Leaf area
The data reveal a significant difference in leaf area between trees under different irrigation regimes. Trees irrigated using drip irrigation showed an average leaf area of 4.6 cm
2 compared to an average of 3.01 cm
2 for non-irrigated trees (Fig 1).
This increase in leaf area in the irrigated trees can be attributed to more vigorous growth and optimal leaf development, resulting from adequate water and nutrient supply. These observations highlight the positive impact of irrigation on leaf development, which can have important implications for overall plant health and productivity.
Irrigation likely supports better photosynthetic efficiency and overall plant vigor, contributing to enhanced growth and potentially improved yield and fruit quality. The results align with previous studies showing that irrigation can significantly improve leaf development and overall crop performance
(Cheroura and Mihoubi, 2023). This suggests that managing water resources effectively can be crucial for maximizing the growth potential and productivity of olive trees.
The analysis of variance indicates a highly significant effect of the treatment on leaf area (P = 0.0014**).
Length of annual shoots
Fig 2 highlights a notable difference in the length of annual shoots between irrigated and non-irrigated trees, with a clear advantage for trees receiving drip irrigation compared to those that are not irrigated.
The length of annual shoots was significantly greater in the trees under drip irrigation. This result suggests that adequate water supply through irrigation supports more robust shoot growth, which can lead to improved overall plant development. The increased shoot length in irrigated trees indicates better access to essential resources, such as water and nutrients, facilitating enhanced growth and potentially greater fruiting potential.
These findings underscore the importance of effective irrigation practices in promoting healthy growth and optimizing the productivity of olive trees. By ensuring that trees receive sufficient water, particularly in arid or semi-arid conditions, growers can enhance vegetative growth and support the development of higher-quality and more productive olive crops.
Both figures show a similar trend, with initially slow growth observed from March 3 to March 31, where shoot growth was around 1 cm. From March 31 to April 7, shoot growth began to accelerate, reaching approximately 1.5 cm for non-irrigated trees and 3 cm for irrigated trees. This acceleration is likely due to more favorable environmental conditions, such as increased water and nutrient availability, which stimulate shoot growth. These observations highlight the significant impact of irrigation on tree growth, showing apparent benefits in shoot length for irrigated trees compared to non-irrigated ones (Fig 2).
At the end of the growth period, there is a noticeable slowdown in growth, characterized by a very slight increase in shoot length. Between April 7 and April 21, trees under irrigation show a total shoot length of 3.5 cm, while non-irrigated trees have a length of 2 cm. This phase of slowed growth could be attributed to various environmental or physiological factors, such as depletion of nutrient reserves or less favorable climatic conditions (Fig 2).
The observed results demonstrate a clear difference in shoot growth favoring irrigated trees over non-irrigated ones. This finding underscores the importance of irrigation in promoting optimal vegetative growth of trees. By providing sufficient water and nutrients to the tree roots, irrigation helps stimulate shoot growth, leading to robust vegetative development and overall tree health.
These results support the argument for irrigation as an essential practice for optimizing growth and productivity in tree crops, potentially leading to positive implications for agricultural yields and the sustainability of production systems.
Number of flower clusters per shoot
Olive flowers are small, white and produced in dense clusters. Each flower consists of four sepals, four petals, two stamens and a pistil composed of a stigma, style and an ovary with two ovules
(Loussert and Brousse, 1978).
The results show a significant disparity in the number of flower clusters per branch between irrigated and non-irrigated trees. Irrigated trees have an average of 24 flower clusters per branch, while non-irrigated trees have only 14. This substantial difference highlights the positive impact of irrigation on flowering, with a notable increase in flower clusters observed in trees with adequate water supply (Table 1).
The variance analysis indicates a significant effect of irrigation on the number of flower clusters per branch (P = 0.0111*).
Number of floral buds per flower cluster
The number of floral buds per flower cluster varies significantly between irrigated and non-irrigated trees. Irrigated trees show a much higher average of 22 floral buds per cluster, compared to just 9 in non-irrigated trees. This substantial difference emphasizes the significant impact of irrigation on floral bud formation, with a notable increase in blooming potential in trees with adequate water. These findings underscore the importance of irrigation for promoting abundant and regular flowering, which can have major implications for fruit yield and quality.
The variance analysis indicates a highly significant effect of irrigation on the number of floral buds per flower cluster (P = 0.0000***).
Number of floral buds per linear meter (Floral intensity)
There is a marked difference in the number of floral buds per linear meter between irrigated and non-irrigated trees. For irrigated trees, floral intensity is measured at 11.78 floral buds per linear meter, while non-irrigated trees have only 4.9 floral buds per linear meter. This divergence suggests a significant link between irrigation and floral bud production, highlighting the positive impact of irrigation on tree flowering (Table 2).
The variance analysis indicates a highly significant effect of irrigation on the number of floral buds per linear meter (P = 0.0000***).
