Growth parameters
The pooled analysis of the growth parameters revealed that
in situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels had significantly influenced the plant height, number of branches plant
-1 and dry matter production at all the growth stages of pigeonpea
viz., vegetative, flowering, pod formation and at harvest, while the interaction effect among themself was found to be non-significant. The variation exerted by the
in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels on growth parameters
viz., plant height, number of branches plant
-1 and dry matter production at vegetative, flowering, pod formation and at harvest stage are given in Table 1a and 1b.
In situ moisture conservation practices recorded the highest growth like plant height, number of branches plant
-1 and dry matter production at all the growth stages. Among the
in situ moisture conservation practices, flatbed with CF (conservation furrow), raised bed with CF and paired row with CF recorded highest growth parameters. This higher growth might be due to better moisture availability for a longer period because of rainwater stored in conservation furrows. The better moisture availability helped the crop to escape from the stress during dry spells which in turn resulted in higher growth parameters
(Kirar et al., 2020; Vijayaprabhakar and Jayanthi, 2018). However, lowest growth was observed in flatbed sowing might be due to low stored soil moisture and poor moisture availability to the crops. Besides, low moisture restricted root growth because of low soil moisture and compacted soil under flatbed has resulted in poor growth
(Sharma et al., 2019).
Application of nitrogen increased growth parameters
viz., plant height, number of branches plant
-1 and dry matter production throughout the crop growth stages. Application of 125% RDN recorded maximum growth parameters
viz., plant height, number of branches plant
-1 and dry matter accumulation. This might be due to the higher nitrogen availability in soil which led to increase absorption of nutrients by pigeonpea which resulted in cell multiplication and elongation that might have helped in improved growth of pigeonpea
(Dayanandanaik et al., 2024; Kulkarni et al., 2020 and
Panchavati et al., 2020). Control,
i.e. no nitrogen application recorded the lower growth parameters of pigeonpea throughout the crop growth peroid. This might be attributed to poor growth of crops due to insufficient supply of nitrogen in the control treatment.
Spad chlorophyll values
The pooled analysis of SPAD chlorophyll content gradually increased up to flowering stage of pigeonpea and later decreased with time due to senescence.
In situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen management did not significantly influenced the SPAD values in pigeonpea are presented in Table 1b. Highest values were recorded in flatbed with CF and raised bed with CF compared to flatbed sowing method owing to increase availability of soil moisture and balanced supply of nutrients to the crop at all stages (
Honnali and Biradar (2020). Application of 125% RDN recorded numerically higher SPAD values followed by 100% RDN. These results are in close association with findings
Honnali et al. (2020) and
Nagaraj et al. (2019).
Physiological growth
The physiological indices
viz., leaf area index (LAI), Absolute growth rate (AGR), crop growth rate (CGR), relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR) increased up to flowering stage and decreased thereafter. AGR is typically measured as an increment in total dry weight per plant over a specific unit of time, whereas, RGR expresses growth in terms of a rate of increase in weight per unit weight. NAR values were higher during early vegetative growth stages but declines as crop advance in age might be due to leaf mutual shading and decreased photosynthetic efficiency in older foliage
(Amanullah et al., 2010).
The physiological growth like LAI, AGR and CGR of pigeonpea were significantly influenced by
in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels during vegetative, flowering and pod formation stage of Pigeonpea. Whereas, RGR and NAR were significantly influenced by
in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels during vegetative stage only, Whereas, at later stages these parameters were non-significant during later stages of pigeonpea. The interaction effect among moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels on all the physiological growth indices was not significant. The graphical representation of all the physiological indices
viz., LAI, AGR, CGR, RGR and NAR as influenced by
in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels are presented in the Fig 1, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 4a, 4b, 5a and 5b respectively.
Among the
in situ moisture conservation practices, flatbed with CF recorded significantly higher LAI, AGR, CGR, RGR and NAR and this was on par with raised bed with CF at all growth stages of pigeonpea except at harvest. Higher physiological indices in moisture conservation practices might be due to the availability of conserved rainwater in the furrows for a longer period. The higher moisture content improved the crop growth of pigeonpea as compared to no moisture conservation practices. While, the lowest physiological indices were recorded in flatbed sowing
i.e., without moisture conservation practice at all growth stages of pigeonpea. This might be due to lower dry matter production resulted in lower physiological indices.
Nitrogen fertilization management exerted significant influence on LAI, AGR, CGR, RGR and NAR of pigeonpea. Application of 125% RDN recorded significantly higher physiological indices of pigeonpea which was followed by 100% RDN and 75% RDN application during both the years as well as in pooled data. Higher dose of nitrogen application resulted in higher nitrogen availability and uptake by crop which reflected in the form of higher dry matter production ultimately leading to higher physiological indices. Significantly lower values of all the physiological indices were registered in control treatment during all stages of pigeonpea. The lower physiological growth in control could be attributed to the deficiency of nitrogen, leading to low dry matter production, indicating reduced photosynthetic activity. Consequently, this could have resulted in the lowest LAI, AGR, CGR, RGR and NAR. Higher doses of nitrogen improved the growth attributing characters
viz., plant height, leaf area and dry matter production which might have increased the physiological growth. These results were in accordance with the findings of
Dayanandanaik et al. (2024);
Venkatalakshmi (2016).
Seed and stalk yield
The perusal of the pooled data of two years of seed and stalk yield presented in Table 2. revealed that flatbed with CF (conservation furrow) recorded higher seed and stalk yield and was on par with raised bed with CF and paired row with CF in the individual years as well as in pooled mean. The conserved moisture in furrows supported crop growth at critical growth stages might have favored overall growth of crop and greater translocation of food material to the reproductive part which might have helped in higher seed and stalk yield. These results were in line with
Raviraja et al. (2023);
Shrivastava et al. (2018) and
Sadavadiya et al. (2017). Flatbed sowing recorded significantly lower pooled seed yield as compared to other moisture conservation practices
i.e., flatbed with CF, raised bed with CF and paired row with CF during both the years of study and in pooled mean.
Among the nitrogen levels 125% RDN application recorded highest seed and stalk yield in pooled mean and followed by 100% RDN and 75% RDN respectively. The crop yield increased with increase in nitrogen application. The increase in yield might be due to higher nitrogen availability which improved leaf area, this increase in leaf area has increased the SPAD chlorophyll content and ultimately photosynthesis which might led to more dry matter production and consequently higher seed yield. These findings are in agreement with the findings of
Honnali et al. (2020);
Daka et al. (2020) and
Panchavati et al. (2020). Significantly lowest seed and stalk yield of pigeonpea was recorded in control might be due to lowest crop growth and dry matter production led to reduction in seed and stalk yields. The interaction effect between
in-situ moisture conservation practices and nitrogen levels did exerted significant influence on seed and stalk yield of pigeonpea in mean data of two years.