Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Demonstration of IPDM Module for the Management of Major Defoliating Insect Pests and Wilt Disease of Chickpea in Prakasam District Andhra Pradesh

M. Jahnavi1,*, N.V.V.S. Durga Prasad2, L. Rajesh Chowdary3
1Department of Crop Protection, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Darsi-523 247, Andhra Pradesh, India.
2Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Darsi-523 247, Andhra Pradesh, India.
3Department of Entomology, Agriculture Research Station, Darsi-523 247, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  • Submitted16-12-2022|

  • Accepted23-08-2024|

  • First Online 23-09-2024|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-5091

Background: A front line demonstration (FLD) on integrated pest and disease management for management of major defoliating insect pests and wilt diseases in chickpea was conducted at Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Darsi, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh during 2020-21 and 2021-22.  

Methods: The field trials were conducted in Bhodanampadu and Abbayapalem villages of Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh in an area of 4 hectares in 10 farmer’s fields during 2020-21 and 2021-22.

Result: The results revealed that mean larval population of H. armigera and S. exigua/ 10 plants of two years were 1.4 and 1.87 in IPDM module over 8.23 and 4.12 larval population/10 plants during 2020-21 and 2021-22 respectively in farmers practice. Mean wilt disease incidence of two years were 7.5 per cent in IPDM module over 18 per cent in farmers practice. IPDM plot gave an average yield of 13.78 q/ha as compared to farmer’s practices i.e 11.25 q/ha. The per cent increase in yield over control was 16.8 and 31.4 during 2020-21 and 2021-22, respectively. The net returns were Rs. 44568, Rs. 24061 and Rs. 35675, Rs. 10875 in IPDM plot and farmers practice plot during 2020-21 and 2021-22 respectively. The average cost benefit ratio was 1:2.23 and 1:1.87 in IPDM and farmers practice plot, respectively.
Chickpea is an important grain legume crop of tropical and subtropical countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America. In the Andhra Pradesh, the normal area sown is 4-5 lakh hectares during Rabi season. In the Prakasam district, chickpea is cultivated during Rabi season in an area of 92410 ha and 87400 ha during 2020-21 and 2021-22 respectively. The major constraints in chickpea cultivation is insect pests like Helicoverpa armigera, Spodoptera exigua and Fusarium wilt and dry root rot diseases that pose great threat to chickpea production. H. armigera inflicts heavy loss on chickpea from the stage of a seedling up to its maturity, but the maximum damage is caused during pod formation stage and it causes 10-60% yield loss in chickpea (Srinivastava, 2007). S. exigua causes heavy damage to the germinating seedlings and the crop up to the vegetative stage. In severe cases, it defoliates the crop completely at early stages of growth (Jagadish and Sharma, 2017). Chickpea wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporium is the most important soil borne disease of chickpea throughtout the world and particularly in the Indian sub-continent. Fusarium wilt pathogen can destroy the crop completely and reduces yield, especially in low rainfall regions which is permanent threat to the chickpea growing areas. This diseases causes yield losses up to 100% under favorable conditions (Anjaiah et al., 2003). Prakasam district is a drought prone area where it receives low rainfall and wilt is serious problem in chickpea growing areas. Most of the farmers are using only pesticides for the control of this pest and diseases and this has led to an increase in the cost of cultivation. There is no single tool available for controlling this pest and diseases, but integrated pest and disease management (IPDM) is mooted as a crop protection package to keep pest population below the economic threshold level. Regular monitoring of the pest is the basis of IPM decision making. Where, information on severity of pest damage, vulnerable stage of the insect for imposing treatments and favorable conditions for disease spread can be gathered. In this context the Integrated pest and disease management (IPDM) module has been validated in the field conditions at Prakasam district during 2020-21 and 2021-22 to reduce the major defoliating insect pests and wilt disease.
The field trials were carried out in ten farmers field of Bodanampadu and Abbayapalem villages of Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh during Rabi season (October II fortnight to February I fortnight) in an area of 4 hectares (each year) under front line demonstration. In Bodanampadu village chickpea is cultivated in an area of 50 acres. Bodanampadu village is situated at 15.85°N latitude and 79.59°E longitude and at an elevation of 121 meters above sea level. Abbayapalem village is situated at 15.84°N latitude and 79.55°E longitude and at an elevation of 121 meters above sea level. In Abbayapalem village chickpea is cultivated in an area of 45 acres. The soil type is light red soils with a pH ranged 7.88-8.28 and EC of 0.11-0.24 ms/cm with a soil nutrients of organic carbon 0.68-1.05%, nitrogen 190-265 kg/ha, phosphorous 22-36 kg/ha and  potassium 539-781 kg/ha.
       
