Banner

Chief Editor:
V. Geethalakshmi
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Coimbatore, INDIA
Frequency:Monthly
Indexing:
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Go...
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 39 issue 4 (december 2005) : 269 - 274

RESPONSE OF UNSEED TO ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SOURCES OF NITROGEN

V.K. Sharma"', B. Dayal
1Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science, RBS Colle~J3ichpuri. Agra. UP - 283 105. India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Sharma"' V.K., Dayal B. (2025). RESPONSE OF UNSEED TO ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SOURCES OF NITROGEN. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 39(4): 269 - 274. doi: .
The results of experiments indicated that the treatment T16 (FYM 7.5 t + 37.5 kg N/ha) was found better with respectr to plant height at 45 days and at the time of harvest, number of tillers and capsules/plant, dry matter production, straw and grain yield of linseed. The maximum uptake of N (grain and straw), P and K by linseed straw were recorded with treatment T16 (FYM 7.5 t + 37.5 kg N/ha) in 1992–93 and 1993–94. Whereas, uptake of sulphur by linseed was highest with treatment T16 (FYM 7.5 t + 37.5 kg Nlha) in 1992–93 and 1993–94. The uptake of P and K was similar in linseed grain with the treatments T13 (FYM 6 t + 30 kg Nlha) and T16 (FYM 1.5 t + 31.5 kg N/ha) in 1992–93 and maximum uptake of P and K by linseed grain in 1993–94 with treatment T13. The physico-chemical properties of soil were improved with treatment T16 (FYM 1.5 t + 37.5 kg N/ha).
    1. Mahapatra. A.K. and Jee. R.C. (1993). Indian J. Agron., 38: 372-77.
    2. Negi. S.C. et a/. (1992). Indian J. Agron., 37: 30-33.
    3. Patel. BA et a/. (1992). Indian J. Agron., 37: 52-54.
    4. Sathiyavelu, A. et a/. (1994). Indian J. Agron., 39: 479-98.
    5. Singh, Bhajan and Brar, S.P.S. (1985). PAU. J. Res., 22: 243-52.
    6. Singh, Vinay et a/. (1994). Indian J. Agron., 39: 507-509.
    7. Verma, L.P. et a/. (2002). Ann. Plant Soil Res., 4: 72-75

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)