soils are deficient in nutrients, particularly in nitrogen. Moisture stress further aggravates the nitrogen deficiency. Nitrogen is essential for the plant growth as it is an integral part of the amino acids, protein, enzymes and chlorophyll molecule. The availability of nitrogen promotes development of the above-ground dark green tissues with soft consistency and contributes in increasing the grain yield. Hence, to achieve higher yields, it is crucial to regulate nitrogen fertilization. The nutrient and moisture stress reduces the input use efficiency of water and fertilizers, ultimately increases the cost of cultivation (Kumar et al., 2023). Under these circumstances, to improve the productivity and sustainability of pigeonpea, it is essential to exercise control over these aspects. In this context, a study on moisture conservation and nitrogen management plays a vital role in enhancing the efficacy of its utilization. Efficient rainwater management practices through land configuration for in-situ rainwater conservation helps to conserve and enhance the moisture availability to the crop plants throughout the growth period of the crops (Garud et al., 2019). Among various land configuration methods ridge and furrows, broad bed and furrows, tied ridges and furrows are effective in controlling surface runoff, soil erosion and increasing infiltration. Besides, moisture availability, these practices improve physico-chemical and biological properties of the soil (Ngangom et al., 2020). Hence, the in situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen level are the most critical for sustainable crop production and resource use efficiency under rainfed condition and provide insurance during abnormal rainfall situation.
       
Growth analysis is a conceptual framework for exploring the impact of management practices like moisture and nutrients on crop development. The study on crop growth and physiology such as leaf area, AGR, CGR and dry matter, prioritizes growth strategies in response to varying environmental challenges. It helps to enhance crop productivity and resilience in changing climate conditions. Growth indices are useful for interpreting plant responses to environmental stimuli. 
       
On this backdrop there is need to study the impact of in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels on growth and physiology of pigeonpea and to evolve an appropriate management practices of successful cultivation of pigeonpea that results in efficient rainwater conservation through land configuration and nitrogen levels for higher productivity of pigeonpea. Keeping the above fact in view the present investigation was conducted to study the impact of in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels on growth analysis and productivity of pigeonpea.
Experimental site
 
Field experiment was conducted during 2022-23 and 2023-24 for two consecutive years at Gunegal Research Farm (GRF), ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santhoshnagar, Hyderabad, India. The rainfall received during crop growth period from July to December during 2022 and 2023 at experimental site was 799.5 mm in 46 rainy days and 440.7 mm in 25 rainy days respectively. The soil of the experimental field was sandy loam in texture and slightly acidic in reaction with pH of 6.4 and EC of 0.13 d Sm-1. The N, P2O5 and K2O and organic carbon content of soil was low (144.65 kg ha-1), medium (28.54 kg ha-1) and medium (236.53 kg ha-1) and medium (0.64 %), respectively.
       
The experiment was laid out in split-plot design with in-situ moisture conservation practices viz., flatbed sowing (I1), flatbed with conservation furrow (CF) (I2), raised bed with conservation furrow (CF) (I3) and paired rows with conservation furrow (CF) (I4) in main plot and nitrogen management practices viz., Control (without fertilizer) (N1), 75% RDN (N2), 100 % RDN (N3) and 125 % RDN (N4) in sub-plots . The pigeonpea variety used for the investigation was ‘WRGE-97’. The nitrogen was applied as per the treatments. The entire recommended dose of P2O5 and K2O (60:60 kg ha-1) for pigeonpea and nitrogen as per the treatments was applied as a basal dose. All the recommended agronomic practices were followed and appropriate weed, pest and disease management operations  were followed.
       
