The MANOVA test showed a very highly significant difference (F = 901.85; P<0.001) concerning the content of total polyphenols within the varieties. The Barbarous variety (Barley br) recorded the highest content (95.92 mgEAG/ml). On the other hand, the varieties Ain lahma (durum wheat al), Akhamokh (Common wheat ak) and Boumerzoug (Common wheat bm) have respectively the lowest levels (17.30; 21.79 and 35.40 mgEAG/ml). Cirta (Durum Wheat c), Chaiir nnabi (naked barley NB), Massine ( Common Wheat m), Saida (Barley s) and Wahbi (Durum Wheat w) varieties have been reported with varying intermediate and ascending levels of 42.94 to 88.38 mgEAG/ml (Fig 1).
The phenolic content of the methanolic extracts of the plant is subject to several variations linked directly to the origin of the plant as well as to intrinsic (genetic) and extrinsic factors (climatic condition; maturity at harvest). Not to mention the disposition of the plant to various diseases that can alter its integrity (
Zeghad, 2009). According to
Khalfallah (2013) and
Adoum 2002, the genetic, structural or physiological factors of cereals are the decisive elements and the cause of this variation.
Flavonoids are among the highly reactive phenolic compounds as hydrogen and electrons. They are therefore excellent antioxidant compounds (
Cotelle, 2001). The MANOVA statistical test reported a very highly significant difference (F = 470.36; P<0.001) in flavonoid contents between the varieties tested. The Barbarous variety (Barley br) presented the highest content (59.04 mgEQU/ml). On the other hand, the lowest levels were recorded in the Akhamokh (Common wheat ak), Wahbi (Durum Wheat w) and Ain Lahma (Durum Wheat al) varieties (with averages varying from 11.21 to 13.69 mgEQU/ml). The Boumerzoug (Common wheat bm), Cirta (Durum Wheat c), Chaiir Ennabi (naked barley NB), Massine (Common wheat m) and Saida (Barley s) varieties were given intermediate levels varying from 18.52 to 35.48 mgEQU/ml (Fig 2).
The phenolic content and particularly the flavonoids present very diverse results, this diversity can be explained by the association of the total phenolic content and in particular that of the flavonoids with the genotype of the seed
(Vaher et al., 2010; Verma et al., 2009; Stalikas, 2007). At the same time, the influence of growth conditions on the biosynthesis and accumulation of phenolic compounds has been proven by
Vaher et al., (2010).
The MANOVA test reported a very highly significant difference (F = 449.84; P<0.001) between the tannin contents of the tested varities. The highest content was found in the Massine variety (Common Wheat m) (11.01 mgEGA/ml) and even the Barbarous variety (Barley br) has a high content, it is around 8.32 mgEGA /ml. The Ain lahma (durum wheat al) and Boumerzoug (commun wheat bm) varieties showed the lowest levels; the averages are 1.94 and 2.95 mgEGA/ml respectively. The tannin levels in the varieties Chaiir Ennabi (Naked Barley), Akhamokh (Common wheat ak), Wahbi (Durum wheat BDw), Saida (Barley Os) and Cirta (Durum wheat BDc) are intermediate, varying from 3.65 to 6 .01 mgEGA/ml (Fig 3).
At all the tested concentrations, the methanolic extracts of the varieties significantly inhibited the DPPHÿ radical in a dose-dependent manner (P<0.01 vis-à-vis the negative control), the Pearson correlation coefficient varied from 0.97 to 0.99, which indicates the existence of the strong positive correlations of all the relations (Table 2 ) (Fig 5).
The extract of the Cirta variety (Durum wheat c) showed the highest activity among all the extracts tested with an inhibition percentage of 76.71% reached at the concentration of 100 µg/ml. Similarly, the extract of the Barbarous variety (Barley br) with a high percentage of inhibition (76.49%). The extracts of the varieties Boumerzoug (Common wheat bm), Akhamokh (Common wheat ak) and Ain lahma (Durum wheat al) recorded low percentages of inhibition varied from 50.33% to 55.32%. The rest of the varieties like Saida (Barley s), Wahbi (Durum wheat w), Chaiir ennebi (Naked Barley) and Massine (Common wheat m) have average antioxidant activities with a percentage of inhibition varied from 55.57% to 63.77%. It is noted that across all the tested extracts, the percentages of inhibition evolved gradually with the concentrations used 20; 25; 50; 75; 80 and 100 µg/ml. All extracts reached their maximum activity at 100 µg/ml. The ascorbic acid used as a reference inhibited the DPPH radical by 90.04% at 100 µg/ml (Fig 4; Fig 5).
