Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi
Print ISSN 0367-8245
Online ISSN 0976-058X
NAAS Rating 5.60
SJR 0.293

Frequency :

Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 39 issue 3 (september 2005) : 208 - 212

ADOPTION GAP IN THE IMPROVED MAIZE TECHNOLOGY

Brij Bala, S.D. Sharma, R.K. Sharma*

Affiliations

¹KVK, Bajaura, Distt. Kullu (H.P.) - 175 125, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Bala Brij, Sharma S.D., Sharma* R.K. (2024). ADOPTION GAP IN THE IMPROVED MAIZE TECHNOLOGY. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 39(3): 208 - 212. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The studies were conducted to estimate the magnitude of gaps in the adoption of recommended technology, knowledge level of farmers and constraints for adoption of recommended practices. Primary data were collected from 200 farmers selected through multistage random sampling technique. The findings revealed that 47% of the farmers had medium level of knowledge about the recommended maize practices. Among the various recommended technologies, the maximum gap was observed in micro-nutrient application (99.30%) followed by herbicidal application (90.75%), plant protection measures (84.35%) and balanced fertilizer use (78.33%). Limited knowledge about micro-nutrients, pesticides and fertilizer application and their advantages was the major reason for the chasm in the adoption of latest recommended practices. Lack of technical know how, non availability of desired variety seed, sub-standard and costly chemical fertilizers and plant nutrients, lack of purchasing power etc. limited the adoption of recommended practices and hence the maize productivity on farmer's fields.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Badal, P.S. and Singh, R.P. (2001). Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 14: 121-133.
Barman, U. and Pathak, K. (2000). Agric. Sci. Digest, 20: 56-57.
Singh, R.P. and Pal, S. (1992). Agric. Situat. India, 47: 245-252.
Sharma, S. et al. (2001). Agric. Ext. Rev., 13: 17-22.
Vasanthakur, J. and Selvi, T.J. (1999). Agric. Ext. Rev., 11: 16-21.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

ADOPTION GAP IN THE IMPROVED MAIZE TECHNOLOGY

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board