Nutrient concentration in top visible dewlap leaf (TVD)
Fertilizer application methods and cultivars had no significant effect on N and K concentration in TVD leaf but there was significantly effect on K (Table 2). Foliar N and K application gave higher N and K concentration than that of no-foliar application in all treatments (Table 2). As mentioned above, the plants experienced prolong flooding stress. For this reason, sugarcane plants formed adventitious roots on their submerged stems during the flooding events. The adventitious roots formation is considered an important adaptation of sugarcane to flooding stress
(Gomathi et al., 2010a; Jaiphong et al., 2016). Under flooding condition, soil rapidly become anoxic, causing nutrient availability in the soil to decrease (
Kozlowski and Pallardy, 1984). Flooding induced severe deficiencies of N, P and K in sugarcane; the N and K concentration were below critical deficiency level
(Singh et al., 2019). Furthermore, the lack of oxygen may cause decay of the primary root systems
(Visser et al., 2015). By lower nutrient availability together with impeded functioning of the primary roots may lead to nutrient deficiency in the plant (
Trought and Drew, 1980). Previous studies reported that the adventitious roots can take up nutrients and water from flood water (
Trought and Drew, 1980;
Khan et al., 1982; Zhang et al., 2017). However, flooding in sugarcane (three months) resulted in reduction by 10 to 78% in N, P and K concentration in leaf
(Gilbert et al., 2007). The application of farm yard manure and foliar spray of KCl and urea proved effective in increasing K ions concentration which regulates the opening and closing of stomata hence transpiration rate
(Chand et al., 2010). Under drought conditions, the application of nitrogen (N) in solid and foliar forms on two broad leave and narrow leave cane varieties proved to be advantageous
(Ali et al., 1997). Foliar N and K under waterlogged conditions can improved nutrients uptake through leaves. Foliar absorption occurs through a process that initially requires penetration into the cuticle (passive percolation or surface adsorption) and then passes (active absorption) through the cells (
Fernandez and Brown, 2013). For cultivars, KK3 was significantly
(p≤
0.05) higher K
+ concentration in TVD leaf than K93-219 (Table 2). Waterlogging induced 28% and 30% reduction in leaf and stem N content, respectively and the reduction was comparatively lesser in resistant clones
(Gomathi et al., 2010a; Gomathi and Chandran, 2012).
Growth character performances
Plant height at harvest and leaf area at 90 and 210 DAP had no significant affected by fertilizer application methods but there is significantly different between two cultivars in plant height and leaf area (Table 3). The highest plant height was observed in KK3. While, K93-219 gave the highest leaf area at 90 and 210 DAP. Foliar N application under waterlogged condition increased leaf area and shoot weight was reported by
Jain et al., (2016).
Yield components and cane yield
Fertilizer application methods was significantly different
(p≤
0.05) in millable cane number (Table 3). The maximum millable cane numbers were attained in the soil NPK + foliar N and K application at 90 and 210 DAP. Similar result was observed in single millable cane weight (Table 3). This was associated with higher K concentration in TVD of such treatment than those of the other treatments in the present study (Table 2). This means that high K content in plants play an important role in contribution the single millable cane weight. A sustained supply of K
+ throughout the growing season will facilitate greater shifting of dry matter from leaf to stem, enhancing the translocation of more assimilates from source to sink
(Mengel and Haeder, 1977). It is an enzyme activator in photosynthesis, protein synthesis, starch formation and translocation of proteins and sugars (
Filho, 1985;
Kwong, 2002;
Wood and Schroeder, 2004). Furthermore, additional foliar N and K at 90 and 210 DAP providing N and K for sugarcane at tillering and grand growth phase supports better plant growth and development reach to ripening phase (millable cane) than the other treatments. Foliar K application at tillering phase (90 DAP) resulted in increased millable cane count was reported by
Mathew et al., (2004). The increase in blackgram and cowpea grain weight due to the application of foliar spray were also reported by
Geetha and Velayutham (2016);
Anitha et al., (2005).
For cultivars, millable cane number and single millable cane weight were significant different in single millable cane weight (Table 3). The cultivars K93-219 produced higher single millable cane weight than KK3 cultivar. This was associated with K93-219 cultivar gave higher leaf area than KK3 cultivar (Table 3). The cultivar K93-219 identified as waterlogging tolerance cultivar (
Office of the Cane and Sugar Board Thailand, 2016;
Palachai et al., 2019). Therefore, the K93-219 could provide more of food from photosynthesis and translocate to stalk than that of KK3 cultivar.
Regarding cane yield, fertilizer application methods and cultivars were significantly different in cane yield (Table 3). The maximum cane yield was obtained in soil NPK combined foliar N and K application at 90 and 210 DAP. This was probably due to higher single millable cane weight and millable cane number than those of other treatments. The cultivar K93-219 produced significantly higher cane yield than KK3. This was due to the K93-219 gave higher single millable cane weight and millable cane number than KK3 cultivar.
Sugar quality
Fertilizer application methods and cultivars had no significant effect on sugar quality components including brix (%), polarity (%), purity (%), fiber (%) and CCS (%) (Table 4). In general, sugarcane responded to K fertilizer by an increase in cane yield without any change in sucrose concentration in the cane (
Kwong, 2002;
Shukla et al., 2009). In contrast, nitrogen applied split into solid and foliar forms on two broad leaves and narrow leaves cane varieties increased polarity (%) juice and CCS (%) of sugarcane
(Ali et al., 1997).