Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 42 issue 4 (december 2008) : 293-297

EFFECT OF GROWTH REGULATORS ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PAPRIKA cv KtPI-19

K. Kannan, M. Jawaharlal, M. Prabhu, T. Senthil Kumar
1Horticultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore- 641 003, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Kannan K., Jawaharlal M., Prabhu M., Kumar Senthil T. (2024). EFFECT OF GROWTH REGULATORS ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PAPRIKA cv KtPI-19. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 42(4): 293-297. doi: .
The investigation on effect of growth regulators on yield and quality of paprika cv. KtPI-19
revealed that the growth regulator spray had significant influence on yield and quality. Spraying
of NAA 25 ppm significantly increased the number of flowers / plant, Number of fruits per plant
and fruit set percentage in winter season, whereas spraying of NAA @ 50 ppm showed increased
in fruit weight, fresh fruit yield / plant, fresh yield / plot and dry yield / plant in winter season and
all the above parameters in summer season. In case of quality parameters 2, 4, D @10 ppm shows
increased ascorbic acid and TSS content in paprika cv. KtPI-19 in both winter and summer season.
Oleoresin, capasaicin and capsanthin content were highest in the plants sprayed with NAA @ 50
ppm in both winter and summer season. From this investigation, it is concluded that NAA @ 50
ppm spray was beneficial in paprika cv. KtPI-90 for increased yield and quality
    1. Barai, B.K. and Sarkar, K.P. (1999). Environ. and Ecology, 17(3):539-542.
    2. Bhosle, A.B., et al. (2002). Orissa J. Hort., 30(2):63-65.
    3. Chandra, R. and Shivraj, A. (1972). Andra Agric. J., 19(1-2):34-44.
    4. Lyngdon, G.B. and Sanyal, D. (1992). Horti. J., 5(1):63-65.
    5. Mehrotra, O.N., et al. (1970). Prog. Hort., 2(1):57-64.
    6. Muralidharan, R. et al. (2002). Madras Agric. J., 89(1-3):63-66.
    7. Pampapatty, K. and Rao, S.N. (1975). Andhra Agric. J., 23(1-2):53-58.
    8. Sharma, N. et al. (1999). J. Hill Res., 12(1):74-76.
    9. Stover, E.W. et al. (2000). Hort. Tech., 35(7):1263-1264.
    10. Wien, H.C. and Turner, A.D. (1989). J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 114(6):981-985.
    11. Wien, H.C. and Zhang Yiping (1991). J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 116(3):516-519.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)