The plant growth parameters  (plant height, number of branches and dry matter accumulation) and physiological observations viz., leaf area index (LAI) (Watson, 1958), Absolute growth rate (AGR) (West et al., 1920), Crop growth rate (CGR), Relative growth rate (RGR) (Radford, 1967), Net assimilation rate (NAR) (Gregory et al., 1926) and chlorophyll content with SPAD chlorophyll meter (Debtanu and Das, 2007) were recorded at vegetative, flowering, pod formation and harvest stages of pigeonpea as per the standard procedures. At maturity, the yield was recorded from the net plot area and computed to per hectare. Statistical analysis for all parameters was carried out in split-plot design with SAS software version 9.2 (English). ANOVA was computed and mean difference was made using least significant difference (LSD) at P≤0.05 level of significance.
Growth parameters
 
The pooled analysis of the growth parameters revealed that in situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels had significantly influenced the plant height, number of branches plant-1 and dry matter production at all the growth stages of pigeonpea viz., vegetative, flowering, pod formation and at harvest, while the interaction effect among themself  was found to be non-significant. The variation exerted by the in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels on growth parameters viz., plant height, number of branches plant-1 and dry matter production at vegetative, flowering, pod formation and at harvest stage are given in Table 1a and 1b.

Table 1a: Influence of in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels on plant height and number of branches plant-1 at different growth stages of pigeonpea (Pooled data over two years).



Table 1b: Influence of in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels on dry matter production and SPAD chlorophyll values at different growth stages of pigeonpea (Pooled data over two years).


       
In situ
moisture conservation practices recorded the highest growth like plant height, number of branches plant-1 and dry matter production at all the growth stages. Among the in situ moisture conservation practices, flatbed with CF (conservation furrow), raised bed with CF and paired row with CF recorded highest growth parameters. This higher growth might be due to better moisture availability for a longer period because of rainwater stored in conservation furrows. The  better moisture availability helped the crop to escape from  the stress during dry spells which in turn resulted in higher growth parameters (Kirar et al., 2020; Vijayaprabhakar and Jayanthi, 2018). However,  lowest growth was observed in flatbed sowing might be due to low stored soil moisture and poor moisture availability to the crops. Besides, low moisture restricted root growth because of low soil moisture and compacted soil under flatbed has resulted in poor growth (Sharma et al., 2019).
       
Application of nitrogen increased growth parameters viz., plant height, number of branches plant-1 and dry matter production throughout the crop growth stages. Application of 125% RDN recorded maximum growth parameters viz., plant height, number of branches plant-1 and dry matter accumulation. This might be due to the higher nitrogen availability in soil which led to increase absorption of nutrients by pigeonpea which resulted in cell multiplication and elongation that might have helped in improved growth of pigeonpea (Dayanandanaik et al., 2024; Kulkarni et al., 2020 and Panchavati et al., 2020). Control, i.e. no nitrogen application recorded the lower growth parameters of pigeonpea throughout the crop growth peroid. This might be attributed to poor growth of crops due to insufficient supply of nitrogen in the control treatment.
 
Spad chlorophyll values
 
The pooled analysis of SPAD chlorophyll content gradually increased up to flowering stage of pigeonpea and later decreased with time due to senescence. In situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen management did not significantly influenced the SPAD values in pigeonpea are presented in Table 1b. Highest values were recorded in flatbed with CF and raised bed with CF compared to flatbed sowing method owing to increase availability of soil moisture and balanced supply of nutrients to the crop at all stages (Honnali and Biradar (2020). Application of 125% RDN recorded numerically higher SPAD values followed by 100% RDN. These results are in close association with findings Honnali et al. (2020) and Nagaraj et al. (2019).
 
Physiological growth
 
The physiological indices viz., leaf area index (LAI),  Absolute growth rate (AGR), crop growth rate (CGR), relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR) increased up to flowering stage and decreased thereafter. AGR is typically measured as an increment in total dry weight per plant over a specific unit of time, whereas, RGR expresses growth in terms of a rate of increase in weight per unit weight. NAR values were higher during early vegetative growth stages but declines as crop advance in age might be due to leaf mutual shading and decreased photosynthetic efficiency in older foliage (Amanullah et al., 2010).
       