All the agronomic practices like sowing, irrigation, fertilizers application and herbicides spraying were the same in both IPDM module and farmers practice in their respective years. The detailed description of IPDM module and farmers practice is given in Table 1. The IPDM module was assessed in Rabi season during 2020-21 and 2021-22.
 

Table 1: Details of botanical/chemical insecticides used in IDPM model followed plots.


 
IPDM module
 
· Deep summer ploughing.
· Use of wilt resistant variety NBeG 49.
· Seed treatment with Trichoderma viride @ 10 g/kg of seed.
· Application of Trichoderma viride @ 2 kg with 90 kg FYM and 4 kg neem cake before sowing.
· Following optimum spacing.
· Fixing of bird perches after crop establishment.
· Application of correct dosage of fertilizers at appropriate stages of crop growth.
· Marigold as trap crop.
· Installation of pheromone traps @ 4 traps/acre.
· As a prophylactic measure spray neem oil @ 1 liter/acre (15 days after sowing).
· Based on ETL: Spraying of Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 50 ml/ac against pod borers.


       
Economic threshold levels (ETLs)
 
Spodoptera exigua-one larvae/square meter under the soil near cut plant at seedling stage; Helicoverpa armigera-5-8 eggs or 2 early instar/10 plants or one mature larvae (more than 1 cm in length)/10 plants or 1 meter row at vegetative/reproductive stage.
 
Farmers practice
 
Sowing of wilt susceptible JG 11 chickpea variety, not following seed treatment and use of imbalance fertilizers, not following IPDM practices and indiscriminate spraying of insecticides.
       
These studies also provide information about the favourable periods for pest buildup that help in the management of the pest. The meteorological data on Maximum temperature, minimum temperature, morning relative humidity, evening relative humidity and rainfall was collected from Andhra Pradesh State Development Planning Society, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh for Rabi season. To know the correlation between Spodoptera exigua and Helicoverpa armigera population and weather parameters, a correlation test was conducted. Through data analysis tool the full model regression equations and correlation were analyzed.
       
Data were recorded on adult moth trap catches/trap/week and numbers of larvae of S. exigua and H. armigera, on 10 randomly selected plants at five spots were collected.
       
The incidence of wilt was recorded randomly in 1 m2 in five spots of a field. The number of healthy and diseased plants was counted in 1 m2. The data on disease incidence was recorded using the following formula:
               
  
      
Information of yield data, economic evaluation in terms of gross returns, net profit earned and cost benefit ratio was recorded.
       
In this study, the economic analysis of technology was worked out by calculating the total cost of cultivation (Total cost incurred for cultivation of chickpea), gross return (Yield × Price of the produce), net return (Gross returns - Total cost of cultivation) and C:B ratio (Gross returns /Total cost of cultivation) of IPM module followed plot and farmer’s practice plot.
The data presented in Table 2 indicated that the pheromone trap catches of S. exigua were negligible during 42nd and 43rd standard week and gradually increased and reached peak level at 45th standard week (14.6 adult moths/trap/week) and further started to decrease. Whereas pheromone trap catches of H. armigera were negligible from 42nd to 50th standard week. From 51th standard week started to increase and reached peak level at 05th standard week (14.68 adult moth trap catches/trap/week) during 2020-21.
 

Table 2: Pheromone trap catches of Spodoptera exigua and Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea and weather parameters influencing the population during 2020-21.


