Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 44 issue 3 (september 2010) : 201 - 205

CAUSALITY BETWEEN EXPORTS AND IMPORTS OF AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN THE CASE OF PAKISTAN.

Qazi Muhammad Adnan Hye1, Ahmed Raza-ul-Mustafa2, Khalid Mahmood3
1Applied Economics Research Centre, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Hye1 Adnan Muhammad Qazi, Raza-ul-Mustafa2 Ahmed, Mahmood3 Khalid (2024). CAUSALITY BETWEEN EXPORTS AND IMPORTS OF AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN THE CASE OF PAKISTAN.. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 44(3): 201 - 205. doi: .

ABSTRACT

This article examines the link between agricultural raw material exports and agricultural raw
material imports in the developing economy like Pakistan. Using the annual data from 1971-2007,
this study finds that agricultural raw material exports and agricultural raw material imports are
cointegrated. There is unidirectional causality from agricultural raw material imports to agricultural
raw material exports in the long run and no causality in either direction in the short run.

REFERENCES

  1. Arize, A. (2002). “Imports and Exports in 50 Countries: Tests for Cointegration and Structural Breaks”, International
  2. Review of Economics and Finance, 11, 101–15.
  3. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. and Rhee, H.-J. (1997). “Are Exports and Imports of Korea Cointegrated?”, International Economic
  4. Journal, 11, 109–14.
  5. Bank, The world (2008). “World Development Indicators 2007”. USA.
  6. Bineau (2007). “Are Imports and Exports Cointegrated: The Case of Bulgaria Between 1967 and 2004”. South East
  7. European Journal of Economics and Business, 2 53-56.
  8. Fountas, S and Wu, J-L (1999). “Are the US current account deficits really sustainable?” International Economic
  9. Journal, 13 51-58.
  10. Hakkio, C. S. and Rush, M. (1991). “Is the Budget Deficit ‘Too Large’?” Economic Inquiry, 29 429-445.
  11. Husted, S. (1992). “The Emerging US Current Account Deficit in the 1980s: A Cointegration Analysis”, Review of
  12. Economics and Statistics, 74 159–66.
  13. Pakistan, Government of (2008). “Pakistan Economic Survey 2007-08” Ministry of Finance: Islamabad.
  14. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. and Smith, R. (2001). “Bounds Testing Approaches to The Analysis of Level Relationships”
  15. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16 289–326.
  16. Narayan and Narayan (2005). “Are Exports and Imports Cointegrated? Evidence from 22 Least Developed Countries”.
  17. Applied Economics Letters, 12 375–378.
  18. Narayan, P.K. (2004), “Reformulating critical values for the bounds F-statictics approach to cointegration: an application
  19. to the tourism demand model for Fiji”, Department of Economics Discussion Papers N0.02/04, Monash University,
  20. Melbourne.
  21. Turner, P (2006). “Response Surfaces For an F-test for Cointegration”. Applied Economics Letters, 13 479-482.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)