Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi
Print ISSN 0367-8245
Online ISSN 0976-058X
NAAS Rating 5.60
SJR 0.217, CiteScore: 0.595

Frequency :

Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 40 issue 1 (march 2006) : 18 - 24

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTION AND MARKETING OF GRAPE IN ANDHRA PRADESH

Y. Radha, D.S. Prasad, S. Jayarama Reddy

Affiliations

¹A.N.G.R. Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad - 500 030, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Radha Y., Prasad D.S., Reddy Jayarama S. (2025). ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTION AND MARKETING OF GRAPE IN ANDHRA PRADESH. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 40(1): 18 - 24. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Due to high protein content (40-42 %) of soybean it is known as “poor man’s meat”. The average productivity of soybean in the country is about 1008 kg/ha, which is, much below than the average productivity of the world, 2148 kg/ha. Some of the major constraints in soybean production are the lack of suitable location specific cultivars, poor seed viability and non-availability of drought resistant varieties, poor storage life of soya oil, beany flavor and high linolenic acid content. From the present investigation, it is concluded that amongst the different soybean genotypes, G9 (EC-34332) produced the highest grain yield (2754 kg/ha). In the high yielding genotypes viz., G9 (EC-34332), G11 (PLSO-76), G10 (EC-39034), mean number of pods per plant, mean number of grains per pod, 1000 grain weight and mean harvest index (HI) were observed to be the major yield contributing characters. Negative correlation of mean protein content with seed yield was observed as the low yielding genotype G7 (DS-141) was found superior in respect of protein content.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Deepak Shah (2000). Production and marketing pattern of grapes in Maharashtra: An appraisal. Indian J. Agric. Marketing, 14(1): 40-53.
National Agricultural Bank for Rural Development (NABARD) (2001). Andhra Pradesh status focus paper 2000-2001

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTION AND MARKETING OF GRAPE IN ANDHRA PRADESH

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board