Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 37 issue 4 (december 2003) : 259 - 263

FERTIUTY RESTORATION BEHAVIOUROF PROMISING CMS UNES IN RICE (ORYZ4 SATIVA L.)

D. Malarvizhi, K. Thiyagarajan, S. Manonmani, P. Deepa Sankar
1Department of Rice, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641003, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Malarvizhi D., Thiyagarajan K., Manonmani S., Sankar Deepa P. (2024). FERTIUTY RESTORATION BEHAVIOUROF PROMISING CMS UNES IN RICE (ORYZ4 SATIVA L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 37(4): 259 - 263. doi: .

ABSTRACT

About 291, short, medium, long duration indica cultivars, japonica and IRRI restorers were crossed with six CMS lines derived from wild abortive cytoplasm viz., IR 58025 A, IR 68888A, IR 68897 A, IR 68281 A, IR 69616 A, PMS 3 A, to identify effective restorers and potential maintainers. Based on pollen/spikelet fertility, 30.4 per cent of the male parents were identified as effective restorers and 13.7 per cent of the male parents were identified as potential maintainers and the rest were grouped into partial restorers and partial maintainers. Thirteen hybrid combinations were identified as promising based on standard heterosis for yield ranging from 18.5 per cent to 40.0 per cent. The hybrid IR 58025 A/IR 60821-34-1-2 R recorded the highest standard heterosis of 40.0 per cent followed by IR 58025 A/IR 8666-30-3-1-4 R (39.5 per cent), IR 58025 MC 10 R (35.6 per cent), IR 69616 A/IRRI 3054 (29.6 per cent) and IR 68888 MR 4595-54-1 R (28.4 per cent).Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Banumathy, 5. (2001). Ph. D. Thesis, TNAlJ, Coimbatore.
    2. BIJral, J.5 eta/. (1989). Rice Res. News, 14(3): 6.
    3. Govindaraj, K.L. et a!. (1984). Int. Rice Res. NewsJet, 9(2): 7-89.
    4. Hemareddy; H.B. etaJ. (2000). ~., 37: 26-28.
    5. Kumari, 5.L. and Mahadevappa, M. (1998). ~., 35: 124-126.
    6. Padmavathi. M. eta!. (1997).01yza., 34: 264 -266.
    7. Pandey, K. eta/. (1990). OIyza., 27: 232-238.
    8. Pradhan, S.B. and Jachuck, P.J. (1999). ~., 36: 374-376.
    9. Sundar, S. (2000). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, TNAU, Coimbatore Standard Evaluation System for Rice (1996), IRRI Los BanoS, Phlbppines.· .'
    10. Virmanl 5.5. and Edwards LB. (1983). Adv. Agron., 36: 145-214.
    11. Viramani: 5.5. et a/. (1986). In: Rice Genetic1i,IRRI, Phibppines, 633-664.
    12. Wilson J .A (1986). Euphytica (Supl.), 6: 13-33.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)