Validation and mutation analysis of coding-region SNPs in the RXFP2 using multiplex PCR
Using multiplex PCR, three mutations were identified in the coding region of
RXFP2 (Table 2). The first mutation, in exon 14, is a synonymous mutation (A→G, proline unchanged). The second and third mutations, both in exon 17, are non-synonymous: G→A (E→K) and G→A (V→M).
The three SNP loci were identified at chromosomal positions 29512087 (T>C), 29505054 (C>T) and 29505096 (C>T) (Fig 2).
Genetic diversity and correlation analysis of the RXFP2 gene
For the first mutation (29512087T>C), genotype frequencies were TT (21.28%), TC (29.79%) and CC (48.93%), with allele frequencies T (36.17%) and C (63.83%). Phenotype frequencies for TT, TC and CC were 100% hornless, 92.86% hornless/7.14% horned and 100% horned, respectively. For the second SNP (29505054C>T), the genotype frequencies were CC (21.28%), CT (30.85%) and TT (48.87%), with allele frequencies C (36.70%) and T (63.30%). The homozygous CC genotype was exclusively associated with the hornless phenotype, while the homozygous TT genotype was exclusively associated with the horned phenotype; heterozygous CT individuals showed a predominantly hornless phenotype (89.66% hornless vs. 10.34% horned). For the third SNP (29505096C>T), genotype frequencies were CC (22.34%), CT (36.17%) and TT (41.49%), with allele frequencies C (40.43%) and T (59.57%). Again, homozygous CC was exclusively hornless, homozygous TT exclusively horned and heterozygous CT individuals were predominantly hornless (73.53% hornless vs. 26.47% horned) (Table 3).
Haplotype analysis using SHEsis identified three combined haplotypes (probability > 0.03). Their frequencies in horned vs. hornless sheep were 6.3% vs. 1.1%, 90.6% vs. 27.2% and 3.1% vs. 71.7%, respectively (Table 4).
Strong linkage disequilibrium (
LD) was observed among the three
SNPs (positions: 29,512,087; 29,505,096; and 29,505,054), with D′ and r
2 approaching 1, indicating complete linkage disequilibrium (Fig 3, Table 5).
RXFP2, also known as leucine-rich G protein-coupled receptor 8 (LGR8), belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family and is the specific receptor for insulin-like factor 3 (INSL-3) in the body
(Duan et al., 2016; Feng et al., 2009). RXFP2 is a candidate gene associated with horn type in sheep. Beyond its well-characterized role in horn development and morphology,
RXFP2 also has other physiological functions. For instance, a study investigated
RXFP2 polymorphisms in Indian sheep and found no association with cryptorchidism, highlighting its functional diversity beyond horn traits
(Kumar et al., 2019).RXFP2 is expressed in horn soft tissue and periosteum, with expression negatively correlated with horn size
(Johnston et al., 2013). Recent studies have highlighted the complex tissue-specific expression and regulatory functions of
RXFP2 in horn tissue, though it may not be the sole determinant of horn traits
(Yang et al., 2025). Several GWAS have reported that
RXFP2 is associated with horn presence but is not directly involved in horn development
(Kijas et al., 2012).
Although previous GWAS and sequencing studies have identified
RXFP2 as a major candidate gene for sheep horn phenotype, these approaches primarily provide genomic association rather than practical genotyping strategies. Here, we characterized coding-region SNPs in
RXFP2 in Oula sheep and developed a multiplex PCR-based detection approach. Unlike previous genome-wide studies, we focused on specific coding-region variants, including two non-synonymous mutations and established a genotyping strategy for horn-associated alleles. Thus, this study translates previous genetic findings into a cost-effective and rapid genotyping tool that can be used as part of marker-assisted selection programs in Oula sheep, with the caveat that heterozygous individuals exhibit incomplete phenotypic penetrance and thus these markers should be interpreted alongside other phenotypic or genomic information. Validation in larger, independent populations is ongoing.
In the preliminary stage, horned and hornless Oula sheep populations were identified by whole-genome resequencing. Previous studies have shown that the 3′ UTR insertion in
RXFP2 is associated with polledness in multiple sheep breeds (
Wiedemar and Drögemüller, 2015). A strong selection signal was detected in the middle and downstream regions of
RXFP2, confirming it as a major candidate gene for horn presence/absence in Oula sheep. Ovine
RXFP2 encodes 763 amino acids and comprises 18 exons
(Wang et al., 2014). GWAS by
(Li et al., 2021) identified
RXFP2 as significantly associated with horned and hornless phenotypes in sheep. A subsequent selective sweep analysis of the Manhattan plot on chromosome 10 revealed that the allele frequency distribution of a non-synonymous SNP downstream of
RXFP2 across multiple breeds was consistent with our findings
(Li et al., 2020). Among the three high-frequency SNPs, 29512087T>C is synonymous, while the other two are non-synonymous.
