Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 44 issue 2 (june 2010) : 136 - 140

STUDY OF GENE ACTION IN MAIZE HYBRIDS

S.Jebaraj*, A. Selvakumar, P. Shanthi
1Agricultural College and Research Institute Madurai- 625 104, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- S.Jebaraj*, Selvakumar A., Shanthi P. (2024). STUDY OF GENE ACTION IN MAIZE HYBRIDS. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 44(2): 136 - 140. doi: .
Investigation was carried out in maize with 12 parents and 32 hybrids through Line x Tester analysis to
study the gene action. The analysis revealed the preponderance of non-additive gene action for seed yield and
its components. Among the parents studied the following parents viz., UMI 112, UMI 264, UMI 278, UMI
285 and Co 1 were good general combiners with higher mean values for seed yield and different yield components
viz., plant height, ear length, kernel rows and 100 grain weight. Among the 32 hybrids evaluated the hybrids
viz., UMI 264 x UMI 285, UMI 278 x UMI 285 and UMI 278 x CO 1, UMI 314 x UMI 285, UMI 328 x UMI
x UMI 61 and UMI 334 x UMI 325 were identified as good specific combiners for single plant yield. These
hybrids could be utilized in heterosis breeding to exploit hybrid vigour.
  1. Gupta, S.C. et al. (2000). Crop Res. 8: 634-636.
  2. Kar, U.C. et al. (2002) Madras Agric. J. 89: 9-13.
  3. Kempthorne, O (1957). An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, pp. 458-471.
  4. Mahto, R.N. and Ganguly, D.K. 2001. J. Res.Birsa Agric. Univ. 13: 197-199.
  5. Saleh, G.B. (2002). J. Agric. Sci. 138: 21-28.
  6. Shanthi, P. et al. (2004). Madras Agric. J. 91: 511-514.
  7. Singh, D.N and Singh, I.S. (1998) J. Res. 10: 177-182.
  8. Suneetha, Y. et al. (2000). Crop Res. 19: 266-270.

Editorial Board

View all (0)