Fertilization rate
Tracking the number of floral buds per branch and the number of fertilized flowers per branch, the data suggest a clear distinction in fertilization rates between irrigated and non-irrigated trees. For irrigated trees, the fertilization rate is approximately 5.79% of flowers fertilized per branch, while for non-irrigated trees, this rate is significantly lower, around 2.28%. This difference again highlights the positive impact of irrigation on tree health and reproduction, resulting in a higher fertilization rate in trees with adequate water supply. The observed low fertilization rate for both varieties is linked to water scarcity and subsequent hydric stress, which can affect fruit formation through pistil abortion (Fig 3).
Variance analysis indicates a highly significant effect of the treatment on the fertilization rate (P = 0.0000***).
Chlorophyll content
The results reveal a clear difference in chlorophyll a and b levels between the leaves of irrigated and non-irrigated trees. Irrigated trees exhibit significantly higher levels of chlorophyll a (21.78 µg/ml) and chlorophyll b (14.66 µg/ml) compared to non-irrigated trees, which have chlorophyll a and b levels of 17.03 µg/ml and 10.02 µg/ml, respectively. These data suggest that irrigation supports optimal physiological activity in trees, demonstrating a beneficial effect on their ability to perform photosynthesis, produce energy and maintain growth and health (Table 3).
The combined chlorophyll a and b content also shows a significant difference between irrigated and non-irrigated trees, with irrigated trees having a higher total chlorophyll a + b content (50.11 µg/ml) compared to non-irrigated trees (39.36 µg/ml) (Table 3). Chlorophyll content can be influenced by many factors, including leaf age, leaf position and environmental factors such as light, temperature and water availability
(Hikosaka et al., 2006).
Adequate irrigation ensures a constant supply of water, promoting optimal photosynthesis and chlorophyll production. Olive trees respond positively to well-managed irrigation, which can enhance leaf growth and health. The effects of irrigation on chlorophyll content may vary based on soil type, climate, olive variety and agricultural management practices. Effective irrigation management, tailored to the specific needs of olive trees and local conditions, can contribute to a significant increase in total chlorophyll content, thus improving the health and productivity of olive groves.
The variance analysis for chlorophyll content does not show a significant difference between the treatment groups, as the p-value is greater than 0.05 (P = 0.1366 ns).
Stomatal density
Increased stomatal density supports plant survival in particularly harsh environments.
The results show that irrigated trees have higher stomatal densities, with 312 stomata/mm2 compared to non-irrigated trees, which have 171 stomata/mm2. Indeed, leaves from the irrigated plots exhibit higher stomatal values, while the non-irrigated plots show lower values (Fig 4).
Variance analysis indicates a highly significant effect of the treatment on stomatal density (P = 0.0002***).
Phenological traits
Phenology studies the biological cycles of plants and their relationship with climatic conditions. This study recorded the different stages of growth and development of trees under two irrigation types (Table 4).
Bud burst
The development cycle of the olive tree begins with the first signs of growth, typically in response to increasing temperatures. The initial key stage is bud burst, occurring around the end of February or early March. This stage marks the beginning of active growth of new shoots and leaves from dormant buds. It is noteworthy that the exact timing of bud burst can vary depending on the olive variety and the specific climatic conditions of the region.
The data indicate that bud burst began around March 15 for irrigated trees, while a slight delay was observed for non-irrigated trees, with bud burst starting around March 19. This slight discrepancy in bud burst timing between the two tree groups may be attributed to differences in soil water availability. Irrigated trees benefit from a regular water supply, potentially leading to a quicker response to favorable environmental conditions. In contrast, non-irrigated trees may experience water stress, slightly delaying the onset of their active growth phase. These observations highlight the impact of irrigation on tree development and underscore the importance of water management in olive cultivation (Table 4).
Floral bouquet formation
Inflorescences consist of long clusters that can have 4 to 6 secondary branches. The number of flowers varies depending on the cluster’s position on the branch
(Ouksili, 1983).
It is interesting to note that floral bouquet formation is the second phenological stage after bud burst. Data indicate that irrigated trees present floral bouquets first compared to non-irrigated trees, with appearance around April 25 for irrigated trees and April 30 for non-irrigated trees. This delay in floral bouquet formation between the two tree groups may also be attributed to the impact of irrigation on tree vigor and health (Table 4).
Blooming
The blooming stage is characterized by the visible formation of more than 50% of the flowers from the floral buds. This stage typically occurs about 15 days after floral bouquet formation. For irrigated trees, blooming is observed around April 15, while for non-irrigated trees, it occurs around April 21. This difference between the two tree groups confirms the significant impact of irrigation on the olive tree development cycle, influencing the speed and regularity of growth and blooming phases (Table 4).
Fertilization
Water plays a crucial role in the synthesis of carbohydrates in the presence of carbon dioxide and light, accelerating growth and fruiting in olive trees
(Braham, 1997;
Bedbabis, 2002).
The same flowering shoots were used to assess the fertilization stage. This stage was reached on April 30 for irrigated trees, with a 4-day advance compared to non-irrigated trees, which reached this stage around June 4 (Table 4).