Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 34 issue 2 (june 2000) : 134-137

HETEROSIS IN MUNGBEAN [VIGNA RADIATA (L.) WILCZEK]

R.P. Ahert V.P. Sonawane, D.V. Dahat
1Department of Botany, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri-413 722, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Sonawane V.P. Ahert R.P., Dahat D.V. (2024). HETEROSIS IN MUNGBEAN [VIGNA RADIATA (L.) WILCZEK]. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 34(2): 134-137. doi: .
Study of heterosis in 21 different hybrids of mungbean resulting from 7 x 7 diallel, excluding reciprocals indicated pronounced hybrid vigour for yield and most of the yield components. Heterosis to the extent of 63.45 and 61.69% over the mldparent and better parent respectively was recorded for grain yield per plant. Heterosis for yield was generally accompanied by heterosis for yield components. Seven hybrids were identified as promising for many desirable traits and they may be of much use in exploiting hybrid vigour in mungbean.
    1. Bhatnagar, C.P. and Singh, B. (1964). Indian J. Genet., 24 89-90.
    2. Chowdhary, R.K. (1991). Agric. Sd. Digest, 11:175-177.
    3. Gupta, S.N. et a/., (1980). Indian J. Hered., 12:49-55.
    4. Pati!, V.S. et a/., (1996). J. Maha. Agric. Univ. 21(1):152-154.
    5. Reddi, Sekhar M. et a/., (1994). Indian. J. Genet., 54(1): 1-5.
    6. Sharma, D.J. and Yadav, R.K. (1994). Indian J. Pulses Res. 6(2):191-193.
    7. Singh, K.B. and Jain, R.P. (1970). Indian J. Genet., 30:244-250.
    8. Swindell, R.E. and Poehlman, J.M. (1976). Tropical agric., 53(1):25-30.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)