The two non-synonymous variants in exon 17 resulted in amino acid substitutions (p.V653M and p.E667K) in
RXFP2. A recent CRISPR/Cas9 partial knockout study in sheep showed that
RXFP2 expression was significantly reduced in horn buds, but horn growth and morphology were unaffected; however, the knockout sheep exhibited unilateral cryptorchidism
(Gao et al., 2025). This finding supports that
RXFP2 is involved in horn phenotype determination rather than directly participating in horn development and highlights the functional relevance of its coding-region variants in horn phenotype regulation. Although the functional consequences of these substitutions require further validation, changes in amino acid properties may influence protein conformation, receptor stability, or downstream signaling. Thus, these variants represent potential functional candidates for
RXFP2 variation and horn phenotype in Oula sheep.
Similar coding-region polymorphisms were reported in Tan sheep, where resequencing of all 18 exons of
RXFP2 identified multiple exonic SNPs, including a synonymous variant (p.P375, c.1125A>G) with distinct genotypes between horned and hornless individuals
(Wang et al., 2014). Although synonymous mutations do not alter the amino acid sequence, accumulating evidence shows that they regulate gene expression through mRNA stability, codon usage bias, splicing and RNA modifications such as N6-methyladenosine (m6A). Recent studies further provided evidence that a single synonymous mutation can modulate phenotypic traits via epitranscriptomic regulation involving m6A modification and mRNA structural conformation
(Zhou et al., 2025). These findings highlight the functional significance of synonymous variants such as p.P375 in
RXFP2. Together with our Oula sheep data, this suggests that
RXFP2 coding-region variation may contribute to horn phenotype diversity across breeds. Notably, allele frequencies at p.P375 in Tan sheep differ from those at the three SNPs in our Oula population (major allele frequencies: 36.17%–63.83%), reflecting population-specific selection or genetic backgrounds. A strong selection signal at
RXFP2 has also been reported in Merino sheep, with a downstream non-synonymous SNP showing distinct allele frequencies between horned and polled populations
(Dominik et al., 2012; Li et al., 2020). In Tibetan sheep, GWAS have identified multiple SNPs in
RXFP2 for horn length and base circumference, with allele frequencies varying across horn phenotypes
(Hu et al., 2026; Tian et al., 2024). These cross-breed comparisons highlight the breed-specific genetic architecture of horn traits and suggest that
RXFP2 variants have been subject to different selection pressures across populations. Moreover, a recent targeted sequencing study demonstrated that different
RXFP2 variants exhibit breed-specific effects on horn morphology and polledness, supporting that the genetic architecture of horn traits is more complex than a single causative mutation
(Hu et al., 2026). In addition, although the hornless trait is a well-known dominant trait,
RXFP2 heterozygotes in our Oula population did not fully exhibit the hornless phenotype, suggesting that other regulatory effects may be involved
(Wang et al., 2019), especially in our Oula sheep population and selection sweeps around
RXFP2 associated with various horn traits further support a polygenic model for horn phenotype regulation
(Guo et al., 2021).
PIC is often associated with within population genetic diversity
(Sun et al., 2007), PIC values (0.25-0.5) indicated moderate polymorphism in Oula sheep, suggesting low genetic variation and selection potential. D′ and r
2 values approached 1, indicating strong LD among the three SNPs. Homozygotes showed complete phenotype concordance at each mutation site, while heterozygotes predicted hornless phenotype with 73.53% to 92.86% accuracy. Haplotype analysis revealed three haplotypes with inheritance probability >3%; CTT showed the highest predictive probability for horned (90.6%), whereas TCC showed the highest for hornless (71.7%).
In Oula sheep,
RXFP2 was identified as a major candidate gene for horn presence/absence. Three key SNPs in coding regions were significantly associated with horn phenotype in both horned and hornless populations and genotype identification is essential for determining horn status. These findings provide useful genetic information for understanding horn phenotype variation in Oula sheep and lay the foundation for further validation of RXFP2 variants in breeding programs.