Loading...

EFFECT OF CROP ESTABLISHMENT METHODS AND WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMICS OF WET SEEDED RICE

Article Id: ARCC062 | Page : 425-430
Citation :- EFFECT OF CROP ESTABLISHMENT METHODS AND WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMICS OF WET SEEDED RICE.Indian Journal of Agricultural Research.2013.(47):425-430
G. Satyanarayana Reddy*, M. Prem Sekhar, C.N. Chandrasekhar1 and P. Muthukrishnan satishreddyagrico@gmail.com
Address : Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore- 641 003, India

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Wetland Farm of Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore during rabi 2009-2010 to study the effect of crop establishment methods and weed management practices on productivity and economics of drum seeding and direct planting system of rice. The direct planting system method of establishment proved better in terms of reducing weed density, dry weight of weeds and increased plant characters, viz., leaf area index, dry matter production, productive tillers and higher grain yield (11%) more compared to drum seeding method of establishment. Whereas, the drum seeding recorded less cost of cultivation (Rs 16,268) and comparable B: C ratio (2.9). Among weed management practices the pre-emergence application of pretilachlor + safener (sofit) @ 0.45 kg a.i. ha-1 on 3 DAS + cono weeding on 45 DAS was very effective to realize higher weed control efficiency (86%), increased productivity and economics (BC ratio 3.4) and it was comparable with pretilachlor + safener (sofit) @ 0.45 kg a.i. ha-1 on 3 DAS + motorized weeding on 45 DAS which recorded BC ratio (3.3).

Keywords

Direct planting system Drum seeding Economics Motorized weeder

References

  1. Balakrishnan, M.; Ravisankar, N.; Meena, K.; Elanchezhian R. and Zamir, S.K. Ahmad. (2007). Yield prediction through feed forward neutral network approach for direct seeded rice (Oryza sativa) in Bay Islands. In: proceedings of 3rd Indian International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IICAI-07) NIA, held at Pune, during 17-19, December, pp. 1533-1541.
  2. Choubey, N.K.; Kolhe, S.S. and Tripathi, R.S. (2001). Relative performance of cyhalofop-butyl for weed control in direct seeded rice. Indian J. Weed Sci., 33 : 132-135.
  3. Choudhury, J.K. and Thakuria, R.K. (1998). Evaluation of herbicides in wet seeded, late sali (winter) (Oryza sativa) rice in Assam. Indian J. Agron., 43 : 291-294.
  4. Gogoi, A.K.; Rajkhowa, D.J. and Kandali, R. (2000). Effect of varieties and weed control practices on rice (Oryza sativa) productivity and weed growth. Indian J. Agron., 45 : 580-585.
  5. Rajkhowa, D.J.; Deka, N.C.; Borah, N. and Barua, I.C. (2007). Effect of herbicide with or without paddy weeder on weeds in transplanted summer rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J. Agron., 52 : 107-110.
  6. Ramasamy, S. (2007). Direct planting system – DPS, an energy saving high output rice establishment technique for lowland rice. A package presented to rice scientists of Tamil Nadu Agricultural University on 27th April, 2007.
  7. Singh, B.; Malik, R.K.; Yadav, A. and Nandal, D.P. (2009). Herbicide Efficacy in Seeded Rice with Different Methods under Wet and Dry Conditions. Indian J. Weed Sci., 41: 37-40.
  8. Subramanian, E.; James Martin, G. and Balasubramanian, R. (2006). Effect of integrated weed management practices on growth and yield of wet seeded rice (Oryza sativa) and their residual effect on succeeding pulse crop. Indian J. Agron.,51: 93-96
  9. Tamil Selvan, N and Budhar, M.N. (2001). Weed control in direct seeded puddled rice.
  10. Madras Agric. J., 88 : 745-746.

Global Footprints