       
During 2020-21 pheromone trap catches of S. exigua adult moth were positive correlated with weather parameter like minimum temperature (0.50), rainfall (0.30) and negatively correlated with morning relative humidity (-0.61). Regression analysis of the S. exigua incidence during 2020-21 indicates that all the parameters i.e., maximum temperature, minimum temperature, morning relative humidity, evening relative humidity and rainfall  together influenced S.exigua incidence to the extent of 59 per cent (R2 = 0.59).
       
The full model regression equations developed is as follows.
 
Y= 113.4+ (0.28) Max Temp + (-2.18) Min Temp + (-1.04) Morning RH + (0.43) Evening RH + (-0.23) RF
        
During 2020-21 pheromone trap catches of H. armigera adult moth were positive correlated with weather parameter like morning relative humidity (0.49), maximum temperature (0.23) and negatively correlated with minimum temperature (-0.57), evening relative humidity (-0.41).
       
Regression analysis of the H. armigera incidence during 2020-21 indicates that all the parameters i.e., maximum temperature, minimum temperature, morning relative humidity, evening relative humidity and rainfall together influenced H. armigera incidence to the extent of 74 per cent (R2 = 0.74).
      
The full model regression equations developed is as follows.
 
Y= -76.8 + (0.54) Max Temp + (0.66) Min Temp + (0.77) Morning RH + (-0.38) Evening RH + (0.30) RF
 
The data presented in Table 3 indicated that the pheromone trap catches of S. exigua were negligible during 42nd and 43rd standard week and gradually increased with 15.2 adult moth trap catches/trap/week) and further started to decrease. Whereas pheromone trap catches of H. armigera were negligible from 42nd to 49th standard week. From 50th standard week started to increase and reached peak level at 05th standard week (19.36 adult moth trap catches/trap/week) during 2021-22. Sagar et al., (2022) reported that the H. armigera population initiation took place from 6th SMW and reached the peak during 12th and 15th SMW with 37.3 and 62 male moths/trap/week during 2015-16 and 2017-18 respectively.
 

Table 3: Pheromone trap catches of Spodoptera exigua and Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea and weather parameters influencing the population during 2021-22.


       
During 2021-22 pheromone trap catches of H. armigera adult moth were positive correlated with weather parameter like evening relative humidity (0.09) and negatively correlated with minimum temperature (-0.66), relative humidity morning (-0.38).
       
Regression analysis of the H. armigera incidence during 2021-22 indicates that all the parameters i.e., maximum temperature, minimum temperature, morning relative humidity, evening relative humidity and rainfall together influenced H. armigera incidence to the extent of 50 per cent (R2 = 0.50). Mehra Keshav et al., (2023) reported that all weather parameters collectively accounted for 81.30 and 52.20 per cent variability in H. armigera larval population of pod borer during 2014-15 and 2015-16 respectively.
       
The full model regression equations developed is as follows.
 
Y= 87.5+ (-1.02) Max Temp + (-1.17) Min Temp + (-0.23) Morning RH + (0.01) Evening RH + (-0.07) RF
 
During 2021-22 pheromone trap catches of S. exigua adult moth were positive correlated with weather parameter like rainfall (0.61), minimum temperature (0.44) and negatively correlated with maximum temperature (-0.26).
       
Regression analysis of the S. exigua incidence during 2021-22 indicates that all the parameters i.e., maximum temperature, minimum temperature, morning relative humidity, evening relative humidity and rainfall  together influenced S. exigua incidence to the extent of 61 per cent (R2 = 0.61).
       
The full model regression equations developed is as follows.
 
Y= 23.4+ (-1.41) Max Temp + (0.94) Min Temp + (0.04) Morning RH + (-0.08) Evening RH + (0.11) RF
 
Kamakshi et al., (2018) reported that pheromone trap catches of S. exigua adult moth in chickpea has positive correlation with minimum temperature (r=0.78), maximum temperature (r=0.73) and soil temperature (r=0.887) and negatively correlated with morning relative humidity (r=0.544). Similarly, Spoorthi et al., (2017) revealed that pheromone trap catches of H. armigera adult moth in chickpea has positive correlation with relative humidity (r=0.27) and rainfall (r= 0.09) during Rabi season, 2016-17.
       