Study of the antioxidant activity of methanolic extracts from cereal leaves. According to the free radical scavenging method DPPH has shown that methanolic extracts possess moderate antioxidant activity. These extracts could therefore constitute an alternative to certain synthetic additives. It is therefore very likely that they contain compounds which, once purified, can exhibit an activity comparable to that of ascorbic acid.According to the circle of correlation established by the ACP, the antioxidant activity (DPPH or the percentage of inhibition) is more correlated with the contents of tannins and flavonoids than the total polyphenols. These results are consistent with those of
Ðordevic' and Dimitrijevic'-Brankovic (2010) who showed that there was a weak correlation between TPC and DPPH radical scavenging activity in cereals (Fig 6).
Cereals with higher TPC values were not necessarily better at inhibiting DPPH. According to
Brand-Williams et al., (1995), ferulic acid, the main phenolic acid in cereal leaves, showed a weak radical-scavenging effect in experiments with the radical DPPH, which may explain the discrepancies.
In our study, the TFC of the extracts corresponds well to the TPC (r = 0.668, p<0.01). This indicates that flavonoids are the major phenolic compounds present in the cereal leaf extract. However, CCT correlated moderately with TPC (r = 0.513, p<0.01). This indicates that condensed tannins could be a second phenolic compound present in cereal leaves. In general, our data indicate that phenols and flavonoids in cereals are major sources of natural antioxidants, followed by condensed tannins. Thus, the antioxidant capacity of cereal leaves seems to be largely influenced by the contents of flavonoids, tannins and total polyphenols (Fig 8).
According to the results of CAH (Fig 7 and 8), the tested varieties are divided into three different groups. The first group includes varieties poor in total polyphenols, flavonoids, tannins and even have the lowest percentages of inhibition, this is the case of the varieties Ain lahma (durum wheat al), Akhamokh (Common wheat ak) and Boumerzoug (Common wheat bm). The second group includes varieties that generally have average levels of total polyphenols, flavonoids, tannins and percentage of inhibition such as Massine (Common wheat m), Saida (Barley s), Cirta (Durum wheat c), Chaiir Ennabi (Naked Barley) and Wahbi (Durum Wheat w). The last group is characterized by a richness in total polyphenols, flavonoids, tannins and has a high percentage of inhibition, this is the case of a single variety which is Barbarous (Barley br) (Fig 8).
The following chromatograms obtained by HPLC analysis of the phenolic extracts of the nine studied varieties. (Fig 9).
Based on HPLC analysis, several types of phenolic compounds were identified in the phenolic extracts of different varieties of studied cereals. We were able to identify 15 compounds (Table 3).
The major phenolic compounds identified in durum wheat species are protocatechuic acid, benzoic acid, pholoroglucinol, vanillic acid. And the minor phenolic compounds found are: catechin, p. coumaric, kaempferol, o. coumaric.
The major phenolic compounds identified in common wheat species are 2.5 dihydrobenzoic acid, pholoroglucinol, vanillic acid, gallic acid. And the minor phenolic compounds found are Ferulic Acid, P.Coumaric Acid, Catecheine, Rutin. The major phenolic compounds identified in barley species are pholoroglucinol, vanillic acid, gallic acid. And the minor phenolic compounds found are syringic acid, catechrin, p.coumaric acid, kaempferol.
The various studies carried out by several authors have shown that phenolic acids as strong antioxidants are present in barley (
Adom and Liu 2002). Hydroxybenzoic acid is the major compound in cereals, with vanilic acid, protocatechuic acid, followed by gallic acid.
From the comparison of the retention times of our different peaks eluted with quercetin, we can say that the latter is absent in our different analyzed extracts. However, other research has identified quercetin in cereal leaves during fluorescence HPLC analysis,
(Vasconcelos et al., 2013). The different peaks in the different chromatographic profiles can be classified into three phenolic groups which are: derivatives of flavones (Catecheine, rutin) those of cinnamic acids (ferulic acid, P. coumaric acid, O. coumaric acid) and derivatives benzoic acids (protocatechuic acid, benzoic acid, vanillic acid, gallic acid; these seem to be the majority).
For barley, methanolic extracts also contain compounds from the flavone and flavonol family and even phenolic acids. The main molecules that have been identified in barley are: keamphérol, keamphérol glycosyl, pholoroglucinol, vanillic acid. These are for the most part glycosylflavonols contrary to the results obtained by
Harborne (1967) affirming that the glycosylflavones characterize the leaves of three cereals: barley which contains Lutonarin 3'-methyl ether, oats which contain 8-c (arabinosylglycosyl)-apigenin and wheat: Titicoccum dicoccum contains: 6-c- (rhamnosylglycosyl)-luteolin.