Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Legume Research, volume 40 issue 3 (june 2017) : 423-428

Screening for drought tolerance in mungbean

M. Prakash*, B. Sunilkumar, G. Sathiyanarayanan, J. Gokulakrishnan
1<p>Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture,&nbsp;Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar-608 002, India.</p>
Cite article:- Prakash* M., Sunilkumar B., Sathiyanarayanan G., Gokulakrishnan J. (2016). Screening for drought tolerance in mungbean . Legume Research. 40(3): 423-428. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.11045.

ABSTRACT

Field experiments were conducted to screen the mungbean genotypes based on root characters and root penetration ability. Observations on root and shoot characters viz., root length, shoot length, number of roots, root diameter, fresh weight of root, fresh weight of shoot, dry weight of root, dry weight of shoot, root volume, growth and yield parameters viz., plant height, number of branches, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, 100 seed weight, seed yield per plant were recorded. Based on the root characters, the genotypes HUM 1, VMGG 67, VMGG 82, VMGG 83 and VMGG 90 were found to be promising. They also performed well in the field experiments. These genotypes were crossed with high yielding varieties like VBN 1, VBN 2, VBN 3 and KM 2 to get F1.Among the 20 crosses obtained, three crosses VMGG-83/VBN 2, VMGG-90/VBN 3 and VMGG-83/VBN 1 were found to perform well in F2 and they will be forwarded to next generation.

REFERENCES


  1. Ali, M.A., Abbas, A., Awan, S.I., Jabran, K. and Gardezi, S.D.A. (2011). Correlated response of various morpho-physiological characters with grain yield in sorghum land races at different growth phases. The J. Anim. Plant Sci. 21: 671-679. 

  2. Anonymous. (2011). Agropedia.iitk.ac.in.

  3. Arumugam, P.M., Anandhi, K. and Selvi, B. (2010). Stability analysis of yield in black gram. Legume Res., 33:70-71.

  4. Bibi A, Sadaqat, H.A., Akram, H.M. and Mohammed, M.I. (2010). Physiological markers for screening sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) germplasm under water stress condition. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 12: 451–455. 

  5. Bidinger, F.R., Mahalaxmi, V., Talukdar, B.J. and Algarswamy. G. (1982). Improvement of drought resistance in pearl millet. Workshop on Principles and Methods of Crop Improvement for Drought Resistance with Emphasis on Rice, IRRI, Los Banos, Phillipines, on May. 4-8th 1981. pp: 45-49.

  6. Dhanda, S.S., Sethi, G.S. and Behl, R.K. (2004). Indices of drought tolerance in wheat genotypes at early stages of plant growth. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 190: 1-6. 

  7. Grade, V.N., Chauvin, L.S., Jalap, D.N. and Koala, A.B.(2014). Response of green gram (Vigna radiata L). varieties to integrated nutrient management in summer season. Agrl. Sci. Digest. 34: 36-40.

  8. Liu, F., Anderson, M.N., Jacobson, S.E. and Jensen, C.R. (2005). Stomatal control and water use efficiency of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) during progressive soil drying. Environ . Exp. Bot. 54: 33 – 40.

  9. Okçu, G., Kaya, M.D. and M. Atak, M. (2005). Effects of salt and drought stresses on germination and seedling growth of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Turk J. Agric. For. 29: 237-242.

  10. Rajendran, R. A., Muthiah, A.R., Manickam, A., Shanmugasundaram, P. and John Joel, A. (2011). Indices of drought tolerance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) genotypes at early stages of plant growth. Res. J. Agric. & Biol. Sci. 7: 42-46. 

  11. Salih, A. A., Ali, I.A., Lux, A., Luxova, M., Cohen, Y., Sugimoto, Y. and Inanaga, S. (1999). Rooting, water uptake, and xylem structure adaptation to drought of two sorghum cultivars. Crop Sci. 39: 168–173. 

  12. Sunilkumar B., Sathiyanarayanan, G. and Prakash, M. (2015). Influence of drought stress on root distribution in Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.)Wilczek].International Journal of Tropical Agriculture. 33 : 837-843.

  13. Sunilkumar B., Gokulakrishnan, J. and Prakash, M. (2015a). Effect of drought stress on seed yield and biophysical charecters in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.)Wilczek]. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture. 33 : 853-864. 

  14. Vincent Vadez. (2014). Root hydraulics: The forgotten side of roots in drought adaptation. Field Crops Research. 166:15-24.

  15. Yadav, S.K., Jyothi Lakshmi, N., Vikram Singh, AmolPatil, Yogesh Kumar Tiwari, Nagendram, E., Sathish, P., Vanaja, M., Maheswari, M. and Venkateswarlu, B. (2013). In vitro screening of Vigna mungo genotypes for PEG induced moisture deficit stress. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology.18: pp 55-60. 

     
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)