Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 41 issue 1 (march 2007) : 1 - 9

SALINITY REGIONALIZATION WITH GEOSTATISTIC METHOD IN A WET SOIL IN SOUTHERN LENJAN-ISFAHAN (IRAN)

K
Kambiz Mashayekhi1
Z
Z. Asadi
S
S.A.R. Movahedi Naeini2
S
S. Hajrasuliha
1Soil Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan Province, Iran

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Mashayekhi1 Kambiz, Asadi Z., Naeini2 Movahedi S.A.R., Hajrasuliha S. (2025). SALINITY REGIONALIZATION WITH GEOSTATISTIC METHOD IN A WET SOIL IN SOUTHERN LENJAN-ISFAHAN (IRAN). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 41(1): 1 - 9. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Due to high soil salinity and sodicity variations, mean value for wet soil samples might not represent distribution center. Soil samples from 0-0.2, 0.2-0.5 and 0.5-1.0 m depths obtained with 25 m intervals from a plot (250 m by 300 m) with ground water 0.65 m below the soil surface. Regional variation for salinity and sodicity was investigated. With median for electrical conductivity and sodium adsorption ratio, soils are non-saline, non-sodic. These would be saline and sodic considering means.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Amini, M. (1999). M.Sc. Thesis, Agricultural College, Isfahan University of Technology. In Farsi.
    2. Chang, C. et al. (1988). Comm. J. Soil. Sci., 68: 202-221.
    3. Chapman, H.D. and Pratt, P.F. (1961). Methods of Analysis for Soil, Plants and Waters. University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences, 309 pp.
    4. Hajrasuliha, S. et al. (1980). Irrig Sci., 1: 208-197.
    5. 8 INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
    6. Hassani Pak, A. (1998). Geostatistics. Tehran University Publishers. In Farsi.
    7. Journel, A.G. and Hujbergts, C.J. (1978). Mining Geostatistics. Academic Press. Inc. 599 pp.
    8. López-Granados, F. et al. (2005). European J. Agron. Available on Line.
    9. Mohammadi, J. (1998). Agric. Natural Res. Sci. Technol., 2(4): 36-49. In Farsi
    10. Mohammadi, J. (1999). Agric. Natural Res. Sci. Tech., 3(1): 1-7. In Farsi
    11. Nourbakhsh, F. (1999). M.Sc. Thesis, Agricultural College, Isfahan University of Technology. In Farsi.
    12. Matheron, G. (1973). Adv. Appl. Prob., 5: 239-465.
    13. Trangmar, B.B. et al. (1985). Adv. Agron., 38: 45-94.
    14. Warrick, A.W. et al. (1986). In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1, 2nd ed. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Amer. Soc. of Agronomy, Madison. Agronomy monograph. 9: 53-82
    Published In
    Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 41 issue 1 (march 2007) : 1 - 9

      SALINITY REGIONALIZATION WITH GEOSTATISTIC METHOD IN A WET SOIL IN SOUTHERN LENJAN-ISFAHAN (IRAN)

      K
      Kambiz Mashayekhi1
      Z
      Z. Asadi
      S
      S.A.R. Movahedi Naeini2
      S
      S. Hajrasuliha
      1Soil Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan Province, Iran

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Mashayekhi1 Kambiz, Asadi Z., Naeini2 Movahedi S.A.R., Hajrasuliha S. (2025). SALINITY REGIONALIZATION WITH GEOSTATISTIC METHOD IN A WET SOIL IN SOUTHERN LENJAN-ISFAHAN (IRAN). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 41(1): 1 - 9. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      Due to high soil salinity and sodicity variations, mean value for wet soil samples might not represent distribution center. Soil samples from 0-0.2, 0.2-0.5 and 0.5-1.0 m depths obtained with 25 m intervals from a plot (250 m by 300 m) with ground water 0.65 m below the soil surface. Regional variation for salinity and sodicity was investigated. With median for electrical conductivity and sodium adsorption ratio, soils are non-saline, non-sodic. These would be saline and sodic considering means.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Amini, M. (1999). M.Sc. Thesis, Agricultural College, Isfahan University of Technology. In Farsi.
        2. Chang, C. et al. (1988). Comm. J. Soil. Sci., 68: 202-221.
        3. Chapman, H.D. and Pratt, P.F. (1961). Methods of Analysis for Soil, Plants and Waters. University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences, 309 pp.
        4. Hajrasuliha, S. et al. (1980). Irrig Sci., 1: 208-197.
        5. 8 INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
        6. Hassani Pak, A. (1998). Geostatistics. Tehran University Publishers. In Farsi.
        7. Journel, A.G. and Hujbergts, C.J. (1978). Mining Geostatistics. Academic Press. Inc. 599 pp.
        8. López-Granados, F. et al. (2005). European J. Agron. Available on Line.
        9. Mohammadi, J. (1998). Agric. Natural Res. Sci. Technol., 2(4): 36-49. In Farsi
        10. Mohammadi, J. (1999). Agric. Natural Res. Sci. Tech., 3(1): 1-7. In Farsi
        11. Nourbakhsh, F. (1999). M.Sc. Thesis, Agricultural College, Isfahan University of Technology. In Farsi.
        12. Matheron, G. (1973). Adv. Appl. Prob., 5: 239-465.
        13. Trangmar, B.B. et al. (1985). Adv. Agron., 38: 45-94.
        14. Warrick, A.W. et al. (1986). In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1, 2nd ed. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Amer. Soc. of Agronomy, Madison. Agronomy monograph. 9: 53-82
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)