Maximum larval population was recorded in farmers practice compared to IPDM technology. The mean larval population of H. armigera/10 plants of two years were 1.4 in IPDM module over 8.23 larval population/10 plants in farmers practice. Whereas, mean larval population of S. exigua/10 plants of two years were 1.87 in IPDM module over 4.12 larval population/10 plants in farmers practice (Table 4). Shankar et al., (2014) reported that the larval density of H. armigera (0.3/10 plants and 1.1/10 plants) and S. exigua (0.2/10 plants and 42.7/10 plants) on chickpea in Andhra Pradesh during the 2010-11 and 2011-12 post rainy season respectively. Vipin kumar et al., (2022) reported that one H. armigera larvae density/plant, 29.05, 24.78 per cent pods were damaged during 2015-16 and 2016-17, respectively and with the increase in larvae density/ plant there was increase in damage pods. At 2, 3, 4 and 5 larval density per plant, the percentage of damaged pods on number basis were 39.16, 48.78, 52.50 and 64.55 during 2015-16. While 36.45, 47.78, 56.32 and 67.76 per cent respectively during 2016-17.
 

Table 4: Impact of IPDM technology on defoliating insect pests in chickpea during 2020-21 and 2021-22.


 
Weather and climatic factors influence the wilt incidence
 
During the demonstration period i.e from October II fortnight to February I fortnight, 231.3 mm and 248.95 mm of rainfall was received during 2020-21 and 2021-22 respectively. Maximum mean temperature was 31.50°C and 29.89°C; minimum mean temperature was 22.23°C and 21.66°C; mean morning relative humidity was 94.15 per cent and 92.86 per cent; mean evening relative humidity was 58.31 per cent and 54.61 per cent during 2020-21 and 2021-22 respectively (Table 5). The spread of wilt pathogens is more in heavy soil types compared to light soils and also wilt incidence was higher under rainfed conditions due to favourable conditions of high temperature and low moisture prevailed during crop growth period Thaware et al., (2015). Wilt incidence increases when chickpea is grown in warmer and drier climates (>25°C) (Nene et al., 2012).
 

Table 5: Weather parameter prevailed during the demonstration period.


       
Higher per cent of wilt disease incidence was recorded in farmers practice compared to IPDM practice. The mean wilt disease incidence of two years was 7.5 per cent in IPDM module over 18 per cent in farmers practice (Table 6). Heavy incidence of wilt disease was encountered in farmers practice due to not sowing of resistant variety, no seed treatment and lack of application of Trichoderma viride in the fields while it got checked in IPDM fields. Parmar et al., (2021) revealed that seed biopriming of T. viride or T. asperellum followed by soil application of T. viride or T. asperellum enriched FYM found significant for the disease management as well as higher yields. Venakataramanamma et al., (2018) reported that the NBeG 49 genotype showed resistant reaction to wilt disease incidence in the field and green house screening with an average wilt disease incidence of 5.50 per cent during 2014-15 and 2015-16. Similarly, Badariprasad et al., (2019) reported that NBeG 47 chickpea variety found tolerant to Fusarium wilt disease incidence with an average of 9.09 per cent compared to check variety JG 11 where per cent of wilt disease incidence is 13.52. The pathogen F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceris is a highly variable nature of growth, colonization and infection also. So, it regularly overcomes the host (chickpea) resistance and causes highly yield loss with their pathogenic nature. The individual management strategy was not applicable to control the pathogen and yield loss. Despite a combined application strategy was given better management in the wilt of chickpea especially on Rabi season. (Mural sankar et al., 2022).
 

Table 6: Per cent disease incidence of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris in chickpea during 2020-21 and 2021-22.


       
Regular monitoring of the insect pests and diseases in the year 2020-21 and 2021-22 revealed that defoliating insect pests Spodoptera exigua, Helicoverpa armigera are the major insect pests followed by low infestation of aphids. Among diseases, Fusarium wilt and dry root rot was the major problem followed by rust and blight. Rust disease which became serious problem during 2021-22.
 
