Banner

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.217, CiteScore: 0.595

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 42 issue 3 (september 2008) : 220 - 223

GENETIC ANALYSIS OF GRAIN YIELD AND ITS COMPONENT TRAITS IN BREAD WHEAT UNDER RAINFED AND IRRIGATED CONDITIONS

Ashok Kumar, S.C. Sharma
1Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, C S K Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishavidalya, Palampur-176062, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Kumar Ashok, Sharma S.C. (2025). GENETIC ANALYSIS OF GRAIN YIELD AND ITS COMPONENT TRAITS IN BREAD WHEAT UNDER RAINFED AND IRRIGATED CONDITIONS. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 42(3): 220 - 223. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The present study revealed the inadequacy of both additive- dominance and digenic epistatic
models for all the traits except spikes/plant in majority of the crosses . Additive gene effects was
prevailed over dominance gene effects for 100- grain weight and grains/ spike, whereas reverse is
for spikes/plant, grain yield/plant and biological yield. Digenic interactions and duplicate type of
epistasis were also observed for these traits. Hybridization systems such as biparental mating and/
or diallel selective matings could be useful for improvement of these traits

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Amawate J.S. and Behl P.N. (1995). Indian J. Genet., 55:120-125.
    2. Cavalli L.L. (1952). In: Quantitative Iheritance. (Rieve, E.C.R. and Waddington, C.H. eds.). HMSO, London. pp. 135-144.
    3. Dofing S.M. and Knight C.W. (1992). Crop Sci., 32:487-489.
    4. Garcia del Moral L.F., et. al. (1991). Crop Sci., 31:1179-1185.
    5. Li, L.Z., Lu D.B. and Cui, D.Q. (1991). Acta Agri.Uni. Menanensis, 25: 372-378.
    6. Misra S.C., et.al. (1994). Indian J. Genet., 54 : 77-82.
    7. Mehla B.S. , Sharma S.C. and Hooda, S.C. (2000). Ann. Biol., 16:95-100.
    8. Pandey D.P. , Dawa T. and Sharma D. (1999). Crop Res., 18:261-265
    9. Srivastava A.N. , Singh C.B. and Rao S.K. 1992. Indian J. Genet., 52:390-395.
    10. Sharma S.N. and Sain R.S. (2002). Indian J. Genet., 62 : 101-103.
    11. Shekhawat U.S., Bharadwaj R.P. , Vijay P. and Parkash V. (2000). .Indian J. Agril. Res , 34:176-178.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)