Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 43 issue 1 (march 2009) : 1-9

YIELD DETERMINATION IN LENTIL UNDER NON-IRRIGATED AND IRRIGATED CONDITIONS: PHENOLOGY, DRY MATTER DISTRIBUTION AND YIELD ATTRIBUTES

A
A. Bhattacharya
1Division of Physiology, Biochemistry and Microbiology, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur-208 024, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Bhattacharya A. (2025). YIELD DETERMINATION IN LENTIL UNDER NON-IRRIGATED AND IRRIGATED CONDITIONS: PHENOLOGY, DRY MATTER DISTRIBUTION AND YIELD ATTRIBUTES. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 43(1): 1-9. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Fifteen lentil genotypes were raised in field under non-irrigated and irrigated conditions
during rabi seasons of 1998-99 and 1999-2000. Phenological days, dry matter distribution in
plant parts at different phenological stages, mean environmental temperature and total degree
days during were observed. Seed yield were higher under irrigated as compared to non-irrigated
condition. Multiple regression between seed yield and different traits exhibited that all of them
do not have significant contribution seed yield and seed yield determining factors are found to
be different under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions. Under non-irrigated condition, lentil
seed yield was determined by total dry matter production and its partitioning/day, mean
temperature and total degree-days during podding to maturity. Under irrigated condition, lentil
seed yield was determined by root dry matter at vegetative stage, total dry matter yield, per day
dry matter production and its partitioning during seed filling period and total degree-days during
flowering to podding. Multiple correlation (R) of traits was 0.9996 and 0.9984 and coefficient of
determination (R2) was 0.9992 and 0.9964 under non-irrigated and irrigated conditions,
respectively. Optimum values of the traits for seed yield maximization also varied amongst irrigated
and non-irrigated conditions.

REFERENCES

  1. Bahl, P.N. et al., (1984). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 54:110-113.
  2. Bhattacharya, A. (1983). Ph.D. Thesis, Division of Plant Physiology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
  3. Bhattacharya, A. et al. (1995). Legume Res., 18:193-196.
  4. Bhattacharya, A., Singh, D.N. (1997). Indian J. Pulses Res., 10:190-194.
  5. Bhattacharya, A. and Chandra, S.(1997). Legume Res., 20:52-56.
  6. Bhattacharya, A. (1998). In “Consolidated Report of Rabi MULLaRP Crops 1997-1998 of All India Coordinated MULLaRP Improvement Programme,” Narendra Dev Agricultural University, Faizabad.
  7. Bhattacharya, A. (1999). Legume Res., 22:222-226.
  8. Bhattacharya, A. and Pandey, P.S. (1999). Indian J. Pulses Res., 12:57-64.
  9. Gifford, R.M. and Evans, L.T. (1981). Annual Rev. Pl. Physiol., 32:485-509.
  10. Hays. H.K., et al., (1955). In “Methodology of Plant Breeding”. International Student Edition, McGraw Hill Book Company Inc. Tokyo. pp. 442-443. Vol. 43, No. 1, 2009 9
  11. Jain, H.K.(1975). Indian J. Genet., 33:169-186.
  12. Rehman, S.M.L. and Meshab Uddin, A.S.M. (2000). Legume Res., 23:1-8.
  13. Singh, K.P., et al., (1986). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 56:224-226.
  14. Singh, D.N. and Bhattacharya, A. (1995). In “Consolidated Report of Rabi Pulses 1994-1995 of All India Coordinated
  15. Pulse Improvement Programme,” Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.
  16. Sinha, S.K. (1973). Indian J. Genet., 34A:988-994.
  17. Sinha, S.K. and Khanna, R. (1975). Adv. Agron. 27:123-174.
  18. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1978). Statistical Methods, 6th Edition, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.Calcutta.
Published In
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 43 issue 1 (march 2009) : 1-9

    YIELD DETERMINATION IN LENTIL UNDER NON-IRRIGATED AND IRRIGATED CONDITIONS: PHENOLOGY, DRY MATTER DISTRIBUTION AND YIELD ATTRIBUTES

    A
    A. Bhattacharya
    1Division of Physiology, Biochemistry and Microbiology, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur-208 024, India

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Bhattacharya A. (2025). YIELD DETERMINATION IN LENTIL UNDER NON-IRRIGATED AND IRRIGATED CONDITIONS: PHENOLOGY, DRY MATTER DISTRIBUTION AND YIELD ATTRIBUTES. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 43(1): 1-9. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    Fifteen lentil genotypes were raised in field under non-irrigated and irrigated conditions
    during rabi seasons of 1998-99 and 1999-2000. Phenological days, dry matter distribution in
    plant parts at different phenological stages, mean environmental temperature and total degree
    days during were observed. Seed yield were higher under irrigated as compared to non-irrigated
    condition. Multiple regression between seed yield and different traits exhibited that all of them
    do not have significant contribution seed yield and seed yield determining factors are found to
    be different under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions. Under non-irrigated condition, lentil
    seed yield was determined by total dry matter production and its partitioning/day, mean
    temperature and total degree-days during podding to maturity. Under irrigated condition, lentil
    seed yield was determined by root dry matter at vegetative stage, total dry matter yield, per day
    dry matter production and its partitioning during seed filling period and total degree-days during
    flowering to podding. Multiple correlation (R) of traits was 0.9996 and 0.9984 and coefficient of
    determination (R2) was 0.9992 and 0.9964 under non-irrigated and irrigated conditions,
    respectively. Optimum values of the traits for seed yield maximization also varied amongst irrigated
    and non-irrigated conditions.

    REFERENCES

    1. Bahl, P.N. et al., (1984). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 54:110-113.
    2. Bhattacharya, A. (1983). Ph.D. Thesis, Division of Plant Physiology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
    3. Bhattacharya, A. et al. (1995). Legume Res., 18:193-196.
    4. Bhattacharya, A., Singh, D.N. (1997). Indian J. Pulses Res., 10:190-194.
    5. Bhattacharya, A. and Chandra, S.(1997). Legume Res., 20:52-56.
    6. Bhattacharya, A. (1998). In “Consolidated Report of Rabi MULLaRP Crops 1997-1998 of All India Coordinated MULLaRP Improvement Programme,” Narendra Dev Agricultural University, Faizabad.
    7. Bhattacharya, A. (1999). Legume Res., 22:222-226.
    8. Bhattacharya, A. and Pandey, P.S. (1999). Indian J. Pulses Res., 12:57-64.
    9. Gifford, R.M. and Evans, L.T. (1981). Annual Rev. Pl. Physiol., 32:485-509.
    10. Hays. H.K., et al., (1955). In “Methodology of Plant Breeding”. International Student Edition, McGraw Hill Book Company Inc. Tokyo. pp. 442-443. Vol. 43, No. 1, 2009 9
    11. Jain, H.K.(1975). Indian J. Genet., 33:169-186.
    12. Rehman, S.M.L. and Meshab Uddin, A.S.M. (2000). Legume Res., 23:1-8.
    13. Singh, K.P., et al., (1986). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 56:224-226.
    14. Singh, D.N. and Bhattacharya, A. (1995). In “Consolidated Report of Rabi Pulses 1994-1995 of All India Coordinated
    15. Pulse Improvement Programme,” Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.
    16. Sinha, S.K. (1973). Indian J. Genet., 34A:988-994.
    17. Sinha, S.K. and Khanna, R. (1975). Adv. Agron. 27:123-174.
    18. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1978). Statistical Methods, 6th Edition, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.Calcutta.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)