The physiological growth like LAI, AGR and CGR of pigeonpea were significantly influenced by in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels during vegetative, flowering and pod formation stage of Pigeonpea. Whereas, RGR and NAR were significantly influenced by in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels during vegetative stage only, Whereas,  at later stages these parameters were non-significant during later stages of pigeonpea. The interaction effect among moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels on all the physiological growth indices was not significant. The graphical representation of all the physiological indices viz., LAI, AGR, CGR, RGR and NAR as influenced by in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels are presented in the Fig 1, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 4a, 4b, 5a and 5b respectively.

Fig 1: Influence of in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels on leaf area index at different growth stages of pigeonpea (Pooled data of 2022-23 and 2023-24).



Fig 2a: Absolute growth rate of pigeonpea as influenced by in situ moisture conservation practices.



Fig 2b: Absolute growth rate of pigeonpea as influenced by nitrogen levels.



Fig 3a: Crop growth rate of pigeonpea as influenced by in situ moisture conservation practices.



Fig 3b: Crop growth rate of pigeonpea as influenced by nitrogen levels.



Fig 4a: Relative growth rate of pigeonpea as influenced by in-situ moisture conservation practices.



Fig 4b: Relative growth rate of pigeonpea as influenced by nitrogen levels.



Fig 5a: Net assimilation rate of pigeonpea as influenced by in-situ moisture conservation practices.



Fig 5b: Net assimilation rate of pigeonpea as influenced by nitrogen levels.


       
Among the in situ moisture conservation practices, flatbed with CF recorded significantly higher LAI, AGR, CGR, RGR and NAR and this was on par with raised bed with CF at all growth stages of pigeonpea except at harvest. Higher physiological indices in moisture conservation practices might be due to the availability of conserved rainwater in the furrows for a longer period. The higher moisture content improved the crop growth of pigeonpea as compared to no moisture conservation practices. While, the lowest physiological indices were recorded in flatbed sowing i.e., without moisture conservation practice at all growth stages of  pigeonpea. This might be due to lower dry matter production resulted in lower physiological indices.
       
Nitrogen fertilization management exerted significant influence on LAI, AGR, CGR, RGR and NAR of pigeonpea. Application of 125% RDN recorded significantly higher physiological indices of pigeonpea which was followed by 100% RDN and 75% RDN application during both the years as well as in pooled data. Higher dose of nitrogen application resulted in higher nitrogen availability and uptake by crop which reflected in the form of higher dry matter production ultimately leading to higher physiological indices. Significantly lower values of all the physiological indices were registered in control treatment  during all stages of pigeonpea. The lower physiological growth in control could be attributed to the deficiency of nitrogen, leading to low dry matter production, indicating reduced photosynthetic activity. Consequently, this could have resulted in the lowest LAI, AGR, CGR, RGR and NAR. Higher doses of nitrogen improved the growth attributing characters viz., plant height, leaf area and dry matter production which might have increased the physiological growth. These results were in accordance with the findings of Dayanandanaik et al. (2024); Venkatalakshmi (2016).
 
Seed and stalk yield
 
The perusal of the pooled data of two years of seed and stalk yield presented in Table 2. revealed that flatbed with CF (conservation furrow) recorded higher seed and stalk yield and was on par with raised bed with CF and paired row with CF in the individual years as well as in pooled mean. The conserved moisture in furrows supported crop growth at critical growth stages might have favored overall growth of crop and greater translocation of food material to the reproductive part which might have helped in higher seed and stalk yield. These results were in line with Raviraja et al. (2023); Shrivastava et al. (2018) and Sadavadiya et al. (2017). Flatbed sowing recorded significantly lower pooled seed yield as compared to other moisture conservation practices i.e., flatbed with CF, raised bed with CF and paired row with CF during both the years of study and in pooled mean.

Table 2: Influence of in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels on seed and stalk yield of pigeonpea (Pooled data of 2022-23 and 2023-24).


