Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 42 issue 2 (june 2008) : 112 - 115

CROP GROWTH RATE AND DEVELOPMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INDIAN MUSTARD VAR VARDAN TO VARYING LEVELS OF NITROGEN AND SULPHUR

Amit Kumar*, Sandeep Kumar
1Deptt. of Agronomy, CCR (PG) College, Muzaffarnagar - 251 001, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Kumar* Amit, Kumar Sandeep (2024). CROP GROWTH RATE AND DEVELOPMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INDIAN MUSTARD VAR VARDAN TO VARYING LEVELS OF NITROGEN AND SULPHUR. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 42(2): 112 - 115. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The present field experiment was conducted on Vardan variety of Indian mustard during Nov,
2003 to March, 2004 to find out the effect of various doses of nitrogen (0, 60, 80, 100, 120 and 140
kg/ ha) and sulphur (0, 20, 40 and 60 kg/ ha) on crop growth rate and various developmental
characters. The results indicated that 50% flowering and 50% podding started significantly earlier
in the plots fertilized with nitrogen and sulphur compared to control plot but the days to attain
maturity were not affected by fertilization. The grain growth duration was significantly longer by 9
days for fertilized plots compared to control. However, crop growth rates at different stages of
growth were not affected by fertilizer application.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Khan, G.M. and Agarwal, S.K. (1988). Haryana J. Agron., 4(2): 91-96.
    2. Patel, R.J. and Shelke, V.B. (1999). Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika, 14:49-53.
    3. Sarkar, R.K. and Ghatak, S. (1988). Indian Agric., 32(1): 63-69.
    4. Tomar, S. et al. (1990). Ann. Agric. Res., 11(3-4): 241-248.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)