The availability of microsatellite markers are less in number for greengram and not available for ricebean. Hence, microsatellite markers from related species were utilized for testing their transferability to greengram and ricebean. Cross-species amplification for adzukibean derived SSR markers were reported in prior by
Srimathy and Jayamani (2010),
Sathya and Jayamani (2013) and
Jena et al., (2015).
Jayamani and Sathya (2012) reported cross species amplification for adzukibean and cowpea derived markers. All the markers used in the present study shown amplification. In greengram, the per cent of polymorphism observed were 62.50, 100 and 54.54 per cent, respectively for the SSR markers derived from adzukibean, commonbean and greengram. The markers that exhibited polymorphism in greengram genotypes were CEDAAG 001, CEDG 015, CEDG 026, CEDG 154, CEDG 198, BM 170, MB 14, MB 17, MB 87, MB 91, DMBSSR 167 and VJ 3120 B. For ricebean, the SSR markers derived from adzuki bean and greengram exhibited 62.50 and 36.36 per cent polymorphism, respectively. The markers shown polymorphism for ricebean genotypes were CEDAAG 001, CEDG 015, CEDG 026, CEDG 043, CEDG 198, MB 17, MB 87, MB 91 and DMBSSR 167.
The number of alleles detected in different SSR markers are presented in Table 2. The number of alleles ranged from one to four with an average of 2.55 alleles per locus. The average number of alleles per locus was low when compared to the results reported by
Gwag et al., (2006) with 3 alleles per locus,
Gwag et al., (2010),
Sathya and Jayamani (2013) with 2.96 alleles per locus,
Shrivastava et al., (2014) with 4.85 alleles per locus and
Chen et al., (2015) with 2.66 alleles per locus in greengram. The lesser number of alleles per locus might be due to the existence of lower level of DNA polymorphism exhibited by the genotypes for the particular marker used and the conservation of that segment of DNA over years. The maximum number of alleles generated by adzukibean derived SSR marker was 4 (CEDAAG 001), commonbean derived SSR marker was 3 (BM 170) and greengram derived SSR marker was 4 (MB 91). Allele size varied from 100-290 bp for the SSR markers used.
Polymorphic information content (PIC) is a measure of informativeness of a genetic marker for linkage studies. The PIC value of the present study varied from 0 to 0.611 which represents the presence of highly conserved region (zero) in the two species which are not subjected to recombination, leading to lack of polymorphism for the marker and a moderate polymorphic nature indicates how ricebean have diverged from the greengram (Table 2).
Li-Xia et al., (2009) and
Chen et al., (2015) recorded an average PIC value of 0.360 in greengram, Somta
et al., (2008) recorded a PIC value of 0.256 which was found to be lower than the average PIC value observed in the current study. The lower PIC value observed in the presence study indicates that the analysis was performed with lesser number of genotypes.
With respect to the markers used, the adzukibean derived marker CEDG 43 and greengram derived marker VJ 3144 A were found to be biallelic only in greengram indicating the heterozygosity for the particular locus whereas in ricebean it was found to be monoallelic. The adzukibean derived marker CEDG 198 expressed biallelic nature in both the species. In ricebean, the commonbean derived marker did not show polymorphism indicating the genetic conservation. The differential polymorphism exhibited by the markers in greengram and ricebean helps in fingerprinting studies and construction of linkage map to tag agronomically important traits.
The dissimilarity value between species was found to be higher than within species indicating higher diversity between species which is the natures rule. The maximum inter-specific dissimilarity value was observed between the greengram (PLS 274 and PLA 334) and the ricebean genotype (RB 559), paving their way to inter-specific hybridization programme. The genotypes LM 103/1 and ML 131 from greengram, the genotypes LRB 324 and RB 559 from ricebean, were identified for their deployment in intra-specific hybridization based upon their high dissimilarity value (Table 3).
In the present study, UPGMA grouped the 30 genotypes into five clusters (Fig 1). By using this method,
Jayamani and Sathya (2012) reported six clusters from 20 greengram and one ricebean genotype,
Sathya and Jayamani (2013) reported five clusters from 36 greengram genotypes,
Chen et al., (2015) reported nine clusters from 157 cultivated and wild greengram accessions. The largest cluster formed by UPGMA was cluster I with 19 greengram genotypes. The cluster II (AC 241) and III (ML 131) had solitary genotype. The rice bean genotypes were grouped in a single cluster V. Based on weighted average for dissimilarity matrix, the Neighbour-Joining tree developed five groups from 30 genotypes (Fig 2). By using Neighbour-Joining tree, Tian
et al., (2013) reported four clusters from 472 cultivated and wild accessions of ricebean.
The comparative study between the clusters and groups formed in UPGMA and Neighbour-Joining tree revealed that, the ricebean genotypes were grouped into a single cluster using both the methods. The results obtained confirmed the genetic divergence between the two
Vigna species at the molecular level by distinct cluster formation. The result is supported by the findings of
Jayamani and Sathya (2012) who also reported separate cluster formation for greengram and ricebean genotypes. The cluster V of dendrograms generated from UPGMA and group V of Neighbour-Joining tree method had same genotypes. These observations indicated the distinctness and stability of the cluster that remained unvaried with the method of analysis.