Yield impact
 
The mean yield of farmers practice was 11.25 q/ha. Whereas it was 13.78 q/ha in IPDM module. In IPDM module, which gave 22.48 per cent increase in yield over farmers practice. Economic performances of chickpea under front line demonstration were depicted in (Table 7). Jat, B.L (2020) reported that average chickpea yield production was 19.2 and 19.8 q/ha was observed in demonstrated technology as compared to farmer’s practices (15.6 and 15.4 q/ha during 2018-19 and 2019-20 years, respectively.
 

Table 7: Economic analysis of demonstration in chickpea.


 
Economic impact
 
In this study, the economic impact of technology was worked out by calculating total cost of cultivation, gross return, net return and C:B ratio of IPDM module followed plot and farmer practice plot. Total cost was calculated by total sum of expenditure of land preparation, seed, irrigation, labour component, cost incurred for fertilizers, pesticides and harvesting.
       
The economic analysis results revealed that the chickpea recorded highest mean gross returns of IPDM module were 62015 Rs ha-1 as compared to 50625 Rs. ha-1 farmers practice. Net returns of IPDM module were 34314 Rs ha-1 as compared to 23275 Rs ha-1 in farmers practice. The C:B ratio in IPDM module was 1:2.23 while, in farmer practice was 1:1.87. IPDM module proved beneficial in respect of yield and economics of chickpea (Table7).
       
It was evident from the results that C:B ratio of chickpea crop in IPDM module was higher than the farmer practice. The factor responsible for lower C:B ratio in farmer practice because of non adoption of IPDM module for defoliating insect pests and wilt disease management in chickpea crop. However, increase in C:B ratio in treatment plot was due to the adoption of IPDM module.
       
The present findings are in conformity with the findings of Yadav et al., (2022) reported an average yield of 19.85 q/ha with net returns of Rs. 74690 (C:B 1:3.1) in IPM plot compared to farmers practices which obtained an yield of 14.5 q/ha with net returns of Rs. 46935 (C:B 1:1.8) in chickpea crop. Similarly, Jayalakshmi et al., (2022) reported an average yield of 14.36 q/ha with improved desi variety Nandyal gram 49 by following improved technology (IPM and IDM)  in demonstration field whereas in farmers practice field which obtained an yield of 12.05 q/ha in chickpea crop.
IPDM module was formulated and tested for the management of major defoliating insect pests and wilt disease and seems to be promising as other IPM modules in the management of other pests in pulse crops. The mean larval population of H. armigera/10 plants of two years were 1.4 in IPDM module over 8.23 larval population/10 plants in farmers practice. Whereas, mean larval population of S. exigua/10 plants of two years were 1.87 in IPDM module over 4.12 larval population/10 plants in farmers practice. Higher per cent of wilt disease incidence was recorded in farmers practice compared to IPDM practice. The mean wilt disease incidence of two years was 7.5 per cent in IPDM module over 18 per cent in farmers practice. Heavy incidence of wilt disease was encountered in farmers practice due to not sowing of resistant variety, no seed treatment and lack of application of Trichoderma viride in the fields while it got checked in IPDM fields. The mean yield of farmers practice was 11.25 q/ha. Whereas it was 13.78 q/ha in IPDM module. In IPDM module, which gave 22.48 per cent increase in yield over farmers practice. The C:B ratio in IPDM module was 1:2.23 while, in farmer practice was 1:1.87. IPDM module proved beneficial in respect of yield and economics of chickpea. Therefore, this can be one of the viable options for the management of major defoliating insect pests and wilt disease in the future. It can be concluded that growing of wilt resistant variety by following seed treatment and 1-2 insecticidal sprayings in combination with IPDM interventions against major defoliating insect pests are enough to achieve higher yields when compared to farmer practices with 2-3 insecticidal mixture sprayings. By reducing the number of sprayings and cost of plant protection paves way for reduced environmental pollution and also decreases the impact on natural enemies. Farmers may adopt this IPDM technology for effective control of major defoliating insect pests and wilt disease in chickpea for higher yields.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

  1. Anjaiah, V., Cornelis, P and Koedam, N. (2003). Effect of genotype and root colonization in biological control of Fusarium wilts in pigeonpea and chickpea by Pseudomonas auruginosa. Canada Journal of Microbiology. 48: 85-91.