       
Among the nitrogen levels 125% RDN application recorded highest seed and stalk yield in pooled mean and followed by 100% RDN and 75% RDN respectively. The crop yield increased with increase in nitrogen application. The increase in yield might be due to higher nitrogen availability which improved leaf area, this increase in leaf area has increased the SPAD chlorophyll content and ultimately photosynthesis which might led to more dry matter production and consequently higher seed yield. These findings are in agreement with the findings of Honnali et al. (2020); Daka et al. (2020) and Panchavati et al. (2020). Significantly lowest seed and stalk yield of pigeonpea was recorded in control might be due to lowest crop growth and dry matter production led to reduction in seed and stalk yields. The interaction effect between in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels did exerted significant influence on seed and stalk yield of pigeonpea in mean data of two years.
From this study, it was concluded that in-situ moisture conservation practices due to different land configuration practices like  flatbed with conservation furrow, raised bed with CF and paired row with CF in combination with higher dose of nitrogen i.e., 125% RDN application resulted in better growth and development and suitable for achieving higher yield of Pigeonpea in Alfisols of Hyderabad, India.
We authors  thankful to the ICAR-CRIDA, Hyderabad for providing necessary financial and technical support under the National Innovations on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) project.
The author declares that there are no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the legume research reported in this paper.

  1. Ahlawat, I.P.S., Sharma, P and Singh, U. (2016). Production, demand and import of pulses in India. Indian Journal of AgronomySpecial issue(61): S33-S41.

  2. Amanullah, M., Asif, K., Nawab, Z., Shah, M., Hassan, A.Z and Khan, S.K. (2010). Impact of planting density and p- fertilizer source on the growth analysis of maize. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 42(4): 2349-2357.

  3. Daka, A.K., Kumar, S., Singh, B., Singh, K., Kumar, A and Navish, K. (2020). Nitrogen use efficiency, economic return and yield performance of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) as influenced by nipping and fertility levels. Legume Research. 43(1): 105-110. doi: 10.18805/LR-4062.

  4. Dayanandanaik, S., Rehaman, H.M.A., Somashekar, K.S., Krishnamurthy, R., Vishwanath, K and Navi, L. (2024). Effect of foliar nutrition on growth and yield of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L). Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 10(2): 142-149.

  5. Debtanu, M. and Das, D.K. (2007). Nitrogen management through SPAD and LCC in rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown in an inceptisol. Annals of Agricultural Research. 26(1): 142-143.

  6. Directorate of Economics and Statistics (2021). Agricultural Statistics at a Glance. 2021 Report.

  7. Garud, H.S., Asewar, B.V., Dhawan, A.S., Gokhale, D.N and Mirza, I.A. (2019). Productivity and soil moisture conservation studies of pigeon pea based intercropping systems as influenced by different land configurations. Legume Research. 42(3): 365-369. doi: 10.18805/LR-4093.

  8. Gregory, F.G. (1926). The effect of climatic conditions on growth of barley. Annals of Botany. 40: 1-26.

  9. Honnali, S. and Biradar, D.P. (2020). Conservation agriculture and nutrient application effects on productivity, profitability and energetics of pigeonpea under semi-arid tropics. Journal of Farm Sciences. 33(1): 49-54.

  10. Honnali, S., Kuchanur, P., Biradar, D.P., Aladakatti, Y.R., Hebbar, M and Nirmalnath, P.J. (2020). Effect of zero tillage practices and nutritional levels on microbes, enzymatic activities in soil and productivity of pigeonpea under rainfed situations. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 9(3): 1140-1149.

  11. Kirar, N.S., Sasode, D.S., Rawat, G.S., Joshi, E. and Mahor, S. (2020). Performance of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) sown on different land configuration techniques. Journal of Pharmacognosy and  Phytochemistry. 9(4): 224-227.

  12. Kulkarni, S., Rao, K.N., Ravi, M.V., Veeresh, H., Desai, B.K and Swamy, M. (2020). Growth and yield of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) as influenced by different nutrient management approaches. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 9(1): 1411- 1415.

