Chief Editor:

V. Geethalakshmi

Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Coimbatore, INDIA

Frequency:Monthly

Indexing:

BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Go...

KNOWLEDGE LEVEL OF TRIBAL PIG OWNERS ABOUT SCIENTIFIC PIG HUSBANDRY PRACTICES

M.K. Verma, A.K. Pandey, R.P. Singh

Affiliations

¹Department of Veterinary & A.H. Extension Ranchi Veterinary College, Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi - 834006, India.

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Verma M.K., Pandey A.K., Singh R.P. (2025). KNOWLEDGE LEVEL OF TRIBAL PIG OWNERS ABOUT SCIENTIFIC PIG HUSBANDRY PRACTICES. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 41(4): 305-307. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Data were collected from 80 tribal pig rearers (40 from remote villages and 40 from nearby
villages) of Jharkhand to ascertain their knowledge level about scientific pig rearing practices. It
revealed that majority of the respondents in nearby villages of towns had medium (60 %) and high
(40 %) level of knowledge, whereas in remote village majority of the respondents (75 %) had low
level of knowledge. The zero order correlation coefficient revealed that knowledge level was positively and significantly correlated with extension contact, annual income (P c status and annual income (P

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Pandey, A.K. and Kumar, R. (1999). J. Dairying, Foods & Home Sci., 18: 121-123.
Tiwari, R. and Tiwari, R. (2001). Indian J. Anim. Res., 35: 73-74.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.