Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 41 issue 1 (march 2007) : 23 - 28

MUNGBEAN SEED YIELD: I. EFFECT OF DRY MATTER DISTRIBUTION AND TEMPERATURE AT DIFFERENT CROP GROWTH STAGES

V
Vijaylaxmi
A
A. Bhattacharya
1Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur - 208 024, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Vijaylaxmi, Bhattacharya A. (2025). MUNGBEAN SEED YIELD: I. EFFECT OF DRY MATTER DISTRIBUTION AND TEMPERATURE AT DIFFERENT CROP GROWTH STAGES. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 41(1): 23 - 28. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Twenty-five mungbean genotypes were involved in field trials to elucidate the effect of dry matter partitioning in different plant parts at various crop growth stages on seed yield. It was found that dry matter partitioned during pre flowering period has very little effect on mungbean yield, but during post flowering period higher magnitude of dry matter partitioned in leaves and stem reduces the yield. Mean temperature during flowering and twenty days after registered an association of 40% with mungbean seed yield.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Bhattacharya, A. et al. (1995). Legume Res., 18: 193-199.
    2. Bhattacharya, A. (1996). Legume Res., 19: 179-184.
    3. Bhattacharya, A. (2000). Indian J. Pulses Res., 13: 50-55.
    4. Bhattacharya A. and Chandra, S. (1997). Legume Res., 20: 52-56.
    5. Chandra, S. et al. (1977). Indian J. PI. Genet., 37: 415-419.
    6. Dahyia, B.S. (1988). Haryana J. Agron., 4: 116-118.
    7. Dewev, D.R. and Lu, K.H. (1959). Agron. J., 51: 515-519.
    8. Ganguly, S.B. et al. (1999). Indian J. Pulses Res., 12(1): 65-74.
    9. Kuo, C.J. et al. (1978). In: Proceeding of 1st International
    10. Mungbean Symposium, Tiwan, AVRDC.
    11. Shanmugasundaram, S. et al. (1977). Bull. Inst. Agr. Kyushu Univ., 2: 25-39.
    12. Sinha, S.K. and Khanna, R. (1975). Adv. Agron., 27: 123-174.
    13. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1978). Statistical Methods 6th Ed. Oxford and IBM Publishing Co. Calcutta.
    14. Summerfield, R.J.S. et al. (1980). Proc. International Workshop on Chickpea Improvement, 1979, ICRISAT, pp. 121-149.
    15. Tickoo, J.L. et al. (1996). In: Recent Advances in Mungbean Research, IIPR, Kanpur, pp. 197-213.
    Published In
    Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 41 issue 1 (march 2007) : 23 - 28

      MUNGBEAN SEED YIELD: I. EFFECT OF DRY MATTER DISTRIBUTION AND TEMPERATURE AT DIFFERENT CROP GROWTH STAGES

      V
      Vijaylaxmi
      A
      A. Bhattacharya
      1Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur - 208 024, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Vijaylaxmi, Bhattacharya A. (2025). MUNGBEAN SEED YIELD: I. EFFECT OF DRY MATTER DISTRIBUTION AND TEMPERATURE AT DIFFERENT CROP GROWTH STAGES. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 41(1): 23 - 28. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      Twenty-five mungbean genotypes were involved in field trials to elucidate the effect of dry matter partitioning in different plant parts at various crop growth stages on seed yield. It was found that dry matter partitioned during pre flowering period has very little effect on mungbean yield, but during post flowering period higher magnitude of dry matter partitioned in leaves and stem reduces the yield. Mean temperature during flowering and twenty days after registered an association of 40% with mungbean seed yield.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Bhattacharya, A. et al. (1995). Legume Res., 18: 193-199.
        2. Bhattacharya, A. (1996). Legume Res., 19: 179-184.
        3. Bhattacharya, A. (2000). Indian J. Pulses Res., 13: 50-55.
        4. Bhattacharya A. and Chandra, S. (1997). Legume Res., 20: 52-56.
        5. Chandra, S. et al. (1977). Indian J. PI. Genet., 37: 415-419.
        6. Dahyia, B.S. (1988). Haryana J. Agron., 4: 116-118.
        7. Dewev, D.R. and Lu, K.H. (1959). Agron. J., 51: 515-519.
        8. Ganguly, S.B. et al. (1999). Indian J. Pulses Res., 12(1): 65-74.
        9. Kuo, C.J. et al. (1978). In: Proceeding of 1st International
        10. Mungbean Symposium, Tiwan, AVRDC.
        11. Shanmugasundaram, S. et al. (1977). Bull. Inst. Agr. Kyushu Univ., 2: 25-39.
        12. Sinha, S.K. and Khanna, R. (1975). Adv. Agron., 27: 123-174.
        13. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1978). Statistical Methods 6th Ed. Oxford and IBM Publishing Co. Calcutta.
        14. Summerfield, R.J.S. et al. (1980). Proc. International Workshop on Chickpea Improvement, 1979, ICRISAT, pp. 121-149.
        15. Tickoo, J.L. et al. (1996). In: Recent Advances in Mungbean Research, IIPR, Kanpur, pp. 197-213.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)