  2. Badariprasad, P.R., Pradeep, B and Mahanthesh Patil, B. (2019). Introduction of new bengalgram variety NBeG 47 in Koppal district. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry.  8(5): 922-923.

  3. Jagdish, J. and Sharma, H.C. (2017). Climate change effects on pest population dynamics and pest management. National Symposium on Pulses for Nutritional Security and Agricultural  Sustainability, IIPR, Kanpur. Pp 29-36.

  4. Jat, L.B., Kumawat, P. (2020). Evaluation of Trichoderma viride against chickpea wilt disease through front line demonstrations on farmers field. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika. 35(3): 197-200. doi: 10.18805/BKAP250.

  5. Jayalakshmi, V., Chaithanya, B.H., Manjunath, J., Ahammad, S.K. and Kamakshi, N. (2022). Impact of tribal sub plan (TSP) intervention on yield and economics of chickpea cultivation in Kurnool district of Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Extension Education. 58(2): 217-220.

  6. Kamakshi, N., Sagar, D., Jayalakshmi, V and Chander, S. (2018). Weather based prediction model for beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua) in chickpea. Journal of Environmental  Biology. 40: 84-88.

  7. Mehra, K., Singh, V. (2023). Relationship between weather parameters and incidence of gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera on chickpea. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 57(3): 399-402. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5818.

  8. Murali, S.P., Shreedevasena, S., Karthiba, L., Raju, P.A., Vanitha, S., Kamalakannan, A. and  Jeyakumar, P. (2022). Ecology, biology and management of fusarium wilt in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): A review. Agricultural Reviews. 1- 6. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-2481.

  9. Nene, Y.L., Reddy, M.V Haware, M.P.,Ghanekar, A.M and Amin, K.S. (2012). Field diagnosis of chickpea diseases and their control. Information Bulletin No.28 (revised). International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. Pp 1-64.

  10. Parmar, H.V. and Gohel, N.M.  (2021). Management of wilt complex of chickpea with seed biopriming and soil application of Trichoderma spp. Legume Research-An International Journal. 1-6. doi: 10.18805/LR-4580.

  11. Sagar, D., Nebapure, M. Chander, S.S. (2022). Assessment of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) adult population in chickpea using weather based indices. Legume Research. 45(2): 260-264. doi: 10.18805/LR-4367.

  12. Shankar, M., Babu, T.R., Sridevi, D. and Sharma, H.C. (2014). Incidence and biology of beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua in chickpea in Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Plant Protection. 42(4): 324-332.

  13. Spoorthi, G.S., Rajendra Singh, Sachan, S.K., Singh, D.V., Sharma, R. and Kumar, S.  (2017). Monitoring and seasonal incidence of gram pod borer (H. armigera) in relation to abiotic factor in chickpea. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. SPI: 490-494.

  14. Srivastava, S.K. (2007). Relative preference of different chickpea genotypes by Helicoverpa armigera Hubner and estimation of yield losses under late sown condition. Indian Journal of Pulses Research. 16(2): 144-146.

  15. Thaware, D.S., Kohire, O.D. and Gholve, V.M. (2015). Survey of chickpea wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f.sp ciceri) disease in Marathwada region of Maharashtra state. Advance Research Journal of Crop Improvement. 6(2): 134-138.

  16. Venakataramanamma, K., Reddy, B.V.B., Jayalakshmi, R.S., Jayalakshmi, V. and Prasad, K.V. H. (2018). Screening of chickpea germplasm/genotypes against Fusarium wilt of chickpea under field and artificial condition. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science. 7(9): 1041- 1050.

  17. Vipin, K., Gupta, K.C., Jain, S.K., Chawla, N. (2022). Effect of larval density of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on pod damage and yield of chickpea. Agricultural Science Digest. 42(1): 76-79. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5134.

  18. Yadav, N.K., Devi., S., Tiwari, D. and Pandey, N.K. (2022). Assessment of integrated pest management module for management of pod borer in chickpea. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension Economics. 40(9): 363-366.

Editorial Board

View all (0)