  13. Kumar, A., Singh, R., Singh, T., Dass, A., Arora, K and Reddy, M.B. (2023). Effect of land configuration and weed management practices on weeds, productivity and profitability of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan). Indian Journal of Ecology. 50(3): 641-645.

  14. Nagaraj, D.M., Babu, B.M., Polisgowdar, B.S., Ayyanagowdar, M.S., Krishnamurthy, D., Kandpaland, K and Ramesh, G. (2019). Influence of chlorophyll content and leaf area index on growth of pigeonpea. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. SP-9: 43-51.

  15. Ngangom, B., Das, A., Lal, R., Idapuganti, R.G., Layek, J., Basavaraj, S., Babu, S., Yadav, G.S and Ghosh, P.K. (2020). Double mulching improves soil properties and productivity of maize-based cropping system in eastern Indian Himalayas. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. 3: 308-320.

  16. Panchavati, G.N., Dhyani, B.P and Shahi, U.P. (2020). Effect of nitrogen levels and scheduling on growth and yield of pigeonpea in integrated approach. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 9(7): 1230-1238.

  17. Radford, P.J. (1967). Growth analysis formulae-their use and abuse. Crop Science. 7(3): 171-173.

  18. Raviraja, B.S.R., Rao, K.N., Bhat, S.N., Amaregouda, A and Sajjanar, S. (2023). Effect of moisture conservation practices on yield and economics of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) in black soil. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 12(9): 1940- 1945.

  19. Sadavadiya, H.B., Naik, V.R and Choudhary, S.D. (2017). Effect of land configuration, irrigation and INM on growth, yield and water use efficiency of Indian bean (var.GNIB-21). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science. 6(7): 2624-2630.

  20. Saileela, K. (2018). Modelling the water balance components of in situ water harvesting for castor and redgram based intercropping systems in Alfisols. Ph.D Thesis. Professor Jayashanker Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad, Telangana.

  21. Sangma, C.B. (2020). Soil and crop health management for the cultivation of pigeon pea: An overview of management practices. Management of Fungal Pathogens in Pulses: Current Status and Future Challenges. pp 143-167.

  22. Sathe, R.K. (2015). Response of transplanted pigeonpea to different panting geometry and land configuration. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis. Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.

  23. Sharma, S.K., Kumar, A., Singh, K and Kumar, N. (2019). Effect of land configuration and weed management on yield and yield attributes of green gram (Vigna radiate). Agricultural Science Digest. 39(4): 320-323. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5025.

  24. Shrivastava, P., Khare, Y.R., Sharma, A and Pahalwan, D.K. (2018). Effect of raised bed sowing of pigeon pea in vertisols in central Narmada valley agro-climatic zone of Madhya Pradesh. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 7(3): 2904-2906.

  25. Tewari, A.K., Shivhare, A.K., Pallewar, S., Tikle, A and Chaturvedi, S.K. (2019). Pulses: Success Story and Way Forward. Promotion of Pulses for Sustainable Production System, Doubling Farmers’ Income and Nutritional Security, Jhansi on 25 October.

  26. Venkatalakshmi, K. (2016). Influence of integrated agronomic management practices on physiological and nutrient uptake of redgram under Alkali soils. Research Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences. 4(3): 1-6.

  27. Vijayaprabhakar, A and Jayanthi, C. (2018). Study on growth and yield response of redgram in various intercropping system and its economics under different land configurations in North Western agro climatic zone of Tamil Nadu. Madras Agricultural Journal. 105(1-3): 7-12.

  28. Watson. D.J. (1958). The dependence of net assimilation rate on leaf area index. Annals of Botany. 22: 37-54.

  29. West, C., Briggs, G.E. and Kidd, F. (1920). Methods and significant relations in the quantitative analysis of plant growth. New Phytologist. 19: 200-207.
In this Article
Published In
Legume Research

Editorial Board

View all (0)