Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 41 issue 1 (march 2007) : 29 - 33

INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION LEVELS AND DICLOFOP-METHYL ON WEED GROWTH AND YIELD OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM)

Rajbir Singh*
1Department of Agronomy, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar - 125 004, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Singh* Rajbir (2024). INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION LEVELS AND DICLOFOP-METHYL ON WEED GROWTH AND YIELD OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 41(1): 29 - 33. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted during winter seasons of 1994-95 and 1995-96 to find out the effect of irrigation levels and post emergence application of diclofop-methyl on weed growth and yield of wheat. Experimental results revealed that there was significant increase in dry matter of grassy and broad leaf weeds with the increase in irrigation levels from one to six. Yield of wheat was significantly more with six irrigations at critical stages compared to one and three irritations. Post emergence application of diclofop-methyl at 1.0 kg/ha provided good control of grassy weeds and produced grain yield at par with isoproturon at 1.0 kg/ha. However, diclofop-methyl applied at different doses failed to control the broad leaf weeds significantly indicating its ineffectiveness against broad leaf weeds

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Balyan, R.S. et al. (1987). HAU J. Res., 17: 170-175.
    2. Banga, R.S. and Dhinwal, A.S. (1993). In: Proc. Int. Symp. Indian Soc. of Weed Sci., Hisar, November, 18-20, III:
    3. 258-59.
    4. Bhatia, A.K. et al. (1981). Indian J. Weed Sci., 13: 95-102.
    5. Choubey, N.K. et al. (1998). Indian J. Weed Sci., 30: 128-131.
    6. Das, T.K. and Yaduraja, N.T. (1999). Fertil. News, 44(3): 35-30.
    7. Hooda, I.S. and Agarwal, S.K. (1987). Indian J. Agron., 32: 261-64.
    8. Malik, R.K. et al. (1989). Indian J. Agron., 32: 312-15.
    9. Malik, R.K. and Singh, S. (1993). In: Proc. Int. Symp. Indian Soc. of Weed Sci., Hisar, November, 18-20, III: 258-59.
    10. Qureshi, F.A. and Vanden Born, W.H. (1979). Can. J. Plant Sci., 59: 87-92.
    11. Tag-E1-Din, A.M.O. et al. (1989). J. Agric. Sci., King Saud Univ., 2: 105-137.
    12. Walia, U.S. et al. (1997). Plant Protection Quarterly, 12: 138-140.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)